On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 09:15:43PM -0500, Dan Vacura wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 08:50:03AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
On 10/18/22 03:54, Dan Vacura wrote:
With the re-use of the previous completion status in 0d1c407b1a749 ("usb: dwc3: gadget: Return proper request status") it could be possible that the next frame would also get dropped if the current frame has a missed isoc error. Ensure that an interrupt is requested for the start of a new frame.
Shouldn't the subject line says [PATCH v3 1/6]?
Yes. Clerical error on my side not updating this after resolving a check-patch error... Not sure if it matters as this patch can exist on it's own. Or if I can send this again with fixed subject line, but that may confuse others, since there's no code difference.
Our tools (b4) will complain it can not find patch 1 in the series, so yes, please resend with them properly numbered so that we can find them all when going to apply them to the tree.
thanks,
greg k-h