From: Anand Jain anand.jain@oracle.com
Commit cdccc03a8a369b59cff5e7ea3292511cfa551120 upstream.
There were few lockdep warnings because btrfs_show_devname() was using device_list_mutex as recorded in the commits:
0ccd05285e7f ("btrfs: fix a possible umount deadlock") 779bf3fefa83 ("btrfs: fix lock dep warning, move scratch dev out of device_list_mutex and uuid_mutex")
And finally, commit 88c14590cdd6 ("btrfs: use RCU in btrfs_show_devname for device list traversal") removed the device_list_mutex from btrfs_show_devname for performance reasons.
This patch removes a stale comment about the function btrfs_show_devname and device_list_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.jain@oracle.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.jain@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -2312,13 +2312,6 @@ void btrfs_destroy_dev_replace_tgtdev(st
mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
- /* - * The update_dev_time() with in btrfs_scratch_superblocks() - * may lead to a call to btrfs_show_devname() which will try - * to hold device_list_mutex. And here this device - * is already out of device list, so we don't have to hold - * the device_list_mutex lock. - */ btrfs_scratch_superblocks(tgtdev->fs_info, tgtdev->bdev, tgtdev->name->str);