From: Timothy E Baldwin T.E.Baldwin99@members.leeds.ac.uk
commit df84fe94708985cdfb78a83148322bcd0a699472 upstream.
Since commit f086f67485c5 ("arm64: ptrace: add support for syscall emulation"), if system call number -1 is called and the process is being traced with PTRACE_SYSCALL, for example by strace, the seccomp check is skipped and -ENOSYS is returned unconditionally (unless altered by the tracer) rather than carrying out action specified in the seccomp filter.
The consequence of this is that it is not possible to reliably strace a seccomp based implementation of a foreign system call interface in which r7/x8 is permitted to be -1 on entry to a system call.
Also trace_sys_enter and audit_syscall_entry are skipped if a system call is skipped.
Fix by removing the in_syscall(regs) check restoring the previous behaviour which is like AArch32, x86 (which uses generic code) and everything else.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov oleg@redhat.com Cc: Catalin Marinascatalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: f086f67485c5 ("arm64: ptrace: add support for syscall emulation") Reviewed-by: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com Tested-by: Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com Signed-off-by: Timothy E Baldwin T.E.Baldwin99@members.leeds.ac.uk Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/90edd33b-6353-1228-791f-0336d94d5f8c@majoroak.me.u... Signed-off-by: Will Deacon will@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -1799,7 +1799,7 @@ int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *
if (flags & (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) { tracehook_report_syscall(regs, PTRACE_SYSCALL_ENTER); - if (!in_syscall(regs) || (flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) + if (flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU) return NO_SYSCALL; }