The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 7771c8c80d62ad065637ef74ed2962983f6c5f6d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to 'stable@vger.kernel.org' --in-reply-to '2023101543-unwatched-reviver-1cd0@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 7771c8c80d62ad065637ef74ed2962983f6c5f6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tzung-Bi Shih tzungbi@kernel.org Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:06:22 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] iio: cros_ec: fix an use-after-free in cros_ec_sensors_push_data()
cros_ec_sensors_push_data() reads `indio_dev->active_scan_mask` and calls iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp() without making sure the `indio_dev` stays in buffer mode. There is a race if `indio_dev` exits buffer mode right before cros_ec_sensors_push_data() accesses them.
An use-after-free on `indio_dev->active_scan_mask` was observed. The call trace: [...] _find_next_bit cros_ec_sensors_push_data cros_ec_sensorhub_event blocking_notifier_call_chain cros_ec_irq_thread
It was caused by a race condition: one thread just freed `active_scan_mask` at [1]; while another thread tried to access the memory at [2].
Fix it by calling iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() to ensure the `indio_dev` can't exit buffer mode during cros_ec_sensors_push_data().
[1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5/source/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer... [2]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5/source/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sens...
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: aa984f1ba4a4 ("iio: cros_ec: Register to cros_ec_sensorhub when EC supports FIFO") Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih tzungbi@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck groeck@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd swboyd@chromium.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230829030622.1571852-1-tzungbi@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c index b72d39fc2434..6bfe5d6847e7 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c @@ -190,8 +190,11 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_push_data(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, /* * Ignore samples if the buffer is not set: it is needed if the ODR is * set but the buffer is not enabled yet. + * + * Note: iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() returns -EBUSY if the buffer + * is not enabled. */ - if (!iio_buffer_enabled(indio_dev)) + if (iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev) < 0) return 0;
out = (s16 *)st->samples; @@ -210,6 +213,7 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_push_data(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, st->samples, timestamp + delta);
+ iio_device_release_buffer_mode(indio_dev); return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cros_ec_sensors_push_data);