On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 05:04:27PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
commit aaf248848db50 ("perf/x86/msr: Add AMD IRPERF (Instructions Retired) performance counter") added support for 'perf -e msr/irperf/', but when exercised, we always get a 0 count:
BEFORE:
$ sudo perf stat -e instructions,msr/irperf/ true
Performance counter stats for 'true':
624,833 instructions # 0.00 stalled cycles per insn 0 msr/irperf/It turns out it simply needs its enable bit - HWCR bit 30 - set. This patch
Avoid having "This patch" or "This commit" in the commit message. It is tautologically useless.
Also, do
$ git grep 'This patch' Documentation/process
for more details.
does just that.
Enablement is restricted to all machines advertising IRPERF capability, except those susceptible to an erratum that makes the IRPERF return bad values.
That erratum occurs in Family 17h models 00-1fh [1], but not in F17h models 20h and above [2].
AFTER (on a family 17h model 31h machine):
$ sudo perf stat -e instructions,msr/irperf/ true
Performance counter stats for 'true':
621,690 instructions # 0.00 stalled cycles per insn 622,490 msr/irperf/[1] "Revision Guide for AMD Family 17h Models 00h-0Fh Processors", currently available here:
https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/55449_Fam_17h_M_00h-0Fh_Rev_Guide.pdf[2] "Revision Guide for AMD Family 17h Models 30h-3Fh Processors", currently available here:
https://developer.amd.com/wp-content/resources/56323-PUB_0.74.pdf
How stable are those links? Past experience shows not very.
Please upload those to a bugzilla.kernel.org entry and add that URL here with a Link: tag.
Cc: Alexander Shishkin alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Cc: Andi Kleen ak@linux.intel.com Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo acme@kernel.org Cc: Babu Moger babu.moger@amd.com Cc: Borislav Petkov bp@alien8.de Cc: Fenghua Yu fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: Frank van der Linden fllinden@amazon.com Cc: H. Peter Anvin hpa@zytor.com Cc: Huang Rui ray.huang@amd.com Cc: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar mingo@redhat.com Cc: Janakarajan Natarajan Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com Cc: Jan Beulich jbeulich@suse.com Cc: Jiaxun Yang jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com Cc: Jiri Olsa jolsa@redhat.com Cc: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com Cc: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: Luwei Kang luwei.kang@intel.com Cc: Martin Liška mliska@suse.cz Cc: Matt Fleming matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Cc: Michael Petlan mpetlan@redhat.com Cc: Namhyung Kim namhyung@kernel.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini pbonzini@redhat.com Cc: Pawan Gupta pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com Cc: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Cc: Tom Lendacky thomas.lendacky@amd.com Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: aaf248848db50 ("perf/x86/msr: Add AMD IRPERF (Instructions Retired) performance counter") Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips kim.phillips@amd.com
RESEND, adding Michael Petlan to cc. Original v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200121171232.28839-2-kim.phillips@amd.com/
v2: Based on Andi Kleen's review:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200116040324.GI302770@tassilo.jf.intel.com/ Add an amd_erratum_1054 and use cpu_has_bug infrastructure instead of open-coding the {family,model} check.arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h index f3327cb56edf..1c1600e7476b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h @@ -404,5 +404,6 @@ #define X86_BUG_SWAPGS X86_BUG(21) /* CPU is affected by speculation through SWAPGS */ #define X86_BUG_TAA X86_BUG(22) /* CPU is affected by TSX Async Abort(TAA) */ #define X86_BUG_ITLB_MULTIHIT X86_BUG(23) /* CPU may incur MCE during certain page attribute changes */ +#define X86_BUG_AMD_E1054 X86_BUG(24) /* CPU is among the affected by Erratum 1054 */
That is visible in /proc/cpuinfo and the string "amd_e1054" means nothing. Call that
X86_BUG_IRPERF
or so to at least give some hint as to what the bug is.
#endif /* _ASM_X86_CPUFEATURES_H */ diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h index ebe1685e92dd..d5e517d1c3dd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h @@ -512,6 +512,8 @@ #define MSR_K7_HWCR 0xc0010015 #define MSR_K7_HWCR_SMMLOCK_BIT 0 #define MSR_K7_HWCR_SMMLOCK BIT_ULL(MSR_K7_HWCR_SMMLOCK_BIT) +#define MSR_K7_HWCR_IRPERF_EN_BIT 30 +#define MSR_K7_HWCR_IRPERF_EN BIT_ULL(MSR_K7_HWCR_IRPERF_EN_BIT) #define MSR_K7_FID_VID_CTL 0xc0010041 #define MSR_K7_FID_VID_STATUS 0xc0010042 diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index 62c30279be77..c067234a271f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ static const int amd_erratum_383[]; static const int amd_erratum_400[]; +static const int amd_erratum_1054[]; static bool cpu_has_amd_erratum(struct cpuinfo_x86 *cpu, const int *erratum); /* @@ -701,6 +702,9 @@ static void early_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) if (cpu_has_amd_erratum(c, amd_erratum_400)) set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_AMD_E400);
- if (cpu_has_amd_erratum(c, amd_erratum_1054))
set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_AMD_E1054);- early_detect_mem_encrypt(c);
/* Re-enable TopologyExtensions if switched off by BIOS */ @@ -978,6 +982,15 @@ static void init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) /* AMD CPUs don't reset SS attributes on SYSRET, Xen does. */ if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_XENPV)) set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS);
- /*
* Turn on the Instructions Retired free counter on machines not* susceptible to erratum #1054 "Instructions Retired Performance* Counter May Be Inaccurate"
. ^ |--- fullstop.
Thx.