4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Roman Gushchin guro@fb.com
[ Upstream commit 0069fb854364da79fd99236ea620affc8e1152d5 ]
Commit fbeb1603bf4e ("bpf: verifier: MOV64 don't mark dst reg unbounded") revealed a typo in commit fb30d4b71214 ("bpf: Add tests for map-in-map"): BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0) was used instead of BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0).
I've noticed the problem by running bpf kselftests.
Fixes: fb30d4b71214 ("bpf: Add tests for map-in-map") Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin guro@fb.com Cc: Martin KaFai Lau kafai@fb.com Cc: Arthur Fabre afabre@cloudflare.com Cc: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Cc: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau kafai@fb.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -6997,7 +6997,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_in_map = { 3 }, @@ -7020,7 +7020,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_in_map = { 3 }, @@ -7042,7 +7042,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_in_map = { 3 },