4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com
Commit a4097b351118 upstream.
We're about to need kvm_psci_version in HYP too. So let's turn it into a static inline, and pass the kvm structure as a second parameter (so that HYP can do a kern_hyp_va on it).
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 18 +++++++++++------- include/kvm/arm_psci.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- virt/kvm/arm/psci.c | 12 ++---------- 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ #include <linux/jump_label.h> #include <uapi/linux/psci.h>
+#include <kvm/arm_psci.h> + #include <asm/kvm_asm.h> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h> #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h> @@ -344,14 +346,16 @@ again:
if (exit_code == ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP && (kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64 || - kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32) && - vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0) == PSCI_0_2_FN_PSCI_VERSION) { - u64 val = PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED; - if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2, vcpu->arch.features)) - val = 2; + kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32)) { + u32 val = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0);
- vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, val); - goto again; + if (val == PSCI_0_2_FN_PSCI_VERSION) { + val = kvm_psci_version(vcpu, kern_hyp_va(vcpu->kvm)); + if (unlikely(val == KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1)) + val = PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED; + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, val); + goto again; + } }
if (static_branch_unlikely(&vgic_v2_cpuif_trap) && --- a/include/kvm/arm_psci.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_psci.h @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #ifndef __KVM_ARM_PSCI_H__ #define __KVM_ARM_PSCI_H__
+#include <linux/kvm_host.h> #include <uapi/linux/psci.h>
#define KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1 PSCI_VERSION(0, 1) @@ -26,7 +27,25 @@
#define KVM_ARM_PSCI_LATEST KVM_ARM_PSCI_1_0
-int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); +/* + * We need the KVM pointer independently from the vcpu as we can call + * this from HYP, and need to apply kern_hyp_va on it... + */ +static inline int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm) +{ + /* + * Our PSCI implementation stays the same across versions from + * v0.2 onward, only adding the few mandatory functions (such + * as FEATURES with 1.0) that are required by newer + * revisions. It is thus safe to return the latest. + */ + if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2, vcpu->arch.features)) + return KVM_ARM_PSCI_LATEST; + + return KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1; +} + + int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
#endif /* __KVM_ARM_PSCI_H__ */ --- a/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(st if (!vcpu) return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS; if (!vcpu->arch.power_off) { - if (kvm_psci_version(source_vcpu) != KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1) + if (kvm_psci_version(source_vcpu, kvm) != KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1) return PSCI_RET_ALREADY_ON; else return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS; @@ -232,14 +232,6 @@ static void kvm_psci_system_reset(struct kvm_prepare_system_event(vcpu, KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_RESET); }
-int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) -{ - if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2, vcpu->arch.features)) - return KVM_ARM_PSCI_LATEST; - - return KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1; -} - static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; @@ -397,7 +389,7 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_ */ static int kvm_psci_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - switch (kvm_psci_version(vcpu)) { + switch (kvm_psci_version(vcpu, vcpu->kvm)) { case KVM_ARM_PSCI_1_0: return kvm_psci_1_0_call(vcpu); case KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_2: