On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 05:24:24PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 04:18:06PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
What you appear to have caught here is an interaction with some unreviewed vendor code - how much of that is going on in the vendor trees you're not testing? If we want to encourage people to pull in stable we should be paying attention to that sort of stuff.
I get weekly merge reports from all of the major SoC vendors when they pull these releases into their tree and run through their full suite of tests. So I am paying attention to this type of thing.
Are you sure you're not just definining major SoC vendors as being people who send you reports here? :P In any case, that's only going to cover a limited subset of potential drivers and subsystems, devices that don't appear on reference designs aren't going to get any coverage at all that way for example.
What I need to figure out here is what is going wrong and why the SoC's testing did not catch this. That's going to take a bit longer...
There's a reasonable chance this is something board specific.