On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:54:00PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Even though FOLL_SPLIT_PMD on hugetlb now always fails with -EOPNOTSUPP, let's add a safety net in case FOLL_SPLIT_PMD usage would ever be reworked.
In particular, before commit 9cb28da54643 ("mm/gup: handle hugetlb in the generic follow_page_mask code"), GUP(FOLL_SPLIT_PMD) would just have returned a page. In particular, hugetlb folios that are not PMD-sized would never have been prone to FOLL_SPLIT_PMD.
hugetlb folios can be anonymous, and page_make_device_exclusive_one() is not really prepared for handling them at all. So let's spell that out.
Agreed, thanks for fixing.
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple apopple@nvidia.com
Fixes: b756a3b5e7ea ("mm: device exclusive memory access") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand david@redhat.com
mm/rmap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index c6c4d4ea29a7..17fbfa61f7ef 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -2499,7 +2499,7 @@ static bool folio_make_device_exclusive(struct folio *folio, * Restrict to anonymous folios for now to avoid potential writeback * issues. */
- if (!folio_test_anon(folio))
- if (!folio_test_anon(folio) || folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) return false;
rmap_walk(folio, &rwc); -- 2.48.1