From: He Ying <heying24(a)huawei.com>
[ Upstream commit a1b29ba2f2c171b9bea73be993bfdf0a62d37d15 ]
The following KASAN warning was reported in our kernel.
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in get_wchan+0x188/0x250
Read of size 4 at addr d216f958 by task ps/14437
CPU: 3 PID: 14437 Comm: ps Tainted: G O 5.10.0 #1
Call Trace:
[daa63858] [c0654348] dump_stack+0x9c/0xe4 (unreliable)
[daa63888] [c035cf0c] print_address_description.constprop.3+0x8c/0x570
[daa63908] [c035d6bc] kasan_report+0x1ac/0x218
[daa63948] [c00496e8] get_wchan+0x188/0x250
[daa63978] [c0461ec8] do_task_stat+0xce8/0xe60
[daa63b98] [c0455ac8] proc_single_show+0x98/0x170
[daa63bc8] [c03cab8c] seq_read_iter+0x1ec/0x900
[daa63c38] [c03cb47c] seq_read+0x1dc/0x290
[daa63d68] [c037fc94] vfs_read+0x164/0x510
[daa63ea8] [c03808e4] ksys_read+0x144/0x1d0
[daa63f38] [c005b1dc] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38
--- interrupt: c00 at 0x8fa8f4
LR = 0x8fa8cc
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:98ebcdd2 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x2 pfn:0x1216f
flags: 0x0()
raw: 00000000 00000000 01010122 00000000 00000002 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
raw: 00000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
d216f800: 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d216f880: f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>d216f900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00
^
d216f980: f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d216fa00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
After looking into this issue, I find the buggy address belongs
to the task stack region. It seems KASAN has something wrong.
I look into the code of __get_wchan in x86 architecture and
find the same issue has been resolved by the commit
f7d27c35ddff ("x86/mm, kasan: Silence KASAN warnings in get_wchan()").
The solution could be applied to powerpc architecture too.
As Andrey Ryabinin said, get_wchan() is racy by design, it may
access volatile stack of running task, thus it may access
redzone in a stack frame and cause KASAN to warn about this.
Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() to silence these warnings.
Reported-by: Wanming Hu <huwanming(a)huaweil.com>
Signed-off-by: He Ying <heying24(a)huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Jingwen <chenjingwen6(a)huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe(a)ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220121014418.155675-1-heying24@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index 02b69a68139c..56c33285b1df 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -2017,12 +2017,12 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
return 0;
do {
- sp = *(unsigned long *)sp;
+ sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)sp);
if (!validate_sp(sp, p, STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD) ||
p->state == TASK_RUNNING)
return 0;
if (count > 0) {
- ip = ((unsigned long *)sp)[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE];
+ ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(((unsigned long *)sp)[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE]);
if (!in_sched_functions(ip))
return ip;
}
--
2.35.1
From: He Ying <heying24(a)huawei.com>
[ Upstream commit a1b29ba2f2c171b9bea73be993bfdf0a62d37d15 ]
The following KASAN warning was reported in our kernel.
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in get_wchan+0x188/0x250
Read of size 4 at addr d216f958 by task ps/14437
CPU: 3 PID: 14437 Comm: ps Tainted: G O 5.10.0 #1
Call Trace:
[daa63858] [c0654348] dump_stack+0x9c/0xe4 (unreliable)
[daa63888] [c035cf0c] print_address_description.constprop.3+0x8c/0x570
[daa63908] [c035d6bc] kasan_report+0x1ac/0x218
[daa63948] [c00496e8] get_wchan+0x188/0x250
[daa63978] [c0461ec8] do_task_stat+0xce8/0xe60
[daa63b98] [c0455ac8] proc_single_show+0x98/0x170
[daa63bc8] [c03cab8c] seq_read_iter+0x1ec/0x900
[daa63c38] [c03cb47c] seq_read+0x1dc/0x290
[daa63d68] [c037fc94] vfs_read+0x164/0x510
[daa63ea8] [c03808e4] ksys_read+0x144/0x1d0
[daa63f38] [c005b1dc] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38
--- interrupt: c00 at 0x8fa8f4
LR = 0x8fa8cc
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:98ebcdd2 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x2 pfn:0x1216f
flags: 0x0()
raw: 00000000 00000000 01010122 00000000 00000002 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
raw: 00000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
d216f800: 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d216f880: f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>d216f900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00
^
d216f980: f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d216fa00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
After looking into this issue, I find the buggy address belongs
to the task stack region. It seems KASAN has something wrong.
I look into the code of __get_wchan in x86 architecture and
find the same issue has been resolved by the commit
f7d27c35ddff ("x86/mm, kasan: Silence KASAN warnings in get_wchan()").
The solution could be applied to powerpc architecture too.
As Andrey Ryabinin said, get_wchan() is racy by design, it may
access volatile stack of running task, thus it may access
redzone in a stack frame and cause KASAN to warn about this.
Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() to silence these warnings.
Reported-by: Wanming Hu <huwanming(a)huaweil.com>
Signed-off-by: He Ying <heying24(a)huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Jingwen <chenjingwen6(a)huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe(a)ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220121014418.155675-1-heying24@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index c94bba9142e7..832663f21422 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -2001,12 +2001,12 @@ static unsigned long __get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
return 0;
do {
- sp = *(unsigned long *)sp;
+ sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)sp);
if (!validate_sp(sp, p, STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD) ||
p->state == TASK_RUNNING)
return 0;
if (count > 0) {
- ip = ((unsigned long *)sp)[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE];
+ ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(((unsigned long *)sp)[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE]);
if (!in_sched_functions(ip))
return ip;
}
--
2.35.1
From: He Ying <heying24(a)huawei.com>
[ Upstream commit a1b29ba2f2c171b9bea73be993bfdf0a62d37d15 ]
The following KASAN warning was reported in our kernel.
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in get_wchan+0x188/0x250
Read of size 4 at addr d216f958 by task ps/14437
CPU: 3 PID: 14437 Comm: ps Tainted: G O 5.10.0 #1
Call Trace:
[daa63858] [c0654348] dump_stack+0x9c/0xe4 (unreliable)
[daa63888] [c035cf0c] print_address_description.constprop.3+0x8c/0x570
[daa63908] [c035d6bc] kasan_report+0x1ac/0x218
[daa63948] [c00496e8] get_wchan+0x188/0x250
[daa63978] [c0461ec8] do_task_stat+0xce8/0xe60
[daa63b98] [c0455ac8] proc_single_show+0x98/0x170
[daa63bc8] [c03cab8c] seq_read_iter+0x1ec/0x900
[daa63c38] [c03cb47c] seq_read+0x1dc/0x290
[daa63d68] [c037fc94] vfs_read+0x164/0x510
[daa63ea8] [c03808e4] ksys_read+0x144/0x1d0
[daa63f38] [c005b1dc] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38
--- interrupt: c00 at 0x8fa8f4
LR = 0x8fa8cc
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:98ebcdd2 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x2 pfn:0x1216f
flags: 0x0()
raw: 00000000 00000000 01010122 00000000 00000002 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
raw: 00000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
d216f800: 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d216f880: f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>d216f900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00
^
d216f980: f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d216fa00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
After looking into this issue, I find the buggy address belongs
to the task stack region. It seems KASAN has something wrong.
I look into the code of __get_wchan in x86 architecture and
find the same issue has been resolved by the commit
f7d27c35ddff ("x86/mm, kasan: Silence KASAN warnings in get_wchan()").
The solution could be applied to powerpc architecture too.
As Andrey Ryabinin said, get_wchan() is racy by design, it may
access volatile stack of running task, thus it may access
redzone in a stack frame and cause KASAN to warn about this.
Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() to silence these warnings.
Reported-by: Wanming Hu <huwanming(a)huaweil.com>
Signed-off-by: He Ying <heying24(a)huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Jingwen <chenjingwen6(a)huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe(a)ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220121014418.155675-1-heying24@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index 3064694afea1..cfb8fd76afb4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -2108,12 +2108,12 @@ static unsigned long __get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
return 0;
do {
- sp = *(unsigned long *)sp;
+ sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)sp);
if (!validate_sp(sp, p, STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD) ||
p->state == TASK_RUNNING)
return 0;
if (count > 0) {
- ip = ((unsigned long *)sp)[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE];
+ ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(((unsigned long *)sp)[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE]);
if (!in_sched_functions(ip))
return ip;
}
--
2.35.1
From: He Ying <heying24(a)huawei.com>
[ Upstream commit a1b29ba2f2c171b9bea73be993bfdf0a62d37d15 ]
The following KASAN warning was reported in our kernel.
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in get_wchan+0x188/0x250
Read of size 4 at addr d216f958 by task ps/14437
CPU: 3 PID: 14437 Comm: ps Tainted: G O 5.10.0 #1
Call Trace:
[daa63858] [c0654348] dump_stack+0x9c/0xe4 (unreliable)
[daa63888] [c035cf0c] print_address_description.constprop.3+0x8c/0x570
[daa63908] [c035d6bc] kasan_report+0x1ac/0x218
[daa63948] [c00496e8] get_wchan+0x188/0x250
[daa63978] [c0461ec8] do_task_stat+0xce8/0xe60
[daa63b98] [c0455ac8] proc_single_show+0x98/0x170
[daa63bc8] [c03cab8c] seq_read_iter+0x1ec/0x900
[daa63c38] [c03cb47c] seq_read+0x1dc/0x290
[daa63d68] [c037fc94] vfs_read+0x164/0x510
[daa63ea8] [c03808e4] ksys_read+0x144/0x1d0
[daa63f38] [c005b1dc] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38
--- interrupt: c00 at 0x8fa8f4
LR = 0x8fa8cc
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:98ebcdd2 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x2 pfn:0x1216f
flags: 0x0()
raw: 00000000 00000000 01010122 00000000 00000002 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
raw: 00000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
d216f800: 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d216f880: f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>d216f900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00
^
d216f980: f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d216fa00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
After looking into this issue, I find the buggy address belongs
to the task stack region. It seems KASAN has something wrong.
I look into the code of __get_wchan in x86 architecture and
find the same issue has been resolved by the commit
f7d27c35ddff ("x86/mm, kasan: Silence KASAN warnings in get_wchan()").
The solution could be applied to powerpc architecture too.
As Andrey Ryabinin said, get_wchan() is racy by design, it may
access volatile stack of running task, thus it may access
redzone in a stack frame and cause KASAN to warn about this.
Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() to silence these warnings.
Reported-by: Wanming Hu <huwanming(a)huaweil.com>
Signed-off-by: He Ying <heying24(a)huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Jingwen <chenjingwen6(a)huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe(a)ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220121014418.155675-1-heying24@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index 50436b52c213..39a0a13a3a27 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -2124,12 +2124,12 @@ static unsigned long __get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
return 0;
do {
- sp = *(unsigned long *)sp;
+ sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)sp);
if (!validate_sp(sp, p, STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD) ||
task_is_running(p))
return 0;
if (count > 0) {
- ip = ((unsigned long *)sp)[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE];
+ ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(((unsigned long *)sp)[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE]);
if (!in_sched_functions(ip))
return ip;
}
--
2.35.1
From: He Ying <heying24(a)huawei.com>
[ Upstream commit a1b29ba2f2c171b9bea73be993bfdf0a62d37d15 ]
The following KASAN warning was reported in our kernel.
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in get_wchan+0x188/0x250
Read of size 4 at addr d216f958 by task ps/14437
CPU: 3 PID: 14437 Comm: ps Tainted: G O 5.10.0 #1
Call Trace:
[daa63858] [c0654348] dump_stack+0x9c/0xe4 (unreliable)
[daa63888] [c035cf0c] print_address_description.constprop.3+0x8c/0x570
[daa63908] [c035d6bc] kasan_report+0x1ac/0x218
[daa63948] [c00496e8] get_wchan+0x188/0x250
[daa63978] [c0461ec8] do_task_stat+0xce8/0xe60
[daa63b98] [c0455ac8] proc_single_show+0x98/0x170
[daa63bc8] [c03cab8c] seq_read_iter+0x1ec/0x900
[daa63c38] [c03cb47c] seq_read+0x1dc/0x290
[daa63d68] [c037fc94] vfs_read+0x164/0x510
[daa63ea8] [c03808e4] ksys_read+0x144/0x1d0
[daa63f38] [c005b1dc] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38
--- interrupt: c00 at 0x8fa8f4
LR = 0x8fa8cc
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:98ebcdd2 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x2 pfn:0x1216f
flags: 0x0()
raw: 00000000 00000000 01010122 00000000 00000002 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
raw: 00000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
d216f800: 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d216f880: f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>d216f900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00
^
d216f980: f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d216fa00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
After looking into this issue, I find the buggy address belongs
to the task stack region. It seems KASAN has something wrong.
I look into the code of __get_wchan in x86 architecture and
find the same issue has been resolved by the commit
f7d27c35ddff ("x86/mm, kasan: Silence KASAN warnings in get_wchan()").
The solution could be applied to powerpc architecture too.
As Andrey Ryabinin said, get_wchan() is racy by design, it may
access volatile stack of running task, thus it may access
redzone in a stack frame and cause KASAN to warn about this.
Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() to silence these warnings.
Reported-by: Wanming Hu <huwanming(a)huaweil.com>
Signed-off-by: He Ying <heying24(a)huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Jingwen <chenjingwen6(a)huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe(a)ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220121014418.155675-1-heying24@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index 984813a4d5dc..a75d20f23dac 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -2160,12 +2160,12 @@ static unsigned long ___get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
return 0;
do {
- sp = *(unsigned long *)sp;
+ sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)sp);
if (!validate_sp(sp, p, STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD) ||
task_is_running(p))
return 0;
if (count > 0) {
- ip = ((unsigned long *)sp)[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE];
+ ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(((unsigned long *)sp)[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE]);
if (!in_sched_functions(ip))
return ip;
}
--
2.35.1
commit 8e1278444446fc97778a5e5c99bca1ce0bbc5ec9 upstream.
The ptrace PEEKUSR/POKEUSR (aka PEEKUSER/POKEUSER) API allows a process
to read/write registers of another process.
To get/set a register, the API takes an index into an imaginary address
space called the "USER area", where the registers of the process are
laid out in some fashion.
The kernel then maps that index to a particular register in its own data
structures and gets/sets the value.
The API only allows a single machine-word to be read/written at a time.
So 4 bytes on 32-bit kernels and 8 bytes on 64-bit kernels.
The way floating point registers (FPRs) are addressed is somewhat
complicated, because double precision float values are 64-bit even on
32-bit CPUs. That means on 32-bit kernels each FPR occupies two
word-sized locations in the USER area. On 64-bit kernels each FPR
occupies one word-sized location in the USER area.
Internally the kernel stores the FPRs in an array of u64s, or if VSX is
enabled, an array of pairs of u64s where one half of each pair stores
the FPR. Which half of the pair stores the FPR depends on the kernel's
endianness.
To handle the different layouts of the FPRs depending on VSX/no-VSX and
big/little endian, the TS_FPR() macro was introduced.
Unfortunately the TS_FPR() macro does not take into account the fact
that the addressing of each FPR differs between 32-bit and 64-bit
kernels. It just takes the index into the "USER area" passed from
userspace and indexes into the fp_state.fpr array.
On 32-bit there are 64 indexes that address FPRs, but only 32 entries in
the fp_state.fpr array, meaning the user can read/write 256 bytes past
the end of the array. Because the fp_state sits in the middle of the
thread_struct there are various fields than can be overwritten,
including some pointers. As such it may be exploitable.
It has also been observed to cause systems to hang or otherwise
misbehave when using gdbserver, and is probably the root cause of this
report which could not be easily reproduced:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/dc38afe9-6b78-f3f5-666b-986939e40fc6@k…
Rather than trying to make the TS_FPR() macro even more complicated to
fix the bug, or add more macros, instead add a special-case for 32-bit
kernels. This is more obvious and hopefully avoids a similar bug
happening again in future.
Note that because 32-bit kernels never have VSX enabled the code doesn't
need to consider TS_FPRWIDTH/OFFSET at all.
Fixes: 87fec0514f61 ("powerpc: PTRACE_PEEKUSR/PTRACE_POKEUSER of FPR registers in little endian builds")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v3.13+
Reported-by: Ariel Miculas <ariel.miculas(a)belden.com>
Tested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy(a)csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe(a)ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609133245.573565-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
index 4f2829634d79..88947f5fd778 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -2938,8 +2938,13 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request,
flush_fp_to_thread(child);
if (fpidx < (PT_FPSCR - PT_FPR0))
- memcpy(&tmp, &child->thread.TS_FPR(fpidx),
- sizeof(long));
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)) {
+ // On 32-bit the index we are passed refers to 32-bit words
+ tmp = ((u32 *)child->thread.fp_state.fpr)[fpidx];
+ } else {
+ memcpy(&tmp, &child->thread.TS_FPR(fpidx),
+ sizeof(long));
+ }
else
tmp = child->thread.fp_state.fpscr;
}
@@ -2971,8 +2976,13 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request,
flush_fp_to_thread(child);
if (fpidx < (PT_FPSCR - PT_FPR0))
- memcpy(&child->thread.TS_FPR(fpidx), &data,
- sizeof(long));
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)) {
+ // On 32-bit the index we are passed refers to 32-bit words
+ ((u32 *)child->thread.fp_state.fpr)[fpidx] = data;
+ } else {
+ memcpy(&child->thread.TS_FPR(fpidx), &data,
+ sizeof(long));
+ }
else
child->thread.fp_state.fpscr = data;
ret = 0;
--
2.35.3