4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit f6176473a0c7472380eef72ebeb330cf9485bf0a ]
When call f2fs_acl_create_masq() failed, the caller f2fs_acl_create() should return -EIO instead of -ENOMEM, this patch makes it consistent with posix_acl_create() which has been fixed in commit beaf226b863a ("posix_acl: don't ignore return value of posix_acl_create_masq()").
Fixes: 83dfe53c185e ("f2fs: fix reference leaks in f2fs_acl_create") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang kernelpatch@126.com Reviewed-by: Chao Yu yuchao0@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/f2fs/acl.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/acl.c b/fs/f2fs/acl.c index fa707cdd4120..22f0d17cde43 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/acl.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/acl.c @@ -352,12 +352,14 @@ static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode, return PTR_ERR(p);
clone = f2fs_acl_clone(p, GFP_NOFS); - if (!clone) - goto no_mem; + if (!clone) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto release_acl; + }
ret = f2fs_acl_create_masq(clone, mode); if (ret < 0) - goto no_mem_clone; + goto release_clone;
if (ret == 0) posix_acl_release(clone); @@ -371,11 +373,11 @@ static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode,
return 0;
-no_mem_clone: +release_clone: posix_acl_release(clone); -no_mem: +release_acl: posix_acl_release(p); - return -ENOMEM; + return ret; }
int f2fs_init_acl(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, struct page *ipage,