April 2025 - Linux-stable-mirror

[PATCH v4 RESEND 1/2] HID: amd_sfh: Fix SRA sensor when it's the only sensor

by Mario Limonciello

From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello(a)amd.com> On systems that only have an SRA sensor connected to SFH the sensor doesn't get enabled due to a bad optimization condition of breaking the sensor walk loop. This optimization is unnecessary in the first place because if there is only one device then the loop only runs once. Drop the condition and explicitly mark sensor as enabled. Reported-by: Yijun Shen <Yijun.Shen(a)dell.com> Tested-By: Yijun Shen <Yijun_Shen(a)Dell.com> Fixes: d1c444b47100d ("HID: amd_sfh: Add support to export device operating states") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello(a)amd.com> --- v2: * Add tag --- drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c index 25f0ebfcbd5f5..c1bdf1e0d44af 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c +++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c @@ -134,9 +134,6 @@ static int amd_sfh1_1_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata) for (i = 0; i < cl_data->num_hid_devices; i++) { cl_data->sensor_sts[i] = SENSOR_DISABLED; - if (cl_data->num_hid_devices == 1 && cl_data->sensor_idx[0] == SRA_IDX) - break; - if (cl_data->sensor_idx[i] == SRA_IDX) { info.sensor_idx = cl_data->sensor_idx[i]; writel(0, privdata->mmio + amd_get_p2c_val(privdata, 0)); @@ -145,8 +142,10 @@ static int amd_sfh1_1_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata) (privdata, cl_data->sensor_idx[i], ENABLE_SENSOR); cl_data->sensor_sts[i] = (status == 0) ? SENSOR_ENABLED : SENSOR_DISABLED; - if (cl_data->sensor_sts[i] == SENSOR_ENABLED) + if (cl_data->sensor_sts[i] == SENSOR_ENABLED) { + cl_data->is_any_sensor_enabled = true; privdata->dev_en.is_sra_present = true; + } continue; } -- 2.43.0

6 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[PATCH RFC v2 1/2] Revert "drm/meson: vclk: fix calculation of 59.94 fractional rates"

by Martin Blumenstingl

From: Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt(a)gmail.com> This reverts commit bfbc68e. The patch does permit the offending YUV420 @ 59.94 phy_freq and vclk_freq mode to match in calculations. It also results in all fractional rates being unavailable for use. This was unintended and requires the patch to be reverted. Fixes: bfbc68e4d869 ("drm/meson: vclk: fix calculation of 59.94 fractional rates") Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl(a)googlemail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c index 2a942dc6a6dc..2a82119eb58e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c @@ -790,13 +790,13 @@ meson_vclk_vic_supported_freq(struct meson_drm *priv, unsigned int phy_freq, FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].pixel_freq)); DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("i = %d phy_freq = %d alt = %d\n", i, params[i].phy_freq, - FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq/1000)*1000); + FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq/10)*10); /* Match strict frequency */ if (phy_freq == params[i].phy_freq && vclk_freq == params[i].vclk_freq) return MODE_OK; /* Match 1000/1001 variant */ - if (phy_freq == (FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq/1000)*1000) && + if (phy_freq == (FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq/10)*10) && vclk_freq == FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].vclk_freq)) return MODE_OK; } @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ void meson_vclk_setup(struct meson_drm *priv, unsigned int target, for (freq = 0 ; params[freq].pixel_freq ; ++freq) { if ((phy_freq == params[freq].phy_freq || - phy_freq == FREQ_1000_1001(params[freq].phy_freq/1000)*1000) && + phy_freq == FREQ_1000_1001(params[freq].phy_freq/10)*10) && (vclk_freq == params[freq].vclk_freq || vclk_freq == FREQ_1000_1001(params[freq].vclk_freq))) { if (vclk_freq != params[freq].vclk_freq) -- 2.49.0

6 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

+ mm-contig_alloc-fix-alloc_contig_range-when-__gfp_comp-and-order-max_order.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch

by Andrew Morton

The patch titled Subject: mm/contig_alloc: fix alloc_contig_range when __GFP_COMP and order < MAX_ORDER has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is mm-contig_alloc-fix-alloc_contig_range-when-__gfp_comp-and-order-max_order.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patche… This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm and is updated there every 2-3 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang(a)huawei.com> Subject: mm/contig_alloc: fix alloc_contig_range when __GFP_COMP and order < MAX_ORDER Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 09:36:20 +0800 When calling alloc_contig_range() with __GFP_COMP and the order of requested pfn range is pageblock_order, less than MAX_ORDER, I triggered WARNING as follows: PFN range: requested [2150105088, 2150105600), allocated [2150105088, 2150106112) WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 580 at mm/page_alloc.c:6877 alloc_contig_range+0x280/0x340 alloc_contig_range() marks pageblocks of the requested pfn range to be isolated, migrate these pages if they are in use and will be freed to MIGRATE_ISOLATED freelist. Suppose two alloc_contig_range() calls at the same time and the requested pfn range are [0x80280000, 0x80280200) and [0x80280200, 0x80280400) respectively. Suppose the two memory range are in use, then alloc_contig_range() will migrate and free these pages to MIGRATE_ISOLATED freelist. __free_one_page() will merge MIGRATE_ISOLATE buddy to larger buddy, resulting in a MAX_ORDER buddy. Finally, find_large_buddy() in alloc_contig_range() returns a MAX_ORDER buddy and results in WARNING. To fix it, call free_contig_range() to free the excess pfn range. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250421013620.459740-1-tujinjiang@huawei.com Fixes: e98337d11bbd ("mm/contig_alloc: support __GFP_COMP") Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang(a)huawei.com> Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao(a)google.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> --- mm/page_alloc.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-contig_alloc-fix-alloc_contig_range-when-__gfp_comp-and-order-max_order +++ a/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -6706,6 +6706,7 @@ int alloc_contig_range_noprof(unsigned l .alloc_contig = true, }; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc.migratepages); + bool is_range_aligned; gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask); if (__alloc_contig_verify_gfp_mask(gfp_mask, (gfp_t *)&cc.gfp_mask)) @@ -6794,7 +6795,14 @@ int alloc_contig_range_noprof(unsigned l goto done; } - if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP)) { + /* + * With __GFP_COMP and the requested order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER, + * isolated free pages can have higher order than the requested + * one. Use split_free_pages() to free out of range pages. + */ + is_range_aligned = is_power_of_2(end - start); + if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP) || + (is_range_aligned && ilog2(end - start) < MAX_PAGE_ORDER)) { split_free_pages(cc.freepages, gfp_mask); /* Free head and tail (if any) */ @@ -6802,7 +6810,15 @@ int alloc_contig_range_noprof(unsigned l free_contig_range(outer_start, start - outer_start); if (end != outer_end) free_contig_range(end, outer_end - end); - } else if (start == outer_start && end == outer_end && is_power_of_2(end - start)) { + + outer_start = start; + outer_end = end; + + if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP)) + goto done; + } + + if (start == outer_start && end == outer_end && is_range_aligned) { struct page *head = pfn_to_page(start); int order = ilog2(end - start); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from tujinjiang(a)huawei.com are mm-contig_alloc-fix-alloc_contig_range-when-__gfp_comp-and-order-max_order.patch

6 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

+ watchdog-fix-watchdog-may-detect-false-positive-of-softlockup.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch

by Andrew Morton

The patch titled Subject: watchdog: fix watchdog may detect false positive of softlockup has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch. Its filename is watchdog-fix-watchdog-may-detect-false-positive-of-softlockup.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patche… This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm and is updated there every 2-3 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun(a)huaweicloud.com> Subject: watchdog: fix watchdog may detect false positive of softlockup Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 03:50:21 +0000 When updating `watchdog_thresh`, there is a race condition between writing the new `watchdog_thresh` value and stopping the old watchdog timer. If the old timer triggers during this window, it may falsely detect a softlockup due to the old interval and the new `watchdog_thresh` value being used. The problem can be described as follow: # We asuume previous watchdog_thresh is 60, so the watchdog timer is # coming every 24s. echo 10 > /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh (User space) | +------>+ update watchdog_thresh (We are in kernel now) | | # using old interval and new `watchdog_thresh` +------>+ watchdog hrtimer (irq context: detect softlockup) | | +-------+ | | + softlockup_stop_all To fix this problem, introduce a shadow variable for `watchdog_thresh`. The update to the actual `watchdog_thresh` is delayed until after the old timer is stopped, preventing false positives. The following testcase may help to understand this problem. --------------------------------------------- echo RT_RUNTIME_SHARE > /sys/kernel/debug/sched/features echo -1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/sched/fair_server/cpu3/runtime echo 60 > /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh taskset -c 3 chrt -r 99 /bin/bash -c "while true;do true; done" & echo 10 > /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh & --------------------------------------------- The test case above first removes the throttling restrictions for real-time tasks. It then sets watchdog_thresh to 60 and executes a real-time task ,a simple while(1) loop, on cpu3. Consequently, the final command gets blocked because the presence of this real-time thread prevents kworker:3 from being selected by the scheduler. This eventually triggers a softlockup detection on cpu3 due to watchdog_timer_fn operating with inconsistent variable - using both the old interval and the updated watchdog_thresh simultaneously. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250421035021.3507649-1-luogengkun@huaweicloud.c… Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun(a)huaweicloud.com> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders(a)chromium.org> Cc: Joel Granados <joel.granados(a)kernel.org> Cc: Song Liu <song(a)kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleinxer <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> --- kernel/watchdog.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/watchdog.c~watchdog-fix-watchdog-may-detect-false-positive-of-softlockup +++ a/kernel/watchdog.c @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ int __read_mostly watchdog_user_enabled static int __read_mostly watchdog_hardlockup_user_enabled = WATCHDOG_HARDLOCKUP_DEFAULT; static int __read_mostly watchdog_softlockup_user_enabled = 1; int __read_mostly watchdog_thresh = 10; +static int __read_mostly watchdog_thresh_next; static int __read_mostly watchdog_hardlockup_available; struct cpumask watchdog_cpumask __read_mostly; @@ -870,12 +871,20 @@ int lockup_detector_offline_cpu(unsigned return 0; } -static void __lockup_detector_reconfigure(void) +static void __lockup_detector_reconfigure(bool thresh_changed) { cpus_read_lock(); watchdog_hardlockup_stop(); softlockup_stop_all(); + /* + * To prevent watchdog_timer_fn from using the old interval and + * the new watchdog_thresh at the same time, which could lead to + * false softlockup reports, it is necessary to update the + * watchdog_thresh after the softlockup is completed. + */ + if (thresh_changed) + watchdog_thresh = READ_ONCE(watchdog_thresh_next); set_sample_period(); lockup_detector_update_enable(); if (watchdog_enabled && watchdog_thresh) @@ -888,7 +897,7 @@ static void __lockup_detector_reconfigur void lockup_detector_reconfigure(void) { mutex_lock(&watchdog_mutex); - __lockup_detector_reconfigure(); + __lockup_detector_reconfigure(false); mutex_unlock(&watchdog_mutex); } @@ -908,7 +917,7 @@ static __init void lockup_detector_setup return; mutex_lock(&watchdog_mutex); - __lockup_detector_reconfigure(); + __lockup_detector_reconfigure(false); softlockup_initialized = true; mutex_unlock(&watchdog_mutex); } @@ -924,11 +933,11 @@ static void __lockup_detector_reconfigur } void lockup_detector_reconfigure(void) { - __lockup_detector_reconfigure(); + __lockup_detector_reconfigure(false); } static inline void lockup_detector_setup(void) { - __lockup_detector_reconfigure(); + __lockup_detector_reconfigure(false); } #endif /* !CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR */ @@ -946,11 +955,11 @@ void lockup_detector_soft_poweroff(void) #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL /* Propagate any changes to the watchdog infrastructure */ -static void proc_watchdog_update(void) +static void proc_watchdog_update(bool thresh_changed) { /* Remove impossible cpus to keep sysctl output clean. */ cpumask_and(&watchdog_cpumask, &watchdog_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask); - __lockup_detector_reconfigure(); + __lockup_detector_reconfigure(thresh_changed); } /* @@ -984,7 +993,7 @@ static int proc_watchdog_common(int whic } else { err = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); if (!err && old != READ_ONCE(*param)) - proc_watchdog_update(); + proc_watchdog_update(false); } mutex_unlock(&watchdog_mutex); return err; @@ -1035,11 +1044,13 @@ static int proc_watchdog_thresh(const st mutex_lock(&watchdog_mutex); - old = READ_ONCE(watchdog_thresh); + watchdog_thresh_next = READ_ONCE(watchdog_thresh); + + old = watchdog_thresh_next; err = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); - if (!err && write && old != READ_ONCE(watchdog_thresh)) - proc_watchdog_update(); + if (!err && write && old != READ_ONCE(watchdog_thresh_next)) + proc_watchdog_update(true); mutex_unlock(&watchdog_mutex); return err; @@ -1060,7 +1071,7 @@ static int proc_watchdog_cpumask(const s err = proc_do_large_bitmap(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); if (!err && write) - proc_watchdog_update(); + proc_watchdog_update(false); mutex_unlock(&watchdog_mutex); return err; @@ -1080,7 +1091,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table watchdog_s }, { .procname = "watchdog_thresh", - .data = &watchdog_thresh, + .data = &watchdog_thresh_next, .maxlen = sizeof(int), .mode = 0644, .proc_handler = proc_watchdog_thresh, _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from luogengkun(a)huaweicloud.com are watchdog-fix-watchdog-may-detect-false-positive-of-softlockup.patch

6 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

+ mm-huge_memory-fix-dereferencing-invalid-pmd-migration-entry.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch

by Andrew Morton

The patch titled Subject: mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is mm-huge_memory-fix-dereferencing-invalid-pmd-migration-entry.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patche… This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm and is updated there every 2-3 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Subject: mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:35:36 +0800 When migrating a THP, concurrent access to the PMD migration entry during a deferred split scan can lead to an invalid address access, as illustrated below. To prevent this invalid access, it is necessary to check the PMD migration entry and return early. In this context, there is no need to use pmd_to_swp_entry and pfn_swap_entry_to_page to verify the equality of the target folio. Since the PMD migration entry is locked, it cannot be served as the target. Mailing list discussion and explanation from Hugh Dickins: "An anon_vma lookup points to a location which may contain the folio of interest, but might instead contain another folio: and weeding out those other folios is precisely what the "folio != pmd_folio((*pmd)" check (and the "risk of replacing the wrong folio" comment a few lines above it) is for." BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffea60001db008 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2199114 Comm: tee Not tainted 6.14.0+ #4 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:split_huge_pmd_locked+0x3b5/0x2b60 Call Trace: <TASK> try_to_migrate_one+0x28c/0x3730 rmap_walk_anon+0x4f6/0x770 unmap_folio+0x196/0x1f0 split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x9f6/0x1560 deferred_split_scan+0xac5/0x12a0 shrinker_debugfs_scan_write+0x376/0x470 full_proxy_write+0x15c/0x220 vfs_write+0x2fc/0xcb0 ksys_write+0x146/0x250 do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The bug is found by syzkaller on an internal kernel, then confirmed on upstream. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250421113536.3682201-1-gavinguo@igalia.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250414072737.1698513-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250418085802.2973519-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ Fixes: 84c3fc4e9c56 ("mm: thp: check pmd migration entry in common path") Signed-off-by: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan(a)redhat.com> Cc: Florent Revest <revest(a)google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> --- mm/huge_memory.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/mm/huge_memory.c~mm-huge_memory-fix-dereferencing-invalid-pmd-migration-entry +++ a/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3075,6 +3075,8 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(stru void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) { + bool pmd_migration = is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd); + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio)); @@ -3085,9 +3087,12 @@ void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_are * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio. */ - if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || - is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) { - if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd)) + if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || pmd_migration) { + /* + * Do not apply pmd_folio() to a migration entry; and folio lock + * guarantees that it must be of the wrong folio anyway. + */ + if (folio && (pmd_migration || folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))) return; __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze); } _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from gavinguo(a)igalia.com are mm-huge_memory-fix-dereferencing-invalid-pmd-migration-entry.patch

6 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: restrict the hw sched jobs upper bound

by Alexey Nepomnyashih

The amdgpu_sched_hw_submission parameter controls the number of hardware jobs that can be scheduled concurrently per ring. This value is later multiplied by ring->max_dw to compute buffer offsets or command patch regions. If amdgpu_sched_hw_submission is set too high (by user input via module parameter), the multiplication can overflow, resulting in corrupted memory offsets or ring buffer overflows. Clamp amdgpu_sched_hw_submission to a practical upper bound (e.g. 2^16) to prevent arithmetic overflow when computing ring buffer offsets during initialization, especially in jpeg_v1_0_start(). Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v5.9+ Fixes: 5d5bd5e32e6e ("drm/amdgpu: restrict the hw sched jobs number to power of two") Signed-off-by: Alexey Nepomnyashih <sdl(a)nppct.ru> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c index 018dfccd771b..69217a021b0e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c @@ -2056,6 +2056,10 @@ static int amdgpu_device_check_arguments(struct amdgpu_device *adev) dev_warn(adev->dev, "sched hw submission jobs (%d) must be at least 2\n", amdgpu_sched_hw_submission); amdgpu_sched_hw_submission = 2; + } else if (amdgpu_sched_hw_submission > 65536) { + dev_warn(adev->dev, "sched hw submission jobs (%d) is too large\n", + amdgpu_sched_hw_submission); + amdgpu_sched_hw_submission = 65536; } else if (!is_power_of_2(amdgpu_sched_hw_submission)) { dev_warn(adev->dev, "sched hw submission jobs (%d) must be a power of 2\n", amdgpu_sched_hw_submission); -- 2.43.0

6 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v2] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry

by Gavin Guo

When migrating a THP, concurrent access to the PMD migration entry during a deferred split scan can lead to a invalid address access, as illustrated below. To prevent this page fault, it is necessary to check the PMD migration entry and return early. In this context, there is no need to use pmd_to_swp_entry and pfn_swap_entry_to_page to verify the equality of the target folio. Since the PMD migration entry is locked, it cannot be served as the target. Mailing list discussion and explanation from Hugh Dickins: "An anon_vma lookup points to a location which may contain the folio of interest, but might instead contain another folio: and weeding out those other folios is precisely what the "folio != pmd_folio((*pmd)" check (and the "risk of replacing the wrong folio" comment a few lines above it) is for." BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffea60001db008 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2199114 Comm: tee Not tainted 6.14.0+ #4 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:split_huge_pmd_locked+0x3b5/0x2b60 Call Trace: <TASK> try_to_migrate_one+0x28c/0x3730 rmap_walk_anon+0x4f6/0x770 unmap_folio+0x196/0x1f0 split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x9f6/0x1560 deferred_split_scan+0xac5/0x12a0 shrinker_debugfs_scan_write+0x376/0x470 full_proxy_write+0x15c/0x220 vfs_write+0x2fc/0xcb0 ksys_write+0x146/0x250 do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The bug is found by syzkaller on an internal kernel, then confirmed on upstream. Fixes: 84c3fc4e9c56 ("mm: thp: check pmd migration entry in common path") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250414072737.1698513-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ --- V1 -> V2: Add explanation from Hugh and correct the wording from page fault to invalid address access. mm/huge_memory.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index 2a47682d1ab7..0cb9547dcff2 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3075,6 +3075,8 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) { + bool pmd_migration = is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd); + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio)); @@ -3085,10 +3087,18 @@ void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio. */ - if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || - is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) { - if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd)) - return; + if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || pmd_migration) { + if (folio) { + /* + * Do not apply pmd_folio() to a migration entry; and + * folio lock guarantees that it must be of the wrong + * folio anyway. + */ + if (pmd_migration) + return; + if (folio != pmd_folio(*pmd)) + return; + } __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze); } } base-commit: a24588245776dafc227243a01bfbeb8a59bafba9 -- 2.43.0

6 months, 1 week

4
6
0 0

[PATCH] iio: adis16201: Correct inclinometer channel resolution

by Gabriel Shahrouzi

The inclinometer channels were previously defined with 14 realbits. However, the ADIS16201 datasheet states the resolution for these output channels is 12 bits (Page 14, text description; Page 15, table 7). Correct the realbits value to 12 to accurately reflect the hardware. Fixes: f7fe1d1dd5a5 ("staging: iio: new adis16201 driver") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Gabriel Shahrouzi <gshahrouzi(a)gmail.com> --- drivers/iio/accel/adis16201.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adis16201.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adis16201.c index 982b33f6eccac..dcc8d9f2ee0f1 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adis16201.c +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adis16201.c @@ -211,9 +211,9 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec adis16201_channels[] = { BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS), 0, 14), ADIS_AUX_ADC_CHAN(ADIS16201_AUX_ADC_REG, ADIS16201_SCAN_AUX_ADC, 0, 12), ADIS_INCLI_CHAN(X, ADIS16201_XINCL_OUT_REG, ADIS16201_SCAN_INCLI_X, - BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS), 0, 14), + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS), 0, 12), ADIS_INCLI_CHAN(Y, ADIS16201_YINCL_OUT_REG, ADIS16201_SCAN_INCLI_Y, - BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS), 0, 14), + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS), 0, 12), IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(7) }; -- 2.43.0

6 months, 1 week

3
7
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Don't clear perf metrics overflow bit" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x a5f5e1238f4ff919816f69e77d2537a48911767b # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025042128-politely-progress-0891@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From a5f5e1238f4ff919816f69e77d2537a48911767b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi(a)linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:41:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Don't clear perf metrics overflow bit unconditionally The below code would always unconditionally clear other status bits like perf metrics overflow bit once PEBS buffer overflows: status &= intel_ctrl | GLOBAL_STATUS_TRACE_TOPAPMI; This is incorrect. Perf metrics overflow bit should be cleared only when fixed counter 3 in PEBS counter group. Otherwise perf metrics overflow could be missed to handle. Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250225110012.GK31462@noisy.programming.kicks-… Fixes: 7b2c05a15d29 ("perf/x86/intel: Generic support for hardware TopDown metrics") Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz(a)infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250415104135.318169-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c index 09d2d66c9f21..2b70a3adde2f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c @@ -3049,7 +3049,6 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status) struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events); int bit; int handled = 0; - u64 intel_ctrl = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, intel_ctrl); inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs); @@ -3093,7 +3092,6 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status) handled++; x86_pmu_handle_guest_pebs(regs, &data); static_call(x86_pmu_drain_pebs)(regs, &data); - status &= intel_ctrl | GLOBAL_STATUS_TRACE_TOPAPMI; /* * PMI throttle may be triggered, which stops the PEBS event. @@ -3104,6 +3102,15 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status) */ if (pebs_enabled != cpuc->pebs_enabled) wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, cpuc->pebs_enabled); + + /* + * Above PEBS handler (PEBS counters snapshotting) has updated fixed + * counter 3 and perf metrics counts if they are in counter group, + * unnecessary to update again. + */ + if (cpuc->events[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_SLOTS] && + is_pebs_counter_event_group(cpuc->events[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_SLOTS])) + status &= ~GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT; } /* @@ -3123,6 +3130,8 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status) static_call(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event)(NULL, NULL); } + status &= hybrid(cpuc->pmu, intel_ctrl); + /* * Checkpointed counters can lead to 'spurious' PMIs because the * rollback caused by the PMI will have cleared the overflow status

6 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Don't clear perf metrics overflow bit" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x a5f5e1238f4ff919816f69e77d2537a48911767b # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025042127-renewal-corporal-ca23@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From a5f5e1238f4ff919816f69e77d2537a48911767b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi(a)linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:41:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Don't clear perf metrics overflow bit unconditionally The below code would always unconditionally clear other status bits like perf metrics overflow bit once PEBS buffer overflows: status &= intel_ctrl | GLOBAL_STATUS_TRACE_TOPAPMI; This is incorrect. Perf metrics overflow bit should be cleared only when fixed counter 3 in PEBS counter group. Otherwise perf metrics overflow could be missed to handle. Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250225110012.GK31462@noisy.programming.kicks-… Fixes: 7b2c05a15d29 ("perf/x86/intel: Generic support for hardware TopDown metrics") Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz(a)infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250415104135.318169-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c index 09d2d66c9f21..2b70a3adde2f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c @@ -3049,7 +3049,6 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status) struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events); int bit; int handled = 0; - u64 intel_ctrl = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, intel_ctrl); inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs); @@ -3093,7 +3092,6 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status) handled++; x86_pmu_handle_guest_pebs(regs, &data); static_call(x86_pmu_drain_pebs)(regs, &data); - status &= intel_ctrl | GLOBAL_STATUS_TRACE_TOPAPMI; /* * PMI throttle may be triggered, which stops the PEBS event. @@ -3104,6 +3102,15 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status) */ if (pebs_enabled != cpuc->pebs_enabled) wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, cpuc->pebs_enabled); + + /* + * Above PEBS handler (PEBS counters snapshotting) has updated fixed + * counter 3 and perf metrics counts if they are in counter group, + * unnecessary to update again. + */ + if (cpuc->events[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_SLOTS] && + is_pebs_counter_event_group(cpuc->events[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_SLOTS])) + status &= ~GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT; } /* @@ -3123,6 +3130,8 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status) static_call(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event)(NULL, NULL); } + status &= hybrid(cpuc->pmu, intel_ctrl); + /* * Checkpointed counters can lead to 'spurious' PMIs because the * rollback caused by the PMI will have cleared the overflow status

6 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror April 2025