[ commit be37bed754ed90b2655382f93f9724b3c1aae847 upstream ]
Dan Carpenter spotted that test_fw_config->reqs will be leaked if
trigger_batched_requests_store() is called two or more times.
The same appears with trigger_batched_requests_async_store().
This bug wasn't triggered by the tests, but observed by Dan's visual
inspection of the code.
The recommended workaround was to return -EBUSY if test_fw_config->reqs
is already allocated.
Fixes: c92316bf8e94 ("test_firmware: add batched firmware tests")
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight(a)intel.com>
Cc: Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang(a)intel.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap(a)infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v4.14
Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <error27(a)gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter(a)linaro.org>
Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof(a)kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509084746.48259-2-mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg…
Signed-off-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac(a)alu.unizg.hr>
[ This fix is applied against the 4.14 stable branch. There are no changes to the ]
[ fix in code when compared to the upstread, only the reformatting for backport. ]
---
lib/test_firmware.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/test_firmware.c b/lib/test_firmware.c
index 1c5e5246bf10..5318c5e18acf 100644
--- a/lib/test_firmware.c
+++ b/lib/test_firmware.c
@@ -621,6 +621,11 @@ static ssize_t trigger_batched_requests_store(struct device *dev,
mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
+ if (test_fw_config->reqs) {
+ rc = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_bail;
+ }
+
test_fw_config->reqs = vzalloc(sizeof(struct test_batched_req) *
test_fw_config->num_requests * 2);
if (!test_fw_config->reqs) {
@@ -723,6 +728,11 @@ ssize_t trigger_batched_requests_async_store(struct device *dev,
mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
+ if (test_fw_config->reqs) {
+ rc = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_bail;
+ }
+
test_fw_config->reqs = vzalloc(sizeof(struct test_batched_req) *
test_fw_config->num_requests * 2);
if (!test_fw_config->reqs) {
--
2.39.3
Binutils-2.38 and GCC-12.1.0 bumped[0][1] the default ISA spec to the newer
20191213 version which moves some instructions from the I extension to the
Zicsr and Zifencei extensions. So if one of the binutils and GCC exceeds
that version, we should explicitly specifying Zicsr and Zifencei via -march
to cope with the new changes. but this only occurs when binutils >= 2.36
and GCC >= 11.1.0. It's a different story when binutils < 2.36.
binutils-2.36 supports the Zifencei extension[2] and splits Zifencei and
Zicsr from I[3]. GCC-11.1.0 is particular[4] because it add support Zicsr
and Zifencei extension for -march. binutils-2.35 does not support the
Zifencei extension, and does not need to specify Zicsr and Zifencei when
working with GCC >= 12.1.0.
To make our lives easier, let's relax the check to binutils >= 2.36 in
CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI. For the other two cases,
where clang < 17 or GCC < 11.1.0, we will deal with them in
CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_OLD_ISA_SPEC.
For more information, please refer to:
commit 6df2a016c0c8 ("riscv: fix build with binutils 2.38")
commit e89c2e815e76 ("riscv: Handle zicsr/zifencei issues between clang and binutils")
Link: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=aed44286efa8ae871… [0]
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=98416dbb0a62579d4a7a4a76bab51… [1]
Link: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=5a1b31e1e1cee6e9f… [2]
Link: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=729a53530e86972d1… [3]
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=b03be74bad08c382da47e048007a7… [4]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230308220842.1231003-1-conor@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230223220546.52879-1-conor@kernel.org
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mingzheng Xing <xingmingzheng(a)iscas.ac.cn>
---
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------
arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 8 ++++++-
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index 4c07b9189c86..10e7a7ad175a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -570,24 +570,30 @@ config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZIHINTPAUSE
config TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI
def_bool y
# https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=aed44286efa8ae871…
- depends on AS_IS_GNU && AS_VERSION >= 23800
- help
- Newer binutils versions default to ISA spec version 20191213 which
- moves some instructions from the I extension to the Zicsr and Zifencei
- extensions.
+ # https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=98416dbb0a62579d4a7a4a76bab51…
+ depends on AS_IS_GNU && AS_VERSION >= 23600
+ help
+ Binutils-2.38 and GCC-12.1.0 bumped the default ISA spec to the newer
+ 20191213 version, which moves some instructions from the I extension to
+ the Zicsr and Zifencei extensions. This requires explicitly specifying
+ Zicsr and Zifencei when binutils >= 2.38 or GCC >= 12.1.0. Zicsr
+ and Zifencei are supported in binutils from version 2.36 onwards.
+ To make life easier, and avoid forcing toolchains that default to a
+ newer ISA spec to version 2.2, relax the check to binutils >= 2.36.
+ For clang < 17 or GCC < 11.1.0, for which this is not possible, this is
+ dealt with in CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_OLD_ISA_SPEC.
config TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_OLD_ISA_SPEC
def_bool y
depends on TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI
# https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/22e199e6afb1263c943c0c0d4498694…
- depends on CC_IS_CLANG && CLANG_VERSION < 170000
- help
- Certain versions of clang do not support zicsr and zifencei via -march
- but newer versions of binutils require it for the reasons noted in the
- help text of CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI. This
- option causes an older ISA spec compatible with these older versions
- of clang to be passed to GAS, which has the same result as passing zicsr
- and zifencei to -march.
+ # https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=b03be74bad08c382da47e048007a7…
+ depends on (CC_IS_CLANG && CLANG_VERSION < 170000) || (CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION < 110100)
+ help
+ Certain versions of clang and GCC do not support zicsr and zifencei via
+ -march. This option causes an older ISA spec compatible with these older
+ versions of clang and GCC to be passed to GAS, which has the same result
+ as passing zicsr and zifencei to -march.
config FPU
bool "FPU support"
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile
index 189345773e7e..b86e5e2c3aea 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile
@@ -11,7 +11,13 @@ compat_vdso-syms += flush_icache
COMPAT_CC := $(CC)
COMPAT_LD := $(LD)
-COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=rv32g -mabi=ilp32
+# binutils 2.35 does not support the zifencei extension, but in the ISA
+# spec 20191213, G stands for IMAFD_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI.
+ifdef CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI
+ COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=rv32g -mabi=ilp32
+else
+ COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=rv32imafd -mabi=ilp32
+endif
COMPAT_LD_FLAGS := -melf32lriscv
# Disable attributes, as they're useless and break the build.
--
2.34.1
Assist Request from You
Please let this not be a surprise message to you because I decided to
contact you on this magnitude and lucrative transaction for our
present and future survival in life. Moreover, I have laid all the
solemn trust in you before I decided to disclose this successful and
confidential transaction to you.
I am Sgt Lauran Glover a Female soldier working for the United
Nations in Poland on war against Russia invasion in Ukraine . I have
in my possession the sum of $3.5million USD Which I made here; I
deposited this money with a Red Cross agent. I want you to stand as my
beneficiary and receive the fund and keep it safe so that as soon as I
am through with my mission here in a month's time.
You will utilize this money the way I am going to instruct here, I
want you to take 40% Percent of the total money for your personal use
While 20% Percent of the money will go to charity, people in the
street and helping the orphanage the remaining 40% percent of the
total money .you will assist me to invest it in a good profitable
Venture or you keep it for me until I arrive in your country.
Please reply back to me if you are willing to work with me so that I
can send you the information where the money has been deposited, this
is not a stolen fund and there are no risks involved. I count on your
understanding and honesty.
Yours
Sgt Lauran Glover