6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ying Hsu yinghsu@chromium.org
[ Upstream commit 1d8e801422d66e4b8c7b187c52196bef94eed887 ]
While executing the Android 13 CTS Verifier Secure Server test on a ChromeOS device, it was observed that the Bluetooth host initiates authentication for an RFCOMM connection after SSP completes. When this happens, some Intel Bluetooth controllers, like AC9560, would disconnect with "Connection Rejected due to Security Reasons (0x0e)".
Historically, BlueZ did not mandate this authentication while an authenticated combination key was already in use for the connection. This behavior was changed since commit 7b5a9241b780 ("Bluetooth: Introduce requirements for security level 4"). So, this patch addresses the aforementioned disconnection issue by restoring the previous behavior.
Signed-off-by: Ying Hsu yinghsu@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz luiz.von.dentz@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c index d75bb9a1d4acf..41250e4b94dff 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c @@ -2400,34 +2400,41 @@ int hci_conn_security(struct hci_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level, __u8 auth_type, if (!test_bit(HCI_CONN_AUTH, &conn->flags)) goto auth;
- /* An authenticated FIPS approved combination key has sufficient - * security for security level 4. */ - if (conn->key_type == HCI_LK_AUTH_COMBINATION_P256 && - sec_level == BT_SECURITY_FIPS) - goto encrypt; - - /* An authenticated combination key has sufficient security for - security level 3. */ - if ((conn->key_type == HCI_LK_AUTH_COMBINATION_P192 || - conn->key_type == HCI_LK_AUTH_COMBINATION_P256) && - sec_level == BT_SECURITY_HIGH) - goto encrypt; - - /* An unauthenticated combination key has sufficient security for - security level 1 and 2. */ - if ((conn->key_type == HCI_LK_UNAUTH_COMBINATION_P192 || - conn->key_type == HCI_LK_UNAUTH_COMBINATION_P256) && - (sec_level == BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM || sec_level == BT_SECURITY_LOW)) - goto encrypt; - - /* A combination key has always sufficient security for the security - levels 1 or 2. High security level requires the combination key - is generated using maximum PIN code length (16). - For pre 2.1 units. */ - if (conn->key_type == HCI_LK_COMBINATION && - (sec_level == BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM || sec_level == BT_SECURITY_LOW || - conn->pin_length == 16)) - goto encrypt; + switch (conn->key_type) { + case HCI_LK_AUTH_COMBINATION_P256: + /* An authenticated FIPS approved combination key has + * sufficient security for security level 4 or lower. + */ + if (sec_level <= BT_SECURITY_FIPS) + goto encrypt; + break; + case HCI_LK_AUTH_COMBINATION_P192: + /* An authenticated combination key has sufficient security for + * security level 3 or lower. + */ + if (sec_level <= BT_SECURITY_HIGH) + goto encrypt; + break; + case HCI_LK_UNAUTH_COMBINATION_P192: + case HCI_LK_UNAUTH_COMBINATION_P256: + /* An unauthenticated combination key has sufficient security + * for security level 2 or lower. + */ + if (sec_level <= BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM) + goto encrypt; + break; + case HCI_LK_COMBINATION: + /* A combination key has always sufficient security for the + * security levels 2 or lower. High security level requires the + * combination key is generated using maximum PIN code length + * (16). For pre 2.1 units. + */ + if (sec_level <= BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM || conn->pin_length == 16) + goto encrypt; + break; + default: + break; + }
auth: if (test_bit(HCI_CONN_ENCRYPT_PEND, &conn->flags))