On 8 Aug 2024, at 10:57, Zi Yan wrote:
On 8 Aug 2024, at 10:36, Kefeng Wang wrote:
On 2024/8/8 22:21, Zi Yan wrote:
On 8 Aug 2024, at 10:14, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 08.08.24 16:13, Zi Yan wrote:
On 8 Aug 2024, at 4:22, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 08.08.24 05:19, Baolin Wang wrote: > >
...
Agreed, maybe we should simply handle that right away and replace the "goto out;" users by "return 0;".
Then, just copy the 3 LOC.
For mm/memory.c that would be:
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 67496dc5064f..410ba50ca746 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -5461,7 +5461,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) if (unlikely(!pte_same(old_pte, vmf->orig_pte))) { pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
goto out;
return 0; } pte = pte_modify(old_pte, vma->vm_page_prot);
@@ -5528,15 +5528,14 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, &vmf->ptl); if (unlikely(!vmf->pte))
goto out;
return 0; if (unlikely(!pte_same(ptep_get(vmf->pte), vmf->orig_pte))) { pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
goto out;
-out: if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) task_numa_fault(last_cpupid, nid, nr_pages, flags); return 0;return 0; } goto out_map; }
Maybe drop this part too,
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 410ba50ca746..07343c1469e0 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -5523,6 +5523,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) if (!migrate_misplaced_folio(folio, vma, target_nid)) { nid = target_nid; flags |= TNF_MIGRATED;
goto out; } else { flags |= TNF_MIGRATE_FAIL; vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
@@ -5533,12 +5534,8 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); return 0; }
goto out_map; }
if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
task_numa_fault(last_cpupid, nid, nr_pages, flags);
return 0;
out_map: /* * Make it present again, depending on how arch implements @@ -5551,6 +5548,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) numa_rebuild_single_mapping(vmf, vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte, writable); pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); +out: if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) task_numa_fault(last_cpupid, nid, nr_pages, flags); return 0;
Even better. Thanks. The updated fixup is attached.
Update the fixup, if Andrew wants to fold it in instead of a resend, again to fix a typo causing compilation failure.
Best Regards, Yan, Zi