The patch below does not apply to the 6.16-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.16.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e6b733ca2f99e968d696c2e812c8eb8e090bf37b
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025092121-boned-marbles-55ea@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.16.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From e6b733ca2f99e968d696c2e812c8eb8e090bf37b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: SeongJae Park <sj(a)kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 19:22:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] samples/damon/prcl: avoid starting DAMON before
initialization
Commit 2780505ec2b4 ("samples/damon/prcl: fix boot time enable crash") is
somehow incompletely applying the origin patch [1]. It is missing the
part that avoids starting DAMON before module initialization. Probably a
mistake during a merge has happened. Fix it by applying the missed part
again.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250909022238.2989-3-sj@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250706193207.39810-3-sj@kernel.org [1]
Fixes: 2780505ec2b4 ("samples/damon/prcl: fix boot time enable crash")
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj(a)kernel.org>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/samples/damon/prcl.c b/samples/damon/prcl.c
index 1b839c06a612..0226652f94d5 100644
--- a/samples/damon/prcl.c
+++ b/samples/damon/prcl.c
@@ -137,6 +137,9 @@ static int damon_sample_prcl_enable_store(
if (enabled == is_enabled)
return 0;
+ if (!init_called)
+ return 0;
+
if (enabled) {
err = damon_sample_prcl_start();
if (err)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 2da6de30e60dd9bb14600eff1cc99df2fa2ddae3
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025092147-truck-ceremony-311d@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 2da6de30e60dd9bb14600eff1cc99df2fa2ddae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 15:23:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm: folio_may_be_lru_cached() unless folio_test_large()
mm/swap.c and mm/mlock.c agree to drain any per-CPU batch as soon as a
large folio is added: so collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios() just wastes
effort when calling lru_add_drain[_all]() on a large folio.
But although there is good reason not to batch up PMD-sized folios, we
might well benefit from batching a small number of low-order mTHPs (though
unclear how that "small number" limitation will be implemented).
So ask if folio_may_be_lru_cached() rather than !folio_test_large(), to
insulate those particular checks from future change. Name preferred to
"folio_is_batchable" because large folios can well be put on a batch: it's
just the per-CPU LRU caches, drained much later, which need care.
Marked for stable, to counter the increase in lru_add_drain_all()s from
"mm/gup: check ref_count instead of lru before migration".
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/57d2eaf8-3607-f318-e0c5-be02dce61ad0@google.com
Fixes: 9a4e9f3b2d73 ("mm: update get_user_pages_longterm to migrate pages allocated from CMA region")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen(a)google.com>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)infradead.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)ziepe.ca>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard(a)nvidia.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keirf(a)google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Li Zhe <lizhe.67(a)bytedance.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel(a)surriel.com>
Cc: Shivank Garg <shivankg(a)amd.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc(a)google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org>
Cc: yangge <yangge1116(a)126.com>
Cc: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu(a)google.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao(a)google.com>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 2fe6ed2cc3fd..7012a0f758d8 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -385,6 +385,16 @@ void folio_add_lru_vma(struct folio *, struct vm_area_struct *);
void mark_page_accessed(struct page *);
void folio_mark_accessed(struct folio *);
+static inline bool folio_may_be_lru_cached(struct folio *folio)
+{
+ /*
+ * Holding PMD-sized folios in per-CPU LRU cache unbalances accounting.
+ * Holding small numbers of low-order mTHP folios in per-CPU LRU cache
+ * will be sensible, but nobody has implemented and tested that yet.
+ */
+ return !folio_test_large(folio);
+}
+
extern atomic_t lru_disable_count;
static inline bool lru_cache_disabled(void)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index b47066a54f52..0bc4d140fc07 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -2307,13 +2307,13 @@ static unsigned long collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios(
continue;
}
- if (drained == 0 &&
+ if (drained == 0 && folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) &&
folio_ref_count(folio) !=
folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1) {
lru_add_drain();
drained = 1;
}
- if (drained == 1 &&
+ if (drained == 1 && folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) &&
folio_ref_count(folio) !=
folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1) {
lru_add_drain_all();
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index a1d93ad33c6d..bb0776f5ef7c 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void mlock_folio(struct folio *folio)
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, mlock_lru(folio)) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ void mlock_new_folio(struct folio *folio)
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, mlock_new(folio)) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ void munlock_folio(struct folio *folio)
*/
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, folio) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 6ae2d5680574..b74ebe865dd9 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static void __folio_batch_add_and_move(struct folio_batch __percpu *fbatch,
local_lock(&cpu_fbatches.lock);
if (!folio_batch_add(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), folio) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
folio_batch_move_lru(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), move_fn);
if (disable_irq)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 2da6de30e60dd9bb14600eff1cc99df2fa2ddae3
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025092146-exhume-krypton-1383@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 2da6de30e60dd9bb14600eff1cc99df2fa2ddae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 15:23:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm: folio_may_be_lru_cached() unless folio_test_large()
mm/swap.c and mm/mlock.c agree to drain any per-CPU batch as soon as a
large folio is added: so collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios() just wastes
effort when calling lru_add_drain[_all]() on a large folio.
But although there is good reason not to batch up PMD-sized folios, we
might well benefit from batching a small number of low-order mTHPs (though
unclear how that "small number" limitation will be implemented).
So ask if folio_may_be_lru_cached() rather than !folio_test_large(), to
insulate those particular checks from future change. Name preferred to
"folio_is_batchable" because large folios can well be put on a batch: it's
just the per-CPU LRU caches, drained much later, which need care.
Marked for stable, to counter the increase in lru_add_drain_all()s from
"mm/gup: check ref_count instead of lru before migration".
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/57d2eaf8-3607-f318-e0c5-be02dce61ad0@google.com
Fixes: 9a4e9f3b2d73 ("mm: update get_user_pages_longterm to migrate pages allocated from CMA region")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen(a)google.com>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)infradead.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)ziepe.ca>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard(a)nvidia.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keirf(a)google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Li Zhe <lizhe.67(a)bytedance.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel(a)surriel.com>
Cc: Shivank Garg <shivankg(a)amd.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc(a)google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org>
Cc: yangge <yangge1116(a)126.com>
Cc: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu(a)google.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao(a)google.com>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 2fe6ed2cc3fd..7012a0f758d8 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -385,6 +385,16 @@ void folio_add_lru_vma(struct folio *, struct vm_area_struct *);
void mark_page_accessed(struct page *);
void folio_mark_accessed(struct folio *);
+static inline bool folio_may_be_lru_cached(struct folio *folio)
+{
+ /*
+ * Holding PMD-sized folios in per-CPU LRU cache unbalances accounting.
+ * Holding small numbers of low-order mTHP folios in per-CPU LRU cache
+ * will be sensible, but nobody has implemented and tested that yet.
+ */
+ return !folio_test_large(folio);
+}
+
extern atomic_t lru_disable_count;
static inline bool lru_cache_disabled(void)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index b47066a54f52..0bc4d140fc07 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -2307,13 +2307,13 @@ static unsigned long collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios(
continue;
}
- if (drained == 0 &&
+ if (drained == 0 && folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) &&
folio_ref_count(folio) !=
folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1) {
lru_add_drain();
drained = 1;
}
- if (drained == 1 &&
+ if (drained == 1 && folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) &&
folio_ref_count(folio) !=
folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1) {
lru_add_drain_all();
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index a1d93ad33c6d..bb0776f5ef7c 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void mlock_folio(struct folio *folio)
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, mlock_lru(folio)) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ void mlock_new_folio(struct folio *folio)
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, mlock_new(folio)) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ void munlock_folio(struct folio *folio)
*/
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, folio) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 6ae2d5680574..b74ebe865dd9 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static void __folio_batch_add_and_move(struct folio_batch __percpu *fbatch,
local_lock(&cpu_fbatches.lock);
if (!folio_batch_add(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), folio) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
folio_batch_move_lru(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), move_fn);
if (disable_irq)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 2da6de30e60dd9bb14600eff1cc99df2fa2ddae3
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025092145-system-superjet-a0fb@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 2da6de30e60dd9bb14600eff1cc99df2fa2ddae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 15:23:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm: folio_may_be_lru_cached() unless folio_test_large()
mm/swap.c and mm/mlock.c agree to drain any per-CPU batch as soon as a
large folio is added: so collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios() just wastes
effort when calling lru_add_drain[_all]() on a large folio.
But although there is good reason not to batch up PMD-sized folios, we
might well benefit from batching a small number of low-order mTHPs (though
unclear how that "small number" limitation will be implemented).
So ask if folio_may_be_lru_cached() rather than !folio_test_large(), to
insulate those particular checks from future change. Name preferred to
"folio_is_batchable" because large folios can well be put on a batch: it's
just the per-CPU LRU caches, drained much later, which need care.
Marked for stable, to counter the increase in lru_add_drain_all()s from
"mm/gup: check ref_count instead of lru before migration".
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/57d2eaf8-3607-f318-e0c5-be02dce61ad0@google.com
Fixes: 9a4e9f3b2d73 ("mm: update get_user_pages_longterm to migrate pages allocated from CMA region")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen(a)google.com>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)infradead.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)ziepe.ca>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard(a)nvidia.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keirf(a)google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Li Zhe <lizhe.67(a)bytedance.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel(a)surriel.com>
Cc: Shivank Garg <shivankg(a)amd.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc(a)google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org>
Cc: yangge <yangge1116(a)126.com>
Cc: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu(a)google.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao(a)google.com>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 2fe6ed2cc3fd..7012a0f758d8 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -385,6 +385,16 @@ void folio_add_lru_vma(struct folio *, struct vm_area_struct *);
void mark_page_accessed(struct page *);
void folio_mark_accessed(struct folio *);
+static inline bool folio_may_be_lru_cached(struct folio *folio)
+{
+ /*
+ * Holding PMD-sized folios in per-CPU LRU cache unbalances accounting.
+ * Holding small numbers of low-order mTHP folios in per-CPU LRU cache
+ * will be sensible, but nobody has implemented and tested that yet.
+ */
+ return !folio_test_large(folio);
+}
+
extern atomic_t lru_disable_count;
static inline bool lru_cache_disabled(void)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index b47066a54f52..0bc4d140fc07 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -2307,13 +2307,13 @@ static unsigned long collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios(
continue;
}
- if (drained == 0 &&
+ if (drained == 0 && folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) &&
folio_ref_count(folio) !=
folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1) {
lru_add_drain();
drained = 1;
}
- if (drained == 1 &&
+ if (drained == 1 && folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) &&
folio_ref_count(folio) !=
folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1) {
lru_add_drain_all();
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index a1d93ad33c6d..bb0776f5ef7c 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void mlock_folio(struct folio *folio)
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, mlock_lru(folio)) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ void mlock_new_folio(struct folio *folio)
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, mlock_new(folio)) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ void munlock_folio(struct folio *folio)
*/
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, folio) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 6ae2d5680574..b74ebe865dd9 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static void __folio_batch_add_and_move(struct folio_batch __percpu *fbatch,
local_lock(&cpu_fbatches.lock);
if (!folio_batch_add(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), folio) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
folio_batch_move_lru(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), move_fn);
if (disable_irq)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 2da6de30e60dd9bb14600eff1cc99df2fa2ddae3
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025092144-angler-cuddly-30db@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 2da6de30e60dd9bb14600eff1cc99df2fa2ddae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 15:23:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm: folio_may_be_lru_cached() unless folio_test_large()
mm/swap.c and mm/mlock.c agree to drain any per-CPU batch as soon as a
large folio is added: so collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios() just wastes
effort when calling lru_add_drain[_all]() on a large folio.
But although there is good reason not to batch up PMD-sized folios, we
might well benefit from batching a small number of low-order mTHPs (though
unclear how that "small number" limitation will be implemented).
So ask if folio_may_be_lru_cached() rather than !folio_test_large(), to
insulate those particular checks from future change. Name preferred to
"folio_is_batchable" because large folios can well be put on a batch: it's
just the per-CPU LRU caches, drained much later, which need care.
Marked for stable, to counter the increase in lru_add_drain_all()s from
"mm/gup: check ref_count instead of lru before migration".
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/57d2eaf8-3607-f318-e0c5-be02dce61ad0@google.com
Fixes: 9a4e9f3b2d73 ("mm: update get_user_pages_longterm to migrate pages allocated from CMA region")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen(a)google.com>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)infradead.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)ziepe.ca>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard(a)nvidia.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keirf(a)google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Li Zhe <lizhe.67(a)bytedance.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel(a)surriel.com>
Cc: Shivank Garg <shivankg(a)amd.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc(a)google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org>
Cc: yangge <yangge1116(a)126.com>
Cc: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu(a)google.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao(a)google.com>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 2fe6ed2cc3fd..7012a0f758d8 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -385,6 +385,16 @@ void folio_add_lru_vma(struct folio *, struct vm_area_struct *);
void mark_page_accessed(struct page *);
void folio_mark_accessed(struct folio *);
+static inline bool folio_may_be_lru_cached(struct folio *folio)
+{
+ /*
+ * Holding PMD-sized folios in per-CPU LRU cache unbalances accounting.
+ * Holding small numbers of low-order mTHP folios in per-CPU LRU cache
+ * will be sensible, but nobody has implemented and tested that yet.
+ */
+ return !folio_test_large(folio);
+}
+
extern atomic_t lru_disable_count;
static inline bool lru_cache_disabled(void)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index b47066a54f52..0bc4d140fc07 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -2307,13 +2307,13 @@ static unsigned long collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios(
continue;
}
- if (drained == 0 &&
+ if (drained == 0 && folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) &&
folio_ref_count(folio) !=
folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1) {
lru_add_drain();
drained = 1;
}
- if (drained == 1 &&
+ if (drained == 1 && folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) &&
folio_ref_count(folio) !=
folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1) {
lru_add_drain_all();
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index a1d93ad33c6d..bb0776f5ef7c 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void mlock_folio(struct folio *folio)
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, mlock_lru(folio)) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ void mlock_new_folio(struct folio *folio)
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, mlock_new(folio)) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ void munlock_folio(struct folio *folio)
*/
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, folio) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 6ae2d5680574..b74ebe865dd9 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static void __folio_batch_add_and_move(struct folio_batch __percpu *fbatch,
local_lock(&cpu_fbatches.lock);
if (!folio_batch_add(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), folio) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
folio_batch_move_lru(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), move_fn);
if (disable_irq)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 2da6de30e60dd9bb14600eff1cc99df2fa2ddae3
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025092143-defrost-backboned-d1ea@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 2da6de30e60dd9bb14600eff1cc99df2fa2ddae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 15:23:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm: folio_may_be_lru_cached() unless folio_test_large()
mm/swap.c and mm/mlock.c agree to drain any per-CPU batch as soon as a
large folio is added: so collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios() just wastes
effort when calling lru_add_drain[_all]() on a large folio.
But although there is good reason not to batch up PMD-sized folios, we
might well benefit from batching a small number of low-order mTHPs (though
unclear how that "small number" limitation will be implemented).
So ask if folio_may_be_lru_cached() rather than !folio_test_large(), to
insulate those particular checks from future change. Name preferred to
"folio_is_batchable" because large folios can well be put on a batch: it's
just the per-CPU LRU caches, drained much later, which need care.
Marked for stable, to counter the increase in lru_add_drain_all()s from
"mm/gup: check ref_count instead of lru before migration".
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/57d2eaf8-3607-f318-e0c5-be02dce61ad0@google.com
Fixes: 9a4e9f3b2d73 ("mm: update get_user_pages_longterm to migrate pages allocated from CMA region")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen(a)google.com>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)infradead.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)ziepe.ca>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard(a)nvidia.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keirf(a)google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Li Zhe <lizhe.67(a)bytedance.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel(a)surriel.com>
Cc: Shivank Garg <shivankg(a)amd.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc(a)google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org>
Cc: yangge <yangge1116(a)126.com>
Cc: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu(a)google.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao(a)google.com>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 2fe6ed2cc3fd..7012a0f758d8 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -385,6 +385,16 @@ void folio_add_lru_vma(struct folio *, struct vm_area_struct *);
void mark_page_accessed(struct page *);
void folio_mark_accessed(struct folio *);
+static inline bool folio_may_be_lru_cached(struct folio *folio)
+{
+ /*
+ * Holding PMD-sized folios in per-CPU LRU cache unbalances accounting.
+ * Holding small numbers of low-order mTHP folios in per-CPU LRU cache
+ * will be sensible, but nobody has implemented and tested that yet.
+ */
+ return !folio_test_large(folio);
+}
+
extern atomic_t lru_disable_count;
static inline bool lru_cache_disabled(void)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index b47066a54f52..0bc4d140fc07 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -2307,13 +2307,13 @@ static unsigned long collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios(
continue;
}
- if (drained == 0 &&
+ if (drained == 0 && folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) &&
folio_ref_count(folio) !=
folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1) {
lru_add_drain();
drained = 1;
}
- if (drained == 1 &&
+ if (drained == 1 && folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) &&
folio_ref_count(folio) !=
folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1) {
lru_add_drain_all();
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index a1d93ad33c6d..bb0776f5ef7c 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void mlock_folio(struct folio *folio)
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, mlock_lru(folio)) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ void mlock_new_folio(struct folio *folio)
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, mlock_new(folio)) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ void munlock_folio(struct folio *folio)
*/
folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, folio) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);
local_unlock(&mlock_fbatch.lock);
}
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 6ae2d5680574..b74ebe865dd9 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static void __folio_batch_add_and_move(struct folio_batch __percpu *fbatch,
local_lock(&cpu_fbatches.lock);
if (!folio_batch_add(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), folio) ||
- folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
+ !folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
folio_batch_move_lru(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), move_fn);
if (disable_irq)