6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Li Nan linan122@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 611d5cbc0b35a752e657a83eebadf40d814d006b ]
Deadlock occurs when mddev is being suspended while some flush bio is in progress. It is a complex issue.
T1. the first flush is at the ending stage, it clears 'mddev->flush_bio' and tries to submit data, but is blocked because mddev is suspended by T4. T2. the second flush sets 'mddev->flush_bio', and attempts to queue md_submit_flush_data(), which is already running (T1) and won't execute again if on the same CPU as T1. T3. the third flush inc active_io and tries to flush, but is blocked because 'mddev->flush_bio' is not NULL (set by T2). T4. mddev_suspend() is called and waits for active_io dec to 0 which is inc by T3.
T1 T2 T3 T4 (flush 1) (flush 2) (third 3) (suspend) md_submit_flush_data mddev->flush_bio = NULL; . . md_flush_request . mddev->flush_bio = bio . queue submit_flushes . . . . md_handle_request . . active_io + 1 . . md_flush_request . . wait !mddev->flush_bio . . . . mddev_suspend . . wait !active_io . . . submit_flushes . queue_work md_submit_flush_data . //md_submit_flush_data is already running (T1) . md_handle_request wait resume
The root issue is non-atomic inc/dec of active_io during flush process. active_io is dec before md_submit_flush_data is queued, and inc soon after md_submit_flush_data() run. md_flush_request active_io + 1 submit_flushes active_io - 1 md_submit_flush_data md_handle_request active_io + 1 make_request active_io - 1
If active_io is dec after md_handle_request() instead of within submit_flushes(), make_request() can be called directly intead of md_handle_request() in md_submit_flush_data(), and active_io will only inc and dec once in the whole flush process. Deadlock will be fixed.
Additionally, the only difference between fixing the issue and before is that there is no return error handling of make_request(). But after previous patch cleaned md_write_start(), make_requst() only return error in raid5_make_request() by dm-raid, see commit 41425f96d7aa ("dm-raid456, md/raid456: fix a deadlock for dm-raid456 while io concurrent with reshape)". Since dm always splits data and flush operation into two separate io, io size of flush submitted by dm always is 0, make_request() will not be called in md_submit_flush_data(). To prevent future modifications from introducing issues, add WARN_ON to ensure make_request() no error is returned in this context.
Fixes: fa2bbff7b0b4 ("md: synchronize flush io with array reconfiguration") Signed-off-by: Li Nan linan122@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Song Liu song@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240525185257.3896201-3-linan666@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/md/md.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c index aff9118ff6975..3a02b8903d626 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md.c +++ b/drivers/md/md.c @@ -550,13 +550,9 @@ static void md_end_flush(struct bio *bio)
rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mddev->flush_pending)) { - /* The pair is percpu_ref_get() from md_flush_request() */ - percpu_ref_put(&mddev->active_io); - + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mddev->flush_pending)) /* The pre-request flush has finished */ queue_work(md_wq, &mddev->flush_work); - } }
static void md_submit_flush_data(struct work_struct *ws); @@ -587,12 +583,8 @@ static void submit_flushes(struct work_struct *ws) rcu_read_lock(); } rcu_read_unlock(); - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mddev->flush_pending)) { - /* The pair is percpu_ref_get() from md_flush_request() */ - percpu_ref_put(&mddev->active_io); - + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mddev->flush_pending)) queue_work(md_wq, &mddev->flush_work); - } }
static void md_submit_flush_data(struct work_struct *ws) @@ -617,8 +609,20 @@ static void md_submit_flush_data(struct work_struct *ws) bio_endio(bio); } else { bio->bi_opf &= ~REQ_PREFLUSH; - md_handle_request(mddev, bio); + + /* + * make_requst() will never return error here, it only + * returns error in raid5_make_request() by dm-raid. + * Since dm always splits data and flush operation into + * two separate io, io size of flush submitted by dm + * always is 0, make_request() will not be called here. + */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mddev->pers->make_request(mddev, bio))) + bio_io_error(bio);; } + + /* The pair is percpu_ref_get() from md_flush_request() */ + percpu_ref_put(&mddev->active_io); }
/*