On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 2:18 PM Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:58:32PM +0000, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
Please see the bisection report below about a boot failure, it looks legit as this commit was made today:
Fix it by ignoring the config in the device tree for now: the later patches in the series will push all inversion handling over to the gpiolib core and set it up properly in the boardfiles for legacy devices, but I did not finish that for this kernel cycle.
So here the patch clearly says it is for "this kernel cycle" which I feel implies that it is NOT for any previous kernels stable or not...
I'm sorry if I missed the "look at this thing that we will apply to stable soon" mail, sadly there are just too many of these for me to handle sometimes. (Maybe it means I am making too many mistakes to begin with, mea culpa.)
Reported-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> Reported-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> Reported-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Oh dear, this is another bot backported commit which I suspect is lacking some context or other from all the other work that was done with GPIO enables :(
This AI seems a bit confused :/ Maybe it is the prolific use of the word "fix" that triggers it?
Yours, Linus Walleij