From: Johannes Berg johannes.berg@intel.com
[ Upstream commit a7ee7d44b57c9ae174088e53a668852b7f4f452d ]
We may end up with a NULL reg_rule after the loop in handle_channel_custom() if the bandwidth didn't fit, check if this is the case and bail out if so.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg johannes.berg@intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221104449.3b558a50201c.I4ad3725c4dacaefd2d18d... Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg johannes.berg@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/wireless/reg.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c index 018c60be153a7..32f575857e415 100644 --- a/net/wireless/reg.c +++ b/net/wireless/reg.c @@ -2269,7 +2269,7 @@ static void handle_channel_custom(struct wiphy *wiphy, break; }
- if (IS_ERR(reg_rule)) { + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(reg_rule)) { pr_debug("Disabling freq %d MHz as custom regd has no rule that fits it\n", chan->center_freq); if (wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_WIPHY_SELF_MANAGED) {