From: Raag Jadav raag.jadav@intel.com
[ Upstream commit 7cfce2b80d5ff7aa713a7710bfe3a562707cb226 ]
Since we don't have runtime PM handles here, we should be using pm_sleep_ptr() macro, so that the compiler can discard it in case CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n.
Fixes: 30b5b066fa83 ("pwm: dwc: Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS for PM functions") Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav raag.jadav@intel.com Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212130247.9985-2-raag.jadav@intel.com Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c index 4929354f8cd95..a4a057ae03ea2 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static struct pci_driver dwc_pwm_driver = { .remove = dwc_pwm_remove, .id_table = dwc_pwm_id_table, .driver = { - .pm = pm_ptr(&dwc_pwm_pm_ops), + .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&dwc_pwm_pm_ops), }, };