Dear Sir :
Nice day!
This is Sue from SHOE MATERIAL factory ,we make sandals material ,outdoor hardware,hiking boots material ,trekking boots material ,footwear accessories ,sport boots buckles,
nordic walking buckles,boot accessories,walking wear accessories,wilderness accessories,trail accessories,fasteners, webbings , webbing buckles, buttons,Hook Loop ,textile accessories,safety buckles,sliders,snaps ,Rings ,chains,suspenders as required for our global clients .
We are manufactory, we are the source, our price is very competitive ,you will get the best price , We have profuse designs with series quality grade, and expressly.
Our factory always produce customer designs and drawing , if you have any products looking please let me know,
we could surely make for you,
Sincerely hope could work with you !
Best regards
sue
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com>
commit e0391e92f9ab4fb3dbdeb139c967dcfa7ac4b115 upstream.
If we do a direct IO sync write, at btrfs_sync_file(), and we need to skip
inode logging or we get an error starting a transaction or an error when
flushing delalloc, we end up unlocking the inode when we shouldn't under
the 'out_release_extents' label, and then unlock it again at
btrfs_direct_write().
Fix that by checking if we have to skip inode unlocking under that label.
Reported-by: syzbot+7dbbb74af6291b5a5a8b(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000dfd631061eaeb4bc@google.com/
Fixes: 939b656bc8ab ("btrfs: fix corruption after buffer fault in during direct IO append write")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 7ca49c02e8f8..c44dfb4370d7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -2433,7 +2433,10 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
out_release_extents:
btrfs_release_log_ctx_extents(&ctx);
- btrfs_inode_unlock(inode, BTRFS_ILOCK_MMAP);
+ if (skip_ilock)
+ up_write(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_mmap_lock);
+ else
+ btrfs_inode_unlock(inode, BTRFS_ILOCK_MMAP);
goto out;
}
--
2.43.0
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x cd7c957f936f8cb80d03e5152f4013aae65bd986
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024081244-uncertain-snarl-e4f6@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
cd7c957f936f ("mptcp: pm: don't try to create sf if alloc failed")
c95eb32ced82 ("mptcp: pm: reduce indentation blocks")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From cd7c957f936f8cb80d03e5152f4013aae65bd986 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe(a)kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:05:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: pm: don't try to create sf if alloc failed
It sounds better to avoid wasting cycles and / or put extreme memory
pressure on the system by trying to create new subflows if it was not
possible to add a new item in the announce list.
While at it, a warning is now printed if the entry was already in the
list as it should not happen with the in-kernel path-manager. With this
PM, mptcp_pm_alloc_anno_list() should only fail in case of memory
pressure.
Fixes: b6c08380860b ("mptcp: remove addr and subflow in PM netlink")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni(a)redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe(a)kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240731-upstream-net-20240731-mptcp-endp-subflow-…
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org>
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 780f4cca165c..2be7af377cda 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ bool mptcp_pm_alloc_anno_list(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
add_entry = mptcp_lookup_anno_list_by_saddr(msk, addr);
if (add_entry) {
- if (mptcp_pm_is_kernel(msk))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(mptcp_pm_is_kernel(msk)))
return false;
sk_reset_timer(sk, &add_entry->add_timer,
@@ -555,8 +555,6 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
/* check first for announce */
if (msk->pm.add_addr_signaled < add_addr_signal_max) {
- local = select_signal_address(pernet, msk);
-
/* due to racing events on both ends we can reach here while
* previous add address is still running: if we invoke now
* mptcp_pm_announce_addr(), that will fail and the
@@ -567,11 +565,15 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
if (msk->pm.addr_signal & BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL))
return;
+ local = select_signal_address(pernet, msk);
if (!local)
goto subflow;
+ /* If the alloc fails, we are on memory pressure, not worth
+ * continuing, and trying to create subflows.
+ */
if (!mptcp_pm_alloc_anno_list(msk, &local->addr))
- goto subflow;
+ return;
__clear_bit(local->addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap);
msk->pm.add_addr_signaled++;
This reverts commit 052c9f0c140c78e5d6826688b5d2f33e19db0ae7.
If the test doesn't pass, we can get this error:
# ./simult_flows.sh: line 275: mptcp_lib_subtest_is_flaky: command not found
This patch is not needed in v6.6: it is there to mark a test as "flaky",
but the MPTCP selftests infrastructure in v6.6 doesn't support them. So
it looks better to revert this patch.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe(a)kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
index be97a7ed0950..f24bd2bf0831 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ run_test()
do_transfer $small $large $time
lret=$?
mptcp_lib_result_code "${lret}" "${msg}"
- if [ $lret -ne 0 ] && ! mptcp_lib_subtest_is_flaky; then
+ if [ $lret -ne 0 ]; then
ret=$lret
[ $bail -eq 0 ] || exit $ret
fi
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ run_test()
do_transfer $large $small $time
lret=$?
mptcp_lib_result_code "${lret}" "${msg}"
- if [ $lret -ne 0 ] && ! mptcp_lib_subtest_is_flaky; then
+ if [ $lret -ne 0 ]; then
ret=$lret
[ $bail -eq 0 ] || exit $ret
fi
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ run_test 10 10 0 0 "balanced bwidth"
run_test 10 10 1 25 "balanced bwidth with unbalanced delay"
# we still need some additional infrastructure to pass the following test-cases
-MPTCP_LIB_SUBTEST_FLAKY=1 run_test 10 3 0 0 "unbalanced bwidth"
+run_test 10 3 0 0 "unbalanced bwidth"
run_test 10 3 1 25 "unbalanced bwidth with unbalanced delay"
run_test 10 3 25 1 "unbalanced bwidth with opposed, unbalanced delay"
--
2.45.2
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com>
commit e0391e92f9ab4fb3dbdeb139c967dcfa7ac4b115 upstream.
If we do a direct IO sync write, at btrfs_sync_file(), and we need to skip
inode logging or we get an error starting a transaction or an error when
flushing delalloc, we end up unlocking the inode when we shouldn't under
the 'out_release_extents' label, and then unlock it again at
btrfs_direct_write().
Fix that by checking if we have to skip inode unlocking under that label.
Reported-by: syzbot+7dbbb74af6291b5a5a8b(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000dfd631061eaeb4bc@google.com/
Fixes: 939b656bc8ab ("btrfs: fix corruption after buffer fault in during direct IO append write")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 7c3ae295fdb5..e23d178f9778 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -2037,7 +2037,10 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
out_release_extents:
btrfs_release_log_ctx_extents(&ctx);
- btrfs_inode_unlock(inode, BTRFS_ILOCK_MMAP);
+ if (skip_ilock)
+ up_write(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_mmap_lock);
+ else
+ btrfs_inode_unlock(inode, BTRFS_ILOCK_MMAP);
goto out;
}
--
2.43.0
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com>
commit e0391e92f9ab4fb3dbdeb139c967dcfa7ac4b115 upstream.
If we do a direct IO sync write, at btrfs_sync_file(), and we need to skip
inode logging or we get an error starting a transaction or an error when
flushing delalloc, we end up unlocking the inode when we shouldn't under
the 'out_release_extents' label, and then unlock it again at
btrfs_direct_write().
Fix that by checking if we have to skip inode unlocking under that label.
Reported-by: syzbot+7dbbb74af6291b5a5a8b(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000dfd631061eaeb4bc@google.com/
Fixes: 939b656bc8ab ("btrfs: fix corruption after buffer fault in during direct IO append write")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index a47a7bbf9b7e..952cf145c629 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -2038,7 +2038,10 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
out_release_extents:
btrfs_release_log_ctx_extents(&ctx);
- btrfs_inode_unlock(BTRFS_I(inode), BTRFS_ILOCK_MMAP);
+ if (skip_ilock)
+ up_write(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_mmap_lock);
+ else
+ btrfs_inode_unlock(BTRFS_I(inode), BTRFS_ILOCK_MMAP);
goto out;
}
--
2.43.0
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com>
commit e0391e92f9ab4fb3dbdeb139c967dcfa7ac4b115 upstream.
If we do a direct IO sync write, at btrfs_sync_file(), and we need to skip
inode logging or we get an error starting a transaction or an error when
flushing delalloc, we end up unlocking the inode when we shouldn't under
the 'out_release_extents' label, and then unlock it again at
btrfs_direct_write().
Fix that by checking if we have to skip inode unlocking under that label.
Reported-by: syzbot+7dbbb74af6291b5a5a8b(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000dfd631061eaeb4bc@google.com/
Fixes: 939b656bc8ab ("btrfs: fix corruption after buffer fault in during direct IO append write")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 35ce1c810bd3..ca434f0cd27f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -2080,7 +2080,10 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
out_release_extents:
btrfs_release_log_ctx_extents(&ctx);
- btrfs_inode_unlock(BTRFS_I(inode), BTRFS_ILOCK_MMAP);
+ if (skip_ilock)
+ up_write(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_mmap_lock);
+ else
+ btrfs_inode_unlock(BTRFS_I(inode), BTRFS_ILOCK_MMAP);
goto out;
}
--
2.43.0
The patch below does not apply to the 6.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x cd7c957f936f8cb80d03e5152f4013aae65bd986
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024081244-smock-nearest-c09a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
cd7c957f936f ("mptcp: pm: don't try to create sf if alloc failed")
c95eb32ced82 ("mptcp: pm: reduce indentation blocks")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From cd7c957f936f8cb80d03e5152f4013aae65bd986 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe(a)kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:05:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: pm: don't try to create sf if alloc failed
It sounds better to avoid wasting cycles and / or put extreme memory
pressure on the system by trying to create new subflows if it was not
possible to add a new item in the announce list.
While at it, a warning is now printed if the entry was already in the
list as it should not happen with the in-kernel path-manager. With this
PM, mptcp_pm_alloc_anno_list() should only fail in case of memory
pressure.
Fixes: b6c08380860b ("mptcp: remove addr and subflow in PM netlink")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni(a)redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe(a)kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240731-upstream-net-20240731-mptcp-endp-subflow-…
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org>
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 780f4cca165c..2be7af377cda 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ bool mptcp_pm_alloc_anno_list(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
add_entry = mptcp_lookup_anno_list_by_saddr(msk, addr);
if (add_entry) {
- if (mptcp_pm_is_kernel(msk))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(mptcp_pm_is_kernel(msk)))
return false;
sk_reset_timer(sk, &add_entry->add_timer,
@@ -555,8 +555,6 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
/* check first for announce */
if (msk->pm.add_addr_signaled < add_addr_signal_max) {
- local = select_signal_address(pernet, msk);
-
/* due to racing events on both ends we can reach here while
* previous add address is still running: if we invoke now
* mptcp_pm_announce_addr(), that will fail and the
@@ -567,11 +565,15 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
if (msk->pm.addr_signal & BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL))
return;
+ local = select_signal_address(pernet, msk);
if (!local)
goto subflow;
+ /* If the alloc fails, we are on memory pressure, not worth
+ * continuing, and trying to create subflows.
+ */
if (!mptcp_pm_alloc_anno_list(msk, &local->addr))
- goto subflow;
+ return;
__clear_bit(local->addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap);
msk->pm.add_addr_signaled++;