September 2023 - Linux-stable-mirror

stable-rc/linux-4.19.y build: 16 builds: 2 failed, 14 passed, 36 warnings (v4.19.294-178-g9828e124552d)

by kernelci.org bot

stable-rc/linux-4.19.y build: 16 builds: 2 failed, 14 passed, 36 warnings (v4.19.294-178-g9828e124552d) Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.19.y/kernel/v4.19.294-1… Tree: stable-rc Branch: linux-4.19.y Git Describe: v4.19.294-178-g9828e124552d Git Commit: 9828e124552d9b3cda4a0077c473ef200e4464ad Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Built: 7 unique architectures Build Failures Detected: riscv: allnoconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL Warnings Detected: arc: arm64: defconfig (gcc-10): 7 warnings defconfig+arm64-chromebook (gcc-10): 7 warnings arm: imx_v6_v7_defconfig (gcc-10): 2 warnings multi_v5_defconfig (gcc-10): 1 warning multi_v7_defconfig (gcc-10): 1 warning omap2plus_defconfig (gcc-10): 2 warnings i386: allnoconfig (gcc-10): 2 warnings i386_defconfig (gcc-10): 4 warnings mips: 32r2el_defconfig (gcc-10): 1 warning riscv: defconfig (gcc-10): 1 warning x86_64: tinyconfig (gcc-10): 2 warnings x86_64_defconfig (gcc-10): 3 warnings x86_64_defconfig+x86-chromebook (gcc-10): 3 warnings Warnings summary: 13 include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 7 fs/quota/dquot.c:2608:1: warning: label ‘out’ defined but not used [-Wunused-label] 6 aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: -z norelro ignored 5 ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE 3 ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' 2 ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' Section mismatches summary: 3 WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es). ================================================================================ Detailed per-defconfig build reports: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32r2el_defconfig (mips, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Warnings: include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- allnoconfig (i386, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- allnoconfig (riscv, gcc-10) — FAIL, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig (riscv, gcc-10) — FAIL, 0 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Warnings: include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig (arm64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 7 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: fs/quota/dquot.c:2608:1: warning: label ‘out’ defined but not used [-Wunused-label] include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: -z norelro ignored aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: -z norelro ignored aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: -z norelro ignored Section mismatches: WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig+arm64-chromebook (arm64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 7 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: fs/quota/dquot.c:2608:1: warning: label ‘out’ defined but not used [-Wunused-label] include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: -z norelro ignored aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: -z norelro ignored aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: -z norelro ignored Section mismatches: WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- haps_hs_smp_defconfig (arc, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i386_defconfig (i386, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 4 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: fs/quota/dquot.c:2608:1: warning: label ‘out’ defined but not used [-Wunused-label] include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- imx_v6_v7_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: fs/quota/dquot.c:2608:1: warning: label ‘out’ defined but not used [-Wunused-label] include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- multi_v5_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Warnings: include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] Section mismatches: WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- multi_v7_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Warnings: include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- omap2plus_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: fs/quota/dquot.c:2608:1: warning: label ‘out’ defined but not used [-Wunused-label] include/linux/pci-ats.h:70:12: warning: ‘pci_prg_resp_pasid_required’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tinyconfig (x86_64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- vexpress_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64_defconfig (x86_64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: fs/quota/dquot.c:2608:1: warning: label ‘out’ defined but not used [-Wunused-label] ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64_defconfig+x86-chromebook (x86_64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: fs/quota/dquot.c:2608:1: warning: label ‘out’ defined but not used [-Wunused-label] ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE --- For more info write to <info(a)kernelci.org>

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

stable-rc/linux-4.14.y build: 16 builds: 0 failed, 16 passed, 21 warnings (v4.14.325-109-g8a7f3816a12c)

by kernelci.org bot

stable-rc/linux-4.14.y build: 16 builds: 0 failed, 16 passed, 21 warnings (v4.14.325-109-g8a7f3816a12c) Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.14.y/kernel/v4.14.325-1… Tree: stable-rc Branch: linux-4.14.y Git Describe: v4.14.325-109-g8a7f3816a12c Git Commit: 8a7f3816a12cf10056b8805c8b2f4b190d264287 Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Built: 6 unique architectures Warnings Detected: arc: arm64: arm: i386: allnoconfig (gcc-10): 3 warnings i386_defconfig (gcc-10): 3 warnings tinyconfig (gcc-10): 3 warnings mips: x86_64: allnoconfig (gcc-10): 3 warnings tinyconfig (gcc-10): 3 warnings x86_64_defconfig (gcc-10): 3 warnings x86_64_defconfig+x86-chromebook (gcc-10): 3 warnings Warnings summary: 7 ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE 4 ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' 4 Warning: synced file at 'tools/objtool/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h' differs from latest kernel version at 'arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h' 3 ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' 3 arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:480: Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `btr' Section mismatches summary: 3 WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es). ================================================================================ Detailed per-defconfig build reports: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32r2el_defconfig (mips, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- allnoconfig (x86_64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: Warning: synced file at 'tools/objtool/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h' differs from latest kernel version at 'arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h' ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- allnoconfig (i386, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:480: Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `btr' ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig (arm64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches Section mismatches: WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig+arm64-chromebook (arm64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches Section mismatches: WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- haps_hs_smp_defconfig (arc, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i386_defconfig (i386, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:480: Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `btr' ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- imx_v6_v7_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- multi_v5_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches Section mismatches: WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- multi_v7_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- omap2plus_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tinyconfig (i386, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:480: Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `btr' ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tinyconfig (x86_64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: Warning: synced file at 'tools/objtool/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h' differs from latest kernel version at 'arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h' ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- vexpress_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64_defconfig (x86_64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: Warning: synced file at 'tools/objtool/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h' differs from latest kernel version at 'arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h' ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64_defconfig+x86-chromebook (x86_64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: Warning: synced file at 'tools/objtool/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h' differs from latest kernel version at 'arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h' ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE --- For more info write to <info(a)kernelci.org>

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

stable-rc/linux-6.1.y build: 22 builds: 18 failed, 4 passed, 108 errors, 19 warnings (v6.1.52-547-g0480b8535974)

by kernelci.org bot

stable-rc/linux-6.1.y build: 22 builds: 18 failed, 4 passed, 108 errors, 19 warnings (v6.1.52-547-g0480b8535974) Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-6.1.y/kernel/v6.1.52-547-… Tree: stable-rc Branch: linux-6.1.y Git Describe: v6.1.52-547-g0480b8535974 Git Commit: 0480b8535974b203450ef268b4f9277c0aff3544 Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Built: 7 unique architectures Build Failures Detected: arc: haps_hs_smp_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL arm64: allnoconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL defconfig+arm64-chromebook: (gcc-10) FAIL arm: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL multi_v5_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL multi_v7_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL omap2plus_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL vexpress_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL i386: allnoconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL i386_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL mips: 32r2el_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL riscv: allnoconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL rv32_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL x86_64: allnoconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL x86_64_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL x86_64_defconfig+x86-chromebook: (gcc-10) FAIL Errors and Warnings Detected: arc: haps_hs_smp_defconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning arm64: allnoconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning defconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning defconfig+arm64-chromebook (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning arm: imx_v6_v7_defconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning multi_v5_defconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning multi_v7_defconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning omap2plus_defconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning vexpress_defconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning i386: allnoconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning i386_defconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning mips: 32r2el_defconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 2 warnings riscv: allnoconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning defconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning rv32_defconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning x86_64: allnoconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning x86_64_defconfig (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning x86_64_defconfig+x86-chromebook (gcc-10): 6 errors, 1 warning Errors summary: 85 io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? 18 io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] 5 io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: 'struct io_worker' has no member named 'wq'; did you mean 'wqe'? Warnings summary: 15 cc1: some warnings being treated as errors 3 cc1: all warnings being treated as errors 1 arch/mips/boot/dts/img/boston.dts:128.19-178.5: Warning (pci_device_reg): /pci@14000000/pci2_root@0,0,0: PCI unit address format error, expected "0,0" ================================================================================ Detailed per-defconfig build reports: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32r2el_defconfig (mips, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: arch/mips/boot/dts/img/boston.dts:128.19-178.5: Warning (pci_device_reg): /pci@14000000/pci2_root@0,0,0: PCI unit address format error, expected "0,0" cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- allnoconfig (arm64, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- allnoconfig (x86_64, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- allnoconfig (riscv, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- allnoconfig (i386, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig (arm64, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig (riscv, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig+arm64-chromebook (arm64, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- haps_hs_smp_defconfig (arc, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: 'struct io_worker' has no member named 'wq'; did you mean 'wqe'? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: 'struct io_worker' has no member named 'wq'; did you mean 'wqe'? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: 'struct io_worker' has no member named 'wq'; did you mean 'wqe'? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: 'struct io_worker' has no member named 'wq'; did you mean 'wqe'? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: 'struct io_worker' has no member named 'wq'; did you mean 'wqe'? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i386_defconfig (i386, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: all warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- imx_v6_v7_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- multi_v5_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- multi_v7_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- nommu_k210_defconfig (riscv, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- nommu_k210_sdcard_defconfig (riscv, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- omap2plus_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rv32_defconfig (riscv, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tinyconfig (i386, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tinyconfig (x86_64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- vexpress_defconfig (arm, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64_defconfig (x86_64, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: all warnings being treated as errors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64_defconfig+x86-chromebook (x86_64, gcc-10) — FAIL, 6 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Errors: io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:191:43: error: ‘struct io_worker’ has no member named ‘wq’; did you mean ‘wqe’? io_uring/io-wq.c:192:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] Warnings: cc1: all warnings being treated as errors --- For more info write to <info(a)kernelci.org>

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: break out of iowq iopoll on teardown" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 45500dc4e01c167ee063f3dcc22f51ced5b2b1e9 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023090909-unnatural-giddiness-7f7a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 45500dc4e01c ("io_uring: break out of iowq iopoll on teardown") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 45500dc4e01c167ee063f3dcc22f51ced5b2b1e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 13:50:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: break out of iowq iopoll on teardown io-wq will retry iopoll even when it failed with -EAGAIN. If that races with task exit, which sets TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL for all its workers, such workers might potentially infinitely spin retrying iopoll again and again and each time failing on some allocation / waiting / etc. Don't keep spinning if io-wq is dying. Fixes: 561fb04a6a225 ("io_uring: replace workqueue usage with io-wq") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c index 62f345587df5..1ecc8c748768 100644 --- a/io_uring/io-wq.c +++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c @@ -174,6 +174,16 @@ static void io_worker_ref_put(struct io_wq *wq) complete(&wq->worker_done); } +bool io_wq_worker_stopped(void) +{ + struct io_worker *worker = current->worker_private; + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!io_wq_current_is_worker())) + return true; + + return test_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT, &worker->wq->state); +} + static void io_worker_cancel_cb(struct io_worker *worker) { struct io_wq_acct *acct = io_wq_get_acct(worker); diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.h b/io_uring/io-wq.h index 06d9ca90c577..2b2a6406dd8e 100644 --- a/io_uring/io-wq.h +++ b/io_uring/io-wq.h @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ void io_wq_hash_work(struct io_wq_work *work, void *val); int io_wq_cpu_affinity(struct io_uring_task *tctx, cpumask_var_t mask); int io_wq_max_workers(struct io_wq *wq, int *new_count); +bool io_wq_worker_stopped(void); static inline bool io_wq_is_hashed(struct io_wq_work *work) { diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index 0f0ba31c3850..58d8dd34a45f 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -1975,6 +1975,8 @@ void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work *work) if (!needs_poll) { if (!(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL)) break; + if (io_wq_worker_stopped()) + break; cond_resched(); continue; }

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

Re: Patch "arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-db845c: Mark cont splash memory region as reserved" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree

by Amit Pundir

On Sat, 9 Sept 2023 at 18:16, <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-db845c: Mark cont splash memory region as reserved > > to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at: > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… > > The filename of the patch is: > arm64-dts-qcom-sdm845-db845c-mark-cont-splash-memory-region-as-reserved.patch > and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory. > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. > Please skip this patch for 5.10.y. We ran into a boot (mdss crash) regression with this patch. Regards, Amit Pundir > > From 110e70fccce4f22b53986ae797d665ffb1950aa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir(a)linaro.org> > Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 18:57:19 +0530 > Subject: arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-db845c: Mark cont splash memory region as reserved > > From: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir(a)linaro.org> > > commit 110e70fccce4f22b53986ae797d665ffb1950aa6 upstream. > > Adding a reserved memory region for the framebuffer memory > (the splash memory region set up by the bootloader). > > It fixes a kernel panic (arm-smmu: Unhandled context fault > at this particular memory region) reported on DB845c running > v5.10.y. > > Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v5.10+ > Reviewed-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly(a)linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir(a)linaro.org> > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski(a)linaro.org> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230726132719.2117369-2-amit.pundir@linaro.org > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson(a)kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c.dts | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c.dts > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c.dts > @@ -85,6 +85,14 @@ > }; > }; > > + reserved-memory { > + /* Cont splash region set up by the bootloader */ > + cont_splash_mem: framebuffer@9d400000 { > + reg = <0x0 0x9d400000 0x0 0x2400000>; > + no-map; > + }; > + }; > + > lt9611_1v8: lt9611-vdd18-regulator { > compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > regulator-name = "LT9611_1V8"; > @@ -482,6 +490,7 @@ > }; > > &mdss { > + memory-region = <&cont_splash_mem>; > status = "okay"; > }; > > > > Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from amit.pundir(a)linaro.org are > > queue-5.10/arm64-dts-qcom-sdm845-db845c-mark-cont-splash-memory-region-as-reserved.patch

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: break out of iowq iopoll on teardown" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 45500dc4e01c167ee063f3dcc22f51ced5b2b1e9 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023090946-waking-jokester-8c89@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 45500dc4e01c ("io_uring: break out of iowq iopoll on teardown") ed29b0b4fd83 ("io_uring: move to separate directory") e0deb6a025ae ("io_uring: avoid io-wq -EAGAIN looping for !IOPOLL") 1d5f5ea7cb7d ("io-wq: remove worker to owner tw dependency") d01905db14eb ("io_uring: clean iowq submit work cancellation") 255657d23704 ("io_uring: clean io_wq_submit_work()'s main loop") 90fa02883f06 ("io_uring: implement async hybrid mode for pollable requests") 3b44b3712c5b ("io_uring: split logic of force_nonblock") 9882131cd9de ("io_uring: kill io_wq_current_is_worker() in iopoll") 9983028e7660 ("io_uring: optimise req->ctx reloads") 5e49c973fc39 ("io_uring: clean up io_import_iovec") 51aac424aef9 ("io_uring: optimise io_import_iovec nonblock passing") c88598a92a58 ("io_uring: optimise read/write iov state storing") 538941e2681c ("io_uring: encapsulate rw state") d886e185a128 ("io_uring: control ->async_data with a REQ_F flag") 30d51dd4ad20 ("io_uring: clean up buffer select") ef05d9ebcc92 ("io_uring: kill off ->inflight_entry field") 6f33b0bc4ea4 ("io_uring: use slist for completion batching") c450178d9be9 ("io_uring: dedup CQE flushing non-empty checks") 4c928904ff77 ("block: move CONFIG_BLOCK guard to top Makefile") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 45500dc4e01c167ee063f3dcc22f51ced5b2b1e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 13:50:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: break out of iowq iopoll on teardown io-wq will retry iopoll even when it failed with -EAGAIN. If that races with task exit, which sets TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL for all its workers, such workers might potentially infinitely spin retrying iopoll again and again and each time failing on some allocation / waiting / etc. Don't keep spinning if io-wq is dying. Fixes: 561fb04a6a225 ("io_uring: replace workqueue usage with io-wq") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c index 62f345587df5..1ecc8c748768 100644 --- a/io_uring/io-wq.c +++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c @@ -174,6 +174,16 @@ static void io_worker_ref_put(struct io_wq *wq) complete(&wq->worker_done); } +bool io_wq_worker_stopped(void) +{ + struct io_worker *worker = current->worker_private; + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!io_wq_current_is_worker())) + return true; + + return test_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT, &worker->wq->state); +} + static void io_worker_cancel_cb(struct io_worker *worker) { struct io_wq_acct *acct = io_wq_get_acct(worker); diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.h b/io_uring/io-wq.h index 06d9ca90c577..2b2a6406dd8e 100644 --- a/io_uring/io-wq.h +++ b/io_uring/io-wq.h @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ void io_wq_hash_work(struct io_wq_work *work, void *val); int io_wq_cpu_affinity(struct io_uring_task *tctx, cpumask_var_t mask); int io_wq_max_workers(struct io_wq *wq, int *new_count); +bool io_wq_worker_stopped(void); static inline bool io_wq_is_hashed(struct io_wq_work *work) { diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index 0f0ba31c3850..58d8dd34a45f 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -1975,6 +1975,8 @@ void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work *work) if (!needs_poll) { if (!(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL)) break; + if (io_wq_worker_stopped()) + break; cond_resched(); continue; }

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: break out of iowq iopoll on teardown" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 45500dc4e01c167ee063f3dcc22f51ced5b2b1e9 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023090945-mural-humming-67c0@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 45500dc4e01c ("io_uring: break out of iowq iopoll on teardown") ed29b0b4fd83 ("io_uring: move to separate directory") e0deb6a025ae ("io_uring: avoid io-wq -EAGAIN looping for !IOPOLL") 1d5f5ea7cb7d ("io-wq: remove worker to owner tw dependency") d01905db14eb ("io_uring: clean iowq submit work cancellation") 255657d23704 ("io_uring: clean io_wq_submit_work()'s main loop") 90fa02883f06 ("io_uring: implement async hybrid mode for pollable requests") 3b44b3712c5b ("io_uring: split logic of force_nonblock") 9882131cd9de ("io_uring: kill io_wq_current_is_worker() in iopoll") 9983028e7660 ("io_uring: optimise req->ctx reloads") 5e49c973fc39 ("io_uring: clean up io_import_iovec") 51aac424aef9 ("io_uring: optimise io_import_iovec nonblock passing") c88598a92a58 ("io_uring: optimise read/write iov state storing") 538941e2681c ("io_uring: encapsulate rw state") d886e185a128 ("io_uring: control ->async_data with a REQ_F flag") 30d51dd4ad20 ("io_uring: clean up buffer select") ef05d9ebcc92 ("io_uring: kill off ->inflight_entry field") 6f33b0bc4ea4 ("io_uring: use slist for completion batching") c450178d9be9 ("io_uring: dedup CQE flushing non-empty checks") 4c928904ff77 ("block: move CONFIG_BLOCK guard to top Makefile") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 45500dc4e01c167ee063f3dcc22f51ced5b2b1e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 13:50:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: break out of iowq iopoll on teardown io-wq will retry iopoll even when it failed with -EAGAIN. If that races with task exit, which sets TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL for all its workers, such workers might potentially infinitely spin retrying iopoll again and again and each time failing on some allocation / waiting / etc. Don't keep spinning if io-wq is dying. Fixes: 561fb04a6a225 ("io_uring: replace workqueue usage with io-wq") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c index 62f345587df5..1ecc8c748768 100644 --- a/io_uring/io-wq.c +++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c @@ -174,6 +174,16 @@ static void io_worker_ref_put(struct io_wq *wq) complete(&wq->worker_done); } +bool io_wq_worker_stopped(void) +{ + struct io_worker *worker = current->worker_private; + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!io_wq_current_is_worker())) + return true; + + return test_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT, &worker->wq->state); +} + static void io_worker_cancel_cb(struct io_worker *worker) { struct io_wq_acct *acct = io_wq_get_acct(worker); diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.h b/io_uring/io-wq.h index 06d9ca90c577..2b2a6406dd8e 100644 --- a/io_uring/io-wq.h +++ b/io_uring/io-wq.h @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ void io_wq_hash_work(struct io_wq_work *work, void *val); int io_wq_cpu_affinity(struct io_uring_task *tctx, cpumask_var_t mask); int io_wq_max_workers(struct io_wq *wq, int *new_count); +bool io_wq_worker_stopped(void); static inline bool io_wq_is_hashed(struct io_wq_work *work) { diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index 0f0ba31c3850..58d8dd34a45f 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -1975,6 +1975,8 @@ void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work *work) if (!needs_poll) { if (!(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL)) break; + if (io_wq_worker_stopped()) + break; cond_resched(); continue; }

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot accept" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1bfed23349716a7811645336a7ce42c4b8f250bc # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023090926-basics-violet-94a6@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 1bfed2334971 ("io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot accept") d86eaed185e9 ("io_uring: cleanup io_aux_cqe() API") ea97f6c8558e ("io_uring: add support for multishot timeouts") a282967c848f ("io_uring: encapsulate task_work state") 13bfa6f15d0b ("io_uring: remove extra tw trylocks") 9d2789ac9d60 ("block/io_uring: pass in issue_flags for uring_cmd task_work handling") 6bb30855560e ("io_uring: if a linked request has REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC then run it async") f58680085478 ("io_uring: add reschedule point to handle_tw_list()") 50470fc5723a ("io_uring: return normal tw run linking optimisation") 31f084b7b028 ("io_uring: simplify fallback execution") b0b7a7d24b66 ("io_uring: return back links tw run optimisation") c3f4d39ee4bc ("io_uring: optimise deferred tw execution") 360173ab9e1a ("io_uring: move io_run_local_work_locked") 3e5655552a82 ("io_uring: mark io_run_local_work static") 2f413956cc8a ("io_uring: don't set TASK_RUNNING in local tw runner") 140102ae9a9f ("io_uring: move defer tw task checks") 1414d6298584 ("io_uring: kill io_run_task_work_ctx") f36ba6cf1ab6 ("io_uring: don't iterate cq wait fast path") 0c4fe008c9cb ("io_uring: rearrange defer list checks") 6e5aedb9324a ("io_uring/poll: attempt request issue after racy poll wakeup") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1bfed23349716a7811645336a7ce42c4b8f250bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence(a)gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:53:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot accept Don't allow overflowing multishot accept CQEs, we want to limit the grows of the overflow list. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Fixes: 4e86a2c980137 ("io_uring: implement multishot mode for accept") Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence(a)gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7d0d749649244873772623dd7747966f516fe6e2.16917576… Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c index eb1f51ddcb23..1599493544a5 100644 --- a/io_uring/net.c +++ b/io_uring/net.c @@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ int io_accept(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags) if (ret < 0) return ret; if (io_aux_cqe(req, issue_flags & IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER, ret, - IORING_CQE_F_MORE, true)) + IORING_CQE_F_MORE, false)) goto retry; return -ECANCELED;

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot accept" failed to apply to 6.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1bfed23349716a7811645336a7ce42c4b8f250bc # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023090925-saline-prorate-1854@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 1bfed2334971 ("io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot accept") d86eaed185e9 ("io_uring: cleanup io_aux_cqe() API") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1bfed23349716a7811645336a7ce42c4b8f250bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence(a)gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:53:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot accept Don't allow overflowing multishot accept CQEs, we want to limit the grows of the overflow list. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Fixes: 4e86a2c980137 ("io_uring: implement multishot mode for accept") Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence(a)gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7d0d749649244873772623dd7747966f516fe6e2.16917576… Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c index eb1f51ddcb23..1599493544a5 100644 --- a/io_uring/net.c +++ b/io_uring/net.c @@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ int io_accept(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags) if (ret < 0) return ret; if (io_aux_cqe(req, issue_flags & IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER, ret, - IORING_CQE_F_MORE, true)) + IORING_CQE_F_MORE, false)) goto retry; return -ECANCELED;

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot recv" failed to apply to 6.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x b2e74db55dd93d6db22a813c9a775b5dbf87c560 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023090908-cursor-reshape-7963@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: b2e74db55dd9 ("io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot recv") d86eaed185e9 ("io_uring: cleanup io_aux_cqe() API") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From b2e74db55dd93d6db22a813c9a775b5dbf87c560 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence(a)gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:53:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot recv Don't allow overflowing multishot recv CQEs, it might get out of hand, hurt performance, and in the worst case scenario OOM the task. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Fixes: b3fdea6ecb55c ("io_uring: multishot recv") Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence(a)gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0b295634e8f1b71aa764c984608c22d85f88f75c.16917576… Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c index 1599493544a5..8c419c01a5db 100644 --- a/io_uring/net.c +++ b/io_uring/net.c @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ static inline bool io_recv_finish(struct io_kiocb *req, int *ret, if (!mshot_finished) { if (io_aux_cqe(req, issue_flags & IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER, - *ret, cflags | IORING_CQE_F_MORE, true)) { + *ret, cflags | IORING_CQE_F_MORE, false)) { io_recv_prep_retry(req); /* Known not-empty or unknown state, retry */ if (cflags & IORING_CQE_F_SOCK_NONEMPTY ||

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror September 2023