4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de
commit 58930cced012adb01bc78b3687049b17ef44d0a3 upstream.
As gcc-8 points out, the bit mask check makes no sense here:
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c: In function 'ext_sd_send_cmd_get_rsp': drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:4130:25: error: bitwise comparison always evaluates to true [-Werror=tautological-compare]
However, the code is even more bogus, as we have already checked for the SD_RSP_TYPE_R0 case earlier in the function and returned success. As seen in the mmc/sd driver core, SD_RSP_TYPE_R0 means "no response" anyway, so checking for a particular response would not help either.
This just removes the nonsensical code to get rid of the warning.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c @@ -4110,12 +4110,6 @@ RTY_SEND_CMD: rtsx_trace(chip); return STATUS_FAIL; } - - } else if (rsp_type == SD_RSP_TYPE_R0) { - if ((ptr[3] & 0x1E) != 0x03) { - rtsx_trace(chip); - return STATUS_FAIL; - } } } }