September 2023 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tracing: Have tracing_max_latency inc the trace array ref" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 7d660c9b2bc95107f90a9f4c4759be85309a6550 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023092020-recreate-account-e563@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 7d660c9b2bc9 ("tracing: Have tracing_max_latency inc the trace array ref count") 21ccc9cd7211 ("tracing: Disable "other" permission bits in the tracefs files") a955d7eac177 ("trace: Add timerlat tracer") bce29ac9ce0b ("trace: Add osnoise tracer") 6880c987e451 ("tracing: Add LATENCY_FS_NOTIFY to define if latency_fsnotify() is defined") 8fa826b7344d ("trace/hwlat: Implement the mode config option") f689e4f280b6 ("tracing: Define new ftrace event "func_repeats"") f2cc020d7876 ("tracing: Fix various typos in comments") 2d396cb3b126 ("tracing: Do not create "enable" or "filter" files for ftrace event subsystem") 0c02006e6f5b ("tracing: Inline tracing_gen_ctx_flags()") 36590c50b2d0 ("tracing: Merge irqflags + preempt counter.") 09c0796adf0c ("Merge tag 'trace-v5.11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 7d660c9b2bc95107f90a9f4c4759be85309a6550 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt(a)goodmis.org> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 22:47:13 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Have tracing_max_latency inc the trace array ref count The tracing_max_latency file points to the trace_array max_latency field. For an instance, if the file is opened and the instance is deleted, reading or writing to the file will cause a use after free. Up the ref count of the trace_array when tracing_max_latency is opened. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230907024803.666889383@goodmis.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1cb3aee2-19af-c472-e265-05176fe9bd84@huawei.com/ Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat(a)kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland(a)arm.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> Cc: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1(a)huawei.com> Fixes: 8530dec63e7b4 ("tracing: Add tracing_check_open_get_tr()") Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt(a)goodmis.org> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c index 0827037ee3b8..c8b8b4c6feaf 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c @@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ static void trace_create_maxlat_file(struct trace_array *tr, init_irq_work(&tr->fsnotify_irqwork, latency_fsnotify_workfn_irq); tr->d_max_latency = trace_create_file("tracing_max_latency", TRACE_MODE_WRITE, - d_tracer, &tr->max_latency, + d_tracer, tr, &tracing_max_lat_fops); } @@ -1805,7 +1805,7 @@ void latency_fsnotify(struct trace_array *tr) #define trace_create_maxlat_file(tr, d_tracer) \ trace_create_file("tracing_max_latency", TRACE_MODE_WRITE, \ - d_tracer, &tr->max_latency, &tracing_max_lat_fops) + d_tracer, tr, &tracing_max_lat_fops) #endif @@ -6717,14 +6717,18 @@ static ssize_t tracing_max_lat_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf, size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos) { - return tracing_nsecs_read(filp->private_data, ubuf, cnt, ppos); + struct trace_array *tr = filp->private_data; + + return tracing_nsecs_read(&tr->max_latency, ubuf, cnt, ppos); } static ssize_t tracing_max_lat_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf, size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos) { - return tracing_nsecs_write(filp->private_data, ubuf, cnt, ppos); + struct trace_array *tr = filp->private_data; + + return tracing_nsecs_write(&tr->max_latency, ubuf, cnt, ppos); } #endif @@ -7778,10 +7782,11 @@ static const struct file_operations tracing_thresh_fops = { #ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE static const struct file_operations tracing_max_lat_fops = { - .open = tracing_open_generic, + .open = tracing_open_generic_tr, .read = tracing_max_lat_read, .write = tracing_max_lat_write, .llseek = generic_file_llseek, + .release = tracing_release_generic_tr, }; #endif

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tracing: Have tracing_max_latency inc the trace array ref" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 7d660c9b2bc95107f90a9f4c4759be85309a6550 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023092019-glamour-railroad-a36d@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 7d660c9b2bc9 ("tracing: Have tracing_max_latency inc the trace array ref count") 21ccc9cd7211 ("tracing: Disable "other" permission bits in the tracefs files") a955d7eac177 ("trace: Add timerlat tracer") bce29ac9ce0b ("trace: Add osnoise tracer") 6880c987e451 ("tracing: Add LATENCY_FS_NOTIFY to define if latency_fsnotify() is defined") 8fa826b7344d ("trace/hwlat: Implement the mode config option") f689e4f280b6 ("tracing: Define new ftrace event "func_repeats"") f2cc020d7876 ("tracing: Fix various typos in comments") 2d396cb3b126 ("tracing: Do not create "enable" or "filter" files for ftrace event subsystem") 0c02006e6f5b ("tracing: Inline tracing_gen_ctx_flags()") 36590c50b2d0 ("tracing: Merge irqflags + preempt counter.") 09c0796adf0c ("Merge tag 'trace-v5.11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 7d660c9b2bc95107f90a9f4c4759be85309a6550 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt(a)goodmis.org> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 22:47:13 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Have tracing_max_latency inc the trace array ref count The tracing_max_latency file points to the trace_array max_latency field. For an instance, if the file is opened and the instance is deleted, reading or writing to the file will cause a use after free. Up the ref count of the trace_array when tracing_max_latency is opened. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230907024803.666889383@goodmis.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1cb3aee2-19af-c472-e265-05176fe9bd84@huawei.com/ Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat(a)kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland(a)arm.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> Cc: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1(a)huawei.com> Fixes: 8530dec63e7b4 ("tracing: Add tracing_check_open_get_tr()") Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt(a)goodmis.org> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c index 0827037ee3b8..c8b8b4c6feaf 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c @@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ static void trace_create_maxlat_file(struct trace_array *tr, init_irq_work(&tr->fsnotify_irqwork, latency_fsnotify_workfn_irq); tr->d_max_latency = trace_create_file("tracing_max_latency", TRACE_MODE_WRITE, - d_tracer, &tr->max_latency, + d_tracer, tr, &tracing_max_lat_fops); } @@ -1805,7 +1805,7 @@ void latency_fsnotify(struct trace_array *tr) #define trace_create_maxlat_file(tr, d_tracer) \ trace_create_file("tracing_max_latency", TRACE_MODE_WRITE, \ - d_tracer, &tr->max_latency, &tracing_max_lat_fops) + d_tracer, tr, &tracing_max_lat_fops) #endif @@ -6717,14 +6717,18 @@ static ssize_t tracing_max_lat_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf, size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos) { - return tracing_nsecs_read(filp->private_data, ubuf, cnt, ppos); + struct trace_array *tr = filp->private_data; + + return tracing_nsecs_read(&tr->max_latency, ubuf, cnt, ppos); } static ssize_t tracing_max_lat_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf, size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos) { - return tracing_nsecs_write(filp->private_data, ubuf, cnt, ppos); + struct trace_array *tr = filp->private_data; + + return tracing_nsecs_write(&tr->max_latency, ubuf, cnt, ppos); } #endif @@ -7778,10 +7782,11 @@ static const struct file_operations tracing_thresh_fops = { #ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE static const struct file_operations tracing_max_lat_fops = { - .open = tracing_open_generic, + .open = tracing_open_generic_tr, .read = tracing_max_lat_read, .write = tracing_max_lat_write, .llseek = generic_file_llseek, + .release = tracing_release_generic_tr, }; #endif

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023092028-purveyor-limpness-f224@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 2c58c3931ede ("btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item") 91bfe3104b8d ("btrfs: improve error message after failure to add delayed dir index item") 763748b238ef ("btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion") c9d02ab4b436 ("btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it") 3bae13e9d42e ("btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item") a176affe547c ("btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it") b7ef5f3a6f37 ("btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch") 086dcbfa50d3 ("btrfs: insert items in batches when logging a directory when possible") eb10d85ee77f ("btrfs: factor out the copying loop of dir items from log_dir_items()") 289cffcb0399 ("btrfs: remove no longer needed checks for NULL log context") 5a656c3628b2 ("btrfs: stop doing GFP_KERNEL memory allocations in the ref verify tool") 506650dcb3a7 ("btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items") bfaa324e9a80 ("btrfs: remove total_data_size variable in btrfs_batch_insert_items()") bb385bedded3 ("btrfs: fix error handling in __btrfs_update_delayed_inode") 64d6b281ba4d ("btrfs: remove unnecessary check_parent_dirs_for_sync()") 3e6a86a193b0 ("btrfs: skip logging directories already logged when logging all parents") ab12313a9f56 ("btrfs: avoid logging new ancestor inodes when logging new inode") 47d3db41e190 ("btrfs: fix race that makes inode logging fallback to transaction commit") 4d6221d7d831 ("btrfs: fix race that causes unnecessary logging of ancestor inodes") 5893dfb98f25 ("btrfs: refactor btrfs_drop_extents() to make it easier to extend") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:06:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item Instead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index item into the delayed node's tree, we can just release all the resources we have allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This is fine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done before calling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pending snapshots in the transaction commit path). So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling. This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it because it only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehow we attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/ CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index bb9908cbabfe..6e779bc16340 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -1426,7 +1426,29 @@ void btrfs_balance_delayed_items(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node(delayed_root, fs_info, BTRFS_DELAYED_BATCH); } -/* Will return 0 or -ENOMEM */ +static void btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) +{ + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info; + const u64 bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1); + + if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags)) + return; + + /* + * Adding the new dir index item does not require touching another + * leaf, so we can release 1 unit of metadata that was previously + * reserved when starting the transaction. This applies only to + * the case where we had a transaction start and excludes the + * transaction join case (when replaying log trees). + */ + trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "transaction", + trans->transid, bytes, 0); + btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL); + ASSERT(trans->bytes_reserved >= bytes); + trans->bytes_reserved -= bytes; +} + +/* Will return 0, -ENOMEM or -EEXIST (index number collision, unexpected). */ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, const char *name, int name_len, struct btrfs_inode *dir, @@ -1468,6 +1490,27 @@ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex); + /* + * First attempt to insert the delayed item. This is to make the error + * handling path simpler in case we fail (-EEXIST). There's no risk of + * any other task coming in and running the delayed item before we do + * the metadata space reservation below, because we are holding the + * delayed node's mutex and that mutex must also be locked before the + * node's delayed items can be run. + */ + ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(delayed_node, delayed_item); + if (unlikely(ret)) { + btrfs_err(trans->fs_info, +"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d", + name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root), + delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt, + delayed_node->index_cnt, ret); + btrfs_release_delayed_item(delayed_item); + btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(trans); + mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); + goto release_node; + } + if (delayed_node->index_item_leaves == 0 || delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size + data_len > leaf_data_size) { delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size = data_len; @@ -1485,37 +1528,14 @@ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, * impossible. */ if (WARN_ON(ret)) { - mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); btrfs_release_delayed_item(delayed_item); + mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); goto release_node; } delayed_node->index_item_leaves++; - } else if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags)) { - const u64 bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1); - - /* - * Adding the new dir index item does not require touching another - * leaf, so we can release 1 unit of metadata that was previously - * reserved when starting the transaction. This applies only to - * the case where we had a transaction start and excludes the - * transaction join case (when replaying log trees). - */ - trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "transaction", - trans->transid, bytes, 0); - btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL); - ASSERT(trans->bytes_reserved >= bytes); - trans->bytes_reserved -= bytes; - } - - ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(delayed_node, delayed_item); - if (unlikely(ret)) { - btrfs_err(trans->fs_info, -"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d", - name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root), - delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt, - delayed_node->index_cnt, ret); - BUG(); + } else { + btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(trans); } mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023092027-census-monorail-5614@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 2c58c3931ede ("btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item") 91bfe3104b8d ("btrfs: improve error message after failure to add delayed dir index item") 763748b238ef ("btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion") c9d02ab4b436 ("btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it") 3bae13e9d42e ("btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item") a176affe547c ("btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it") b7ef5f3a6f37 ("btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch") 086dcbfa50d3 ("btrfs: insert items in batches when logging a directory when possible") eb10d85ee77f ("btrfs: factor out the copying loop of dir items from log_dir_items()") 289cffcb0399 ("btrfs: remove no longer needed checks for NULL log context") 5a656c3628b2 ("btrfs: stop doing GFP_KERNEL memory allocations in the ref verify tool") 506650dcb3a7 ("btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items") bfaa324e9a80 ("btrfs: remove total_data_size variable in btrfs_batch_insert_items()") bb385bedded3 ("btrfs: fix error handling in __btrfs_update_delayed_inode") 64d6b281ba4d ("btrfs: remove unnecessary check_parent_dirs_for_sync()") 3e6a86a193b0 ("btrfs: skip logging directories already logged when logging all parents") ab12313a9f56 ("btrfs: avoid logging new ancestor inodes when logging new inode") 47d3db41e190 ("btrfs: fix race that makes inode logging fallback to transaction commit") 4d6221d7d831 ("btrfs: fix race that causes unnecessary logging of ancestor inodes") 5893dfb98f25 ("btrfs: refactor btrfs_drop_extents() to make it easier to extend") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:06:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item Instead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index item into the delayed node's tree, we can just release all the resources we have allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This is fine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done before calling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pending snapshots in the transaction commit path). So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling. This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it because it only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehow we attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/ CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index bb9908cbabfe..6e779bc16340 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -1426,7 +1426,29 @@ void btrfs_balance_delayed_items(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node(delayed_root, fs_info, BTRFS_DELAYED_BATCH); } -/* Will return 0 or -ENOMEM */ +static void btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) +{ + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info; + const u64 bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1); + + if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags)) + return; + + /* + * Adding the new dir index item does not require touching another + * leaf, so we can release 1 unit of metadata that was previously + * reserved when starting the transaction. This applies only to + * the case where we had a transaction start and excludes the + * transaction join case (when replaying log trees). + */ + trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "transaction", + trans->transid, bytes, 0); + btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL); + ASSERT(trans->bytes_reserved >= bytes); + trans->bytes_reserved -= bytes; +} + +/* Will return 0, -ENOMEM or -EEXIST (index number collision, unexpected). */ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, const char *name, int name_len, struct btrfs_inode *dir, @@ -1468,6 +1490,27 @@ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex); + /* + * First attempt to insert the delayed item. This is to make the error + * handling path simpler in case we fail (-EEXIST). There's no risk of + * any other task coming in and running the delayed item before we do + * the metadata space reservation below, because we are holding the + * delayed node's mutex and that mutex must also be locked before the + * node's delayed items can be run. + */ + ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(delayed_node, delayed_item); + if (unlikely(ret)) { + btrfs_err(trans->fs_info, +"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d", + name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root), + delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt, + delayed_node->index_cnt, ret); + btrfs_release_delayed_item(delayed_item); + btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(trans); + mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); + goto release_node; + } + if (delayed_node->index_item_leaves == 0 || delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size + data_len > leaf_data_size) { delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size = data_len; @@ -1485,37 +1528,14 @@ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, * impossible. */ if (WARN_ON(ret)) { - mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); btrfs_release_delayed_item(delayed_item); + mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); goto release_node; } delayed_node->index_item_leaves++; - } else if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags)) { - const u64 bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1); - - /* - * Adding the new dir index item does not require touching another - * leaf, so we can release 1 unit of metadata that was previously - * reserved when starting the transaction. This applies only to - * the case where we had a transaction start and excludes the - * transaction join case (when replaying log trees). - */ - trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "transaction", - trans->transid, bytes, 0); - btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL); - ASSERT(trans->bytes_reserved >= bytes); - trans->bytes_reserved -= bytes; - } - - ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(delayed_node, delayed_item); - if (unlikely(ret)) { - btrfs_err(trans->fs_info, -"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d", - name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root), - delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt, - delayed_node->index_cnt, ret); - BUG(); + } else { + btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(trans); } mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023092026-anemia-unwanted-1c2a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 2c58c3931ede ("btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item") 91bfe3104b8d ("btrfs: improve error message after failure to add delayed dir index item") 763748b238ef ("btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion") c9d02ab4b436 ("btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it") 3bae13e9d42e ("btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item") a176affe547c ("btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it") b7ef5f3a6f37 ("btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch") 086dcbfa50d3 ("btrfs: insert items in batches when logging a directory when possible") eb10d85ee77f ("btrfs: factor out the copying loop of dir items from log_dir_items()") 289cffcb0399 ("btrfs: remove no longer needed checks for NULL log context") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:06:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item Instead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index item into the delayed node's tree, we can just release all the resources we have allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This is fine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done before calling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pending snapshots in the transaction commit path). So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling. This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it because it only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehow we attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/ CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index bb9908cbabfe..6e779bc16340 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -1426,7 +1426,29 @@ void btrfs_balance_delayed_items(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node(delayed_root, fs_info, BTRFS_DELAYED_BATCH); } -/* Will return 0 or -ENOMEM */ +static void btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) +{ + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info; + const u64 bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1); + + if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags)) + return; + + /* + * Adding the new dir index item does not require touching another + * leaf, so we can release 1 unit of metadata that was previously + * reserved when starting the transaction. This applies only to + * the case where we had a transaction start and excludes the + * transaction join case (when replaying log trees). + */ + trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "transaction", + trans->transid, bytes, 0); + btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL); + ASSERT(trans->bytes_reserved >= bytes); + trans->bytes_reserved -= bytes; +} + +/* Will return 0, -ENOMEM or -EEXIST (index number collision, unexpected). */ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, const char *name, int name_len, struct btrfs_inode *dir, @@ -1468,6 +1490,27 @@ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex); + /* + * First attempt to insert the delayed item. This is to make the error + * handling path simpler in case we fail (-EEXIST). There's no risk of + * any other task coming in and running the delayed item before we do + * the metadata space reservation below, because we are holding the + * delayed node's mutex and that mutex must also be locked before the + * node's delayed items can be run. + */ + ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(delayed_node, delayed_item); + if (unlikely(ret)) { + btrfs_err(trans->fs_info, +"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d", + name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root), + delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt, + delayed_node->index_cnt, ret); + btrfs_release_delayed_item(delayed_item); + btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(trans); + mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); + goto release_node; + } + if (delayed_node->index_item_leaves == 0 || delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size + data_len > leaf_data_size) { delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size = data_len; @@ -1485,37 +1528,14 @@ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, * impossible. */ if (WARN_ON(ret)) { - mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); btrfs_release_delayed_item(delayed_item); + mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); goto release_node; } delayed_node->index_item_leaves++; - } else if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags)) { - const u64 bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1); - - /* - * Adding the new dir index item does not require touching another - * leaf, so we can release 1 unit of metadata that was previously - * reserved when starting the transaction. This applies only to - * the case where we had a transaction start and excludes the - * transaction join case (when replaying log trees). - */ - trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "transaction", - trans->transid, bytes, 0); - btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL); - ASSERT(trans->bytes_reserved >= bytes); - trans->bytes_reserved -= bytes; - } - - ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(delayed_node, delayed_item); - if (unlikely(ret)) { - btrfs_err(trans->fs_info, -"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d", - name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root), - delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt, - delayed_node->index_cnt, ret); - BUG(); + } else { + btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(trans); } mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023092025-unwell-virtual-9c97@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 2c58c3931ede ("btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item") 91bfe3104b8d ("btrfs: improve error message after failure to add delayed dir index item") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:06:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item Instead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index item into the delayed node's tree, we can just release all the resources we have allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This is fine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done before calling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pending snapshots in the transaction commit path). So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling. This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it because it only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehow we attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/ CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index bb9908cbabfe..6e779bc16340 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -1426,7 +1426,29 @@ void btrfs_balance_delayed_items(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node(delayed_root, fs_info, BTRFS_DELAYED_BATCH); } -/* Will return 0 or -ENOMEM */ +static void btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) +{ + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info; + const u64 bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1); + + if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags)) + return; + + /* + * Adding the new dir index item does not require touching another + * leaf, so we can release 1 unit of metadata that was previously + * reserved when starting the transaction. This applies only to + * the case where we had a transaction start and excludes the + * transaction join case (when replaying log trees). + */ + trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "transaction", + trans->transid, bytes, 0); + btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL); + ASSERT(trans->bytes_reserved >= bytes); + trans->bytes_reserved -= bytes; +} + +/* Will return 0, -ENOMEM or -EEXIST (index number collision, unexpected). */ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, const char *name, int name_len, struct btrfs_inode *dir, @@ -1468,6 +1490,27 @@ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex); + /* + * First attempt to insert the delayed item. This is to make the error + * handling path simpler in case we fail (-EEXIST). There's no risk of + * any other task coming in and running the delayed item before we do + * the metadata space reservation below, because we are holding the + * delayed node's mutex and that mutex must also be locked before the + * node's delayed items can be run. + */ + ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(delayed_node, delayed_item); + if (unlikely(ret)) { + btrfs_err(trans->fs_info, +"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d", + name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root), + delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt, + delayed_node->index_cnt, ret); + btrfs_release_delayed_item(delayed_item); + btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(trans); + mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); + goto release_node; + } + if (delayed_node->index_item_leaves == 0 || delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size + data_len > leaf_data_size) { delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size = data_len; @@ -1485,37 +1528,14 @@ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, * impossible. */ if (WARN_ON(ret)) { - mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); btrfs_release_delayed_item(delayed_item); + mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); goto release_node; } delayed_node->index_item_leaves++; - } else if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags)) { - const u64 bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1); - - /* - * Adding the new dir index item does not require touching another - * leaf, so we can release 1 unit of metadata that was previously - * reserved when starting the transaction. This applies only to - * the case where we had a transaction start and excludes the - * transaction join case (when replaying log trees). - */ - trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "transaction", - trans->transid, bytes, 0); - btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL); - ASSERT(trans->bytes_reserved >= bytes); - trans->bytes_reserved -= bytes; - } - - ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(delayed_node, delayed_item); - if (unlikely(ret)) { - btrfs_err(trans->fs_info, -"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d", - name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root), - delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt, - delayed_node->index_cnt, ret); - BUG(); + } else { + btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(trans); } mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index" failed to apply to 6.5-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.5-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.5.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023092024-maritime-smelting-37a5@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.5.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 2c58c3931ede ("btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item") 91bfe3104b8d ("btrfs: improve error message after failure to add delayed dir index item") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:06:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item Instead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index item into the delayed node's tree, we can just release all the resources we have allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This is fine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done before calling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pending snapshots in the transaction commit path). So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling. This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it because it only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehow we attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/ CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index bb9908cbabfe..6e779bc16340 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -1426,7 +1426,29 @@ void btrfs_balance_delayed_items(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node(delayed_root, fs_info, BTRFS_DELAYED_BATCH); } -/* Will return 0 or -ENOMEM */ +static void btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) +{ + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info; + const u64 bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1); + + if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags)) + return; + + /* + * Adding the new dir index item does not require touching another + * leaf, so we can release 1 unit of metadata that was previously + * reserved when starting the transaction. This applies only to + * the case where we had a transaction start and excludes the + * transaction join case (when replaying log trees). + */ + trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "transaction", + trans->transid, bytes, 0); + btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL); + ASSERT(trans->bytes_reserved >= bytes); + trans->bytes_reserved -= bytes; +} + +/* Will return 0, -ENOMEM or -EEXIST (index number collision, unexpected). */ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, const char *name, int name_len, struct btrfs_inode *dir, @@ -1468,6 +1490,27 @@ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex); + /* + * First attempt to insert the delayed item. This is to make the error + * handling path simpler in case we fail (-EEXIST). There's no risk of + * any other task coming in and running the delayed item before we do + * the metadata space reservation below, because we are holding the + * delayed node's mutex and that mutex must also be locked before the + * node's delayed items can be run. + */ + ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(delayed_node, delayed_item); + if (unlikely(ret)) { + btrfs_err(trans->fs_info, +"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d", + name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root), + delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt, + delayed_node->index_cnt, ret); + btrfs_release_delayed_item(delayed_item); + btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(trans); + mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); + goto release_node; + } + if (delayed_node->index_item_leaves == 0 || delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size + data_len > leaf_data_size) { delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size = data_len; @@ -1485,37 +1528,14 @@ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, * impossible. */ if (WARN_ON(ret)) { - mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); btrfs_release_delayed_item(delayed_item); + mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); goto release_node; } delayed_node->index_item_leaves++; - } else if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags)) { - const u64 bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1); - - /* - * Adding the new dir index item does not require touching another - * leaf, so we can release 1 unit of metadata that was previously - * reserved when starting the transaction. This applies only to - * the case where we had a transaction start and excludes the - * transaction join case (when replaying log trees). - */ - trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "transaction", - trans->transid, bytes, 0); - btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL); - ASSERT(trans->bytes_reserved >= bytes); - trans->bytes_reserved -= bytes; - } - - ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(delayed_node, delayed_item); - if (unlikely(ret)) { - btrfs_err(trans->fs_info, -"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d", - name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root), - delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt, - delayed_node->index_cnt, ret); - BUG(); + } else { + btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(trans); } mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.14.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 4ca8e03cf2bfaeef7c85939fa1ea0c749cd116ab # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023092013-slightly-hubcap-822b@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.14.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 4ca8e03cf2bf ("btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert") 487781796d30 ("btrfs: make fast fsyncs wait only for writeback") 75b463d2b47a ("btrfs: do not commit logs and transactions during link and rename operations") 260db43cd2f5 ("btrfs: delete duplicated words + other fixes in comments") 3ef64143a796 ("btrfs: remove no longer used trans_list member of struct btrfs_ordered_extent") cd8d39f4aeb3 ("btrfs: remove no longer used log_list member of struct btrfs_ordered_extent") 7af597433d43 ("btrfs: make full fsyncs always operate on the entire file again") 0a8068a3dd42 ("btrfs: make ranged full fsyncs more efficient") da447009a256 ("btrfs: factor out inode items copy loop from btrfs_log_inode()") a5eeb3d17b97 ("btrfs: add helper to get the end offset of a file extent item") 95418ed1d107 ("btrfs: fix missing file extent item for hole after ranged fsync") 3f1c64ce0438 ("btrfs: delete the ordered isize update code") 41a2ee75aab0 ("btrfs: introduce per-inode file extent tree") 236ebc20d9af ("btrfs: fix log context list corruption after rename whiteout error") b5e4ff9d465d ("Btrfs: fix infinite loop during fsync after rename operations") 0e56315ca147 ("Btrfs: fix missing hole after hole punching and fsync when using NO_HOLES") 9c7d3a548331 ("btrfs: move extent_io_tree defs to their own header") 6f0d04f8e72e ("btrfs: separate out the extent io init function") 33ca832fefa5 ("btrfs: separate out the extent leak code") afd7a71872f1 ("Merge tag 'for-5.4-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 4ca8e03cf2bfaeef7c85939fa1ea0c749cd116ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 16:59:04 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert If we do fast tree logging we increment a counter on the current transaction for every ordered extent we need to wait for. This means we expect the transaction to still be there when we clear pending on the ordered extent. However if we happen to abort the transaction and clean it up, there could be no running transaction, and thus we'll trip the "ASSERT(trans)" check. This is obviously incorrect, and the code properly deals with the case that the transaction doesn't exist. Fix this ASSERT() to only fire if there's no trans and we don't have BTRFS_FS_ERROR() set on the file system. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c index b46ab348e8e5..345c449d588c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ void btrfs_remove_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_inode, refcount_inc(&trans->use_count); spin_unlock(&fs_info->trans_lock); - ASSERT(trans); + ASSERT(trans || BTRFS_FS_ERROR(fs_info)); if (trans) { if (atomic_dec_and_test(&trans->pending_ordered)) wake_up(&trans->pending_wait);

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 4ca8e03cf2bfaeef7c85939fa1ea0c749cd116ab # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023092012-congress-stubborn-56b5@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 4ca8e03cf2bf ("btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert") 487781796d30 ("btrfs: make fast fsyncs wait only for writeback") 75b463d2b47a ("btrfs: do not commit logs and transactions during link and rename operations") 260db43cd2f5 ("btrfs: delete duplicated words + other fixes in comments") 3ef64143a796 ("btrfs: remove no longer used trans_list member of struct btrfs_ordered_extent") cd8d39f4aeb3 ("btrfs: remove no longer used log_list member of struct btrfs_ordered_extent") 7af597433d43 ("btrfs: make full fsyncs always operate on the entire file again") 0a8068a3dd42 ("btrfs: make ranged full fsyncs more efficient") da447009a256 ("btrfs: factor out inode items copy loop from btrfs_log_inode()") a5eeb3d17b97 ("btrfs: add helper to get the end offset of a file extent item") 95418ed1d107 ("btrfs: fix missing file extent item for hole after ranged fsync") 3f1c64ce0438 ("btrfs: delete the ordered isize update code") 41a2ee75aab0 ("btrfs: introduce per-inode file extent tree") 236ebc20d9af ("btrfs: fix log context list corruption after rename whiteout error") b5e4ff9d465d ("Btrfs: fix infinite loop during fsync after rename operations") 0e56315ca147 ("Btrfs: fix missing hole after hole punching and fsync when using NO_HOLES") 9c7d3a548331 ("btrfs: move extent_io_tree defs to their own header") 6f0d04f8e72e ("btrfs: separate out the extent io init function") 33ca832fefa5 ("btrfs: separate out the extent leak code") afd7a71872f1 ("Merge tag 'for-5.4-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 4ca8e03cf2bfaeef7c85939fa1ea0c749cd116ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 16:59:04 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert If we do fast tree logging we increment a counter on the current transaction for every ordered extent we need to wait for. This means we expect the transaction to still be there when we clear pending on the ordered extent. However if we happen to abort the transaction and clean it up, there could be no running transaction, and thus we'll trip the "ASSERT(trans)" check. This is obviously incorrect, and the code properly deals with the case that the transaction doesn't exist. Fix this ASSERT() to only fire if there's no trans and we don't have BTRFS_FS_ERROR() set on the file system. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c index b46ab348e8e5..345c449d588c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ void btrfs_remove_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_inode, refcount_inc(&trans->use_count); spin_unlock(&fs_info->trans_lock); - ASSERT(trans); + ASSERT(trans || BTRFS_FS_ERROR(fs_info)); if (trans) { if (atomic_dec_and_test(&trans->pending_ordered)) wake_up(&trans->pending_wait);

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 4ca8e03cf2bfaeef7c85939fa1ea0c749cd116ab # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023092011-resume-sneezing-595f@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 4ca8e03cf2bf ("btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert") 487781796d30 ("btrfs: make fast fsyncs wait only for writeback") 75b463d2b47a ("btrfs: do not commit logs and transactions during link and rename operations") 260db43cd2f5 ("btrfs: delete duplicated words + other fixes in comments") 3ef64143a796 ("btrfs: remove no longer used trans_list member of struct btrfs_ordered_extent") cd8d39f4aeb3 ("btrfs: remove no longer used log_list member of struct btrfs_ordered_extent") 7af597433d43 ("btrfs: make full fsyncs always operate on the entire file again") 0a8068a3dd42 ("btrfs: make ranged full fsyncs more efficient") da447009a256 ("btrfs: factor out inode items copy loop from btrfs_log_inode()") a5eeb3d17b97 ("btrfs: add helper to get the end offset of a file extent item") 95418ed1d107 ("btrfs: fix missing file extent item for hole after ranged fsync") 3f1c64ce0438 ("btrfs: delete the ordered isize update code") 41a2ee75aab0 ("btrfs: introduce per-inode file extent tree") 236ebc20d9af ("btrfs: fix log context list corruption after rename whiteout error") b5e4ff9d465d ("Btrfs: fix infinite loop during fsync after rename operations") 0e56315ca147 ("Btrfs: fix missing hole after hole punching and fsync when using NO_HOLES") 9c7d3a548331 ("btrfs: move extent_io_tree defs to their own header") 6f0d04f8e72e ("btrfs: separate out the extent io init function") 33ca832fefa5 ("btrfs: separate out the extent leak code") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 4ca8e03cf2bfaeef7c85939fa1ea0c749cd116ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 16:59:04 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert If we do fast tree logging we increment a counter on the current transaction for every ordered extent we need to wait for. This means we expect the transaction to still be there when we clear pending on the ordered extent. However if we happen to abort the transaction and clean it up, there could be no running transaction, and thus we'll trip the "ASSERT(trans)" check. This is obviously incorrect, and the code properly deals with the case that the transaction doesn't exist. Fix this ASSERT() to only fire if there's no trans and we don't have BTRFS_FS_ERROR() set on the file system. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c index b46ab348e8e5..345c449d588c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ void btrfs_remove_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_inode, refcount_inc(&trans->use_count); spin_unlock(&fs_info->trans_lock); - ASSERT(trans); + ASSERT(trans || BTRFS_FS_ERROR(fs_info)); if (trans) { if (atomic_dec_and_test(&trans->pending_ordered)) wake_up(&trans->pending_wait);

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror September 2023