On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 07:19:51 +0800 Kuan-Wei Chiu visitorckw@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, I'll prepare a revert patch to address the issue and plan to submit it for backporting to -stable.
However, I'd like to confirm whether the following patch series structure would be appropriate:
- Patch 1: Revert 866898efbb25 and CC it to stable
- Patch 2–8: Introduce the new equality-aware heap API
- Patch 9: Revert Patch 1 and switch bcache to use the new API
In this case, we would only backport Patch 1 to stable.
Alternatively, would you prefer we simply revert 866898efbb25 without introducing and using the new API in the same series?
Yes, just the revert for now, please. Let's not make that dependent on new development.