On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 4:05 AM Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com wrote:
Am 26.04.23 um 08:17 schrieb Chia-I Wu:
mgr->ctx_handles should be protected by mgr->lock.
v2: improve commit message
Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu olvaffe@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Please don't manually CC stable@vger.kernel.org while sending patches out, let us maintainers push that upstream with the appropriate tag and Greg picking it up from there.
A Fixes tag and figuring out to which stable versions this needs to be backported are nice to have as well, but Alex and I can take care of that as well.
Apart from that the technical side of the patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com.
All done. Thanks for clarifying the process and sorry for getting it wrong in the first place :(
Regards, Christian.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c index e9b45089a28a6..863b2a34b2d64 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, { struct fd f = fdget(fd); struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv;
struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr; struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx; uint32_t id; int r;@@ -51,8 +52,11 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, return r; }
idr_for_each_entry(&fpriv->ctx_mgr.ctx_handles, ctx, id)
mgr = &fpriv->ctx_mgr;mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);idr_for_each_entry(&mgr->ctx_handles, ctx, id) amdgpu_ctx_priority_override(ctx, priority);mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock); fdput(f); return 0;