February 2025 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64/sme: Move storage of reg_smidr to __cpuinfo_store_cpu()" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x d3c7c48d004f6c8d892f39b5d69884fd0fe98c81 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025021014-landscape-stencil-2aa9@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From d3c7c48d004f6c8d892f39b5d69884fd0fe98c81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 21:59:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] arm64/sme: Move storage of reg_smidr to __cpuinfo_store_cpu() In commit 892f7237b3ff ("arm64: Delay initialisation of cpuinfo_arm64::reg_{zcr,smcr}") we moved access to ZCR, SMCR and SMIDR later in the boot process in order to ensure that we don't attempt to interact with them if SVE or SME is disabled on the command line. Unfortunately when initialising the boot CPU in init_cpu_features() we work on a copy of the struct cpuinfo_arm64 for the boot CPU used only during boot, not the percpu copy used by the sysfs code. The expectation of the feature identification code was that the ID registers would be read in __cpuinfo_store_cpu() and the values not modified by init_cpu_features(). The main reason for the original change was to avoid early accesses to ZCR on practical systems that were seen shipping with SVE reported in ID registers but traps enabled at EL3 and handled as fatal errors, SME was rolled in due to the similarity with SVE. Since then we have removed the early accesses to ZCR and SMCR in commits: abef0695f9665c3d ("arm64/sve: Remove ZCR pseudo register from cpufeature code") 391208485c3ad50f ("arm64/sve: Remove SMCR pseudo register from cpufeature code") so only the SMIDR_EL1 part of the change remains. Since SMIDR_EL1 is only trapped via FEAT_IDST and not the SME trap it is less likely to be affected by similar issues, and the factors that lead to issues with SVE are less likely to apply to SME. Since we have not yet seen practical SME systems that need to use a command line override (and are only just beginning to see SME systems at all) and the ID register read is much more likely to be safe let's just store SMIDR_EL1 along with all the other ID register reads in __cpuinfo_store_cpu(). This issue wasn't apparent when testing on emulated platforms that do not report values in SMIDR_EL1. Fixes: 892f7237b3ff ("arm64: Delay initialisation of cpuinfo_arm64::reg_{zcr,smcr}") Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241217-arm64-fix-boot-cpu-smidr-v3-1-7be278a856… Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index 13de0c7af053..b105e6683571 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -1166,12 +1166,6 @@ void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info) id_aa64pfr1_sme(read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1))) { unsigned long cpacr = cpacr_save_enable_kernel_sme(); - /* - * We mask out SMPS since even if the hardware - * supports priorities the kernel does not at present - * and we block access to them. - */ - info->reg_smidr = read_cpuid(SMIDR_EL1) & ~SMIDR_EL1_SMPS; vec_init_vq_map(ARM64_VEC_SME); cpacr_restore(cpacr); @@ -1422,13 +1416,6 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu, id_aa64pfr1_sme(read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1))) { unsigned long cpacr = cpacr_save_enable_kernel_sme(); - /* - * We mask out SMPS since even if the hardware - * supports priorities the kernel does not at present - * and we block access to them. - */ - info->reg_smidr = read_cpuid(SMIDR_EL1) & ~SMIDR_EL1_SMPS; - /* Probe vector lengths */ if (!system_capabilities_finalized()) vec_update_vq_map(ARM64_VEC_SME); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c index d79e88fccdfc..c45633b5ae23 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c @@ -482,6 +482,16 @@ static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info) if (id_aa64pfr0_mpam(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) info->reg_mpamidr = read_cpuid(MPAMIDR_EL1); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SME) && + id_aa64pfr1_sme(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1)) { + /* + * We mask out SMPS since even if the hardware + * supports priorities the kernel does not at present + * and we block access to them. + */ + info->reg_smidr = read_cpuid(SMIDR_EL1) & ~SMIDR_EL1_SMPS; + } + cpuinfo_detect_icache_policy(info); }

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: Filter out SVE hwcaps when FEAT_SVE isn't implemented" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 064737920bdbca86df91b96aed256e88018fef3a # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025021017-pardon-unpeeled-1e81@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 064737920bdbca86df91b96aed256e88018fef3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Zyngier <maz(a)kernel.org> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 22:59:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Filter out SVE hwcaps when FEAT_SVE isn't implemented The hwcaps code that exposes SVE features to userspace only considers ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, while this is only valid when ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE advertises that SVE is actually supported. The expectations are that when ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE is 0, the ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 register is also 0. So far, so good. Things become a bit more interesting if the HW implements SME. In this case, a few ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 fields indicate *SME* features. And these fields overlap with their SVE interpretations. But the architecture says that the SME and SVE feature sets must match, so we're still hunky-dory. This goes wrong if the HW implements SME, but not SVE. In this case, we end-up advertising some SVE features to userspace, even if the HW has none. That's because we never consider whether SVE is actually implemented. Oh well. Fix it by restricting all SVE capabilities to ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE being non-zero. The HWCAPS documentation is amended to reflect the actually checks performed by the kernel. Fixes: 06a916feca2b ("arm64: Expose SVE2 features for userspace") Reported-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas(a)arm.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland(a)arm.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250107-arm64-2024-dpisa-v5-1-7578da51fc3d@kerne… Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst index 2ff922a406ad..1a31723e79fd 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst @@ -178,22 +178,28 @@ HWCAP2_DCPODP Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.DPB == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SVE2 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEAES - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEPMULL - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0010. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SVEBITPERM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BitPerm == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BitPerm == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVESHA3 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SHA3 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SHA3 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVESM4 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SM4 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SM4 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_FLAGM2 Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1.TS == 0b0010. @@ -202,16 +208,20 @@ HWCAP2_FRINT Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.FRINTTS == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEI8MM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.I8MM == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.I8MM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEF32MM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F32MM == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F32MM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEF64MM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F64MM == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F64MM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEBF16 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_I8MM Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.I8MM == 0b0001. @@ -277,7 +287,8 @@ HWCAP2_EBF16 Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.BF16 == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SVE_EBF16 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0010. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0010. HWCAP2_CSSC Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.CSSC == 0b0001. @@ -286,7 +297,8 @@ HWCAP2_RPRFM Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.RPRFM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVE2P1 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0010. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SME2 Functionality implied by ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1.SMEver == 0b0001. @@ -313,7 +325,8 @@ HWCAP2_HBC Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.BC == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVE_B16B16 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.B16B16 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.B16B16 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_LRCPC3 Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.LRCPC == 0b0011. diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index b105e6683571..678da3ffaef9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -3008,6 +3008,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = { .matches = match, \ } +#define HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(match, reg, field, min_value, cap_type, cap) \ + { \ + __HWCAP_CAP(#cap, cap_type, cap) \ + HWCAP_CPUID_MATCH(reg, field, min_value) \ + .matches = match, \ + } + #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities ptr_auth_hwcap_addr_matches[] = { { @@ -3036,6 +3043,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities ptr_auth_hwcap_gen_matches[] = { }; #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE +static bool has_sve_feature(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap, int scope) +{ + return system_supports_sve() && has_user_cpuid_feature(cap, scope); +} +#endif + static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_elf_hwcaps[] = { HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, AES, PMULL, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_PMULL), HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, AES, AES, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_AES), @@ -3078,19 +3092,19 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_elf_hwcaps[] = { HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, AT, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_USCAT), #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, SVE, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2p1, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2P1), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEAES), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, PMULL128, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEPMULL), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BitPerm, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBITPERM), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, B16B16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_B16B16), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBF16), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, EBF16, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_EBF16), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SHA3, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESHA3), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SM4, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESM4), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, I8MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEI8MM), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F32MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF32MM), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F64MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF64MM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2p1, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2P1), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEAES), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, PMULL128, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEPMULL), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BitPerm, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBITPERM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, B16B16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_B16B16), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBF16), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, EBF16, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_EBF16), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SHA3, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESHA3), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SM4, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESM4), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, I8MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEI8MM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F32MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF32MM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F64MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF64MM), #endif #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_GCS HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, GCS, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_GCS),

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: Filter out SVE hwcaps when FEAT_SVE isn't implemented" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 064737920bdbca86df91b96aed256e88018fef3a # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025021012-straw-unsterile-169b@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 064737920bdbca86df91b96aed256e88018fef3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Zyngier <maz(a)kernel.org> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 22:59:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Filter out SVE hwcaps when FEAT_SVE isn't implemented The hwcaps code that exposes SVE features to userspace only considers ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, while this is only valid when ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE advertises that SVE is actually supported. The expectations are that when ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE is 0, the ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 register is also 0. So far, so good. Things become a bit more interesting if the HW implements SME. In this case, a few ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 fields indicate *SME* features. And these fields overlap with their SVE interpretations. But the architecture says that the SME and SVE feature sets must match, so we're still hunky-dory. This goes wrong if the HW implements SME, but not SVE. In this case, we end-up advertising some SVE features to userspace, even if the HW has none. That's because we never consider whether SVE is actually implemented. Oh well. Fix it by restricting all SVE capabilities to ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE being non-zero. The HWCAPS documentation is amended to reflect the actually checks performed by the kernel. Fixes: 06a916feca2b ("arm64: Expose SVE2 features for userspace") Reported-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas(a)arm.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland(a)arm.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250107-arm64-2024-dpisa-v5-1-7578da51fc3d@kerne… Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst index 2ff922a406ad..1a31723e79fd 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst @@ -178,22 +178,28 @@ HWCAP2_DCPODP Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.DPB == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SVE2 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEAES - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEPMULL - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0010. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SVEBITPERM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BitPerm == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BitPerm == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVESHA3 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SHA3 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SHA3 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVESM4 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SM4 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SM4 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_FLAGM2 Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1.TS == 0b0010. @@ -202,16 +208,20 @@ HWCAP2_FRINT Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.FRINTTS == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEI8MM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.I8MM == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.I8MM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEF32MM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F32MM == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F32MM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEF64MM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F64MM == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F64MM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEBF16 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_I8MM Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.I8MM == 0b0001. @@ -277,7 +287,8 @@ HWCAP2_EBF16 Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.BF16 == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SVE_EBF16 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0010. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0010. HWCAP2_CSSC Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.CSSC == 0b0001. @@ -286,7 +297,8 @@ HWCAP2_RPRFM Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.RPRFM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVE2P1 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0010. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SME2 Functionality implied by ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1.SMEver == 0b0001. @@ -313,7 +325,8 @@ HWCAP2_HBC Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.BC == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVE_B16B16 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.B16B16 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.B16B16 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_LRCPC3 Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.LRCPC == 0b0011. diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index b105e6683571..678da3ffaef9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -3008,6 +3008,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = { .matches = match, \ } +#define HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(match, reg, field, min_value, cap_type, cap) \ + { \ + __HWCAP_CAP(#cap, cap_type, cap) \ + HWCAP_CPUID_MATCH(reg, field, min_value) \ + .matches = match, \ + } + #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities ptr_auth_hwcap_addr_matches[] = { { @@ -3036,6 +3043,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities ptr_auth_hwcap_gen_matches[] = { }; #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE +static bool has_sve_feature(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap, int scope) +{ + return system_supports_sve() && has_user_cpuid_feature(cap, scope); +} +#endif + static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_elf_hwcaps[] = { HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, AES, PMULL, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_PMULL), HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, AES, AES, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_AES), @@ -3078,19 +3092,19 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_elf_hwcaps[] = { HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, AT, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_USCAT), #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, SVE, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2p1, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2P1), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEAES), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, PMULL128, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEPMULL), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BitPerm, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBITPERM), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, B16B16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_B16B16), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBF16), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, EBF16, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_EBF16), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SHA3, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESHA3), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SM4, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESM4), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, I8MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEI8MM), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F32MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF32MM), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F64MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF64MM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2p1, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2P1), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEAES), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, PMULL128, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEPMULL), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BitPerm, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBITPERM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, B16B16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_B16B16), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBF16), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, EBF16, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_EBF16), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SHA3, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESHA3), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SM4, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESM4), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, I8MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEI8MM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F32MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF32MM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F64MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF64MM), #endif #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_GCS HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, GCS, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_GCS),

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: Filter out SVE hwcaps when FEAT_SVE isn't implemented" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 064737920bdbca86df91b96aed256e88018fef3a # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025021006-unclog-unlearned-af9c@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 064737920bdbca86df91b96aed256e88018fef3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Zyngier <maz(a)kernel.org> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 22:59:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Filter out SVE hwcaps when FEAT_SVE isn't implemented The hwcaps code that exposes SVE features to userspace only considers ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, while this is only valid when ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE advertises that SVE is actually supported. The expectations are that when ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE is 0, the ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 register is also 0. So far, so good. Things become a bit more interesting if the HW implements SME. In this case, a few ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 fields indicate *SME* features. And these fields overlap with their SVE interpretations. But the architecture says that the SME and SVE feature sets must match, so we're still hunky-dory. This goes wrong if the HW implements SME, but not SVE. In this case, we end-up advertising some SVE features to userspace, even if the HW has none. That's because we never consider whether SVE is actually implemented. Oh well. Fix it by restricting all SVE capabilities to ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE being non-zero. The HWCAPS documentation is amended to reflect the actually checks performed by the kernel. Fixes: 06a916feca2b ("arm64: Expose SVE2 features for userspace") Reported-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas(a)arm.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland(a)arm.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250107-arm64-2024-dpisa-v5-1-7578da51fc3d@kerne… Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst index 2ff922a406ad..1a31723e79fd 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst @@ -178,22 +178,28 @@ HWCAP2_DCPODP Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.DPB == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SVE2 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEAES - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEPMULL - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0010. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SVEBITPERM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BitPerm == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BitPerm == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVESHA3 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SHA3 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SHA3 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVESM4 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SM4 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SM4 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_FLAGM2 Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1.TS == 0b0010. @@ -202,16 +208,20 @@ HWCAP2_FRINT Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.FRINTTS == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEI8MM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.I8MM == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.I8MM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEF32MM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F32MM == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F32MM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEF64MM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F64MM == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F64MM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEBF16 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_I8MM Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.I8MM == 0b0001. @@ -277,7 +287,8 @@ HWCAP2_EBF16 Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.BF16 == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SVE_EBF16 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0010. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0010. HWCAP2_CSSC Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.CSSC == 0b0001. @@ -286,7 +297,8 @@ HWCAP2_RPRFM Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.RPRFM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVE2P1 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0010. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SME2 Functionality implied by ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1.SMEver == 0b0001. @@ -313,7 +325,8 @@ HWCAP2_HBC Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.BC == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVE_B16B16 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.B16B16 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.B16B16 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_LRCPC3 Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.LRCPC == 0b0011. diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index b105e6683571..678da3ffaef9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -3008,6 +3008,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = { .matches = match, \ } +#define HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(match, reg, field, min_value, cap_type, cap) \ + { \ + __HWCAP_CAP(#cap, cap_type, cap) \ + HWCAP_CPUID_MATCH(reg, field, min_value) \ + .matches = match, \ + } + #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities ptr_auth_hwcap_addr_matches[] = { { @@ -3036,6 +3043,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities ptr_auth_hwcap_gen_matches[] = { }; #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE +static bool has_sve_feature(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap, int scope) +{ + return system_supports_sve() && has_user_cpuid_feature(cap, scope); +} +#endif + static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_elf_hwcaps[] = { HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, AES, PMULL, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_PMULL), HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, AES, AES, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_AES), @@ -3078,19 +3092,19 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_elf_hwcaps[] = { HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, AT, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_USCAT), #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, SVE, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2p1, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2P1), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEAES), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, PMULL128, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEPMULL), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BitPerm, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBITPERM), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, B16B16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_B16B16), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBF16), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, EBF16, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_EBF16), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SHA3, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESHA3), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SM4, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESM4), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, I8MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEI8MM), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F32MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF32MM), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F64MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF64MM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2p1, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2P1), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEAES), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, PMULL128, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEPMULL), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BitPerm, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBITPERM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, B16B16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_B16B16), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBF16), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, EBF16, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_EBF16), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SHA3, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESHA3), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SM4, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESM4), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, I8MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEI8MM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F32MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF32MM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F64MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF64MM), #endif #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_GCS HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, GCS, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_GCS),

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: Filter out SVE hwcaps when FEAT_SVE isn't implemented" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 064737920bdbca86df91b96aed256e88018fef3a # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025021005-riding-underfeed-c095@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 064737920bdbca86df91b96aed256e88018fef3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Zyngier <maz(a)kernel.org> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 22:59:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Filter out SVE hwcaps when FEAT_SVE isn't implemented The hwcaps code that exposes SVE features to userspace only considers ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, while this is only valid when ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE advertises that SVE is actually supported. The expectations are that when ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE is 0, the ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 register is also 0. So far, so good. Things become a bit more interesting if the HW implements SME. In this case, a few ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 fields indicate *SME* features. And these fields overlap with their SVE interpretations. But the architecture says that the SME and SVE feature sets must match, so we're still hunky-dory. This goes wrong if the HW implements SME, but not SVE. In this case, we end-up advertising some SVE features to userspace, even if the HW has none. That's because we never consider whether SVE is actually implemented. Oh well. Fix it by restricting all SVE capabilities to ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE being non-zero. The HWCAPS documentation is amended to reflect the actually checks performed by the kernel. Fixes: 06a916feca2b ("arm64: Expose SVE2 features for userspace") Reported-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas(a)arm.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland(a)arm.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250107-arm64-2024-dpisa-v5-1-7578da51fc3d@kerne… Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst index 2ff922a406ad..1a31723e79fd 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst @@ -178,22 +178,28 @@ HWCAP2_DCPODP Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.DPB == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SVE2 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEAES - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEPMULL - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0010. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.AES == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SVEBITPERM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BitPerm == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BitPerm == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVESHA3 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SHA3 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SHA3 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVESM4 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SM4 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SM4 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_FLAGM2 Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1.TS == 0b0010. @@ -202,16 +208,20 @@ HWCAP2_FRINT Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.FRINTTS == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEI8MM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.I8MM == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.I8MM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEF32MM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F32MM == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F32MM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEF64MM - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F64MM == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.F64MM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVEBF16 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_I8MM Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.I8MM == 0b0001. @@ -277,7 +287,8 @@ HWCAP2_EBF16 Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.BF16 == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SVE_EBF16 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0010. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.BF16 == 0b0010. HWCAP2_CSSC Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.CSSC == 0b0001. @@ -286,7 +297,8 @@ HWCAP2_RPRFM Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.RPRFM == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVE2P1 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0010. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0010. HWCAP2_SME2 Functionality implied by ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1.SMEver == 0b0001. @@ -313,7 +325,8 @@ HWCAP2_HBC Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.BC == 0b0001. HWCAP2_SVE_B16B16 - Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.B16B16 == 0b0001. + Functionality implied by ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE == 0b0001 and + ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.B16B16 == 0b0001. HWCAP2_LRCPC3 Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.LRCPC == 0b0011. diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index b105e6683571..678da3ffaef9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -3008,6 +3008,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = { .matches = match, \ } +#define HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(match, reg, field, min_value, cap_type, cap) \ + { \ + __HWCAP_CAP(#cap, cap_type, cap) \ + HWCAP_CPUID_MATCH(reg, field, min_value) \ + .matches = match, \ + } + #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities ptr_auth_hwcap_addr_matches[] = { { @@ -3036,6 +3043,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities ptr_auth_hwcap_gen_matches[] = { }; #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE +static bool has_sve_feature(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap, int scope) +{ + return system_supports_sve() && has_user_cpuid_feature(cap, scope); +} +#endif + static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_elf_hwcaps[] = { HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, AES, PMULL, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_PMULL), HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, AES, AES, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_AES), @@ -3078,19 +3092,19 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_elf_hwcaps[] = { HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, AT, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_USCAT), #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, SVE, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2p1, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2P1), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEAES), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, PMULL128, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEPMULL), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BitPerm, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBITPERM), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, B16B16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_B16B16), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBF16), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, EBF16, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_EBF16), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SHA3, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESHA3), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SM4, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESM4), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, I8MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEI8MM), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F32MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF32MM), - HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F64MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF64MM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2p1, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2P1), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SVEver, SVE2, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEAES), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, AES, PMULL128, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEPMULL), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BitPerm, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBITPERM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, B16B16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_B16B16), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEBF16), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, BF16, EBF16, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_EBF16), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SHA3, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESHA3), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, SM4, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVESM4), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, I8MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEI8MM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F32MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF32MM), + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(has_sve_feature, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, F64MM, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEF64MM), #endif #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_GCS HWCAP_CAP(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, GCS, IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_GCS),

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] spi: atmel-qspi: Memory barriers after memory-mapped I/O" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x be92ab2de0ee1a13291c3b47b2d7eb24d80c0a2c # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025021005-grain-faucet-6a4d@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From be92ab2de0ee1a13291c3b47b2d7eb24d80c0a2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Bence=20Cs=C3=B3k=C3=A1s?= <csokas.bence(a)prolan.hu> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 10:12:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] spi: atmel-qspi: Memory barriers after memory-mapped I/O MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The QSPI peripheral control and status registers are accessible via the SoC's APB bus, whereas MMIO transactions' data travels on the AHB bus. Microchip documentation and even sample code from Atmel emphasises the need for a memory barrier before the first MMIO transaction to the AHB-connected QSPI, and before the last write to its registers via APB. This is achieved by the following lines in `atmel_qspi_transfer()`: /* Dummy read of QSPI_IFR to synchronize APB and AHB accesses */ (void)atmel_qspi_read(aq, QSPI_IFR); However, the current documentation makes no mention to synchronization requirements in the other direction, i.e. after the last data written via AHB, and before the first register access on APB. In our case, we were facing an issue where the QSPI peripheral would cease to send any new CSR (nCS Rise) interrupts, leading to a timeout in `atmel_qspi_wait_for_completion()` and ultimately this panic in higher levels: ubi0 error: ubi_io_write: error -110 while writing 63108 bytes to PEB 491:128, written 63104 bytes After months of extensive research of the codebase, fiddling around the debugger with kgdb, and back-and-forth with Microchip, we came to the conclusion that the issue is probably that the peripheral is still busy receiving on AHB when the LASTXFER bit is written to its Control Register on APB, therefore this write gets lost, and the peripheral still thinks there is more data to come in the MMIO transfer. This was first formulated when we noticed that doubling the write() of QSPI_CR_LASTXFER seemed to solve the problem. Ultimately, the solution is to introduce memory barriers after the AHB-mapped MMIO transfers, to ensure ordering. Fixes: d5433def3153 ("mtd: spi-nor: atmel-quadspi: Add spi-mem support to atmel-quadspi") Cc: Hari.PrasathGE(a)microchip.com Cc: Mahesh.Abotula(a)microchip.com Cc: Marco.Cardellini(a)microchip.com Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # c0a0203cf579: ("spi: atmel-quadspi: Create `atmel_qspi_ops`"...) Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.x.y Signed-off-by: Bence Csókás <csokas.bence(a)prolan.hu> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241219091258.395187-1-csokas.bence@prolan.hu Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c index f46da363574f..8fdc9d27a95e 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c @@ -661,13 +661,20 @@ static int atmel_qspi_transfer(struct spi_mem *mem, (void)atmel_qspi_read(aq, QSPI_IFR); /* Send/Receive data */ - if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) + if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) { memcpy_fromio(op->data.buf.in, aq->mem + offset, op->data.nbytes); - else + + /* Synchronize AHB and APB accesses again */ + rmb(); + } else { memcpy_toio(aq->mem + offset, op->data.buf.out, op->data.nbytes); + /* Synchronize AHB and APB accesses again */ + wmb(); + } + /* Release the chip-select */ atmel_qspi_write(QSPI_CR_LASTXFER, aq, QSPI_CR);

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] spi: atmel-qspi: Memory barriers after memory-mapped I/O" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x be92ab2de0ee1a13291c3b47b2d7eb24d80c0a2c # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025021004-crank-detonate-a1d2@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From be92ab2de0ee1a13291c3b47b2d7eb24d80c0a2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Bence=20Cs=C3=B3k=C3=A1s?= <csokas.bence(a)prolan.hu> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 10:12:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] spi: atmel-qspi: Memory barriers after memory-mapped I/O MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The QSPI peripheral control and status registers are accessible via the SoC's APB bus, whereas MMIO transactions' data travels on the AHB bus. Microchip documentation and even sample code from Atmel emphasises the need for a memory barrier before the first MMIO transaction to the AHB-connected QSPI, and before the last write to its registers via APB. This is achieved by the following lines in `atmel_qspi_transfer()`: /* Dummy read of QSPI_IFR to synchronize APB and AHB accesses */ (void)atmel_qspi_read(aq, QSPI_IFR); However, the current documentation makes no mention to synchronization requirements in the other direction, i.e. after the last data written via AHB, and before the first register access on APB. In our case, we were facing an issue where the QSPI peripheral would cease to send any new CSR (nCS Rise) interrupts, leading to a timeout in `atmel_qspi_wait_for_completion()` and ultimately this panic in higher levels: ubi0 error: ubi_io_write: error -110 while writing 63108 bytes to PEB 491:128, written 63104 bytes After months of extensive research of the codebase, fiddling around the debugger with kgdb, and back-and-forth with Microchip, we came to the conclusion that the issue is probably that the peripheral is still busy receiving on AHB when the LASTXFER bit is written to its Control Register on APB, therefore this write gets lost, and the peripheral still thinks there is more data to come in the MMIO transfer. This was first formulated when we noticed that doubling the write() of QSPI_CR_LASTXFER seemed to solve the problem. Ultimately, the solution is to introduce memory barriers after the AHB-mapped MMIO transfers, to ensure ordering. Fixes: d5433def3153 ("mtd: spi-nor: atmel-quadspi: Add spi-mem support to atmel-quadspi") Cc: Hari.PrasathGE(a)microchip.com Cc: Mahesh.Abotula(a)microchip.com Cc: Marco.Cardellini(a)microchip.com Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # c0a0203cf579: ("spi: atmel-quadspi: Create `atmel_qspi_ops`"...) Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.x.y Signed-off-by: Bence Csókás <csokas.bence(a)prolan.hu> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241219091258.395187-1-csokas.bence@prolan.hu Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c index f46da363574f..8fdc9d27a95e 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c @@ -661,13 +661,20 @@ static int atmel_qspi_transfer(struct spi_mem *mem, (void)atmel_qspi_read(aq, QSPI_IFR); /* Send/Receive data */ - if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) + if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) { memcpy_fromio(op->data.buf.in, aq->mem + offset, op->data.nbytes); - else + + /* Synchronize AHB and APB accesses again */ + rmb(); + } else { memcpy_toio(aq->mem + offset, op->data.buf.out, op->data.nbytes); + /* Synchronize AHB and APB accesses again */ + wmb(); + } + /* Release the chip-select */ atmel_qspi_write(QSPI_CR_LASTXFER, aq, QSPI_CR);

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] spi: atmel-qspi: Memory barriers after memory-mapped I/O" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x be92ab2de0ee1a13291c3b47b2d7eb24d80c0a2c # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025021003-crewmate-marxism-a03e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From be92ab2de0ee1a13291c3b47b2d7eb24d80c0a2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Bence=20Cs=C3=B3k=C3=A1s?= <csokas.bence(a)prolan.hu> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 10:12:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] spi: atmel-qspi: Memory barriers after memory-mapped I/O MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The QSPI peripheral control and status registers are accessible via the SoC's APB bus, whereas MMIO transactions' data travels on the AHB bus. Microchip documentation and even sample code from Atmel emphasises the need for a memory barrier before the first MMIO transaction to the AHB-connected QSPI, and before the last write to its registers via APB. This is achieved by the following lines in `atmel_qspi_transfer()`: /* Dummy read of QSPI_IFR to synchronize APB and AHB accesses */ (void)atmel_qspi_read(aq, QSPI_IFR); However, the current documentation makes no mention to synchronization requirements in the other direction, i.e. after the last data written via AHB, and before the first register access on APB. In our case, we were facing an issue where the QSPI peripheral would cease to send any new CSR (nCS Rise) interrupts, leading to a timeout in `atmel_qspi_wait_for_completion()` and ultimately this panic in higher levels: ubi0 error: ubi_io_write: error -110 while writing 63108 bytes to PEB 491:128, written 63104 bytes After months of extensive research of the codebase, fiddling around the debugger with kgdb, and back-and-forth with Microchip, we came to the conclusion that the issue is probably that the peripheral is still busy receiving on AHB when the LASTXFER bit is written to its Control Register on APB, therefore this write gets lost, and the peripheral still thinks there is more data to come in the MMIO transfer. This was first formulated when we noticed that doubling the write() of QSPI_CR_LASTXFER seemed to solve the problem. Ultimately, the solution is to introduce memory barriers after the AHB-mapped MMIO transfers, to ensure ordering. Fixes: d5433def3153 ("mtd: spi-nor: atmel-quadspi: Add spi-mem support to atmel-quadspi") Cc: Hari.PrasathGE(a)microchip.com Cc: Mahesh.Abotula(a)microchip.com Cc: Marco.Cardellini(a)microchip.com Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # c0a0203cf579: ("spi: atmel-quadspi: Create `atmel_qspi_ops`"...) Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.x.y Signed-off-by: Bence Csókás <csokas.bence(a)prolan.hu> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241219091258.395187-1-csokas.bence@prolan.hu Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c index f46da363574f..8fdc9d27a95e 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c @@ -661,13 +661,20 @@ static int atmel_qspi_transfer(struct spi_mem *mem, (void)atmel_qspi_read(aq, QSPI_IFR); /* Send/Receive data */ - if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) + if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) { memcpy_fromio(op->data.buf.in, aq->mem + offset, op->data.nbytes); - else + + /* Synchronize AHB and APB accesses again */ + rmb(); + } else { memcpy_toio(aq->mem + offset, op->data.buf.out, op->data.nbytes); + /* Synchronize AHB and APB accesses again */ + wmb(); + } + /* Release the chip-select */ atmel_qspi_write(QSPI_CR_LASTXFER, aq, QSPI_CR);

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] spi: atmel-qspi: Memory barriers after memory-mapped I/O" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x be92ab2de0ee1a13291c3b47b2d7eb24d80c0a2c # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025021002-capitol-dribble-d5f7@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From be92ab2de0ee1a13291c3b47b2d7eb24d80c0a2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Bence=20Cs=C3=B3k=C3=A1s?= <csokas.bence(a)prolan.hu> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 10:12:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] spi: atmel-qspi: Memory barriers after memory-mapped I/O MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The QSPI peripheral control and status registers are accessible via the SoC's APB bus, whereas MMIO transactions' data travels on the AHB bus. Microchip documentation and even sample code from Atmel emphasises the need for a memory barrier before the first MMIO transaction to the AHB-connected QSPI, and before the last write to its registers via APB. This is achieved by the following lines in `atmel_qspi_transfer()`: /* Dummy read of QSPI_IFR to synchronize APB and AHB accesses */ (void)atmel_qspi_read(aq, QSPI_IFR); However, the current documentation makes no mention to synchronization requirements in the other direction, i.e. after the last data written via AHB, and before the first register access on APB. In our case, we were facing an issue where the QSPI peripheral would cease to send any new CSR (nCS Rise) interrupts, leading to a timeout in `atmel_qspi_wait_for_completion()` and ultimately this panic in higher levels: ubi0 error: ubi_io_write: error -110 while writing 63108 bytes to PEB 491:128, written 63104 bytes After months of extensive research of the codebase, fiddling around the debugger with kgdb, and back-and-forth with Microchip, we came to the conclusion that the issue is probably that the peripheral is still busy receiving on AHB when the LASTXFER bit is written to its Control Register on APB, therefore this write gets lost, and the peripheral still thinks there is more data to come in the MMIO transfer. This was first formulated when we noticed that doubling the write() of QSPI_CR_LASTXFER seemed to solve the problem. Ultimately, the solution is to introduce memory barriers after the AHB-mapped MMIO transfers, to ensure ordering. Fixes: d5433def3153 ("mtd: spi-nor: atmel-quadspi: Add spi-mem support to atmel-quadspi") Cc: Hari.PrasathGE(a)microchip.com Cc: Mahesh.Abotula(a)microchip.com Cc: Marco.Cardellini(a)microchip.com Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # c0a0203cf579: ("spi: atmel-quadspi: Create `atmel_qspi_ops`"...) Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.x.y Signed-off-by: Bence Csókás <csokas.bence(a)prolan.hu> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241219091258.395187-1-csokas.bence@prolan.hu Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c index f46da363574f..8fdc9d27a95e 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c @@ -661,13 +661,20 @@ static int atmel_qspi_transfer(struct spi_mem *mem, (void)atmel_qspi_read(aq, QSPI_IFR); /* Send/Receive data */ - if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) + if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) { memcpy_fromio(op->data.buf.in, aq->mem + offset, op->data.nbytes); - else + + /* Synchronize AHB and APB accesses again */ + rmb(); + } else { memcpy_toio(aq->mem + offset, op->data.buf.out, op->data.nbytes); + /* Synchronize AHB and APB accesses again */ + wmb(); + } + /* Release the chip-select */ atmel_qspi_write(QSPI_CR_LASTXFER, aq, QSPI_CR);

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] spi: atmel-qspi: Memory barriers after memory-mapped I/O" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x be92ab2de0ee1a13291c3b47b2d7eb24d80c0a2c # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025021001-swinging-ashes-6c0f@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From be92ab2de0ee1a13291c3b47b2d7eb24d80c0a2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Bence=20Cs=C3=B3k=C3=A1s?= <csokas.bence(a)prolan.hu> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 10:12:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] spi: atmel-qspi: Memory barriers after memory-mapped I/O MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The QSPI peripheral control and status registers are accessible via the SoC's APB bus, whereas MMIO transactions' data travels on the AHB bus. Microchip documentation and even sample code from Atmel emphasises the need for a memory barrier before the first MMIO transaction to the AHB-connected QSPI, and before the last write to its registers via APB. This is achieved by the following lines in `atmel_qspi_transfer()`: /* Dummy read of QSPI_IFR to synchronize APB and AHB accesses */ (void)atmel_qspi_read(aq, QSPI_IFR); However, the current documentation makes no mention to synchronization requirements in the other direction, i.e. after the last data written via AHB, and before the first register access on APB. In our case, we were facing an issue where the QSPI peripheral would cease to send any new CSR (nCS Rise) interrupts, leading to a timeout in `atmel_qspi_wait_for_completion()` and ultimately this panic in higher levels: ubi0 error: ubi_io_write: error -110 while writing 63108 bytes to PEB 491:128, written 63104 bytes After months of extensive research of the codebase, fiddling around the debugger with kgdb, and back-and-forth with Microchip, we came to the conclusion that the issue is probably that the peripheral is still busy receiving on AHB when the LASTXFER bit is written to its Control Register on APB, therefore this write gets lost, and the peripheral still thinks there is more data to come in the MMIO transfer. This was first formulated when we noticed that doubling the write() of QSPI_CR_LASTXFER seemed to solve the problem. Ultimately, the solution is to introduce memory barriers after the AHB-mapped MMIO transfers, to ensure ordering. Fixes: d5433def3153 ("mtd: spi-nor: atmel-quadspi: Add spi-mem support to atmel-quadspi") Cc: Hari.PrasathGE(a)microchip.com Cc: Mahesh.Abotula(a)microchip.com Cc: Marco.Cardellini(a)microchip.com Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # c0a0203cf579: ("spi: atmel-quadspi: Create `atmel_qspi_ops`"...) Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.x.y Signed-off-by: Bence Csókás <csokas.bence(a)prolan.hu> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241219091258.395187-1-csokas.bence@prolan.hu Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c index f46da363574f..8fdc9d27a95e 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c @@ -661,13 +661,20 @@ static int atmel_qspi_transfer(struct spi_mem *mem, (void)atmel_qspi_read(aq, QSPI_IFR); /* Send/Receive data */ - if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) + if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) { memcpy_fromio(op->data.buf.in, aq->mem + offset, op->data.nbytes); - else + + /* Synchronize AHB and APB accesses again */ + rmb(); + } else { memcpy_toio(aq->mem + offset, op->data.buf.out, op->data.nbytes); + /* Synchronize AHB and APB accesses again */ + wmb(); + } + /* Release the chip-select */ atmel_qspi_write(QSPI_CR_LASTXFER, aq, QSPI_CR);

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror February 2025