6.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: SeongJae Park sj@kernel.org
commit 28ab2265e9422ccd81e4beafc0ace90f78de04c4 upstream.
damon_test_new_filter() is assuming all dynamic memory allocation in it will succeed. Those are indeed likely in the real use cases since those allocations are too small to fail, but theoretically those could fail. In the case, inappropriate memory access can happen. Fix it by appropriately cleanup pre-allocated memory and skip the execution of the remaining tests in the failure cases.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251101182021.74868-14-sj@kernel.org Fixes: 2a158e956b98 ("mm/damon/core-test: add a test for damos_new_filter()") Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park sj@kernel.org Cc: Brendan Higgins brendan.higgins@linux.dev Cc: David Gow davidgow@google.com Cc: Kefeng Wang wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [6.6+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h +++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h @@ -412,6 +412,8 @@ static void damos_test_new_filter(struct struct damos_filter *filter;
filter = damos_new_filter(DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ANON, true, false); + if (!filter) + kunit_skip(test, "filter alloc fail"); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, filter->type, DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ANON); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, filter->matching, true); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, filter->list.prev, &filter->list);