From: Nikolay Borisov nborisov@suse.com
commit 5750c37523a2c8cbb450b9ef31e21c2ba876b05e upstream.
Raviu reported that running his regular fs_trim segfaulted with the following backtrace:
[ 237.525947] assertion failed: prev, in ../fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1595 [ 237.525984] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 237.525985] kernel BUG at ../fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3117! [ 237.525992] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 237.525998] CPU: 4 PID: 4423 Comm: fstrim Tainted: G U OE 5.4.14-8-vanilla #1 [ 237.526001] Hardware name: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. [ 237.526044] RIP: 0010:assfail.constprop.58+0x18/0x1a [btrfs] [ 237.526079] Call Trace: [ 237.526120] find_first_clear_extent_bit+0x13d/0x150 [btrfs] [ 237.526148] btrfs_trim_fs+0x211/0x3f0 [btrfs] [ 237.526184] btrfs_ioctl_fitrim+0x103/0x170 [btrfs] [ 237.526219] btrfs_ioctl+0x129a/0x2ed0 [btrfs] [ 237.526227] ? filemap_map_pages+0x190/0x3d0 [ 237.526232] ? do_filp_open+0xaf/0x110 [ 237.526238] ? _copy_to_user+0x22/0x30 [ 237.526242] ? cp_new_stat+0x150/0x180 [ 237.526247] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x640 [ 237.526278] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [ 237.526283] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x640 [ 237.526288] ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x3c/0x60 [ 237.526292] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [ 237.526297] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 237.526303] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x1c0 [ 237.526310] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
That was due to btrfs_fs_device::aloc_tree being empty. Initially I thought this wasn't possible and as a percaution have put the assert in find_first_clear_extent_bit. Turns out this is indeed possible and could happen when a file system with SINGLE data/metadata profile has a 2nd device added. Until balance is run or a new chunk is allocated on this device it will be completely empty.
In this case find_first_clear_extent_bit should return the full range [0, -1ULL] and let the caller handle this i.e for trim the end will be capped at the size of actual device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/izW2WNyvy1dEDweBICizKnd2KDwDiDyY2EYQr4YC... Fixes: 45bfcfc168f8 ("btrfs: Implement find_first_clear_extent_bit") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+ Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov nborisov@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -1593,21 +1593,25 @@ void find_first_clear_extent_bit(struct /* Find first extent with bits cleared */ while (1) { node = __etree_search(tree, start, &next, &prev, NULL, NULL); - if (!node) { + if (!node && !next && !prev) { + /* + * Tree is completely empty, send full range and let + * caller deal with it + */ + *start_ret = 0; + *end_ret = -1; + goto out; + } else if (!node && !next) { + /* + * We are past the last allocated chunk, set start at + * the end of the last extent. + */ + state = rb_entry(prev, struct extent_state, rb_node); + *start_ret = state->end + 1; + *end_ret = -1; + goto out; + } else if (!node) { node = next; - if (!node) { - /* - * We are past the last allocated chunk, - * set start at the end of the last extent. The - * device alloc tree should never be empty so - * prev is always set. - */ - ASSERT(prev); - state = rb_entry(prev, struct extent_state, rb_node); - *start_ret = state->end + 1; - *end_ret = -1; - goto out; - } } /* * At this point 'node' either contains 'start' or start is --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c @@ -441,8 +441,17 @@ static int test_find_first_clear_extent_ int ret = -EINVAL;
test_msg("running find_first_clear_extent_bit test"); + extent_io_tree_init(NULL, &tree, IO_TREE_SELFTEST, NULL);
+ /* Test correct handling of empty tree */ + find_first_clear_extent_bit(&tree, 0, &start, &end, CHUNK_TRIMMED); + if (start != 0 || end != -1) { + test_err( + "error getting a range from completely empty tree: start %llu end %llu", + start, end); + goto out; + } /* * Set 1M-4M alloc/discard and 32M-64M thus leaving a hole between * 4M-32M