June 2022 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tracing: Have event format check not flag %p* on" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 499f12168aebd6da8fa32c9b7d6203ca9b5eb88d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt(a)goodmis.org> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:56:32 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Have event format check not flag %p* on __get_dynamic_array() The print fmt check against trace events to make sure that the format does not use pointers that may be freed from the time of the trace to the time the event is read, gives a false positive on %pISpc when reading data that was saved in __get_dynamic_array() when it is perfectly fine to do so, as the data being read is on the ring buffer. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220407144524.2a592ed6@canb.auug.org.au/ Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Fixes: 5013f454a352c ("tracing: Add check of trace event print fmts for dereferencing pointers") Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt(a)goodmis.org> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c index 78f313b7b315..d5913487821a 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c @@ -392,12 +392,6 @@ static void test_event_printk(struct trace_event_call *call) if (!(dereference_flags & (1ULL << arg))) goto next_arg; - /* Check for __get_sockaddr */; - if (str_has_prefix(fmt + i, "__get_sockaddr(")) { - dereference_flags &= ~(1ULL << arg); - goto next_arg; - } - /* Find the REC-> in the argument */ c = strchr(fmt + i, ','); r = strstr(fmt + i, "REC->"); @@ -413,7 +407,14 @@ static void test_event_printk(struct trace_event_call *call) a = strchr(fmt + i, '&'); if ((a && (a < r)) || test_field(r, call)) dereference_flags &= ~(1ULL << arg); + } else if ((r = strstr(fmt + i, "__get_dynamic_array(")) && + (!c || r < c)) { + dereference_flags &= ~(1ULL << arg); + } else if ((r = strstr(fmt + i, "__get_sockaddr(")) && + (!c || r < c)) { + dereference_flags &= ~(1ULL << arg); } + next_arg: i--; arg++;

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 01/18] KVM: arm64: Always start with clearing SVE flag on load

by Marc Zyngier

On each vcpu load, we set the KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED flag if SVE is enabled for EL0 on the host. This is used to restore the correct state on vpcu put. However, it appears that nothing ever clears this flag. Once set, it will stick until the vcpu is destroyed, which has the potential to spuriously enable SVE for userspace. We probably never saw the issue because no VMM uses SVE, but that's still pretty bad. Unconditionally clearing the flag on vcpu load addresses the issue. Fixes: 8383741ab2e7 ("KVM: arm64: Get rid of host SVE tracking/saving") Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz(a)kernel.org> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org --- arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c index 441edb9c398c..3c2cfc3adc51 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->arch.flags &= ~KVM_ARM64_FP_ENABLED; vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_FP_HOST; + vcpu->arch.flags &= ~KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED; if (read_sysreg(cpacr_el1) & CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN) vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED; -- 2.34.1

2 years, 10 months

2
3
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: fix bug_on in __es_tree_search" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From d36f6ed761b53933b0b4126486c10d3da7751e7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 20:08:16 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix bug_on in __es_tree_search Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON: ================================================================== kernel BUG at fs/ext4/extents_status.c:199! [...] RIP: 0010:ext4_es_end fs/ext4/extents_status.c:199 [inline] RIP: 0010:__es_tree_search+0x1e0/0x260 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:217 [...] Call Trace: ext4_es_cache_extent+0x109/0x340 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:766 ext4_cache_extents+0x239/0x2e0 fs/ext4/extents.c:561 ext4_find_extent+0x6b7/0xa20 fs/ext4/extents.c:964 ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x16b/0x4b70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4384 ext4_map_blocks+0xe26/0x19f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:567 ext4_getblk+0x320/0x4c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:980 ext4_bread+0x2d/0x170 fs/ext4/inode.c:1031 ext4_quota_read+0x248/0x320 fs/ext4/super.c:6257 v2_read_header+0x78/0x110 fs/quota/quota_v2.c:63 v2_check_quota_file+0x76/0x230 fs/quota/quota_v2.c:82 vfs_load_quota_inode+0x5d1/0x1530 fs/quota/dquot.c:2368 dquot_enable+0x28a/0x330 fs/quota/dquot.c:2490 ext4_quota_enable fs/ext4/super.c:6137 [inline] ext4_enable_quotas+0x5d7/0x960 fs/ext4/super.c:6163 ext4_fill_super+0xa7c9/0xdc00 fs/ext4/super.c:4754 mount_bdev+0x2e9/0x3b0 fs/super.c:1158 mount_fs+0x4b/0x1e4 fs/super.c:1261 [...] ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows: ------------------------------------- ext4_fill_super ext4_enable_quotas ext4_quota_enable ext4_iget __ext4_iget ext4_ext_check_inode ext4_ext_check __ext4_ext_check ext4_valid_extent_entries Check for overlapping extents does't take effect dquot_enable vfs_load_quota_inode v2_check_quota_file v2_read_header ext4_quota_read ext4_bread ext4_getblk ext4_map_blocks ext4_ext_map_blocks ext4_find_extent ext4_cache_extents ext4_es_cache_extent ext4_es_cache_extent __es_tree_search ext4_es_end BUG_ON(es->es_lblk + es->es_len < es->es_lblk) The error ext4 extents is as follows: 0af3 0300 0400 0000 00000000 extent_header 00000000 0100 0000 12000000 extent1 00000000 0100 0000 18000000 extent2 02000000 0400 0000 14000000 extent3 In the ext4_valid_extent_entries function, if prev is 0, no error is returned even if lblock<=prev. This was intended to skip the check on the first extent, but in the error image above, prev=0+1-1=0 when checking the second extent, so even though lblock<=prev, the function does not return an error. As a result, bug_ON occurs in __es_tree_search and the system panics. To solve this problem, we only need to check that: 1. The lblock of the first extent is not less than 0. 2. The lblock of the next extent is not less than the next block of the previous extent. The same applies to extent_idx. Cc: stable(a)kernel.org Fixes: 5946d089379a ("ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220518120816.1541863-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(a)mit.edu> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index 474479ce76e0..c148bb97b527 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode, { unsigned short entries; ext4_lblk_t lblock = 0; - ext4_lblk_t prev = 0; + ext4_lblk_t cur = 0; if (eh->eh_entries == 0) return 1; @@ -396,11 +396,11 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode, /* Check for overlapping extents */ lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext->ee_block); - if ((lblock <= prev) && prev) { + if (lblock < cur) { *pblk = ext4_ext_pblock(ext); return 0; } - prev = lblock + ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext) - 1; + cur = lblock + ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext); ext++; entries--; } @@ -420,13 +420,13 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode, /* Check for overlapping index extents */ lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext_idx->ei_block); - if ((lblock <= prev) && prev) { + if (lblock < cur) { *pblk = ext4_idx_pblock(ext_idx); return 0; } ext_idx++; entries--; - prev = lblock; + cur = lblock + 1; } } return 1;

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: fix bug_on in __es_tree_search" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From d36f6ed761b53933b0b4126486c10d3da7751e7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 20:08:16 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix bug_on in __es_tree_search Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON: ================================================================== kernel BUG at fs/ext4/extents_status.c:199! [...] RIP: 0010:ext4_es_end fs/ext4/extents_status.c:199 [inline] RIP: 0010:__es_tree_search+0x1e0/0x260 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:217 [...] Call Trace: ext4_es_cache_extent+0x109/0x340 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:766 ext4_cache_extents+0x239/0x2e0 fs/ext4/extents.c:561 ext4_find_extent+0x6b7/0xa20 fs/ext4/extents.c:964 ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x16b/0x4b70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4384 ext4_map_blocks+0xe26/0x19f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:567 ext4_getblk+0x320/0x4c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:980 ext4_bread+0x2d/0x170 fs/ext4/inode.c:1031 ext4_quota_read+0x248/0x320 fs/ext4/super.c:6257 v2_read_header+0x78/0x110 fs/quota/quota_v2.c:63 v2_check_quota_file+0x76/0x230 fs/quota/quota_v2.c:82 vfs_load_quota_inode+0x5d1/0x1530 fs/quota/dquot.c:2368 dquot_enable+0x28a/0x330 fs/quota/dquot.c:2490 ext4_quota_enable fs/ext4/super.c:6137 [inline] ext4_enable_quotas+0x5d7/0x960 fs/ext4/super.c:6163 ext4_fill_super+0xa7c9/0xdc00 fs/ext4/super.c:4754 mount_bdev+0x2e9/0x3b0 fs/super.c:1158 mount_fs+0x4b/0x1e4 fs/super.c:1261 [...] ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows: ------------------------------------- ext4_fill_super ext4_enable_quotas ext4_quota_enable ext4_iget __ext4_iget ext4_ext_check_inode ext4_ext_check __ext4_ext_check ext4_valid_extent_entries Check for overlapping extents does't take effect dquot_enable vfs_load_quota_inode v2_check_quota_file v2_read_header ext4_quota_read ext4_bread ext4_getblk ext4_map_blocks ext4_ext_map_blocks ext4_find_extent ext4_cache_extents ext4_es_cache_extent ext4_es_cache_extent __es_tree_search ext4_es_end BUG_ON(es->es_lblk + es->es_len < es->es_lblk) The error ext4 extents is as follows: 0af3 0300 0400 0000 00000000 extent_header 00000000 0100 0000 12000000 extent1 00000000 0100 0000 18000000 extent2 02000000 0400 0000 14000000 extent3 In the ext4_valid_extent_entries function, if prev is 0, no error is returned even if lblock<=prev. This was intended to skip the check on the first extent, but in the error image above, prev=0+1-1=0 when checking the second extent, so even though lblock<=prev, the function does not return an error. As a result, bug_ON occurs in __es_tree_search and the system panics. To solve this problem, we only need to check that: 1. The lblock of the first extent is not less than 0. 2. The lblock of the next extent is not less than the next block of the previous extent. The same applies to extent_idx. Cc: stable(a)kernel.org Fixes: 5946d089379a ("ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220518120816.1541863-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(a)mit.edu> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index 474479ce76e0..c148bb97b527 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode, { unsigned short entries; ext4_lblk_t lblock = 0; - ext4_lblk_t prev = 0; + ext4_lblk_t cur = 0; if (eh->eh_entries == 0) return 1; @@ -396,11 +396,11 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode, /* Check for overlapping extents */ lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext->ee_block); - if ((lblock <= prev) && prev) { + if (lblock < cur) { *pblk = ext4_ext_pblock(ext); return 0; } - prev = lblock + ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext) - 1; + cur = lblock + ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext); ext++; entries--; } @@ -420,13 +420,13 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode, /* Check for overlapping index extents */ lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext_idx->ei_block); - if ((lblock <= prev) && prev) { + if (lblock < cur) { *pblk = ext4_idx_pblock(ext_idx); return 0; } ext_idx++; entries--; - prev = lblock; + cur = lblock + 1; } } return 1;

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: fix bug_on in __es_tree_search" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From d36f6ed761b53933b0b4126486c10d3da7751e7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 20:08:16 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix bug_on in __es_tree_search Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON: ================================================================== kernel BUG at fs/ext4/extents_status.c:199! [...] RIP: 0010:ext4_es_end fs/ext4/extents_status.c:199 [inline] RIP: 0010:__es_tree_search+0x1e0/0x260 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:217 [...] Call Trace: ext4_es_cache_extent+0x109/0x340 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:766 ext4_cache_extents+0x239/0x2e0 fs/ext4/extents.c:561 ext4_find_extent+0x6b7/0xa20 fs/ext4/extents.c:964 ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x16b/0x4b70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4384 ext4_map_blocks+0xe26/0x19f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:567 ext4_getblk+0x320/0x4c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:980 ext4_bread+0x2d/0x170 fs/ext4/inode.c:1031 ext4_quota_read+0x248/0x320 fs/ext4/super.c:6257 v2_read_header+0x78/0x110 fs/quota/quota_v2.c:63 v2_check_quota_file+0x76/0x230 fs/quota/quota_v2.c:82 vfs_load_quota_inode+0x5d1/0x1530 fs/quota/dquot.c:2368 dquot_enable+0x28a/0x330 fs/quota/dquot.c:2490 ext4_quota_enable fs/ext4/super.c:6137 [inline] ext4_enable_quotas+0x5d7/0x960 fs/ext4/super.c:6163 ext4_fill_super+0xa7c9/0xdc00 fs/ext4/super.c:4754 mount_bdev+0x2e9/0x3b0 fs/super.c:1158 mount_fs+0x4b/0x1e4 fs/super.c:1261 [...] ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows: ------------------------------------- ext4_fill_super ext4_enable_quotas ext4_quota_enable ext4_iget __ext4_iget ext4_ext_check_inode ext4_ext_check __ext4_ext_check ext4_valid_extent_entries Check for overlapping extents does't take effect dquot_enable vfs_load_quota_inode v2_check_quota_file v2_read_header ext4_quota_read ext4_bread ext4_getblk ext4_map_blocks ext4_ext_map_blocks ext4_find_extent ext4_cache_extents ext4_es_cache_extent ext4_es_cache_extent __es_tree_search ext4_es_end BUG_ON(es->es_lblk + es->es_len < es->es_lblk) The error ext4 extents is as follows: 0af3 0300 0400 0000 00000000 extent_header 00000000 0100 0000 12000000 extent1 00000000 0100 0000 18000000 extent2 02000000 0400 0000 14000000 extent3 In the ext4_valid_extent_entries function, if prev is 0, no error is returned even if lblock<=prev. This was intended to skip the check on the first extent, but in the error image above, prev=0+1-1=0 when checking the second extent, so even though lblock<=prev, the function does not return an error. As a result, bug_ON occurs in __es_tree_search and the system panics. To solve this problem, we only need to check that: 1. The lblock of the first extent is not less than 0. 2. The lblock of the next extent is not less than the next block of the previous extent. The same applies to extent_idx. Cc: stable(a)kernel.org Fixes: 5946d089379a ("ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220518120816.1541863-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(a)mit.edu> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index 474479ce76e0..c148bb97b527 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode, { unsigned short entries; ext4_lblk_t lblock = 0; - ext4_lblk_t prev = 0; + ext4_lblk_t cur = 0; if (eh->eh_entries == 0) return 1; @@ -396,11 +396,11 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode, /* Check for overlapping extents */ lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext->ee_block); - if ((lblock <= prev) && prev) { + if (lblock < cur) { *pblk = ext4_ext_pblock(ext); return 0; } - prev = lblock + ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext) - 1; + cur = lblock + ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext); ext++; entries--; } @@ -420,13 +420,13 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode, /* Check for overlapping index extents */ lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext_idx->ei_block); - if ((lblock <= prev) && prev) { + if (lblock < cur) { *pblk = ext4_idx_pblock(ext_idx); return 0; } ext_idx++; entries--; - prev = lblock; + cur = lblock + 1; } } return 1;

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_write and" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From f87c7a4b084afc13190cbb263538e444cb2b392a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 21:40:31 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_write and ext4_convert_inline_data Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON: ================================================================== EXT4-fs error (device loop3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:805: group 0, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 25 vs 31513 free clusters kernel BUG at fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:53! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 PID: 25371 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.10.0+ #1 RIP: 0010:ext4_put_nojournal fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:53 [inline] RIP: 0010:__ext4_journal_stop+0x10e/0x110 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:116 [...] Call Trace: ext4_write_inline_data_end+0x59a/0x730 fs/ext4/inline.c:795 generic_perform_write+0x279/0x3c0 mm/filemap.c:3344 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x2e3/0x3d0 fs/ext4/file.c:270 ext4_file_write_iter+0x30a/0x11c0 fs/ext4/file.c:520 do_iter_readv_writev+0x339/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:732 do_iter_write+0x107/0x430 fs/read_write.c:861 vfs_writev fs/read_write.c:934 [inline] do_pwritev+0x1e5/0x380 fs/read_write.c:1031 [...] ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows: cpu1 cpu2 __________________________|__________________________ do_pwritev vfs_writev do_iter_write ext4_file_write_iter ext4_buffered_write_iter generic_perform_write ext4_da_write_begin vfs_fallocate ext4_fallocate ext4_convert_inline_data ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock clear EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ext4_map_blocks ext4_ext_map_blocks ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_good_group_nolock ext4_mb_init_group ext4_mb_init_cache ext4_mb_generate_buddy --> error ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA) ext4_restore_inline_data set EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ext4_block_write_begin ext4_da_write_end ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA) ext4_write_inline_data_end handle=NULL ext4_journal_stop(handle) __ext4_journal_stop ext4_put_nojournal(handle) ref_cnt = (unsigned long)handle BUG_ON(ref_cnt == 0) ---> BUG_ON The lock held by ext4_convert_inline_data is xattr_sem, but the lock held by generic_perform_write is i_rwsem. Therefore, the two locks can be concurrent. To solve above issue, we add inode_lock() for ext4_convert_inline_data(). At the same time, move ext4_convert_inline_data() in front of ext4_punch_hole(), remove similar handling from ext4_punch_hole(). Fixes: 0c8d414f163f ("ext4: let fallocate handle inline data correctly") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220428134031.4153381-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(a)mit.edu> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index e473fde6b64b..474479ce76e0 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -4693,15 +4693,17 @@ long ext4_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len) FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; + inode_lock(inode); + ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); + inode_unlock(inode); + if (ret) + goto exit; + if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) { ret = ext4_punch_hole(file, offset, len); goto exit; } - ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); - if (ret) - goto exit; - if (mode & FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE) { ret = ext4_collapse_range(file, offset, len); goto exit; diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 5948bbba28e3..890f769d6e20 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -3979,15 +3979,6 @@ int ext4_punch_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t length) trace_ext4_punch_hole(inode, offset, length, 0); - ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA); - if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) { - filemap_invalidate_lock(mapping); - ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); - filemap_invalidate_unlock(mapping); - if (ret) - return ret; - } - /* * Write out all dirty pages to avoid race conditions * Then release them.

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_write and" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From f87c7a4b084afc13190cbb263538e444cb2b392a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 21:40:31 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_write and ext4_convert_inline_data Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON: ================================================================== EXT4-fs error (device loop3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:805: group 0, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 25 vs 31513 free clusters kernel BUG at fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:53! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 PID: 25371 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.10.0+ #1 RIP: 0010:ext4_put_nojournal fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:53 [inline] RIP: 0010:__ext4_journal_stop+0x10e/0x110 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:116 [...] Call Trace: ext4_write_inline_data_end+0x59a/0x730 fs/ext4/inline.c:795 generic_perform_write+0x279/0x3c0 mm/filemap.c:3344 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x2e3/0x3d0 fs/ext4/file.c:270 ext4_file_write_iter+0x30a/0x11c0 fs/ext4/file.c:520 do_iter_readv_writev+0x339/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:732 do_iter_write+0x107/0x430 fs/read_write.c:861 vfs_writev fs/read_write.c:934 [inline] do_pwritev+0x1e5/0x380 fs/read_write.c:1031 [...] ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows: cpu1 cpu2 __________________________|__________________________ do_pwritev vfs_writev do_iter_write ext4_file_write_iter ext4_buffered_write_iter generic_perform_write ext4_da_write_begin vfs_fallocate ext4_fallocate ext4_convert_inline_data ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock clear EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ext4_map_blocks ext4_ext_map_blocks ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_good_group_nolock ext4_mb_init_group ext4_mb_init_cache ext4_mb_generate_buddy --> error ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA) ext4_restore_inline_data set EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ext4_block_write_begin ext4_da_write_end ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA) ext4_write_inline_data_end handle=NULL ext4_journal_stop(handle) __ext4_journal_stop ext4_put_nojournal(handle) ref_cnt = (unsigned long)handle BUG_ON(ref_cnt == 0) ---> BUG_ON The lock held by ext4_convert_inline_data is xattr_sem, but the lock held by generic_perform_write is i_rwsem. Therefore, the two locks can be concurrent. To solve above issue, we add inode_lock() for ext4_convert_inline_data(). At the same time, move ext4_convert_inline_data() in front of ext4_punch_hole(), remove similar handling from ext4_punch_hole(). Fixes: 0c8d414f163f ("ext4: let fallocate handle inline data correctly") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220428134031.4153381-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(a)mit.edu> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index e473fde6b64b..474479ce76e0 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -4693,15 +4693,17 @@ long ext4_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len) FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; + inode_lock(inode); + ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); + inode_unlock(inode); + if (ret) + goto exit; + if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) { ret = ext4_punch_hole(file, offset, len); goto exit; } - ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); - if (ret) - goto exit; - if (mode & FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE) { ret = ext4_collapse_range(file, offset, len); goto exit; diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 5948bbba28e3..890f769d6e20 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -3979,15 +3979,6 @@ int ext4_punch_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t length) trace_ext4_punch_hole(inode, offset, length, 0); - ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA); - if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) { - filemap_invalidate_lock(mapping); - ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); - filemap_invalidate_unlock(mapping); - if (ret) - return ret; - } - /* * Write out all dirty pages to avoid race conditions * Then release them.

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_write and" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From f87c7a4b084afc13190cbb263538e444cb2b392a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 21:40:31 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_write and ext4_convert_inline_data Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON: ================================================================== EXT4-fs error (device loop3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:805: group 0, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 25 vs 31513 free clusters kernel BUG at fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:53! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 PID: 25371 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.10.0+ #1 RIP: 0010:ext4_put_nojournal fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:53 [inline] RIP: 0010:__ext4_journal_stop+0x10e/0x110 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:116 [...] Call Trace: ext4_write_inline_data_end+0x59a/0x730 fs/ext4/inline.c:795 generic_perform_write+0x279/0x3c0 mm/filemap.c:3344 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x2e3/0x3d0 fs/ext4/file.c:270 ext4_file_write_iter+0x30a/0x11c0 fs/ext4/file.c:520 do_iter_readv_writev+0x339/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:732 do_iter_write+0x107/0x430 fs/read_write.c:861 vfs_writev fs/read_write.c:934 [inline] do_pwritev+0x1e5/0x380 fs/read_write.c:1031 [...] ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows: cpu1 cpu2 __________________________|__________________________ do_pwritev vfs_writev do_iter_write ext4_file_write_iter ext4_buffered_write_iter generic_perform_write ext4_da_write_begin vfs_fallocate ext4_fallocate ext4_convert_inline_data ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock clear EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ext4_map_blocks ext4_ext_map_blocks ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_good_group_nolock ext4_mb_init_group ext4_mb_init_cache ext4_mb_generate_buddy --> error ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA) ext4_restore_inline_data set EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ext4_block_write_begin ext4_da_write_end ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA) ext4_write_inline_data_end handle=NULL ext4_journal_stop(handle) __ext4_journal_stop ext4_put_nojournal(handle) ref_cnt = (unsigned long)handle BUG_ON(ref_cnt == 0) ---> BUG_ON The lock held by ext4_convert_inline_data is xattr_sem, but the lock held by generic_perform_write is i_rwsem. Therefore, the two locks can be concurrent. To solve above issue, we add inode_lock() for ext4_convert_inline_data(). At the same time, move ext4_convert_inline_data() in front of ext4_punch_hole(), remove similar handling from ext4_punch_hole(). Fixes: 0c8d414f163f ("ext4: let fallocate handle inline data correctly") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220428134031.4153381-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(a)mit.edu> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index e473fde6b64b..474479ce76e0 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -4693,15 +4693,17 @@ long ext4_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len) FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; + inode_lock(inode); + ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); + inode_unlock(inode); + if (ret) + goto exit; + if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) { ret = ext4_punch_hole(file, offset, len); goto exit; } - ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); - if (ret) - goto exit; - if (mode & FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE) { ret = ext4_collapse_range(file, offset, len); goto exit; diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 5948bbba28e3..890f769d6e20 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -3979,15 +3979,6 @@ int ext4_punch_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t length) trace_ext4_punch_hole(inode, offset, length, 0); - ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA); - if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) { - filemap_invalidate_lock(mapping); - ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); - filemap_invalidate_unlock(mapping); - if (ret) - return ret; - } - /* * Write out all dirty pages to avoid race conditions * Then release them.

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_write and" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From f87c7a4b084afc13190cbb263538e444cb2b392a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 21:40:31 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_write and ext4_convert_inline_data Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON: ================================================================== EXT4-fs error (device loop3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:805: group 0, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 25 vs 31513 free clusters kernel BUG at fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:53! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 PID: 25371 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.10.0+ #1 RIP: 0010:ext4_put_nojournal fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:53 [inline] RIP: 0010:__ext4_journal_stop+0x10e/0x110 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:116 [...] Call Trace: ext4_write_inline_data_end+0x59a/0x730 fs/ext4/inline.c:795 generic_perform_write+0x279/0x3c0 mm/filemap.c:3344 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x2e3/0x3d0 fs/ext4/file.c:270 ext4_file_write_iter+0x30a/0x11c0 fs/ext4/file.c:520 do_iter_readv_writev+0x339/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:732 do_iter_write+0x107/0x430 fs/read_write.c:861 vfs_writev fs/read_write.c:934 [inline] do_pwritev+0x1e5/0x380 fs/read_write.c:1031 [...] ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows: cpu1 cpu2 __________________________|__________________________ do_pwritev vfs_writev do_iter_write ext4_file_write_iter ext4_buffered_write_iter generic_perform_write ext4_da_write_begin vfs_fallocate ext4_fallocate ext4_convert_inline_data ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock clear EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ext4_map_blocks ext4_ext_map_blocks ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_good_group_nolock ext4_mb_init_group ext4_mb_init_cache ext4_mb_generate_buddy --> error ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA) ext4_restore_inline_data set EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ext4_block_write_begin ext4_da_write_end ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA) ext4_write_inline_data_end handle=NULL ext4_journal_stop(handle) __ext4_journal_stop ext4_put_nojournal(handle) ref_cnt = (unsigned long)handle BUG_ON(ref_cnt == 0) ---> BUG_ON The lock held by ext4_convert_inline_data is xattr_sem, but the lock held by generic_perform_write is i_rwsem. Therefore, the two locks can be concurrent. To solve above issue, we add inode_lock() for ext4_convert_inline_data(). At the same time, move ext4_convert_inline_data() in front of ext4_punch_hole(), remove similar handling from ext4_punch_hole(). Fixes: 0c8d414f163f ("ext4: let fallocate handle inline data correctly") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220428134031.4153381-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(a)mit.edu> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index e473fde6b64b..474479ce76e0 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -4693,15 +4693,17 @@ long ext4_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len) FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; + inode_lock(inode); + ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); + inode_unlock(inode); + if (ret) + goto exit; + if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) { ret = ext4_punch_hole(file, offset, len); goto exit; } - ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); - if (ret) - goto exit; - if (mode & FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE) { ret = ext4_collapse_range(file, offset, len); goto exit; diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 5948bbba28e3..890f769d6e20 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -3979,15 +3979,6 @@ int ext4_punch_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t length) trace_ext4_punch_hole(inode, offset, length, 0); - ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA); - if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) { - filemap_invalidate_lock(mapping); - ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); - filemap_invalidate_unlock(mapping); - if (ret) - return ret; - } - /* * Write out all dirty pages to avoid race conditions * Then release them.

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_write and" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From f87c7a4b084afc13190cbb263538e444cb2b392a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 21:40:31 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_write and ext4_convert_inline_data Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON: ================================================================== EXT4-fs error (device loop3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:805: group 0, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 25 vs 31513 free clusters kernel BUG at fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:53! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 PID: 25371 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.10.0+ #1 RIP: 0010:ext4_put_nojournal fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:53 [inline] RIP: 0010:__ext4_journal_stop+0x10e/0x110 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:116 [...] Call Trace: ext4_write_inline_data_end+0x59a/0x730 fs/ext4/inline.c:795 generic_perform_write+0x279/0x3c0 mm/filemap.c:3344 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x2e3/0x3d0 fs/ext4/file.c:270 ext4_file_write_iter+0x30a/0x11c0 fs/ext4/file.c:520 do_iter_readv_writev+0x339/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:732 do_iter_write+0x107/0x430 fs/read_write.c:861 vfs_writev fs/read_write.c:934 [inline] do_pwritev+0x1e5/0x380 fs/read_write.c:1031 [...] ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows: cpu1 cpu2 __________________________|__________________________ do_pwritev vfs_writev do_iter_write ext4_file_write_iter ext4_buffered_write_iter generic_perform_write ext4_da_write_begin vfs_fallocate ext4_fallocate ext4_convert_inline_data ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock clear EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ext4_map_blocks ext4_ext_map_blocks ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_good_group_nolock ext4_mb_init_group ext4_mb_init_cache ext4_mb_generate_buddy --> error ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA) ext4_restore_inline_data set EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ext4_block_write_begin ext4_da_write_end ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA) ext4_write_inline_data_end handle=NULL ext4_journal_stop(handle) __ext4_journal_stop ext4_put_nojournal(handle) ref_cnt = (unsigned long)handle BUG_ON(ref_cnt == 0) ---> BUG_ON The lock held by ext4_convert_inline_data is xattr_sem, but the lock held by generic_perform_write is i_rwsem. Therefore, the two locks can be concurrent. To solve above issue, we add inode_lock() for ext4_convert_inline_data(). At the same time, move ext4_convert_inline_data() in front of ext4_punch_hole(), remove similar handling from ext4_punch_hole(). Fixes: 0c8d414f163f ("ext4: let fallocate handle inline data correctly") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220428134031.4153381-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(a)mit.edu> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index e473fde6b64b..474479ce76e0 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -4693,15 +4693,17 @@ long ext4_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len) FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; + inode_lock(inode); + ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); + inode_unlock(inode); + if (ret) + goto exit; + if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) { ret = ext4_punch_hole(file, offset, len); goto exit; } - ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); - if (ret) - goto exit; - if (mode & FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE) { ret = ext4_collapse_range(file, offset, len); goto exit; diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 5948bbba28e3..890f769d6e20 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -3979,15 +3979,6 @@ int ext4_punch_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t length) trace_ext4_punch_hole(inode, offset, length, 0); - ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA); - if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) { - filemap_invalidate_lock(mapping); - ret = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode); - filemap_invalidate_unlock(mapping); - if (ret) - return ret; - } - /* * Write out all dirty pages to avoid race conditions * Then release them.

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror June 2022