September 2023 - Linux-stable-mirror

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 1/2] autofs: fix memory leak of waitqueues in autofs_catatonic_mode

by Sasha Levin

From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin(a)ispras.ru> [ Upstream commit ccbe77f7e45dfb4420f7f531b650c00c6e9c7507 ] Syzkaller reports a memory leak: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88810b279e00 (size 96): comm "syz-executor399", pid 3631, jiffies 4294964921 (age 23.870s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 9e 27 0b 81 88 ff ff ..........'..... 08 9e 27 0b 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..'............. backtrace: [<ffffffff814cfc90>] kmalloc_trace+0x20/0x90 mm/slab_common.c:1046 [<ffffffff81bb75ca>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:576 [inline] [<ffffffff81bb75ca>] autofs_wait+0x3fa/0x9a0 fs/autofs/waitq.c:378 [<ffffffff81bb88a7>] autofs_do_expire_multi+0xa7/0x3e0 fs/autofs/expire.c:593 [<ffffffff81bb8c33>] autofs_expire_multi+0x53/0x80 fs/autofs/expire.c:619 [<ffffffff81bb6972>] autofs_root_ioctl_unlocked+0x322/0x3b0 fs/autofs/root.c:897 [<ffffffff81bb6a95>] autofs_root_ioctl+0x25/0x30 fs/autofs/root.c:910 [<ffffffff81602a9c>] vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] [<ffffffff81602a9c>] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] [<ffffffff81602a9c>] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] [<ffffffff81602a9c>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856 [<ffffffff84608225>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [<ffffffff84608225>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [<ffffffff84800087>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd autofs_wait_queue structs should be freed if their wait_ctr becomes zero. Otherwise they will be lost. In this case an AUTOFS_IOC_EXPIRE_MULTI ioctl is done, then a new waitqueue struct is allocated in autofs_wait(), its initial wait_ctr equals 2. After that wait_event_killable() is interrupted (it returns -ERESTARTSYS), so that 'wq->name.name == NULL' condition may be not satisfied. Actually, this condition can be satisfied when autofs_wait_release() or autofs_catatonic_mode() is called and, what is also important, wait_ctr is decremented in those places. Upon the exit of autofs_wait(), wait_ctr is decremented to 1. Then the unmounting process begins: kill_sb calls autofs_catatonic_mode(), which should have freed the waitqueues, but it only decrements its usage counter to zero which is not a correct behaviour. edit:imk This description is of course not correct. The umount performed as a result of an expire is a umount of a mount that has been automounted, it's not the autofs mount itself. They happen independently, usually after everything mounted within the autofs file system has been expired away. If everything hasn't been expired away the automount daemon can still exit leaving mounts in place. But expires done in both cases will result in a notification that calls autofs_wait_release() with a result status. The problem case is the summary execution of of the automount daemon. In this case any waiting processes won't be woken up until either they are terminated or the mount is umounted. end edit: imk So in catatonic mode we should free waitqueues which counter becomes zero. edit: imk Initially I was concerned that the calling of autofs_wait_release() and autofs_catatonic_mode() was not mutually exclusive but that can't be the case (obviously) because the queue entry (or entries) is removed from the list when either of these two functions are called. Consequently the wait entry will be freed by only one of these functions or by the woken process in autofs_wait() depending on the order of the calls. end edit: imk Reported-by: syzbot+5e53f70e69ff0c0a1c0c(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Suggested-by: Takeshi Misawa <jeliantsurux(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin(a)ispras.ru> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov(a)ispras.ru> Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven(a)themaw.net> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin(a)gmail.com> Cc: autofs(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <169112719161.7590.6700123246297365841.stgit(a)donald.themaw.net> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- fs/autofs/waitq.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/autofs/waitq.c b/fs/autofs/waitq.c index f6385c6ef0a56..44ba0cd4ebc4f 100644 --- a/fs/autofs/waitq.c +++ b/fs/autofs/waitq.c @@ -35,8 +35,9 @@ void autofs_catatonic_mode(struct autofs_sb_info *sbi) wq->status = -ENOENT; /* Magic is gone - report failure */ kfree(wq->name.name); wq->name.name = NULL; - wq->wait_ctr--; wake_up_interruptible(&wq->queue); + if (!--wq->wait_ctr) + kfree(wq); wq = nwq; } fput(sbi->pipe); /* Close the pipe */ -- 2.40.1

1 year, 7 months

1
1
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 1/3] autofs: fix memory leak of waitqueues in autofs_catatonic_mode

by Sasha Levin

From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin(a)ispras.ru> [ Upstream commit ccbe77f7e45dfb4420f7f531b650c00c6e9c7507 ] Syzkaller reports a memory leak: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88810b279e00 (size 96): comm "syz-executor399", pid 3631, jiffies 4294964921 (age 23.870s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 9e 27 0b 81 88 ff ff ..........'..... 08 9e 27 0b 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..'............. backtrace: [<ffffffff814cfc90>] kmalloc_trace+0x20/0x90 mm/slab_common.c:1046 [<ffffffff81bb75ca>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:576 [inline] [<ffffffff81bb75ca>] autofs_wait+0x3fa/0x9a0 fs/autofs/waitq.c:378 [<ffffffff81bb88a7>] autofs_do_expire_multi+0xa7/0x3e0 fs/autofs/expire.c:593 [<ffffffff81bb8c33>] autofs_expire_multi+0x53/0x80 fs/autofs/expire.c:619 [<ffffffff81bb6972>] autofs_root_ioctl_unlocked+0x322/0x3b0 fs/autofs/root.c:897 [<ffffffff81bb6a95>] autofs_root_ioctl+0x25/0x30 fs/autofs/root.c:910 [<ffffffff81602a9c>] vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] [<ffffffff81602a9c>] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] [<ffffffff81602a9c>] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] [<ffffffff81602a9c>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856 [<ffffffff84608225>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [<ffffffff84608225>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [<ffffffff84800087>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd autofs_wait_queue structs should be freed if their wait_ctr becomes zero. Otherwise they will be lost. In this case an AUTOFS_IOC_EXPIRE_MULTI ioctl is done, then a new waitqueue struct is allocated in autofs_wait(), its initial wait_ctr equals 2. After that wait_event_killable() is interrupted (it returns -ERESTARTSYS), so that 'wq->name.name == NULL' condition may be not satisfied. Actually, this condition can be satisfied when autofs_wait_release() or autofs_catatonic_mode() is called and, what is also important, wait_ctr is decremented in those places. Upon the exit of autofs_wait(), wait_ctr is decremented to 1. Then the unmounting process begins: kill_sb calls autofs_catatonic_mode(), which should have freed the waitqueues, but it only decrements its usage counter to zero which is not a correct behaviour. edit:imk This description is of course not correct. The umount performed as a result of an expire is a umount of a mount that has been automounted, it's not the autofs mount itself. They happen independently, usually after everything mounted within the autofs file system has been expired away. If everything hasn't been expired away the automount daemon can still exit leaving mounts in place. But expires done in both cases will result in a notification that calls autofs_wait_release() with a result status. The problem case is the summary execution of of the automount daemon. In this case any waiting processes won't be woken up until either they are terminated or the mount is umounted. end edit: imk So in catatonic mode we should free waitqueues which counter becomes zero. edit: imk Initially I was concerned that the calling of autofs_wait_release() and autofs_catatonic_mode() was not mutually exclusive but that can't be the case (obviously) because the queue entry (or entries) is removed from the list when either of these two functions are called. Consequently the wait entry will be freed by only one of these functions or by the woken process in autofs_wait() depending on the order of the calls. end edit: imk Reported-by: syzbot+5e53f70e69ff0c0a1c0c(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Suggested-by: Takeshi Misawa <jeliantsurux(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin(a)ispras.ru> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov(a)ispras.ru> Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven(a)themaw.net> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin(a)gmail.com> Cc: autofs(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <169112719161.7590.6700123246297365841.stgit(a)donald.themaw.net> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- fs/autofs/waitq.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/autofs/waitq.c b/fs/autofs/waitq.c index b04c528b19d34..1230bdf329898 100644 --- a/fs/autofs/waitq.c +++ b/fs/autofs/waitq.c @@ -32,8 +32,9 @@ void autofs_catatonic_mode(struct autofs_sb_info *sbi) wq->status = -ENOENT; /* Magic is gone - report failure */ kfree(wq->name.name); wq->name.name = NULL; - wq->wait_ctr--; wake_up_interruptible(&wq->queue); + if (!--wq->wait_ctr) + kfree(wq); wq = nwq; } fput(sbi->pipe); /* Close the pipe */ -- 2.40.1

1 year, 7 months

1
2
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 1/3] autofs: fix memory leak of waitqueues in autofs_catatonic_mode

by Sasha Levin

From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin(a)ispras.ru> [ Upstream commit ccbe77f7e45dfb4420f7f531b650c00c6e9c7507 ] Syzkaller reports a memory leak: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88810b279e00 (size 96): comm "syz-executor399", pid 3631, jiffies 4294964921 (age 23.870s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 9e 27 0b 81 88 ff ff ..........'..... 08 9e 27 0b 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..'............. backtrace: [<ffffffff814cfc90>] kmalloc_trace+0x20/0x90 mm/slab_common.c:1046 [<ffffffff81bb75ca>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:576 [inline] [<ffffffff81bb75ca>] autofs_wait+0x3fa/0x9a0 fs/autofs/waitq.c:378 [<ffffffff81bb88a7>] autofs_do_expire_multi+0xa7/0x3e0 fs/autofs/expire.c:593 [<ffffffff81bb8c33>] autofs_expire_multi+0x53/0x80 fs/autofs/expire.c:619 [<ffffffff81bb6972>] autofs_root_ioctl_unlocked+0x322/0x3b0 fs/autofs/root.c:897 [<ffffffff81bb6a95>] autofs_root_ioctl+0x25/0x30 fs/autofs/root.c:910 [<ffffffff81602a9c>] vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] [<ffffffff81602a9c>] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] [<ffffffff81602a9c>] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] [<ffffffff81602a9c>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856 [<ffffffff84608225>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [<ffffffff84608225>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [<ffffffff84800087>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd autofs_wait_queue structs should be freed if their wait_ctr becomes zero. Otherwise they will be lost. In this case an AUTOFS_IOC_EXPIRE_MULTI ioctl is done, then a new waitqueue struct is allocated in autofs_wait(), its initial wait_ctr equals 2. After that wait_event_killable() is interrupted (it returns -ERESTARTSYS), so that 'wq->name.name == NULL' condition may be not satisfied. Actually, this condition can be satisfied when autofs_wait_release() or autofs_catatonic_mode() is called and, what is also important, wait_ctr is decremented in those places. Upon the exit of autofs_wait(), wait_ctr is decremented to 1. Then the unmounting process begins: kill_sb calls autofs_catatonic_mode(), which should have freed the waitqueues, but it only decrements its usage counter to zero which is not a correct behaviour. edit:imk This description is of course not correct. The umount performed as a result of an expire is a umount of a mount that has been automounted, it's not the autofs mount itself. They happen independently, usually after everything mounted within the autofs file system has been expired away. If everything hasn't been expired away the automount daemon can still exit leaving mounts in place. But expires done in both cases will result in a notification that calls autofs_wait_release() with a result status. The problem case is the summary execution of of the automount daemon. In this case any waiting processes won't be woken up until either they are terminated or the mount is umounted. end edit: imk So in catatonic mode we should free waitqueues which counter becomes zero. edit: imk Initially I was concerned that the calling of autofs_wait_release() and autofs_catatonic_mode() was not mutually exclusive but that can't be the case (obviously) because the queue entry (or entries) is removed from the list when either of these two functions are called. Consequently the wait entry will be freed by only one of these functions or by the woken process in autofs_wait() depending on the order of the calls. end edit: imk Reported-by: syzbot+5e53f70e69ff0c0a1c0c(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Suggested-by: Takeshi Misawa <jeliantsurux(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin(a)ispras.ru> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov(a)ispras.ru> Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven(a)themaw.net> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin(a)gmail.com> Cc: autofs(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <169112719161.7590.6700123246297365841.stgit(a)donald.themaw.net> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- fs/autofs/waitq.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/autofs/waitq.c b/fs/autofs/waitq.c index 5ced859dac539..dd479198310e8 100644 --- a/fs/autofs/waitq.c +++ b/fs/autofs/waitq.c @@ -32,8 +32,9 @@ void autofs_catatonic_mode(struct autofs_sb_info *sbi) wq->status = -ENOENT; /* Magic is gone - report failure */ kfree(wq->name.name); wq->name.name = NULL; - wq->wait_ctr--; wake_up_interruptible(&wq->queue); + if (!--wq->wait_ctr) + kfree(wq); wq = nwq; } fput(sbi->pipe); /* Close the pipe */ -- 2.40.1

1 year, 7 months

1
2
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 1/3] autofs: fix memory leak of waitqueues in autofs_catatonic_mode

by Sasha Levin

From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin(a)ispras.ru> [ Upstream commit ccbe77f7e45dfb4420f7f531b650c00c6e9c7507 ] Syzkaller reports a memory leak: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88810b279e00 (size 96): comm "syz-executor399", pid 3631, jiffies 4294964921 (age 23.870s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 9e 27 0b 81 88 ff ff ..........'..... 08 9e 27 0b 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..'............. backtrace: [<ffffffff814cfc90>] kmalloc_trace+0x20/0x90 mm/slab_common.c:1046 [<ffffffff81bb75ca>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:576 [inline] [<ffffffff81bb75ca>] autofs_wait+0x3fa/0x9a0 fs/autofs/waitq.c:378 [<ffffffff81bb88a7>] autofs_do_expire_multi+0xa7/0x3e0 fs/autofs/expire.c:593 [<ffffffff81bb8c33>] autofs_expire_multi+0x53/0x80 fs/autofs/expire.c:619 [<ffffffff81bb6972>] autofs_root_ioctl_unlocked+0x322/0x3b0 fs/autofs/root.c:897 [<ffffffff81bb6a95>] autofs_root_ioctl+0x25/0x30 fs/autofs/root.c:910 [<ffffffff81602a9c>] vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] [<ffffffff81602a9c>] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] [<ffffffff81602a9c>] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] [<ffffffff81602a9c>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856 [<ffffffff84608225>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [<ffffffff84608225>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [<ffffffff84800087>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd autofs_wait_queue structs should be freed if their wait_ctr becomes zero. Otherwise they will be lost. In this case an AUTOFS_IOC_EXPIRE_MULTI ioctl is done, then a new waitqueue struct is allocated in autofs_wait(), its initial wait_ctr equals 2. After that wait_event_killable() is interrupted (it returns -ERESTARTSYS), so that 'wq->name.name == NULL' condition may be not satisfied. Actually, this condition can be satisfied when autofs_wait_release() or autofs_catatonic_mode() is called and, what is also important, wait_ctr is decremented in those places. Upon the exit of autofs_wait(), wait_ctr is decremented to 1. Then the unmounting process begins: kill_sb calls autofs_catatonic_mode(), which should have freed the waitqueues, but it only decrements its usage counter to zero which is not a correct behaviour. edit:imk This description is of course not correct. The umount performed as a result of an expire is a umount of a mount that has been automounted, it's not the autofs mount itself. They happen independently, usually after everything mounted within the autofs file system has been expired away. If everything hasn't been expired away the automount daemon can still exit leaving mounts in place. But expires done in both cases will result in a notification that calls autofs_wait_release() with a result status. The problem case is the summary execution of of the automount daemon. In this case any waiting processes won't be woken up until either they are terminated or the mount is umounted. end edit: imk So in catatonic mode we should free waitqueues which counter becomes zero. edit: imk Initially I was concerned that the calling of autofs_wait_release() and autofs_catatonic_mode() was not mutually exclusive but that can't be the case (obviously) because the queue entry (or entries) is removed from the list when either of these two functions are called. Consequently the wait entry will be freed by only one of these functions or by the woken process in autofs_wait() depending on the order of the calls. end edit: imk Reported-by: syzbot+5e53f70e69ff0c0a1c0c(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Suggested-by: Takeshi Misawa <jeliantsurux(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin(a)ispras.ru> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov(a)ispras.ru> Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven(a)themaw.net> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin(a)gmail.com> Cc: autofs(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <169112719161.7590.6700123246297365841.stgit(a)donald.themaw.net> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- fs/autofs/waitq.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/autofs/waitq.c b/fs/autofs/waitq.c index 54c1f8b8b0757..efdc76732faed 100644 --- a/fs/autofs/waitq.c +++ b/fs/autofs/waitq.c @@ -32,8 +32,9 @@ void autofs_catatonic_mode(struct autofs_sb_info *sbi) wq->status = -ENOENT; /* Magic is gone - report failure */ kfree(wq->name.name - wq->offset); wq->name.name = NULL; - wq->wait_ctr--; wake_up_interruptible(&wq->queue); + if (!--wq->wait_ctr) + kfree(wq); wq = nwq; } fput(sbi->pipe); /* Close the pipe */ -- 2.40.1

1 year, 7 months

1
2
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] memfd: replace ratcheting feature from vm.memfd_noexec with" failed to apply to 6.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 9876cfe8ec1cb3c88de31f4d58d57b0e7e22bcc4 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023090700-zippy-raven-214b@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 9876cfe8ec1c ("memfd: replace ratcheting feature from vm.memfd_noexec with hierarchy") 202e14222fad ("memfd: do not -EACCES old memfd_create() users with vm.memfd_noexec=2") badbbcd76545 ("selftests/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED") 72de25913022 ("mm/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED") 3efd33b75358 ("kernel: pid_namespace: remove unused set_memfd_noexec_scope()") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 9876cfe8ec1cb3c88de31f4d58d57b0e7e22bcc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:41:00 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] memfd: replace ratcheting feature from vm.memfd_noexec with hierarchy This sysctl has the very unusual behaviour of not allowing any user (even CAP_SYS_ADMIN) to reduce the restriction setting, meaning that if you were to set this sysctl to a more restrictive option in the host pidns you would need to reboot your machine in order to reset it. The justification given in [1] is that this is a security feature and thus it should not be possible to disable. Aside from the fact that we have plenty of security-related sysctls that can be disabled after being enabled (fs.protected_symlinks for instance), the protection provided by the sysctl is to stop users from being able to create a binary and then execute it. A user with CAP_SYS_ADMIN can trivially do this without memfd_create(2): % cat mount-memfd.c #include <fcntl.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <linux/mount.h> #define SHELLCODE "#!/bin/echo this file was executed from this totally private tmpfs:" int main(void) { int fsfd = fsopen("tmpfs", FSOPEN_CLOEXEC); assert(fsfd >= 0); assert(!fsconfig(fsfd, FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE, NULL, NULL, 2)); int dfd = fsmount(fsfd, FSMOUNT_CLOEXEC, 0); assert(dfd >= 0); int execfd = openat(dfd, "exe", O_CREAT | O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC, 0782); assert(execfd >= 0); assert(write(execfd, SHELLCODE, strlen(SHELLCODE)) == strlen(SHELLCODE)); assert(!close(execfd)); char *execpath = NULL; char *argv[] = { "bad-exe", NULL }, *envp[] = { NULL }; execfd = openat(dfd, "exe", O_PATH | O_CLOEXEC); assert(execfd >= 0); assert(asprintf(&execpath, "/proc/self/fd/%d", execfd) > 0); assert(!execve(execpath, argv, envp)); } % ./mount-memfd this file was executed from this totally private tmpfs: /proc/self/fd/5 % Given that it is possible for CAP_SYS_ADMIN users to create executable binaries without memfd_create(2) and without touching the host filesystem (not to mention the many other things a CAP_SYS_ADMIN process would be able to do that would be equivalent or worse), it seems strange to cause a fair amount of headache to admins when there doesn't appear to be an actual security benefit to blocking this. There appear to be concerns about confused-deputy-esque attacks[2] but a confused deputy that can write to arbitrary sysctls is a bigger security issue than executable memfds. /* New API */ The primary requirement from the original author appears to be more based on the need to be able to restrict an entire system in a hierarchical manner[3], such that child namespaces cannot re-enable executable memfds. So, implement that behaviour explicitly -- the vm.memfd_noexec scope is evaluated up the pidns tree to &init_pid_ns and you have the most restrictive value applied to you. The new lower limit you can set vm.memfd_noexec is whatever limit applies to your parent. Note that a pidns will inherit a copy of the parent pidns's effective vm.memfd_noexec setting at unshare() time. This matches the existing behaviour, and it also ensures that a pidns will never have its vm.memfd_noexec setting *lowered* behind its back (but it will be raised if the parent raises theirs). /* Backwards Compatibility */ As the previous version of the sysctl didn't allow you to lower the setting at all, there are no backwards compatibility issues with this aspect of the change. However it should be noted that now that the setting is completely hierarchical. Previously, a cloned pidns would just copy the current pidns setting, meaning that if the parent's vm.memfd_noexec was changed it wouldn't propoagate to existing pid namespaces. Now, the restriction applies recursively. This is a uAPI change, however: * The sysctl is very new, having been merged in 6.3. * Several aspects of the sysctl were broken up until this patchset and the other patchset by Jeff Xu last month. And thus it seems incredibly unlikely that any real users would run into this issue. In the worst case, if this causes userspace isues we could make it so that modifying the setting follows the hierarchical rules but the restriction checking uses the cached copy. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/CABi2SkWnAgHK1i6iqSqPMYuNEhtHBkO8jUuCvmG3RmUB5TKHJw… [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/CALmYWFs_dNCzw_pW1yRAo4bGCPEtykroEQaowNULp7svwMLjOg… [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/CALmYWFuahdUF7cT4cm7_TGLqPanuHXJ-hVSfZt7vpTnc18DPrw… Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230814-memfd-vm-noexec-uapi-fixes-v2-4-7ff9e3e1… Fixes: 105ff5339f49 ("mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC") Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com> Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus(a)codewreck.org> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp(a)chromium.org> Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu(a)google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h index 53974d79d98e..f9f9931e02d6 100644 --- a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h +++ b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ struct pid_namespace { int reboot; /* group exit code if this pidns was rebooted */ struct ns_common ns; #if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) - /* sysctl for vm.memfd_noexec */ int memfd_noexec_scope; #endif } __randomize_layout; @@ -56,6 +55,23 @@ static inline struct pid_namespace *get_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns) return ns; } +#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) +static inline int pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(struct pid_namespace *ns) +{ + int scope = MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC; + + for (; ns; ns = ns->parent) + scope = max(scope, READ_ONCE(ns->memfd_noexec_scope)); + + return scope; +} +#else +static inline int pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(struct pid_namespace *ns) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif + extern struct pid_namespace *copy_pid_ns(unsigned long flags, struct user_namespace *user_ns, struct pid_namespace *ns); extern void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns); @@ -70,6 +86,11 @@ static inline struct pid_namespace *get_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns) return ns; } +static inline int pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(struct pid_namespace *ns) +{ + return 0; +} + static inline struct pid_namespace *copy_pid_ns(unsigned long flags, struct user_namespace *user_ns, struct pid_namespace *ns) { diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c index 6a1d23a11026..fee14a4486a3 100644 --- a/kernel/pid.c +++ b/kernel/pid.c @@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ struct pid_namespace init_pid_ns = { #ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS .ns.ops = &pidns_operations, #endif +#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) + .memfd_noexec_scope = MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC, +#endif }; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_pid_ns); diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c index 0bf44afe04dd..619972c78774 100644 --- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c +++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c @@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ static struct pid_namespace *create_pid_namespace(struct user_namespace *user_ns ns->user_ns = get_user_ns(user_ns); ns->ucounts = ucounts; ns->pid_allocated = PIDNS_ADDING; - - initialize_memfd_noexec_scope(ns); - +#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) + ns->memfd_noexec_scope = pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(parent_pid_ns); +#endif return ns; out_free_idr: diff --git a/kernel/pid_sysctl.h b/kernel/pid_sysctl.h index b26e027fc9cd..2ee41a3a1dfd 100644 --- a/kernel/pid_sysctl.h +++ b/kernel/pid_sysctl.h @@ -5,33 +5,30 @@ #include <linux/pid_namespace.h> #if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) -static inline void initialize_memfd_noexec_scope(struct pid_namespace *ns) -{ - ns->memfd_noexec_scope = - task_active_pid_ns(current)->memfd_noexec_scope; -} - static int pid_mfd_noexec_dointvec_minmax(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buf, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) { struct pid_namespace *ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); struct ctl_table table_copy; + int err, scope, parent_scope; if (write && !ns_capable(ns->user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) return -EPERM; table_copy = *table; - if (ns != &init_pid_ns) - table_copy.data = &ns->memfd_noexec_scope; - /* - * set minimum to current value, the effect is only bigger - * value is accepted. - */ - if (*(int *)table_copy.data > *(int *)table_copy.extra1) - table_copy.extra1 = table_copy.data; + /* You cannot set a lower enforcement value than your parent. */ + parent_scope = pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(ns->parent); + /* Equivalent to pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(ns). */ + scope = max(READ_ONCE(ns->memfd_noexec_scope), parent_scope); + + table_copy.data = &scope; + table_copy.extra1 = &parent_scope; - return proc_dointvec_minmax(&table_copy, write, buf, lenp, ppos); + err = proc_dointvec_minmax(&table_copy, write, buf, lenp, ppos); + if (!err && write) + WRITE_ONCE(ns->memfd_noexec_scope, scope); + return err; } static struct ctl_table pid_ns_ctl_table_vm[] = { @@ -51,7 +48,6 @@ static inline void register_pid_ns_sysctl_table_vm(void) register_sysctl("vm", pid_ns_ctl_table_vm); } #else -static inline void initialize_memfd_noexec_scope(struct pid_namespace *ns) {} static inline void register_pid_ns_sysctl_table_vm(void) {} #endif diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index aa46521057ab..1cad1904fc26 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -271,7 +271,8 @@ long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned int arg) static int check_sysctl_memfd_noexec(unsigned int *flags) { #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL - int sysctl = task_active_pid_ns(current)->memfd_noexec_scope; + struct pid_namespace *ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); + int sysctl = pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(ns); if (!(*flags & (MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))) { if (sysctl >= MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL)

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] memfd: replace ratcheting feature from vm.memfd_noexec with" failed to apply to 6.5-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.5-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.5.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 9876cfe8ec1cb3c88de31f4d58d57b0e7e22bcc4 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023090753-unashamed-carnival-1476@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.5.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 9876cfe8ec1c ("memfd: replace ratcheting feature from vm.memfd_noexec with hierarchy") 202e14222fad ("memfd: do not -EACCES old memfd_create() users with vm.memfd_noexec=2") badbbcd76545 ("selftests/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED") 72de25913022 ("mm/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 9876cfe8ec1cb3c88de31f4d58d57b0e7e22bcc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:41:00 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] memfd: replace ratcheting feature from vm.memfd_noexec with hierarchy This sysctl has the very unusual behaviour of not allowing any user (even CAP_SYS_ADMIN) to reduce the restriction setting, meaning that if you were to set this sysctl to a more restrictive option in the host pidns you would need to reboot your machine in order to reset it. The justification given in [1] is that this is a security feature and thus it should not be possible to disable. Aside from the fact that we have plenty of security-related sysctls that can be disabled after being enabled (fs.protected_symlinks for instance), the protection provided by the sysctl is to stop users from being able to create a binary and then execute it. A user with CAP_SYS_ADMIN can trivially do this without memfd_create(2): % cat mount-memfd.c #include <fcntl.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <linux/mount.h> #define SHELLCODE "#!/bin/echo this file was executed from this totally private tmpfs:" int main(void) { int fsfd = fsopen("tmpfs", FSOPEN_CLOEXEC); assert(fsfd >= 0); assert(!fsconfig(fsfd, FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE, NULL, NULL, 2)); int dfd = fsmount(fsfd, FSMOUNT_CLOEXEC, 0); assert(dfd >= 0); int execfd = openat(dfd, "exe", O_CREAT | O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC, 0782); assert(execfd >= 0); assert(write(execfd, SHELLCODE, strlen(SHELLCODE)) == strlen(SHELLCODE)); assert(!close(execfd)); char *execpath = NULL; char *argv[] = { "bad-exe", NULL }, *envp[] = { NULL }; execfd = openat(dfd, "exe", O_PATH | O_CLOEXEC); assert(execfd >= 0); assert(asprintf(&execpath, "/proc/self/fd/%d", execfd) > 0); assert(!execve(execpath, argv, envp)); } % ./mount-memfd this file was executed from this totally private tmpfs: /proc/self/fd/5 % Given that it is possible for CAP_SYS_ADMIN users to create executable binaries without memfd_create(2) and without touching the host filesystem (not to mention the many other things a CAP_SYS_ADMIN process would be able to do that would be equivalent or worse), it seems strange to cause a fair amount of headache to admins when there doesn't appear to be an actual security benefit to blocking this. There appear to be concerns about confused-deputy-esque attacks[2] but a confused deputy that can write to arbitrary sysctls is a bigger security issue than executable memfds. /* New API */ The primary requirement from the original author appears to be more based on the need to be able to restrict an entire system in a hierarchical manner[3], such that child namespaces cannot re-enable executable memfds. So, implement that behaviour explicitly -- the vm.memfd_noexec scope is evaluated up the pidns tree to &init_pid_ns and you have the most restrictive value applied to you. The new lower limit you can set vm.memfd_noexec is whatever limit applies to your parent. Note that a pidns will inherit a copy of the parent pidns's effective vm.memfd_noexec setting at unshare() time. This matches the existing behaviour, and it also ensures that a pidns will never have its vm.memfd_noexec setting *lowered* behind its back (but it will be raised if the parent raises theirs). /* Backwards Compatibility */ As the previous version of the sysctl didn't allow you to lower the setting at all, there are no backwards compatibility issues with this aspect of the change. However it should be noted that now that the setting is completely hierarchical. Previously, a cloned pidns would just copy the current pidns setting, meaning that if the parent's vm.memfd_noexec was changed it wouldn't propoagate to existing pid namespaces. Now, the restriction applies recursively. This is a uAPI change, however: * The sysctl is very new, having been merged in 6.3. * Several aspects of the sysctl were broken up until this patchset and the other patchset by Jeff Xu last month. And thus it seems incredibly unlikely that any real users would run into this issue. In the worst case, if this causes userspace isues we could make it so that modifying the setting follows the hierarchical rules but the restriction checking uses the cached copy. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/CABi2SkWnAgHK1i6iqSqPMYuNEhtHBkO8jUuCvmG3RmUB5TKHJw… [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/CALmYWFs_dNCzw_pW1yRAo4bGCPEtykroEQaowNULp7svwMLjOg… [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/CALmYWFuahdUF7cT4cm7_TGLqPanuHXJ-hVSfZt7vpTnc18DPrw… Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230814-memfd-vm-noexec-uapi-fixes-v2-4-7ff9e3e1… Fixes: 105ff5339f49 ("mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC") Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com> Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus(a)codewreck.org> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp(a)chromium.org> Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu(a)google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h index 53974d79d98e..f9f9931e02d6 100644 --- a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h +++ b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ struct pid_namespace { int reboot; /* group exit code if this pidns was rebooted */ struct ns_common ns; #if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) - /* sysctl for vm.memfd_noexec */ int memfd_noexec_scope; #endif } __randomize_layout; @@ -56,6 +55,23 @@ static inline struct pid_namespace *get_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns) return ns; } +#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) +static inline int pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(struct pid_namespace *ns) +{ + int scope = MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC; + + for (; ns; ns = ns->parent) + scope = max(scope, READ_ONCE(ns->memfd_noexec_scope)); + + return scope; +} +#else +static inline int pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(struct pid_namespace *ns) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif + extern struct pid_namespace *copy_pid_ns(unsigned long flags, struct user_namespace *user_ns, struct pid_namespace *ns); extern void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns); @@ -70,6 +86,11 @@ static inline struct pid_namespace *get_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns) return ns; } +static inline int pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(struct pid_namespace *ns) +{ + return 0; +} + static inline struct pid_namespace *copy_pid_ns(unsigned long flags, struct user_namespace *user_ns, struct pid_namespace *ns) { diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c index 6a1d23a11026..fee14a4486a3 100644 --- a/kernel/pid.c +++ b/kernel/pid.c @@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ struct pid_namespace init_pid_ns = { #ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS .ns.ops = &pidns_operations, #endif +#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) + .memfd_noexec_scope = MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC, +#endif }; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_pid_ns); diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c index 0bf44afe04dd..619972c78774 100644 --- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c +++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c @@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ static struct pid_namespace *create_pid_namespace(struct user_namespace *user_ns ns->user_ns = get_user_ns(user_ns); ns->ucounts = ucounts; ns->pid_allocated = PIDNS_ADDING; - - initialize_memfd_noexec_scope(ns); - +#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) + ns->memfd_noexec_scope = pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(parent_pid_ns); +#endif return ns; out_free_idr: diff --git a/kernel/pid_sysctl.h b/kernel/pid_sysctl.h index b26e027fc9cd..2ee41a3a1dfd 100644 --- a/kernel/pid_sysctl.h +++ b/kernel/pid_sysctl.h @@ -5,33 +5,30 @@ #include <linux/pid_namespace.h> #if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) -static inline void initialize_memfd_noexec_scope(struct pid_namespace *ns) -{ - ns->memfd_noexec_scope = - task_active_pid_ns(current)->memfd_noexec_scope; -} - static int pid_mfd_noexec_dointvec_minmax(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buf, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) { struct pid_namespace *ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); struct ctl_table table_copy; + int err, scope, parent_scope; if (write && !ns_capable(ns->user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) return -EPERM; table_copy = *table; - if (ns != &init_pid_ns) - table_copy.data = &ns->memfd_noexec_scope; - /* - * set minimum to current value, the effect is only bigger - * value is accepted. - */ - if (*(int *)table_copy.data > *(int *)table_copy.extra1) - table_copy.extra1 = table_copy.data; + /* You cannot set a lower enforcement value than your parent. */ + parent_scope = pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(ns->parent); + /* Equivalent to pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(ns). */ + scope = max(READ_ONCE(ns->memfd_noexec_scope), parent_scope); + + table_copy.data = &scope; + table_copy.extra1 = &parent_scope; - return proc_dointvec_minmax(&table_copy, write, buf, lenp, ppos); + err = proc_dointvec_minmax(&table_copy, write, buf, lenp, ppos); + if (!err && write) + WRITE_ONCE(ns->memfd_noexec_scope, scope); + return err; } static struct ctl_table pid_ns_ctl_table_vm[] = { @@ -51,7 +48,6 @@ static inline void register_pid_ns_sysctl_table_vm(void) register_sysctl("vm", pid_ns_ctl_table_vm); } #else -static inline void initialize_memfd_noexec_scope(struct pid_namespace *ns) {} static inline void register_pid_ns_sysctl_table_vm(void) {} #endif diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index aa46521057ab..1cad1904fc26 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -271,7 +271,8 @@ long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned int arg) static int check_sysctl_memfd_noexec(unsigned int *flags) { #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL - int sysctl = task_active_pid_ns(current)->memfd_noexec_scope; + struct pid_namespace *ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); + int sysctl = pidns_memfd_noexec_scope(ns); if (!(*flags & (MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))) { if (sysctl >= MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL)

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] memfd: do not -EACCES old memfd_create() users with" failed to apply to 6.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 202e14222fadb246dfdf182e67de1518e86a1e20 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023090747-scant-detest-aeed@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 202e14222fad ("memfd: do not -EACCES old memfd_create() users with vm.memfd_noexec=2") badbbcd76545 ("selftests/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED") 72de25913022 ("mm/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 202e14222fadb246dfdf182e67de1518e86a1e20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:40:58 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] memfd: do not -EACCES old memfd_create() users with vm.memfd_noexec=2 Given the difficulty of auditing all of userspace to figure out whether every memfd_create() user has switched to passing MFD_EXEC and MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL flags, it seems far less distruptive to make it possible for older programs that don't make use of executable memfds to run under vm.memfd_noexec=2. Otherwise, a small dependency change can result in spurious errors. For programs that don't use executable memfds, passing MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL is functionally a no-op and thus having the same In addition, every failure under vm.memfd_noexec=2 needs to print to the kernel log so that userspace can figure out where the error came from. The concerns about pr_warn_ratelimited() spam that caused the switch to pr_warn_once()[1,2] do not apply to the vm.memfd_noexec=2 case. This is a user-visible API change, but as it allows programs to do something that would be blocked before, and the sysctl itself was broken and recently released, it seems unlikely this will cause any issues. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/Y5yS8wCnuYGLHMj4@x1n/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/202212161233.85C9783FB@keescook/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230814-memfd-vm-noexec-uapi-fixes-v2-2-7ff9e3e1… Fixes: 105ff5339f49 ("mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC") Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com> Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus(a)codewreck.org> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp(a)chromium.org> Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu(a)google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h index c758809d5bcf..53974d79d98e 100644 --- a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h +++ b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h @@ -17,18 +17,10 @@ struct fs_pin; #if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) -/* - * sysctl for vm.memfd_noexec - * 0: memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL - * acts like MFD_EXEC was set. - * 1: memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL - * acts like MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL was set. - * 2: memfd_create() without MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL will be - * rejected. - */ -#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC 0 -#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL 1 -#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED 2 +/* modes for vm.memfd_noexec sysctl */ +#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC 0 /* MFD_EXEC implied if unset */ +#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL 1 /* MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL implied if unset */ +#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED 2 /* same as 1, except MFD_EXEC rejected */ #endif struct pid_namespace { diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index 0bdbd2335af7..d65485c762de 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -271,30 +271,22 @@ long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned int arg) static int check_sysctl_memfd_noexec(unsigned int *flags) { #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL - char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; - int sysctl = MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC; - struct pid_namespace *ns; - - ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); - if (ns) - sysctl = ns->memfd_noexec_scope; + int sysctl = task_active_pid_ns(current)->memfd_noexec_scope; if (!(*flags & (MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))) { - if (sysctl == MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL) + if (sysctl >= MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL) *flags |= MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL; else *flags |= MFD_EXEC; } - if (*flags & MFD_EXEC && sysctl >= MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED) { - pr_warn_once( - "memfd_create(): MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL is enforced, pid=%d '%s'\n", - task_pid_nr(current), get_task_comm(comm, current)); - + if (!(*flags & MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL) && sysctl >= MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED) { + pr_err_ratelimited( + "%s[%d]: memfd_create() requires MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL with vm.memfd_noexec=%d\n", + current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), sysctl); return -EACCES; } #endif - return 0; } @@ -302,7 +294,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, const char __user *, uname, unsigned int, flags) { - char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; unsigned int *file_seals; struct file *file; int fd, error; @@ -325,12 +316,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, if (!(flags & (MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))) { pr_warn_once( - "memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL, pid=%d '%s'\n", - task_pid_nr(current), get_task_comm(comm, current)); + "%s[%d]: memfd_create() called without MFD_EXEC or MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL set\n", + current->comm, task_pid_nr(current)); } - if (check_sysctl_memfd_noexec(&flags) < 0) - return -EACCES; + error = check_sysctl_memfd_noexec(&flags); + if (error < 0) + return error; /* length includes terminating zero */ len = strnlen_user(uname, MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN + 1); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c index 8eb49204f9ea..8b7390ad81d1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c @@ -1145,11 +1145,23 @@ static void test_sysctl_child(void) printf("%s sysctl 2\n", memfd_str); sysctl_assert_write("2"); - mfd_fail_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_2", - MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); - mfd_fail_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_2_MFD_EXEC", - MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_EXEC); - fd = mfd_assert_new("", 0, MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL); + mfd_fail_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_2_exec", + MFD_EXEC | MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); + + fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_2_dfl", + mfd_def_size, + MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); + mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0666); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_SEAL_EXEC); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0777); + close(fd); + + fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_2_noexec_seal", + mfd_def_size, + MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL | MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); + mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0666); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_SEAL_EXEC); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0777); close(fd); sysctl_fail_write("0");

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] memfd: do not -EACCES old memfd_create() users with" failed to apply to 6.5-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.5-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.5.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 202e14222fadb246dfdf182e67de1518e86a1e20 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023090745-depict-kinswoman-9083@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.5.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 202e14222fad ("memfd: do not -EACCES old memfd_create() users with vm.memfd_noexec=2") badbbcd76545 ("selftests/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED") 72de25913022 ("mm/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 202e14222fadb246dfdf182e67de1518e86a1e20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:40:58 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] memfd: do not -EACCES old memfd_create() users with vm.memfd_noexec=2 Given the difficulty of auditing all of userspace to figure out whether every memfd_create() user has switched to passing MFD_EXEC and MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL flags, it seems far less distruptive to make it possible for older programs that don't make use of executable memfds to run under vm.memfd_noexec=2. Otherwise, a small dependency change can result in spurious errors. For programs that don't use executable memfds, passing MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL is functionally a no-op and thus having the same In addition, every failure under vm.memfd_noexec=2 needs to print to the kernel log so that userspace can figure out where the error came from. The concerns about pr_warn_ratelimited() spam that caused the switch to pr_warn_once()[1,2] do not apply to the vm.memfd_noexec=2 case. This is a user-visible API change, but as it allows programs to do something that would be blocked before, and the sysctl itself was broken and recently released, it seems unlikely this will cause any issues. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/Y5yS8wCnuYGLHMj4@x1n/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/202212161233.85C9783FB@keescook/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230814-memfd-vm-noexec-uapi-fixes-v2-2-7ff9e3e1… Fixes: 105ff5339f49 ("mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC") Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com> Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus(a)codewreck.org> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp(a)chromium.org> Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu(a)google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h index c758809d5bcf..53974d79d98e 100644 --- a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h +++ b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h @@ -17,18 +17,10 @@ struct fs_pin; #if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) -/* - * sysctl for vm.memfd_noexec - * 0: memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL - * acts like MFD_EXEC was set. - * 1: memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL - * acts like MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL was set. - * 2: memfd_create() without MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL will be - * rejected. - */ -#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC 0 -#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL 1 -#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED 2 +/* modes for vm.memfd_noexec sysctl */ +#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC 0 /* MFD_EXEC implied if unset */ +#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL 1 /* MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL implied if unset */ +#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED 2 /* same as 1, except MFD_EXEC rejected */ #endif struct pid_namespace { diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index 0bdbd2335af7..d65485c762de 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -271,30 +271,22 @@ long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned int arg) static int check_sysctl_memfd_noexec(unsigned int *flags) { #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL - char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; - int sysctl = MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC; - struct pid_namespace *ns; - - ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); - if (ns) - sysctl = ns->memfd_noexec_scope; + int sysctl = task_active_pid_ns(current)->memfd_noexec_scope; if (!(*flags & (MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))) { - if (sysctl == MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL) + if (sysctl >= MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL) *flags |= MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL; else *flags |= MFD_EXEC; } - if (*flags & MFD_EXEC && sysctl >= MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED) { - pr_warn_once( - "memfd_create(): MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL is enforced, pid=%d '%s'\n", - task_pid_nr(current), get_task_comm(comm, current)); - + if (!(*flags & MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL) && sysctl >= MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED) { + pr_err_ratelimited( + "%s[%d]: memfd_create() requires MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL with vm.memfd_noexec=%d\n", + current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), sysctl); return -EACCES; } #endif - return 0; } @@ -302,7 +294,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, const char __user *, uname, unsigned int, flags) { - char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; unsigned int *file_seals; struct file *file; int fd, error; @@ -325,12 +316,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, if (!(flags & (MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))) { pr_warn_once( - "memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL, pid=%d '%s'\n", - task_pid_nr(current), get_task_comm(comm, current)); + "%s[%d]: memfd_create() called without MFD_EXEC or MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL set\n", + current->comm, task_pid_nr(current)); } - if (check_sysctl_memfd_noexec(&flags) < 0) - return -EACCES; + error = check_sysctl_memfd_noexec(&flags); + if (error < 0) + return error; /* length includes terminating zero */ len = strnlen_user(uname, MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN + 1); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c index 8eb49204f9ea..8b7390ad81d1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c @@ -1145,11 +1145,23 @@ static void test_sysctl_child(void) printf("%s sysctl 2\n", memfd_str); sysctl_assert_write("2"); - mfd_fail_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_2", - MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); - mfd_fail_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_2_MFD_EXEC", - MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_EXEC); - fd = mfd_assert_new("", 0, MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL); + mfd_fail_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_2_exec", + MFD_EXEC | MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); + + fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_2_dfl", + mfd_def_size, + MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); + mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0666); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_SEAL_EXEC); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0777); + close(fd); + + fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_2_noexec_seal", + mfd_def_size, + MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL | MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); + mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0666); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_SEAL_EXEC); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0777); close(fd); sysctl_fail_write("0");

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related" failed to apply to 6.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 434ed3350f57c03a9654fe0619755cc137a58935 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023090742-velocity-perjury-fa80@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 434ed3350f57 ("memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flags") 202e14222fad ("memfd: do not -EACCES old memfd_create() users with vm.memfd_noexec=2") badbbcd76545 ("selftests/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED") 72de25913022 ("mm/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 434ed3350f57c03a9654fe0619755cc137a58935 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:40:59 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flags In order to incentivise userspace to switch to passing MFD_EXEC and MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL, we need to provide a warning on each attempt to call memfd_create() without the new flags. pr_warn_once() is not useful because on most systems the one warning is burned up during the boot process (on my system, systemd does this within the first second of boot) and thus userspace will in practice never see the warnings to push them to switch to the new flags. The original patchset[1] used pr_warn_ratelimited(), however there were concerns about the degree of spam in the kernel log[2,3]. The resulting inability to detect every case was flagged as an issue at the time[4]. While we could come up with an alternative rate-limiting scheme such as only outputting the message if vm.memfd_noexec has been modified, or only outputting the message once for a given task, these alternatives have downsides that don't make sense given how low-stakes a single kernel warning message is. Switching to pr_info_ratelimited() instead should be fine -- it's possible some monitoring tool will be unhappy with a stream of warning-level messages but there's already plenty of info-level message spam in dmesg. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/20221215001205.51969-4-jeffxu@google.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/202212161233.85C9783FB@keescook/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/Y5yS8wCnuYGLHMj4@x1n/ [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/f185bb42-b29c-977e-312e-3349eea15383@linuxfoundatio… Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230814-memfd-vm-noexec-uapi-fixes-v2-3-7ff9e3e1… Fixes: 105ff5339f49 ("mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC") Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp(a)chromium.org> Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus(a)codewreck.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index d65485c762de..aa46521057ab 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, return -EINVAL; if (!(flags & (MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))) { - pr_warn_once( + pr_info_ratelimited( "%s[%d]: memfd_create() called without MFD_EXEC or MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL set\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current)); }

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related" failed to apply to 6.5-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.5-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.5.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 434ed3350f57c03a9654fe0619755cc137a58935 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023090740-subfloor-legal-0e0a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.5.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 434ed3350f57 ("memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flags") 202e14222fad ("memfd: do not -EACCES old memfd_create() users with vm.memfd_noexec=2") badbbcd76545 ("selftests/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED") 72de25913022 ("mm/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 434ed3350f57c03a9654fe0619755cc137a58935 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:40:59 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flags In order to incentivise userspace to switch to passing MFD_EXEC and MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL, we need to provide a warning on each attempt to call memfd_create() without the new flags. pr_warn_once() is not useful because on most systems the one warning is burned up during the boot process (on my system, systemd does this within the first second of boot) and thus userspace will in practice never see the warnings to push them to switch to the new flags. The original patchset[1] used pr_warn_ratelimited(), however there were concerns about the degree of spam in the kernel log[2,3]. The resulting inability to detect every case was flagged as an issue at the time[4]. While we could come up with an alternative rate-limiting scheme such as only outputting the message if vm.memfd_noexec has been modified, or only outputting the message once for a given task, these alternatives have downsides that don't make sense given how low-stakes a single kernel warning message is. Switching to pr_info_ratelimited() instead should be fine -- it's possible some monitoring tool will be unhappy with a stream of warning-level messages but there's already plenty of info-level message spam in dmesg. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/20221215001205.51969-4-jeffxu@google.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/202212161233.85C9783FB@keescook/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/Y5yS8wCnuYGLHMj4@x1n/ [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/f185bb42-b29c-977e-312e-3349eea15383@linuxfoundatio… Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230814-memfd-vm-noexec-uapi-fixes-v2-3-7ff9e3e1… Fixes: 105ff5339f49 ("mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC") Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp(a)chromium.org> Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus(a)codewreck.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index d65485c762de..aa46521057ab 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, return -EINVAL; if (!(flags & (MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))) { - pr_warn_once( + pr_info_ratelimited( "%s[%d]: memfd_create() called without MFD_EXEC or MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL set\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current)); }

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror September 2023