6.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Paolo Abeni pabeni@redhat.com
commit ae155060247be8dcae3802a95bd1bdf93ab3215d upstream.
The CI reports sporadic failures of the fastclose self-tests. The root cause is a duplicate reset, not carrying the relevant MPTCP option. In the failing scenario the bad reset is received by the peer before the fastclose one, preventing the reception of the latter.
Indeed there is window of opportunity at fastclose time for the following race:
mptcp_do_fastclose __mptcp_close_ssk __tcp_close() tcp_set_state() [1] tcp_send_active_reset() [2]
After [1] the stack will send reset to in-flight data reaching the now closed port. Such reset may race with [2].
Address the issue explicitly sending a single reset on fastclose before explicitly moving the subflow to close status.
Fixes: d21f83485518 ("mptcp: use fastclose on more edge scenarios") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/596 Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni pabeni@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang geliang@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) matttbe@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) matttbe@kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118-net-mptcp-misc-fixes-6-18-rc6-v1-6-806d378... Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/mptcp/protocol.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c @@ -2377,7 +2377,6 @@ bool __mptcp_retransmit_pending_data(str
/* flags for __mptcp_close_ssk() */ #define MPTCP_CF_PUSH BIT(1) -#define MPTCP_CF_FASTCLOSE BIT(2)
/* be sure to send a reset only if the caller asked for it, also * clean completely the subflow status when the subflow reaches @@ -2388,7 +2387,7 @@ static void __mptcp_subflow_disconnect(s unsigned int flags) { if (((1 << ssk->sk_state) & (TCPF_CLOSE | TCPF_LISTEN)) || - (flags & MPTCP_CF_FASTCLOSE)) { + subflow->send_fastclose) { /* The MPTCP code never wait on the subflow sockets, TCP-level * disconnect should never fail */ @@ -2435,14 +2434,8 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct soc
lock_sock_nested(ssk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
- if ((flags & MPTCP_CF_FASTCLOSE) && !__mptcp_check_fallback(msk)) { - /* be sure to force the tcp_close path - * to generate the egress reset - */ - ssk->sk_lingertime = 0; - sock_set_flag(ssk, SOCK_LINGER); - subflow->send_fastclose = 1; - } + if (subflow->send_fastclose && ssk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE) + tcp_set_state(ssk, TCP_CLOSE);
need_push = (flags & MPTCP_CF_PUSH) && __mptcp_retransmit_pending_data(sk); if (!dispose_it) { @@ -2745,9 +2738,26 @@ static void mptcp_do_fastclose(struct so struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
mptcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE); - mptcp_for_each_subflow_safe(msk, subflow, tmp) - __mptcp_close_ssk(sk, mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow), - subflow, MPTCP_CF_FASTCLOSE); + + /* Explicitly send the fastclose reset as need */ + if (__mptcp_check_fallback(msk)) + return; + + mptcp_for_each_subflow_safe(msk, subflow, tmp) { + struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow); + + lock_sock(ssk); + + /* Some subflow socket states don't allow/need a reset.*/ + if ((1 << ssk->sk_state) & (TCPF_LISTEN | TCPF_CLOSE)) + goto unlock; + + subflow->send_fastclose = 1; + tcp_send_active_reset(ssk, ssk->sk_allocation, + SK_RST_REASON_TCP_ABORT_ON_CLOSE); +unlock: + release_sock(ssk); + } }
static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work)