From: Yang Jihong yangjihong1@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 15def34e2635ab7e0e96f1bc32e1b69609f14942 ]
commit e050e3f0a71bf ("perf: Fix broken interrupt rate throttling") introduces a change in throttling threshold judgment. Before this, compare hwc->interrupts and max_samples_per_tick, then increase hwc->interrupts by 1, but this commit reverses order of these two behaviors, causing the semantics of max_samples_per_tick to change. In literal sense of "max_samples_per_tick", if hwc->interrupts == max_samples_per_tick, it should not be throttled, therefore, the judgment condition should be changed to "hwc->interrupts > max_samples_per_tick".
In fact, this may cause the hardlockup to fail, The minimum value of max_samples_per_tick may be 1, in this case, the return value of __perf_event_account_interrupt function is 1. As a result, nmi_watchdog gets throttled, which would stop PMU (Use x86 architecture as an example, see x86_pmu_handle_irq).
Fixes: e050e3f0a71b ("perf: Fix broken interrupt rate throttling") Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong yangjihong1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230227023508.102230-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/events/core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index 7699b99706ad4..934332b3eb541 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -9254,8 +9254,8 @@ __perf_event_account_interrupt(struct perf_event *event, int throttle) hwc->interrupts = 1; } else { hwc->interrupts++; - if (unlikely(throttle - && hwc->interrupts >= max_samples_per_tick)) { + if (unlikely(throttle && + hwc->interrupts > max_samples_per_tick)) { __this_cpu_inc(perf_throttled_count); tick_dep_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), TICK_DEP_BIT_PERF_EVENTS); hwc->interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS;