LPM consists of HIPM (host initiated power management) and DIPM
(device initiated power management).
ata_eh_set_lpm() will only enable HIPM if both the HBA and the device
supports it.
However, DIPM will be enabled as long as the device supports it.
The HBA will later reject the device's request to enter a power state
that it does not support (Slumber/Partial/DevSleep) (DevSleep is never
initiated by the device).
For a HBA that doesn't support any LPM states, simply don't set a LPM
policy such that all the HIPM/DIPM probing/enabling will be skipped.
Not enabling HIPM or DIPM in the first place is safer than relying on
the device following the AHCI specification and respecting the NAK.
(There are comments in the code that some devices misbehave when
receiving a NAK.)
Performing this check in ahci_update_initial_lpm_policy() also has the
advantage that a HBA that doesn't support any LPM states will take the
exact same code paths as a port that is external/hot plug capable.
Fixes: 7627a0edef54 ("ata: ahci: Drop low power policy board type")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel(a)kernel.org>
---
We have not received any bug reports with this.
The devices that were quirked recently all supported both Partial and
Slumber.
This is more a defensive action, as it seems unnecessary to enable DIPM
in the first place, if the HBA doesn't support any LPM states.
drivers/ata/ahci.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
index 07d66d2c5f0d..214de08de642 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
@@ -1735,6 +1735,12 @@ static void ahci_update_initial_lpm_policy(struct ata_port *ap)
if (ap->pflags & ATA_PFLAG_EXTERNAL)
return;
+ /* If no LPM states are supported by the HBA, do not bother with LPM */
+ if ((ap->host->flags & ATA_HOST_NO_PART) &&
+ (ap->host->flags & ATA_HOST_NO_SSC) &&
+ (ap->host->flags & ATA_HOST_NO_DEVSLP))
+ return;
+
/* user modified policy via module param */
if (mobile_lpm_policy != -1) {
policy = mobile_lpm_policy;
--
2.45.1
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/vmalloc: fix vbq->free breakage
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-vmalloc-fix-vbq-free-breakage.patch
This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged
------------------------------------------------------
From: "hailong.liu" <hailong.liu(a)oppo.com>
Subject: mm/vmalloc: fix vbq->free breakage
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 17:31:08 +0800
The function xa_for_each() in _vm_unmap_aliases() loops through all vbs.
However, since commit 062eacf57ad9 ("mm: vmalloc: remove a global
vmap_blocks xarray") the vb from xarray may not be on the corresponding
CPU vmap_block_queue. Consequently, purge_fragmented_block() might use
the wrong vbq->lock to protect the free list, leading to vbq->free
breakage.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240530093108.4512-1-hailong.liu@oppo.com
Fixes: fc1e0d980037 ("mm/vmalloc: prevent stale TLBs in fully utilized blocks")
Signed-off-by: Hailong.Liu <liuhailong(a)oppo.com>
Reported-by: Guangye Yang <guangye.yang(a)mediatek.com>
Cc: Barry Song <21cnbao(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)infradead.org>
Cc: Gao Xiang <xiang(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Guangye Yang <guangye.yang(a)mediatek.com>
Cc: liuhailong <liuhailong(a)oppo.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang(a)unisoc.com>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmalloc-fix-vbq-free-breakage
+++ a/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2830,10 +2830,9 @@ static void _vm_unmap_aliases(unsigned l
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct vmap_block_queue *vbq = &per_cpu(vmap_block_queue, cpu);
struct vmap_block *vb;
- unsigned long idx;
rcu_read_lock();
- xa_for_each(&vbq->vmap_blocks, idx, vb) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(vb, &vbq->free, free_list) {
spin_lock(&vb->lock);
/*
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hailong.liu(a)oppo.com are