From: "Paul E. McKenney" paulmck@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit 0db7c32ad3160ae06f497d48a74bd46a2a35e6bf ]
Early in debugging, it made some sense to differentiate the first iteration from subsequent iterations, but now this just causes confusion. This commit therefore moves the "set_tasks_gp_state(rtp, RTGS_WAIT_CBS)" statement to the beginning of the "for" loop in rcu_tasks_kthread().
Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay neeraju@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h index 806160c44b172..6591914af4864 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg) * This loop is terminated by the system going down. ;-) */ for (;;) { + set_tasks_gp_state(rtp, RTGS_WAIT_CBS);
/* Pick up any new callbacks. */ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtp->cbs_lock, flags); @@ -236,8 +237,6 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg) } /* Paranoid sleep to keep this from entering a tight loop */ schedule_timeout_idle(rtp->gp_sleep); - - set_tasks_gp_state(rtp, RTGS_WAIT_CBS); } }