March 2025 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/hugetlb: wait for hugetlb folios to be freed" failed to apply to 6.13-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.13-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.13.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 67bab13307c83fb742c2556b06cdc39dbad27f07 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030902-guidance-kung-0573@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.13.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 67bab13307c83fb742c2556b06cdc39dbad27f07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ge Yang <yangge1116(a)126.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:46:44 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: wait for hugetlb folios to be freed Since the introduction of commit c77c0a8ac4c52 ("mm/hugetlb: defer freeing of huge pages if in non-task context"), which supports deferring the freeing of hugetlb pages, the allocation of contiguous memory through cma_alloc() may fail probabilistically. In the CMA allocation process, if it is found that the CMA area is occupied by in-use hugetlb folios, these in-use hugetlb folios need to be migrated to another location. When there are no available hugetlb folios in the free hugetlb pool during the migration of in-use hugetlb folios, new folios are allocated from the buddy system. A temporary state is set on the newly allocated folio. Upon completion of the hugetlb folio migration, the temporary state is transferred from the new folios to the old folios. Normally, when the old folios with the temporary state are freed, it is directly released back to the buddy system. However, due to the deferred freeing of hugetlb pages, the PageBuddy() check fails, ultimately leading to the failure of cma_alloc(). Here is a simplified call trace illustrating the process: cma_alloc() ->__alloc_contig_migrate_range() // Migrate in-use hugetlb folios ->unmap_and_move_huge_page() ->folio_putback_hugetlb() // Free old folios ->test_pages_isolated() ->__test_page_isolated_in_pageblock() ->PageBuddy(page) // Check if the page is in buddy To resolve this issue, we have implemented a function named wait_for_freed_hugetlb_folios(). This function ensures that the hugetlb folios are properly released back to the buddy system after their migration is completed. By invoking wait_for_freed_hugetlb_folios() before calling PageBuddy(), we ensure that PageBuddy() will succeed. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1739936804-18199-1-git-send-email-yangge1116@126.… Fixes: c77c0a8ac4c5 ("mm/hugetlb: defer freeing of huge pages if in non-task context") Signed-off-by: Ge Yang <yangge1116(a)126.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Barry Song <21cnbao(a)gmail.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador(a)suse.de> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h index ec8c0ccc8f95..dbe76d4f1bfc 100644 --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h @@ -682,6 +682,7 @@ struct huge_bootmem_page { int isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *list); int replace_free_hugepage_folios(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn); +void wait_for_freed_hugetlb_folios(void); struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, bool cow_from_owner); struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio_nodemask(struct hstate *h, int preferred_nid, @@ -1066,6 +1067,10 @@ static inline int replace_free_hugepage_folios(unsigned long start_pfn, return 0; } +static inline void wait_for_freed_hugetlb_folios(void) +{ +} + static inline struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, bool cow_from_owner) diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 163190e89ea1..811b29f77abf 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -2943,6 +2943,14 @@ int replace_free_hugepage_folios(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) return ret; } +void wait_for_freed_hugetlb_folios(void) +{ + if (llist_empty(&hpage_freelist)) + return; + + flush_work(&free_hpage_work); +} + typedef enum { /* * For either 0/1: we checked the per-vma resv map, and one resv diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c index c608e9d72865..a051a29e95ad 100644 --- a/mm/page_isolation.c +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c @@ -607,6 +607,16 @@ int test_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn, struct zone *zone; int ret; + /* + * Due to the deferred freeing of hugetlb folios, the hugepage folios may + * not immediately release to the buddy system. This can cause PageBuddy() + * to fail in __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(). To ensure that the + * hugetlb folios are properly released back to the buddy system, we + * invoke the wait_for_freed_hugetlb_folios() function to wait for the + * release to complete. + */ + wait_for_freed_hugetlb_folios(); + /* * Note: pageblock_nr_pages != MAX_PAGE_ORDER. Then, chunks of free * pages are not aligned to pageblock_nr_pages.

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: shmem: fix potential data corruption during shmem swapin" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 058313515d5aab10d0a01dd634f92ed4a4e71d4c # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030954-polish-overeater-d2be@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 058313515d5aab10d0a01dd634f92ed4a4e71d4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:52:55 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm: shmem: fix potential data corruption during shmem swapin Alex and Kairui reported some issues (system hang or data corruption) when swapping out or swapping in large shmem folios. This is especially easy to reproduce when the tmpfs is mount with the 'huge=within_size' parameter. Thanks to Kairui's reproducer, the issue can be easily replicated. The root cause of the problem is that swap readahead may asynchronously swap in order 0 folios into the swap cache, while the shmem mapping can still store large swap entries. Then an order 0 folio is inserted into the shmem mapping without splitting the large swap entry, which overwrites the original large swap entry, leading to data corruption. When getting a folio from the swap cache, we should split the large swap entry stored in the shmem mapping if the orders do not match, to fix this issue. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2fe47c557e74e9df5fe2437ccdc6c9115fa1bf70.17404769… Fixes: 809bc86517cc ("mm: shmem: support large folio swap out") Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com> Reported-by: Alex Xu (Hello71) <alex_y_xu(a)yahoo.ca> Reported-by: Kairui Song <ryncsn(a)gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1738717785.im3r5g2vxc.none@localhost/ Tested-by: Kairui Song <kasong(a)tencent.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Cc: Lance Yang <ioworker0(a)gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcow <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index 4ea6109a8043..cebbac97a221 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -2253,7 +2253,7 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, struct folio *folio = NULL; bool skip_swapcache = false; swp_entry_t swap; - int error, nr_pages; + int error, nr_pages, order, split_order; VM_BUG_ON(!*foliop || !xa_is_value(*foliop)); swap = radix_to_swp_entry(*foliop); @@ -2272,10 +2272,9 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, /* Look it up and read it in.. */ folio = swap_cache_get_folio(swap, NULL, 0); + order = xa_get_order(&mapping->i_pages, index); if (!folio) { - int order = xa_get_order(&mapping->i_pages, index); bool fallback_order0 = false; - int split_order; /* Or update major stats only when swapin succeeds?? */ if (fault_type) { @@ -2339,6 +2338,29 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, error = -ENOMEM; goto failed; } + } else if (order != folio_order(folio)) { + /* + * Swap readahead may swap in order 0 folios into swapcache + * asynchronously, while the shmem mapping can still stores + * large swap entries. In such cases, we should split the + * large swap entry to prevent possible data corruption. + */ + split_order = shmem_split_large_entry(inode, index, swap, gfp); + if (split_order < 0) { + error = split_order; + goto failed; + } + + /* + * If the large swap entry has already been split, it is + * necessary to recalculate the new swap entry based on + * the old order alignment. + */ + if (split_order > 0) { + pgoff_t offset = index - round_down(index, 1 << split_order); + + swap = swp_entry(swp_type(swap), swp_offset(swap) + offset); + } } alloced: @@ -2346,7 +2368,8 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, folio_lock(folio); if ((!skip_swapcache && !folio_test_swapcache(folio)) || folio->swap.val != swap.val || - !shmem_confirm_swap(mapping, index, swap)) { + !shmem_confirm_swap(mapping, index, swap) || + xa_get_order(&mapping->i_pages, index) != folio_order(folio)) { error = -EEXIST; goto unlock; }

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: shmem: fix potential data corruption during shmem swapin" failed to apply to 6.13-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.13-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.13.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 058313515d5aab10d0a01dd634f92ed4a4e71d4c # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030953-alkalize-eardrum-de40@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.13.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 058313515d5aab10d0a01dd634f92ed4a4e71d4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:52:55 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm: shmem: fix potential data corruption during shmem swapin Alex and Kairui reported some issues (system hang or data corruption) when swapping out or swapping in large shmem folios. This is especially easy to reproduce when the tmpfs is mount with the 'huge=within_size' parameter. Thanks to Kairui's reproducer, the issue can be easily replicated. The root cause of the problem is that swap readahead may asynchronously swap in order 0 folios into the swap cache, while the shmem mapping can still store large swap entries. Then an order 0 folio is inserted into the shmem mapping without splitting the large swap entry, which overwrites the original large swap entry, leading to data corruption. When getting a folio from the swap cache, we should split the large swap entry stored in the shmem mapping if the orders do not match, to fix this issue. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2fe47c557e74e9df5fe2437ccdc6c9115fa1bf70.17404769… Fixes: 809bc86517cc ("mm: shmem: support large folio swap out") Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com> Reported-by: Alex Xu (Hello71) <alex_y_xu(a)yahoo.ca> Reported-by: Kairui Song <ryncsn(a)gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1738717785.im3r5g2vxc.none@localhost/ Tested-by: Kairui Song <kasong(a)tencent.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Cc: Lance Yang <ioworker0(a)gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcow <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index 4ea6109a8043..cebbac97a221 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -2253,7 +2253,7 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, struct folio *folio = NULL; bool skip_swapcache = false; swp_entry_t swap; - int error, nr_pages; + int error, nr_pages, order, split_order; VM_BUG_ON(!*foliop || !xa_is_value(*foliop)); swap = radix_to_swp_entry(*foliop); @@ -2272,10 +2272,9 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, /* Look it up and read it in.. */ folio = swap_cache_get_folio(swap, NULL, 0); + order = xa_get_order(&mapping->i_pages, index); if (!folio) { - int order = xa_get_order(&mapping->i_pages, index); bool fallback_order0 = false; - int split_order; /* Or update major stats only when swapin succeeds?? */ if (fault_type) { @@ -2339,6 +2338,29 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, error = -ENOMEM; goto failed; } + } else if (order != folio_order(folio)) { + /* + * Swap readahead may swap in order 0 folios into swapcache + * asynchronously, while the shmem mapping can still stores + * large swap entries. In such cases, we should split the + * large swap entry to prevent possible data corruption. + */ + split_order = shmem_split_large_entry(inode, index, swap, gfp); + if (split_order < 0) { + error = split_order; + goto failed; + } + + /* + * If the large swap entry has already been split, it is + * necessary to recalculate the new swap entry based on + * the old order alignment. + */ + if (split_order > 0) { + pgoff_t offset = index - round_down(index, 1 << split_order); + + swap = swp_entry(swp_type(swap), swp_offset(swap) + offset); + } } alloced: @@ -2346,7 +2368,8 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, folio_lock(folio); if ((!skip_swapcache && !folio_test_swapcache(folio)) || folio->swap.val != swap.val || - !shmem_confirm_swap(mapping, index, swap)) { + !shmem_confirm_swap(mapping, index, swap) || + xa_get_order(&mapping->i_pages, index) != folio_order(folio)) { error = -EEXIST; goto unlock; }

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] hwpoison, memory_hotplug: lock folio before unmap hwpoisoned" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x af288a426c3e3552b62595c6138ec6371a17dbba # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030937-relax-dubbed-d185@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From af288a426c3e3552b62595c6138ec6371a17dbba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:43:29 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] hwpoison, memory_hotplug: lock folio before unmap hwpoisoned folio Commit b15c87263a69 ("hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlined) add page poison checks in do_migrate_range in order to make offline hwpoisoned page possible by introducing isolate_lru_page and try_to_unmap for hwpoisoned page. However folio lock must be held before calling try_to_unmap. Add it to fix this problem. Warning will be produced if folio is not locked during unmap: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at ./include/linux/swapops.h:400! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 411 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc1-00016-g3c434c7ee82a-dirty #41 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 40400005 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : try_to_unmap_one+0xb08/0xd3c lr : try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c Call trace: try_to_unmap_one+0xb08/0xd3c (P) try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c (L) rmap_walk_anon+0xdc/0x1f8 rmap_walk+0x3c/0x58 try_to_unmap+0x88/0x90 unmap_poisoned_folio+0x30/0xa8 do_migrate_range+0x4a0/0x568 offline_pages+0x5a4/0x670 memory_block_action+0x17c/0x374 memory_subsys_offline+0x3c/0x78 device_offline+0xa4/0xd0 state_store+0x8c/0xf0 dev_attr_store+0x18/0x2c sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x54 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8 vfs_write+0x3a8/0x4bc ksys_write+0x6c/0xf8 __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28 invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x30/0xd0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc8/0xcc el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c Code: f9407be0 b5fff320 d4210000 17ffff97 (d4210000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250217014329.3610326-4-mawupeng1@huawei.com Fixes: b15c87263a69 ("hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlined") Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi(a)gmail.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador(a)suse.de> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index a6abd8d4a09c..16cf9e17077e 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -1832,8 +1832,11 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_has_hwpoisoned(folio))) { if (WARN_ON(folio_test_lru(folio))) folio_isolate_lru(folio); - if (folio_mapped(folio)) + if (folio_mapped(folio)) { + folio_lock(folio); unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, pfn, false); + folio_unlock(folio); + } goto put_folio; }

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] hwpoison, memory_hotplug: lock folio before unmap hwpoisoned" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x af288a426c3e3552b62595c6138ec6371a17dbba # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030936-oink-rocklike-abc3@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From af288a426c3e3552b62595c6138ec6371a17dbba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:43:29 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] hwpoison, memory_hotplug: lock folio before unmap hwpoisoned folio Commit b15c87263a69 ("hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlined) add page poison checks in do_migrate_range in order to make offline hwpoisoned page possible by introducing isolate_lru_page and try_to_unmap for hwpoisoned page. However folio lock must be held before calling try_to_unmap. Add it to fix this problem. Warning will be produced if folio is not locked during unmap: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at ./include/linux/swapops.h:400! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 411 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc1-00016-g3c434c7ee82a-dirty #41 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 40400005 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : try_to_unmap_one+0xb08/0xd3c lr : try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c Call trace: try_to_unmap_one+0xb08/0xd3c (P) try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c (L) rmap_walk_anon+0xdc/0x1f8 rmap_walk+0x3c/0x58 try_to_unmap+0x88/0x90 unmap_poisoned_folio+0x30/0xa8 do_migrate_range+0x4a0/0x568 offline_pages+0x5a4/0x670 memory_block_action+0x17c/0x374 memory_subsys_offline+0x3c/0x78 device_offline+0xa4/0xd0 state_store+0x8c/0xf0 dev_attr_store+0x18/0x2c sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x54 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8 vfs_write+0x3a8/0x4bc ksys_write+0x6c/0xf8 __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28 invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x30/0xd0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc8/0xcc el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c Code: f9407be0 b5fff320 d4210000 17ffff97 (d4210000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250217014329.3610326-4-mawupeng1@huawei.com Fixes: b15c87263a69 ("hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlined") Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi(a)gmail.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador(a)suse.de> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index a6abd8d4a09c..16cf9e17077e 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -1832,8 +1832,11 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_has_hwpoisoned(folio))) { if (WARN_ON(folio_test_lru(folio))) folio_isolate_lru(folio); - if (folio_mapped(folio)) + if (folio_mapped(folio)) { + folio_lock(folio); unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, pfn, false); + folio_unlock(folio); + } goto put_folio; }

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] hwpoison, memory_hotplug: lock folio before unmap hwpoisoned" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x af288a426c3e3552b62595c6138ec6371a17dbba # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030935-pasted-diner-95df@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From af288a426c3e3552b62595c6138ec6371a17dbba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:43:29 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] hwpoison, memory_hotplug: lock folio before unmap hwpoisoned folio Commit b15c87263a69 ("hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlined) add page poison checks in do_migrate_range in order to make offline hwpoisoned page possible by introducing isolate_lru_page and try_to_unmap for hwpoisoned page. However folio lock must be held before calling try_to_unmap. Add it to fix this problem. Warning will be produced if folio is not locked during unmap: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at ./include/linux/swapops.h:400! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 411 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc1-00016-g3c434c7ee82a-dirty #41 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 40400005 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : try_to_unmap_one+0xb08/0xd3c lr : try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c Call trace: try_to_unmap_one+0xb08/0xd3c (P) try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c (L) rmap_walk_anon+0xdc/0x1f8 rmap_walk+0x3c/0x58 try_to_unmap+0x88/0x90 unmap_poisoned_folio+0x30/0xa8 do_migrate_range+0x4a0/0x568 offline_pages+0x5a4/0x670 memory_block_action+0x17c/0x374 memory_subsys_offline+0x3c/0x78 device_offline+0xa4/0xd0 state_store+0x8c/0xf0 dev_attr_store+0x18/0x2c sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x54 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8 vfs_write+0x3a8/0x4bc ksys_write+0x6c/0xf8 __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28 invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x30/0xd0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc8/0xcc el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c Code: f9407be0 b5fff320 d4210000 17ffff97 (d4210000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250217014329.3610326-4-mawupeng1@huawei.com Fixes: b15c87263a69 ("hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlined") Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi(a)gmail.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador(a)suse.de> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index a6abd8d4a09c..16cf9e17077e 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -1832,8 +1832,11 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_has_hwpoisoned(folio))) { if (WARN_ON(folio_test_lru(folio))) folio_isolate_lru(folio); - if (folio_mapped(folio)) + if (folio_mapped(folio)) { + folio_lock(folio); unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, pfn, false); + folio_unlock(folio); + } goto put_folio; }

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] hwpoison, memory_hotplug: lock folio before unmap hwpoisoned" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x af288a426c3e3552b62595c6138ec6371a17dbba # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030934-clock-preview-4a7a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From af288a426c3e3552b62595c6138ec6371a17dbba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:43:29 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] hwpoison, memory_hotplug: lock folio before unmap hwpoisoned folio Commit b15c87263a69 ("hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlined) add page poison checks in do_migrate_range in order to make offline hwpoisoned page possible by introducing isolate_lru_page and try_to_unmap for hwpoisoned page. However folio lock must be held before calling try_to_unmap. Add it to fix this problem. Warning will be produced if folio is not locked during unmap: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at ./include/linux/swapops.h:400! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 411 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc1-00016-g3c434c7ee82a-dirty #41 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 40400005 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : try_to_unmap_one+0xb08/0xd3c lr : try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c Call trace: try_to_unmap_one+0xb08/0xd3c (P) try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c (L) rmap_walk_anon+0xdc/0x1f8 rmap_walk+0x3c/0x58 try_to_unmap+0x88/0x90 unmap_poisoned_folio+0x30/0xa8 do_migrate_range+0x4a0/0x568 offline_pages+0x5a4/0x670 memory_block_action+0x17c/0x374 memory_subsys_offline+0x3c/0x78 device_offline+0xa4/0xd0 state_store+0x8c/0xf0 dev_attr_store+0x18/0x2c sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x54 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8 vfs_write+0x3a8/0x4bc ksys_write+0x6c/0xf8 __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28 invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x30/0xd0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc8/0xcc el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c Code: f9407be0 b5fff320 d4210000 17ffff97 (d4210000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250217014329.3610326-4-mawupeng1@huawei.com Fixes: b15c87263a69 ("hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlined") Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi(a)gmail.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador(a)suse.de> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index a6abd8d4a09c..16cf9e17077e 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -1832,8 +1832,11 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_has_hwpoisoned(folio))) { if (WARN_ON(folio_test_lru(folio))) folio_isolate_lru(folio); - if (folio_mapped(folio)) + if (folio_mapped(folio)) { + folio_lock(folio); unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, pfn, false); + folio_unlock(folio); + } goto put_folio; }

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] hwpoison, memory_hotplug: lock folio before unmap hwpoisoned" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x af288a426c3e3552b62595c6138ec6371a17dbba # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030928-lukewarm-cranberry-950f@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From af288a426c3e3552b62595c6138ec6371a17dbba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:43:29 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] hwpoison, memory_hotplug: lock folio before unmap hwpoisoned folio Commit b15c87263a69 ("hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlined) add page poison checks in do_migrate_range in order to make offline hwpoisoned page possible by introducing isolate_lru_page and try_to_unmap for hwpoisoned page. However folio lock must be held before calling try_to_unmap. Add it to fix this problem. Warning will be produced if folio is not locked during unmap: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at ./include/linux/swapops.h:400! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 411 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc1-00016-g3c434c7ee82a-dirty #41 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 40400005 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : try_to_unmap_one+0xb08/0xd3c lr : try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c Call trace: try_to_unmap_one+0xb08/0xd3c (P) try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c (L) rmap_walk_anon+0xdc/0x1f8 rmap_walk+0x3c/0x58 try_to_unmap+0x88/0x90 unmap_poisoned_folio+0x30/0xa8 do_migrate_range+0x4a0/0x568 offline_pages+0x5a4/0x670 memory_block_action+0x17c/0x374 memory_subsys_offline+0x3c/0x78 device_offline+0xa4/0xd0 state_store+0x8c/0xf0 dev_attr_store+0x18/0x2c sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x54 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8 vfs_write+0x3a8/0x4bc ksys_write+0x6c/0xf8 __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28 invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x30/0xd0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc8/0xcc el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c Code: f9407be0 b5fff320 d4210000 17ffff97 (d4210000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250217014329.3610326-4-mawupeng1@huawei.com Fixes: b15c87263a69 ("hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlined") Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi(a)gmail.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador(a)suse.de> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index a6abd8d4a09c..16cf9e17077e 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -1832,8 +1832,11 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_has_hwpoisoned(folio))) { if (WARN_ON(folio_test_lru(folio))) folio_isolate_lru(folio); - if (folio_mapped(folio)) + if (folio_mapped(folio)) { + folio_lock(folio); unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, pfn, false); + folio_unlock(folio); + } goto put_folio; }

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: memory-failure: update ttu flag inside" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x b81679b1633aa43c0d973adfa816d78c1ed0d032 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030932-mystify-finicky-bf5c@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From b81679b1633aa43c0d973adfa816d78c1ed0d032 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:43:27 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm: memory-failure: update ttu flag inside unmap_poisoned_folio Patch series "mm: memory_failure: unmap poisoned folio during migrate properly", v3. Fix two bugs during folio migration if the folio is poisoned. This patch (of 3): Commit 6da6b1d4a7df ("mm/hwpoison: convert TTU_IGNORE_HWPOISON to TTU_HWPOISON") introduce TTU_HWPOISON to replace TTU_IGNORE_HWPOISON in order to stop send SIGBUS signal when accessing an error page after a memory error on a clean folio. However during page migration, anon folio must be set with TTU_HWPOISON during unmap_*(). For pagecache we need some policy just like the one in hwpoison_user_mappings to set this flag. So move this policy from hwpoison_user_mappings to unmap_poisoned_folio to handle this warning properly. Warning will be produced during unamp poison folio with the following log: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 365 at mm/rmap.c:1847 try_to_unmap_one+0x8fc/0xd3c Modules linked in: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 365 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc1-00018-gacdb4bbda7ab #42 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 20400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : try_to_unmap_one+0x8fc/0xd3c lr : try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c Call trace: try_to_unmap_one+0x8fc/0xd3c (P) try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c (L) rmap_walk_anon+0xdc/0x1f8 rmap_walk+0x3c/0x58 try_to_unmap+0x88/0x90 unmap_poisoned_folio+0x30/0xa8 do_migrate_range+0x4a0/0x568 offline_pages+0x5a4/0x670 memory_block_action+0x17c/0x374 memory_subsys_offline+0x3c/0x78 device_offline+0xa4/0xd0 state_store+0x8c/0xf0 dev_attr_store+0x18/0x2c sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x54 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8 vfs_write+0x3a8/0x4bc ksys_write+0x6c/0xf8 __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28 invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x30/0xd0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc8/0xcc el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [mawupeng1(a)huawei.com: unmap_poisoned_folio(): remove shadowed local `mapping', per Miaohe] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250219060653.3849083-1-mawupeng1@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250217014329.3610326-1-mawupeng1@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250217014329.3610326-2-mawupeng1@huawei.com Fixes: 6da6b1d4a7df ("mm/hwpoison: convert TTU_IGNORE_HWPOISON to TTU_HWPOISON") Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi(a)gmail.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador(a)suse.de> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 109ef30fee11..20b3535935a3 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static inline int find_next_best_node(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask) * mm/memory-failure.c */ #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE -void unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags ttu); +int unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, unsigned long pfn, bool must_kill); void shake_folio(struct folio *folio); extern int hwpoison_filter(struct page *p); @@ -1138,8 +1138,9 @@ unsigned long page_mapped_in_vma(const struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma); #else -static inline void unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags ttu) +static inline int unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, unsigned long pfn, bool must_kill) { + return -EBUSY; } #endif diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index 995a15eb67e2..327e02fdc029 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -1556,11 +1556,35 @@ static int get_hwpoison_page(struct page *p, unsigned long flags) return ret; } -void unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags ttu) +int unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, unsigned long pfn, bool must_kill) { - if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio) && !folio_test_anon(folio)) { - struct address_space *mapping; + enum ttu_flags ttu = TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK | TTU_SYNC | TTU_HWPOISON; + struct address_space *mapping; + if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) { + pr_err("%#lx: keeping poisoned page in swap cache\n", pfn); + ttu &= ~TTU_HWPOISON; + } + + /* + * Propagate the dirty bit from PTEs to struct page first, because we + * need this to decide if we should kill or just drop the page. + * XXX: the dirty test could be racy: set_page_dirty() may not always + * be called inside page lock (it's recommended but not enforced). + */ + mapping = folio_mapping(folio); + if (!must_kill && !folio_test_dirty(folio) && mapping && + mapping_can_writeback(mapping)) { + if (folio_mkclean(folio)) { + folio_set_dirty(folio); + } else { + ttu &= ~TTU_HWPOISON; + pr_info("%#lx: corrupted page was clean: dropped without side effects\n", + pfn); + } + } + + if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio) && !folio_test_anon(folio)) { /* * For hugetlb folios in shared mappings, try_to_unmap * could potentially call huge_pmd_unshare. Because of @@ -1572,7 +1596,7 @@ void unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags ttu) if (!mapping) { pr_info("%#lx: could not lock mapping for mapped hugetlb folio\n", folio_pfn(folio)); - return; + return -EBUSY; } try_to_unmap(folio, ttu|TTU_RMAP_LOCKED); @@ -1580,6 +1604,8 @@ void unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags ttu) } else { try_to_unmap(folio, ttu); } + + return folio_mapped(folio) ? -EBUSY : 0; } /* @@ -1589,8 +1615,6 @@ void unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags ttu) static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struct folio *folio, struct page *p, unsigned long pfn, int flags) { - enum ttu_flags ttu = TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK | TTU_SYNC | TTU_HWPOISON; - struct address_space *mapping; LIST_HEAD(tokill); bool unmap_success; int forcekill; @@ -1613,29 +1637,6 @@ static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struct folio *folio, struct page *p, if (!folio_mapped(folio)) return true; - if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) { - pr_err("%#lx: keeping poisoned page in swap cache\n", pfn); - ttu &= ~TTU_HWPOISON; - } - - /* - * Propagate the dirty bit from PTEs to struct page first, because we - * need this to decide if we should kill or just drop the page. - * XXX: the dirty test could be racy: set_page_dirty() may not always - * be called inside page lock (it's recommended but not enforced). - */ - mapping = folio_mapping(folio); - if (!(flags & MF_MUST_KILL) && !folio_test_dirty(folio) && mapping && - mapping_can_writeback(mapping)) { - if (folio_mkclean(folio)) { - folio_set_dirty(folio); - } else { - ttu &= ~TTU_HWPOISON; - pr_info("%#lx: corrupted page was clean: dropped without side effects\n", - pfn); - } - } - /* * First collect all the processes that have the page * mapped in dirty form. This has to be done before try_to_unmap, @@ -1643,9 +1644,7 @@ static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struct folio *folio, struct page *p, */ collect_procs(folio, p, &tokill, flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED); - unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, ttu); - - unmap_success = !folio_mapped(folio); + unmap_success = !unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, pfn, flags & MF_MUST_KILL); if (!unmap_success) pr_err("%#lx: failed to unmap page (folio mapcount=%d)\n", pfn, folio_mapcount(folio)); diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index e3655f07dd6e..e7e47838fd49 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -1833,7 +1833,8 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) if (WARN_ON(folio_test_lru(folio))) folio_isolate_lru(folio); if (folio_mapped(folio)) - unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK); + unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, pfn, false); + continue; }

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: memory-failure: update ttu flag inside" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x b81679b1633aa43c0d973adfa816d78c1ed0d032 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030931-doornail-culinary-ca50@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From b81679b1633aa43c0d973adfa816d78c1ed0d032 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:43:27 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm: memory-failure: update ttu flag inside unmap_poisoned_folio Patch series "mm: memory_failure: unmap poisoned folio during migrate properly", v3. Fix two bugs during folio migration if the folio is poisoned. This patch (of 3): Commit 6da6b1d4a7df ("mm/hwpoison: convert TTU_IGNORE_HWPOISON to TTU_HWPOISON") introduce TTU_HWPOISON to replace TTU_IGNORE_HWPOISON in order to stop send SIGBUS signal when accessing an error page after a memory error on a clean folio. However during page migration, anon folio must be set with TTU_HWPOISON during unmap_*(). For pagecache we need some policy just like the one in hwpoison_user_mappings to set this flag. So move this policy from hwpoison_user_mappings to unmap_poisoned_folio to handle this warning properly. Warning will be produced during unamp poison folio with the following log: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 365 at mm/rmap.c:1847 try_to_unmap_one+0x8fc/0xd3c Modules linked in: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 365 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc1-00018-gacdb4bbda7ab #42 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 20400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : try_to_unmap_one+0x8fc/0xd3c lr : try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c Call trace: try_to_unmap_one+0x8fc/0xd3c (P) try_to_unmap_one+0x3dc/0xd3c (L) rmap_walk_anon+0xdc/0x1f8 rmap_walk+0x3c/0x58 try_to_unmap+0x88/0x90 unmap_poisoned_folio+0x30/0xa8 do_migrate_range+0x4a0/0x568 offline_pages+0x5a4/0x670 memory_block_action+0x17c/0x374 memory_subsys_offline+0x3c/0x78 device_offline+0xa4/0xd0 state_store+0x8c/0xf0 dev_attr_store+0x18/0x2c sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x54 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8 vfs_write+0x3a8/0x4bc ksys_write+0x6c/0xf8 __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28 invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x30/0xd0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc8/0xcc el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [mawupeng1(a)huawei.com: unmap_poisoned_folio(): remove shadowed local `mapping', per Miaohe] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250219060653.3849083-1-mawupeng1@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250217014329.3610326-1-mawupeng1@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250217014329.3610326-2-mawupeng1@huawei.com Fixes: 6da6b1d4a7df ("mm/hwpoison: convert TTU_IGNORE_HWPOISON to TTU_HWPOISON") Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi(a)gmail.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador(a)suse.de> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 109ef30fee11..20b3535935a3 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static inline int find_next_best_node(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask) * mm/memory-failure.c */ #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE -void unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags ttu); +int unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, unsigned long pfn, bool must_kill); void shake_folio(struct folio *folio); extern int hwpoison_filter(struct page *p); @@ -1138,8 +1138,9 @@ unsigned long page_mapped_in_vma(const struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma); #else -static inline void unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags ttu) +static inline int unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, unsigned long pfn, bool must_kill) { + return -EBUSY; } #endif diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index 995a15eb67e2..327e02fdc029 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -1556,11 +1556,35 @@ static int get_hwpoison_page(struct page *p, unsigned long flags) return ret; } -void unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags ttu) +int unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, unsigned long pfn, bool must_kill) { - if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio) && !folio_test_anon(folio)) { - struct address_space *mapping; + enum ttu_flags ttu = TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK | TTU_SYNC | TTU_HWPOISON; + struct address_space *mapping; + if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) { + pr_err("%#lx: keeping poisoned page in swap cache\n", pfn); + ttu &= ~TTU_HWPOISON; + } + + /* + * Propagate the dirty bit from PTEs to struct page first, because we + * need this to decide if we should kill or just drop the page. + * XXX: the dirty test could be racy: set_page_dirty() may not always + * be called inside page lock (it's recommended but not enforced). + */ + mapping = folio_mapping(folio); + if (!must_kill && !folio_test_dirty(folio) && mapping && + mapping_can_writeback(mapping)) { + if (folio_mkclean(folio)) { + folio_set_dirty(folio); + } else { + ttu &= ~TTU_HWPOISON; + pr_info("%#lx: corrupted page was clean: dropped without side effects\n", + pfn); + } + } + + if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio) && !folio_test_anon(folio)) { /* * For hugetlb folios in shared mappings, try_to_unmap * could potentially call huge_pmd_unshare. Because of @@ -1572,7 +1596,7 @@ void unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags ttu) if (!mapping) { pr_info("%#lx: could not lock mapping for mapped hugetlb folio\n", folio_pfn(folio)); - return; + return -EBUSY; } try_to_unmap(folio, ttu|TTU_RMAP_LOCKED); @@ -1580,6 +1604,8 @@ void unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags ttu) } else { try_to_unmap(folio, ttu); } + + return folio_mapped(folio) ? -EBUSY : 0; } /* @@ -1589,8 +1615,6 @@ void unmap_poisoned_folio(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags ttu) static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struct folio *folio, struct page *p, unsigned long pfn, int flags) { - enum ttu_flags ttu = TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK | TTU_SYNC | TTU_HWPOISON; - struct address_space *mapping; LIST_HEAD(tokill); bool unmap_success; int forcekill; @@ -1613,29 +1637,6 @@ static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struct folio *folio, struct page *p, if (!folio_mapped(folio)) return true; - if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) { - pr_err("%#lx: keeping poisoned page in swap cache\n", pfn); - ttu &= ~TTU_HWPOISON; - } - - /* - * Propagate the dirty bit from PTEs to struct page first, because we - * need this to decide if we should kill or just drop the page. - * XXX: the dirty test could be racy: set_page_dirty() may not always - * be called inside page lock (it's recommended but not enforced). - */ - mapping = folio_mapping(folio); - if (!(flags & MF_MUST_KILL) && !folio_test_dirty(folio) && mapping && - mapping_can_writeback(mapping)) { - if (folio_mkclean(folio)) { - folio_set_dirty(folio); - } else { - ttu &= ~TTU_HWPOISON; - pr_info("%#lx: corrupted page was clean: dropped without side effects\n", - pfn); - } - } - /* * First collect all the processes that have the page * mapped in dirty form. This has to be done before try_to_unmap, @@ -1643,9 +1644,7 @@ static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struct folio *folio, struct page *p, */ collect_procs(folio, p, &tokill, flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED); - unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, ttu); - - unmap_success = !folio_mapped(folio); + unmap_success = !unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, pfn, flags & MF_MUST_KILL); if (!unmap_success) pr_err("%#lx: failed to unmap page (folio mapcount=%d)\n", pfn, folio_mapcount(folio)); diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index e3655f07dd6e..e7e47838fd49 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -1833,7 +1833,8 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) if (WARN_ON(folio_test_lru(folio))) folio_isolate_lru(folio); if (folio_mapped(folio)) - unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK); + unmap_poisoned_folio(folio, pfn, false); + continue; }

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror March 2025