December 2024 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] soc: fsl: cpm1: qmc: Set the ret error code on" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x cb3daa51db819a172e9524e96e2ed96b4237e51a # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120331-disarm-unfixed-bbec@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From cb3daa51db819a172e9524e96e2ed96b4237e51a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Herve Codina <herve.codina(a)bootlin.com> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:56:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] soc: fsl: cpm1: qmc: Set the ret error code on platform_get_irq() failure A kernel test robot detected a missing error code: qmc.c:1942 qmc_probe() warn: missing error code 'ret' Indeed, the error returned by platform_get_irq() is checked and the operation is aborted in case of failure but the ret error code is not set in that case. Set the ret error code. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter(a)linaro.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202411051350.KNy6ZIWA-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: 3178d58e0b97 ("soc: fsl: cpm1: Add support for QMC") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina(a)bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241105145623.401528-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy(a)csgroup.eu> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qmc.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qmc.c index 3dffebb48b0d..fa7dc7d4abf3 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qmc.c +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qmc.c @@ -2005,8 +2005,10 @@ static int qmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Set the irq handler */ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); - if (irq < 0) + if (irq < 0) { + ret = irq; goto err_exit_xcc; + } ret = devm_request_irq(qmc->dev, irq, qmc_irq_handler, 0, "qmc", qmc); if (ret < 0) goto err_exit_xcc;

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: fix ordering between checking QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 6bda857bcbb86fb9d0e54fbef93a093d51172acc # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120344-onshore-retrain-f7ee@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 6bda857bcbb86fb9d0e54fbef93a093d51172acc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:29:33 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block: fix ordering between checking QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED request adding Supposing the following scenario. CPU0 CPU1 blk_mq_insert_request() 1) store blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() blk_queue_flag_clear() 3) store blk_mq_run_hw_queues() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() if (!blk_mq_hctx_has_pending()) 4) load return blk_mq_run_hw_queue() if (blk_queue_quiesced()) 2) load return blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests() The full memory barrier should be inserted between 1) and 2), as well as between 3) and 4) to make sure that either CPU0 sees QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED is cleared or CPU1 sees dispatch list or setting of bitmap of software queue. Otherwise, either CPU will not rerun the hardware queue causing starvation. So the first solution is to 1) add a pair of memory barrier to fix the problem, another solution is to 2) use hctx->queue->queue_lock to synchronize QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED. Here, we chose 2) to fix it since memory barrier is not easy to be maintained. Fixes: f4560ffe8cec ("blk-mq: use QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED to quiesce queue") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun(a)bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei(a)redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014092934.53630-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 5deb9dffca0a..bb4ee2380dce 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -2227,6 +2227,24 @@ void blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned long msecs) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue); +static inline bool blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) +{ + bool need_run; + + /* + * When queue is quiesced, we may be switching io scheduler, or + * updating nr_hw_queues, or other things, and we can't run queue + * any more, even blk_mq_hctx_has_pending() can't be called safely. + * + * And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is + * quiesced. + */ + __blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx->queue, false, + need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) && + blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)); + return need_run; +} + /** * blk_mq_run_hw_queue - Start to run a hardware queue. * @hctx: Pointer to the hardware queue to run. @@ -2247,20 +2265,23 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async) might_sleep_if(!async && hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING); - /* - * When queue is quiesced, we may be switching io scheduler, or - * updating nr_hw_queues, or other things, and we can't run queue - * any more, even __blk_mq_hctx_has_pending() can't be called safely. - * - * And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is - * quiesced. - */ - __blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx->queue, false, - need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) && - blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)); + need_run = blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(hctx); + if (!need_run) { + unsigned long flags; - if (!need_run) - return; + /* + * Synchronize with blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(), because we check + * if hw queue is quiesced locklessly above, we need the use + * ->queue_lock to make sure we see the up-to-date status to + * not miss rerunning the hw queue. + */ + spin_lock_irqsave(&hctx->queue->queue_lock, flags); + need_run = blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(hctx); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hctx->queue->queue_lock, flags); + + if (!need_run) + return; + } if (async || !cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask)) { blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, 0);

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: fix ordering between checking QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 6bda857bcbb86fb9d0e54fbef93a093d51172acc # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120343-express-overbuilt-6478@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 6bda857bcbb86fb9d0e54fbef93a093d51172acc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:29:33 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block: fix ordering between checking QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED request adding Supposing the following scenario. CPU0 CPU1 blk_mq_insert_request() 1) store blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() blk_queue_flag_clear() 3) store blk_mq_run_hw_queues() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() if (!blk_mq_hctx_has_pending()) 4) load return blk_mq_run_hw_queue() if (blk_queue_quiesced()) 2) load return blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests() The full memory barrier should be inserted between 1) and 2), as well as between 3) and 4) to make sure that either CPU0 sees QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED is cleared or CPU1 sees dispatch list or setting of bitmap of software queue. Otherwise, either CPU will not rerun the hardware queue causing starvation. So the first solution is to 1) add a pair of memory barrier to fix the problem, another solution is to 2) use hctx->queue->queue_lock to synchronize QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED. Here, we chose 2) to fix it since memory barrier is not easy to be maintained. Fixes: f4560ffe8cec ("blk-mq: use QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED to quiesce queue") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun(a)bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei(a)redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014092934.53630-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 5deb9dffca0a..bb4ee2380dce 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -2227,6 +2227,24 @@ void blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned long msecs) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue); +static inline bool blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) +{ + bool need_run; + + /* + * When queue is quiesced, we may be switching io scheduler, or + * updating nr_hw_queues, or other things, and we can't run queue + * any more, even blk_mq_hctx_has_pending() can't be called safely. + * + * And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is + * quiesced. + */ + __blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx->queue, false, + need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) && + blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)); + return need_run; +} + /** * blk_mq_run_hw_queue - Start to run a hardware queue. * @hctx: Pointer to the hardware queue to run. @@ -2247,20 +2265,23 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async) might_sleep_if(!async && hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING); - /* - * When queue is quiesced, we may be switching io scheduler, or - * updating nr_hw_queues, or other things, and we can't run queue - * any more, even __blk_mq_hctx_has_pending() can't be called safely. - * - * And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is - * quiesced. - */ - __blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx->queue, false, - need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) && - blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)); + need_run = blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(hctx); + if (!need_run) { + unsigned long flags; - if (!need_run) - return; + /* + * Synchronize with blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(), because we check + * if hw queue is quiesced locklessly above, we need the use + * ->queue_lock to make sure we see the up-to-date status to + * not miss rerunning the hw queue. + */ + spin_lock_irqsave(&hctx->queue->queue_lock, flags); + need_run = blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(hctx); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hctx->queue->queue_lock, flags); + + if (!need_run) + return; + } if (async || !cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask)) { blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, 0);

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: fix ordering between checking QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 6bda857bcbb86fb9d0e54fbef93a093d51172acc # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120343-livable-euphemism-b28b@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 6bda857bcbb86fb9d0e54fbef93a093d51172acc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:29:33 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block: fix ordering between checking QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED request adding Supposing the following scenario. CPU0 CPU1 blk_mq_insert_request() 1) store blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() blk_queue_flag_clear() 3) store blk_mq_run_hw_queues() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() if (!blk_mq_hctx_has_pending()) 4) load return blk_mq_run_hw_queue() if (blk_queue_quiesced()) 2) load return blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests() The full memory barrier should be inserted between 1) and 2), as well as between 3) and 4) to make sure that either CPU0 sees QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED is cleared or CPU1 sees dispatch list or setting of bitmap of software queue. Otherwise, either CPU will not rerun the hardware queue causing starvation. So the first solution is to 1) add a pair of memory barrier to fix the problem, another solution is to 2) use hctx->queue->queue_lock to synchronize QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED. Here, we chose 2) to fix it since memory barrier is not easy to be maintained. Fixes: f4560ffe8cec ("blk-mq: use QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED to quiesce queue") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun(a)bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei(a)redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014092934.53630-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 5deb9dffca0a..bb4ee2380dce 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -2227,6 +2227,24 @@ void blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned long msecs) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue); +static inline bool blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) +{ + bool need_run; + + /* + * When queue is quiesced, we may be switching io scheduler, or + * updating nr_hw_queues, or other things, and we can't run queue + * any more, even blk_mq_hctx_has_pending() can't be called safely. + * + * And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is + * quiesced. + */ + __blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx->queue, false, + need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) && + blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)); + return need_run; +} + /** * blk_mq_run_hw_queue - Start to run a hardware queue. * @hctx: Pointer to the hardware queue to run. @@ -2247,20 +2265,23 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async) might_sleep_if(!async && hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING); - /* - * When queue is quiesced, we may be switching io scheduler, or - * updating nr_hw_queues, or other things, and we can't run queue - * any more, even __blk_mq_hctx_has_pending() can't be called safely. - * - * And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is - * quiesced. - */ - __blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx->queue, false, - need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) && - blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)); + need_run = blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(hctx); + if (!need_run) { + unsigned long flags; - if (!need_run) - return; + /* + * Synchronize with blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(), because we check + * if hw queue is quiesced locklessly above, we need the use + * ->queue_lock to make sure we see the up-to-date status to + * not miss rerunning the hw queue. + */ + spin_lock_irqsave(&hctx->queue->queue_lock, flags); + need_run = blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(hctx); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hctx->queue->queue_lock, flags); + + if (!need_run) + return; + } if (async || !cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask)) { blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, 0);

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: fix ordering between checking QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 6bda857bcbb86fb9d0e54fbef93a093d51172acc # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120341-stray-sinner-8eb4@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 6bda857bcbb86fb9d0e54fbef93a093d51172acc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:29:33 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block: fix ordering between checking QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED request adding Supposing the following scenario. CPU0 CPU1 blk_mq_insert_request() 1) store blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() blk_queue_flag_clear() 3) store blk_mq_run_hw_queues() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() if (!blk_mq_hctx_has_pending()) 4) load return blk_mq_run_hw_queue() if (blk_queue_quiesced()) 2) load return blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests() The full memory barrier should be inserted between 1) and 2), as well as between 3) and 4) to make sure that either CPU0 sees QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED is cleared or CPU1 sees dispatch list or setting of bitmap of software queue. Otherwise, either CPU will not rerun the hardware queue causing starvation. So the first solution is to 1) add a pair of memory barrier to fix the problem, another solution is to 2) use hctx->queue->queue_lock to synchronize QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED. Here, we chose 2) to fix it since memory barrier is not easy to be maintained. Fixes: f4560ffe8cec ("blk-mq: use QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED to quiesce queue") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun(a)bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei(a)redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014092934.53630-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 5deb9dffca0a..bb4ee2380dce 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -2227,6 +2227,24 @@ void blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned long msecs) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue); +static inline bool blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) +{ + bool need_run; + + /* + * When queue is quiesced, we may be switching io scheduler, or + * updating nr_hw_queues, or other things, and we can't run queue + * any more, even blk_mq_hctx_has_pending() can't be called safely. + * + * And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is + * quiesced. + */ + __blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx->queue, false, + need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) && + blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)); + return need_run; +} + /** * blk_mq_run_hw_queue - Start to run a hardware queue. * @hctx: Pointer to the hardware queue to run. @@ -2247,20 +2265,23 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async) might_sleep_if(!async && hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING); - /* - * When queue is quiesced, we may be switching io scheduler, or - * updating nr_hw_queues, or other things, and we can't run queue - * any more, even __blk_mq_hctx_has_pending() can't be called safely. - * - * And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is - * quiesced. - */ - __blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx->queue, false, - need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) && - blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)); + need_run = blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(hctx); + if (!need_run) { + unsigned long flags; - if (!need_run) - return; + /* + * Synchronize with blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(), because we check + * if hw queue is quiesced locklessly above, we need the use + * ->queue_lock to make sure we see the up-to-date status to + * not miss rerunning the hw queue. + */ + spin_lock_irqsave(&hctx->queue->queue_lock, flags); + need_run = blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(hctx); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hctx->queue->queue_lock, flags); + + if (!need_run) + return; + } if (async || !cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask)) { blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, 0);

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: fix missing dispatching request when queue is started" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 2003ee8a9aa14d766b06088156978d53c2e9be3d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120326-hedging-banker-f8bd@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 2003ee8a9aa14d766b06088156978d53c2e9be3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:29:32 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block: fix missing dispatching request when queue is started or unquiesced Supposing the following scenario with a virtio_blk driver. CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 blk_mq_try_issue_directly() __blk_mq_issue_directly() q->mq_ops->queue_rq() virtio_queue_rq() blk_mq_stop_hw_queue() virtblk_done() blk_mq_try_issue_directly() if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped()) blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_insert_request() return After CPU0 has marked the queue as stopped, CPU1 will see the queue is stopped. But before CPU1 puts the request on the dispatch list, CPU2 receives the interrupt of completion of request, so it will run the hardware queue and marks the queue as non-stopped. Meanwhile, CPU1 also runs the same hardware queue. After both CPU1 and CPU2 complete blk_mq_run_hw_queue(), CPU1 just puts the request to the same hardware queue and returns. It misses dispatching a request. Fix it by running the hardware queue explicitly. And blk_mq_request_issue_directly() should handle a similar situation. Fix it as well. Fixes: d964f04a8fde ("blk-mq: fix direct issue") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun(a)bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei(a)redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014092934.53630-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 7d05a56e3639..5deb9dffca0a 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -2647,6 +2647,7 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) || blk_queue_quiesced(rq->q)) { blk_mq_insert_request(rq, 0); + blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false); return; } @@ -2677,6 +2678,7 @@ static blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq, bool last) if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) || blk_queue_quiesced(rq->q)) { blk_mq_insert_request(rq, 0); + blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false); return BLK_STS_OK; }

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: fix missing dispatching request when queue is started" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 2003ee8a9aa14d766b06088156978d53c2e9be3d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120325-botanical-radish-48b4@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 2003ee8a9aa14d766b06088156978d53c2e9be3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:29:32 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block: fix missing dispatching request when queue is started or unquiesced Supposing the following scenario with a virtio_blk driver. CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 blk_mq_try_issue_directly() __blk_mq_issue_directly() q->mq_ops->queue_rq() virtio_queue_rq() blk_mq_stop_hw_queue() virtblk_done() blk_mq_try_issue_directly() if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped()) blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_insert_request() return After CPU0 has marked the queue as stopped, CPU1 will see the queue is stopped. But before CPU1 puts the request on the dispatch list, CPU2 receives the interrupt of completion of request, so it will run the hardware queue and marks the queue as non-stopped. Meanwhile, CPU1 also runs the same hardware queue. After both CPU1 and CPU2 complete blk_mq_run_hw_queue(), CPU1 just puts the request to the same hardware queue and returns. It misses dispatching a request. Fix it by running the hardware queue explicitly. And blk_mq_request_issue_directly() should handle a similar situation. Fix it as well. Fixes: d964f04a8fde ("blk-mq: fix direct issue") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun(a)bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei(a)redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014092934.53630-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 7d05a56e3639..5deb9dffca0a 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -2647,6 +2647,7 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) || blk_queue_quiesced(rq->q)) { blk_mq_insert_request(rq, 0); + blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false); return; } @@ -2677,6 +2678,7 @@ static blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq, bool last) if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) || blk_queue_quiesced(rq->q)) { blk_mq_insert_request(rq, 0); + blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false); return BLK_STS_OK; }

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: fix missing dispatching request when queue is started" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 2003ee8a9aa14d766b06088156978d53c2e9be3d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120324-eating-amid-74df@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 2003ee8a9aa14d766b06088156978d53c2e9be3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:29:32 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block: fix missing dispatching request when queue is started or unquiesced Supposing the following scenario with a virtio_blk driver. CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 blk_mq_try_issue_directly() __blk_mq_issue_directly() q->mq_ops->queue_rq() virtio_queue_rq() blk_mq_stop_hw_queue() virtblk_done() blk_mq_try_issue_directly() if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped()) blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_insert_request() return After CPU0 has marked the queue as stopped, CPU1 will see the queue is stopped. But before CPU1 puts the request on the dispatch list, CPU2 receives the interrupt of completion of request, so it will run the hardware queue and marks the queue as non-stopped. Meanwhile, CPU1 also runs the same hardware queue. After both CPU1 and CPU2 complete blk_mq_run_hw_queue(), CPU1 just puts the request to the same hardware queue and returns. It misses dispatching a request. Fix it by running the hardware queue explicitly. And blk_mq_request_issue_directly() should handle a similar situation. Fix it as well. Fixes: d964f04a8fde ("blk-mq: fix direct issue") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun(a)bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei(a)redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014092934.53630-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 7d05a56e3639..5deb9dffca0a 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -2647,6 +2647,7 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) || blk_queue_quiesced(rq->q)) { blk_mq_insert_request(rq, 0); + blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false); return; } @@ -2677,6 +2678,7 @@ static blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq, bool last) if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) || blk_queue_quiesced(rq->q)) { blk_mq_insert_request(rq, 0); + blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false); return BLK_STS_OK; }

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: fix missing dispatching request when queue is started" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 2003ee8a9aa14d766b06088156978d53c2e9be3d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120322-cyclic-shadily-cc71@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 2003ee8a9aa14d766b06088156978d53c2e9be3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:29:32 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block: fix missing dispatching request when queue is started or unquiesced Supposing the following scenario with a virtio_blk driver. CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 blk_mq_try_issue_directly() __blk_mq_issue_directly() q->mq_ops->queue_rq() virtio_queue_rq() blk_mq_stop_hw_queue() virtblk_done() blk_mq_try_issue_directly() if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped()) blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_insert_request() return After CPU0 has marked the queue as stopped, CPU1 will see the queue is stopped. But before CPU1 puts the request on the dispatch list, CPU2 receives the interrupt of completion of request, so it will run the hardware queue and marks the queue as non-stopped. Meanwhile, CPU1 also runs the same hardware queue. After both CPU1 and CPU2 complete blk_mq_run_hw_queue(), CPU1 just puts the request to the same hardware queue and returns. It misses dispatching a request. Fix it by running the hardware queue explicitly. And blk_mq_request_issue_directly() should handle a similar situation. Fix it as well. Fixes: d964f04a8fde ("blk-mq: fix direct issue") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song(a)linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun(a)bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei(a)redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014092934.53630-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 7d05a56e3639..5deb9dffca0a 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -2647,6 +2647,7 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) || blk_queue_quiesced(rq->q)) { blk_mq_insert_request(rq, 0); + blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false); return; } @@ -2677,6 +2678,7 @@ static blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq, bool last) if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) || blk_queue_quiesced(rq->q)) { blk_mq_insert_request(rq, 0); + blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false); return BLK_STS_OK; }

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] serial: amba-pl011: Fix RX stall when DMA is used" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 2bcacc1c87acf9a8ebc17de18cb2b3cfeca547cf # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120358-dating-yahoo-5b4b@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 2bcacc1c87acf9a8ebc17de18cb2b3cfeca547cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kartik Rajput <kkartik(a)nvidia.com> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:56:29 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] serial: amba-pl011: Fix RX stall when DMA is used Function pl011_throttle_rx() calls pl011_stop_rx() to disable RX, which also disables the RX DMA by clearing the RXDMAE bit of the DMACR register. However, to properly unthrottle RX when DMA is used, the function pl011_unthrottle_rx() is expected to set the RXDMAE bit of the DMACR register, which it currently lacks. This causes RX to stall after the throttle API is called. Set RXDMAE bit in the DMACR register while unthrottling RX if RX DMA is used. Fixes: 211565b10099 ("serial: pl011: UPSTAT_AUTORTS requires .throttle/unthrottle") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kartik Rajput <kkartik(a)nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij(a)linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241113092629.60226-1-kkartik@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c index 56e587b94823..2facdbcd73eb 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c @@ -1819,6 +1819,11 @@ static void pl011_unthrottle_rx(struct uart_port *port) pl011_write(uap->im, uap, REG_IMSC); + if (uap->using_rx_dma) { + uap->dmacr |= UART011_RXDMAE; + pl011_write(uap->dmacr, uap, REG_DMACR); + } + uart_port_unlock_irqrestore(&uap->port, flags); }

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror December 2024