On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:36:49AM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote:
Hi,
After backport commit c79c5a0a00a9 ("mm/memory-failure: check the mapcount of the precise page"),
I got an error message as written on the patch. The problem can be fixed by the patch or just revert.
Now I prefer to revert because I think it is related to folio and no impact in stable, or maybe I'm wrong.
I checked out what is going wrong here, and Liu Shixin is correct.
Commit c79c5a0a00a9 was incorrectly backported to v5.10 and commit 70168fdc743b changees the page passed to try_to_unmap(). It now passes the tail page, and should always have passed hpage. Please apply the patch below to v5.10 (and any other trees that c79c5a0a00a9 got backported to).
Thanks,
On 2024/3/7 20:48, Liu Shixin wrote:
When backport commit c79c5a0a00a9 to 5.10-stable, there is a mistake change. The head page instead of tail page should be passed to try_to_unmap(), otherwise unmap will failed as follows.
Memory failure: 0x121c10: failed to unmap page (mapcount=1) Memory failure: 0x121c10: recovery action for unmapping failed page: Ignored
Fixes: 70168fdc743b ("mm/memory-failure: check the mapcount of the precise page") Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin liushixin2@huawei.com
mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index f320ff02cc19..dba2936292cf 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn, unmap_success = false; } } else {
unmap_success = try_to_unmap(p, ttu);
unmap_success = try_to_unmap(hpage, ttu);