On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:56 AM Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:48 AM Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org wrote:
There was never anything "loff_t" about bitmask at any point.
Not 'bitmask'. It's 'blksize'. Hopefully that was obvious in context.
Isn't the parameter `blksize` of `nbd_set_size` declared as `loff_t`?