March 2022 - Linux-stable-mirror

[PATCH 5.15] KVM: x86/mmu: kvm_faultin_pfn has to return false if pfh is returned

by Andrei Vagin

[ Upstream commit a7cc099f2ec3117678adeb69749bef7e9dde3148 ] This looks like a typo in 8f32d5e563cb. This change didn't intend to do any functional changes. The problem was caught by gVisor tests. Fixes: 8f32d5e563cb ("KVM: x86/mmu: allow kvm_faultin_pfn to return page fault handling code") Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk(a)redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin(a)gmail.com> Message-Id: <20211015163221.472508-1-avagin(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 2297dd90fe4a..d6579bae25ca 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -3967,6 +3967,7 @@ static bool kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool prefault, gfn_t gfn, *pfn = __gfn_to_pfn_memslot(slot, gfn, false, NULL, write, writable, hva); + return false; out_retry: *r = RET_PF_RETRY; -- 2.35.1

2 years, 10 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH 4.9 0/2] batman-adv: Fixes for stable/linux-4.9.y

by Sven Eckelmann

Hi, following two patches were backported "automatically" applied in 4.14.y, 4.19.y, 5.4.y, 5.10.y, 5.5.y and 5.16.y. But they failed to apply cleanly in v4.9.y due to some changes in the patch context and one missing function in the older batman-adv version. These problems were now fixed manually. Kind regards, Sven Sven Eckelmann (2): batman-adv: Request iflink once in batadv-on-batadv check batman-adv: Don't expect inter-netns unique iflink indices net/batman-adv/hard-interface.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 2.30.2

2 years, 10 months

2
3
0 0

stable-rc/linux-5.16.y baseline: 84 runs, 1 regressions (v5.16.13-54-g8a3839d7a6f3)

by kernelci.org bot

stable-rc/linux-5.16.y baseline: 84 runs, 1 regressions (v5.16.13-54-g8a3839d7a6f3) Regressions Summary ------------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions -----------------+-------+---------------+----------+----------------------------+------------ rk3399-gru-kevin | arm64 | lab-collabora | gcc-10 | defconfig+arm64-chromebook | 1 Details: https://kernelci.org/test/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-5.16.y/kernel/v5.16.13… Test: baseline Tree: stable-rc Branch: linux-5.16.y Describe: v5.16.13-54-g8a3839d7a6f3 URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git SHA: 8a3839d7a6f38d700fead63c3976116e5172ba62 Test Regressions ---------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions -----------------+-------+---------------+----------+----------------------------+------------ rk3399-gru-kevin | arm64 | lab-collabora | gcc-10 | defconfig+arm64-chromebook | 1 Details: https://kernelci.org/test/plan/id/622c4e97f81263e8e3c629d6 Results: 88 PASS, 4 FAIL, 0 SKIP Full config: defconfig+arm64-chromebook Compiler: gcc-10 (aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110) Plain log: https://storage.kernelci.org//stable-rc/linux-5.16.y/v5.16.13-54-g8a3839d7a… HTML log: https://storage.kernelci.org//stable-rc/linux-5.16.y/v5.16.13-54-g8a3839d7a… Rootfs: http://storage.kernelci.org/images/rootfs/buildroot/buildroot-baseline/2022… * baseline.bootrr.rockchip-i2s1-probed: https://kernelci.org/test/case/id/622c4e97f81263e8e3c629fb failing since 5 days (last pass: v5.16.12, first fail: v5.16.12-166-g373826da847f) 2022-03-12T07:40:51.874866 <8>[ 32.621217] <LAVA_SIGNAL_TESTCASE TEST_CASE_ID=rockchip-i2s0-probed RESULT=pass> 2022-03-12T07:40:52.898118 /lava-5864366/1/../bin/lava-test-case 2022-03-12T07:40:52.908814 <8>[ 33.656455] <LAVA_SIGNAL_TESTCASE TEST_CASE_ID=rockchip-i2s1-probed RESULT=fail>

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE"" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From aa6f8dcbab473f3a3c7454b74caa46d36cdc5d13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 18:07:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" Unfortunately, we ended up merging an old version of the patch "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" instead of merging the latest one. Christoph (the swiotlb maintainer), he asked me to create an incremental fix (after I have pointed this out the mix up, and asked him for guidance). So here we go. The main differences between what we got and what was agreed are: * swiotlb_sync_single_for_device is also required to do an extra bounce * We decided not to introduce DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE until we have exploiters * The implantation of DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE is flawed: DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE must take precedence over DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC Thus this patch removes DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE, and makes swiotlb_sync_single_for_device() bounce unconditionally (that is, also when dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE) in order do avoid synchronising back stale data from the swiotlb buffer. Let me note, that if the size used with dma_sync_* API is less than the size used with dma_[un]map_*, under certain circumstances we may still end up with swiotlb not being transparent. In that sense, this is no perfect fix either. To get this bullet proof, we would have to bounce the entire mapping/bounce buffer. For that we would have to figure out the starting address, and the size of the mapping in swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(). While this does seem possible, there seems to be no firm consensus on how things are supposed to work. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Fixes: ddbd89deb7d3 ("swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst index 17706dc91ec9..1887d92e8e92 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst @@ -130,11 +130,3 @@ accesses to DMA buffers in both privileged "supervisor" and unprivileged subsystem that the buffer is fully accessible at the elevated privilege level (and ideally inaccessible or at least read-only at the lesser-privileged levels). - -DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE ------------------- - -This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected to -overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any of the -previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows bounce-buffering -implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h index 6150d11a607e..dca2b1355bb1 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h @@ -61,14 +61,6 @@ */ #define DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED (1UL << 9) -/* - * This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected - * to overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any - * of the previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows - * bounce-buffering implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. - */ -#define DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE (1UL << 10) - /* * A dma_addr_t can hold any valid DMA or bus address for the platform. It can * be given to a device to use as a DMA source or target. It is specific to a diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index bfc56cb21705..6db1c475ec82 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -627,10 +627,14 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr, for (i = 0; i < nr_slots(alloc_size + offset); i++) mem->slots[index + i].orig_addr = slot_addr(orig_addr, i); tlb_addr = slot_addr(mem->start, index) + offset; - if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) && - (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE) || dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || - dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + /* + * When dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE we could omit the copy from the orig + * to the tlb buffer, if we knew for sure the device will + * overwirte the entire current content. But we don't. Thus + * unconditional bounce may prevent leaking swiotlb content (i.e. + * kernel memory) to user-space. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); return tlb_addr; } @@ -697,10 +701,13 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, void swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir) { - if (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); - else - BUG_ON(dir != DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + /* + * Unconditional bounce is necessary to avoid corruption on + * sync_*_for_cpu or dma_ummap_* when the device didn't overwrite + * the whole lengt of the bounce buffer. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir)); } void swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE"" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From aa6f8dcbab473f3a3c7454b74caa46d36cdc5d13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 18:07:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" Unfortunately, we ended up merging an old version of the patch "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" instead of merging the latest one. Christoph (the swiotlb maintainer), he asked me to create an incremental fix (after I have pointed this out the mix up, and asked him for guidance). So here we go. The main differences between what we got and what was agreed are: * swiotlb_sync_single_for_device is also required to do an extra bounce * We decided not to introduce DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE until we have exploiters * The implantation of DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE is flawed: DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE must take precedence over DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC Thus this patch removes DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE, and makes swiotlb_sync_single_for_device() bounce unconditionally (that is, also when dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE) in order do avoid synchronising back stale data from the swiotlb buffer. Let me note, that if the size used with dma_sync_* API is less than the size used with dma_[un]map_*, under certain circumstances we may still end up with swiotlb not being transparent. In that sense, this is no perfect fix either. To get this bullet proof, we would have to bounce the entire mapping/bounce buffer. For that we would have to figure out the starting address, and the size of the mapping in swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(). While this does seem possible, there seems to be no firm consensus on how things are supposed to work. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Fixes: ddbd89deb7d3 ("swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst index 17706dc91ec9..1887d92e8e92 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst @@ -130,11 +130,3 @@ accesses to DMA buffers in both privileged "supervisor" and unprivileged subsystem that the buffer is fully accessible at the elevated privilege level (and ideally inaccessible or at least read-only at the lesser-privileged levels). - -DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE ------------------- - -This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected to -overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any of the -previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows bounce-buffering -implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h index 6150d11a607e..dca2b1355bb1 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h @@ -61,14 +61,6 @@ */ #define DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED (1UL << 9) -/* - * This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected - * to overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any - * of the previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows - * bounce-buffering implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. - */ -#define DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE (1UL << 10) - /* * A dma_addr_t can hold any valid DMA or bus address for the platform. It can * be given to a device to use as a DMA source or target. It is specific to a diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index bfc56cb21705..6db1c475ec82 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -627,10 +627,14 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr, for (i = 0; i < nr_slots(alloc_size + offset); i++) mem->slots[index + i].orig_addr = slot_addr(orig_addr, i); tlb_addr = slot_addr(mem->start, index) + offset; - if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) && - (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE) || dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || - dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + /* + * When dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE we could omit the copy from the orig + * to the tlb buffer, if we knew for sure the device will + * overwirte the entire current content. But we don't. Thus + * unconditional bounce may prevent leaking swiotlb content (i.e. + * kernel memory) to user-space. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); return tlb_addr; } @@ -697,10 +701,13 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, void swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir) { - if (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); - else - BUG_ON(dir != DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + /* + * Unconditional bounce is necessary to avoid corruption on + * sync_*_for_cpu or dma_ummap_* when the device didn't overwrite + * the whole lengt of the bounce buffer. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir)); } void swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE"" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From aa6f8dcbab473f3a3c7454b74caa46d36cdc5d13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 18:07:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" Unfortunately, we ended up merging an old version of the patch "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" instead of merging the latest one. Christoph (the swiotlb maintainer), he asked me to create an incremental fix (after I have pointed this out the mix up, and asked him for guidance). So here we go. The main differences between what we got and what was agreed are: * swiotlb_sync_single_for_device is also required to do an extra bounce * We decided not to introduce DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE until we have exploiters * The implantation of DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE is flawed: DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE must take precedence over DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC Thus this patch removes DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE, and makes swiotlb_sync_single_for_device() bounce unconditionally (that is, also when dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE) in order do avoid synchronising back stale data from the swiotlb buffer. Let me note, that if the size used with dma_sync_* API is less than the size used with dma_[un]map_*, under certain circumstances we may still end up with swiotlb not being transparent. In that sense, this is no perfect fix either. To get this bullet proof, we would have to bounce the entire mapping/bounce buffer. For that we would have to figure out the starting address, and the size of the mapping in swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(). While this does seem possible, there seems to be no firm consensus on how things are supposed to work. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Fixes: ddbd89deb7d3 ("swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst index 17706dc91ec9..1887d92e8e92 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst @@ -130,11 +130,3 @@ accesses to DMA buffers in both privileged "supervisor" and unprivileged subsystem that the buffer is fully accessible at the elevated privilege level (and ideally inaccessible or at least read-only at the lesser-privileged levels). - -DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE ------------------- - -This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected to -overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any of the -previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows bounce-buffering -implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h index 6150d11a607e..dca2b1355bb1 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h @@ -61,14 +61,6 @@ */ #define DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED (1UL << 9) -/* - * This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected - * to overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any - * of the previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows - * bounce-buffering implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. - */ -#define DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE (1UL << 10) - /* * A dma_addr_t can hold any valid DMA or bus address for the platform. It can * be given to a device to use as a DMA source or target. It is specific to a diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index bfc56cb21705..6db1c475ec82 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -627,10 +627,14 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr, for (i = 0; i < nr_slots(alloc_size + offset); i++) mem->slots[index + i].orig_addr = slot_addr(orig_addr, i); tlb_addr = slot_addr(mem->start, index) + offset; - if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) && - (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE) || dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || - dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + /* + * When dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE we could omit the copy from the orig + * to the tlb buffer, if we knew for sure the device will + * overwirte the entire current content. But we don't. Thus + * unconditional bounce may prevent leaking swiotlb content (i.e. + * kernel memory) to user-space. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); return tlb_addr; } @@ -697,10 +701,13 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, void swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir) { - if (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); - else - BUG_ON(dir != DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + /* + * Unconditional bounce is necessary to avoid corruption on + * sync_*_for_cpu or dma_ummap_* when the device didn't overwrite + * the whole lengt of the bounce buffer. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir)); } void swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE"" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From aa6f8dcbab473f3a3c7454b74caa46d36cdc5d13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 18:07:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" Unfortunately, we ended up merging an old version of the patch "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" instead of merging the latest one. Christoph (the swiotlb maintainer), he asked me to create an incremental fix (after I have pointed this out the mix up, and asked him for guidance). So here we go. The main differences between what we got and what was agreed are: * swiotlb_sync_single_for_device is also required to do an extra bounce * We decided not to introduce DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE until we have exploiters * The implantation of DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE is flawed: DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE must take precedence over DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC Thus this patch removes DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE, and makes swiotlb_sync_single_for_device() bounce unconditionally (that is, also when dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE) in order do avoid synchronising back stale data from the swiotlb buffer. Let me note, that if the size used with dma_sync_* API is less than the size used with dma_[un]map_*, under certain circumstances we may still end up with swiotlb not being transparent. In that sense, this is no perfect fix either. To get this bullet proof, we would have to bounce the entire mapping/bounce buffer. For that we would have to figure out the starting address, and the size of the mapping in swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(). While this does seem possible, there seems to be no firm consensus on how things are supposed to work. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Fixes: ddbd89deb7d3 ("swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst index 17706dc91ec9..1887d92e8e92 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst @@ -130,11 +130,3 @@ accesses to DMA buffers in both privileged "supervisor" and unprivileged subsystem that the buffer is fully accessible at the elevated privilege level (and ideally inaccessible or at least read-only at the lesser-privileged levels). - -DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE ------------------- - -This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected to -overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any of the -previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows bounce-buffering -implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h index 6150d11a607e..dca2b1355bb1 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h @@ -61,14 +61,6 @@ */ #define DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED (1UL << 9) -/* - * This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected - * to overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any - * of the previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows - * bounce-buffering implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. - */ -#define DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE (1UL << 10) - /* * A dma_addr_t can hold any valid DMA or bus address for the platform. It can * be given to a device to use as a DMA source or target. It is specific to a diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index bfc56cb21705..6db1c475ec82 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -627,10 +627,14 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr, for (i = 0; i < nr_slots(alloc_size + offset); i++) mem->slots[index + i].orig_addr = slot_addr(orig_addr, i); tlb_addr = slot_addr(mem->start, index) + offset; - if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) && - (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE) || dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || - dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + /* + * When dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE we could omit the copy from the orig + * to the tlb buffer, if we knew for sure the device will + * overwirte the entire current content. But we don't. Thus + * unconditional bounce may prevent leaking swiotlb content (i.e. + * kernel memory) to user-space. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); return tlb_addr; } @@ -697,10 +701,13 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, void swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir) { - if (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); - else - BUG_ON(dir != DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + /* + * Unconditional bounce is necessary to avoid corruption on + * sync_*_for_cpu or dma_ummap_* when the device didn't overwrite + * the whole lengt of the bounce buffer. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir)); } void swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE"" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From aa6f8dcbab473f3a3c7454b74caa46d36cdc5d13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 18:07:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" Unfortunately, we ended up merging an old version of the patch "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" instead of merging the latest one. Christoph (the swiotlb maintainer), he asked me to create an incremental fix (after I have pointed this out the mix up, and asked him for guidance). So here we go. The main differences between what we got and what was agreed are: * swiotlb_sync_single_for_device is also required to do an extra bounce * We decided not to introduce DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE until we have exploiters * The implantation of DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE is flawed: DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE must take precedence over DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC Thus this patch removes DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE, and makes swiotlb_sync_single_for_device() bounce unconditionally (that is, also when dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE) in order do avoid synchronising back stale data from the swiotlb buffer. Let me note, that if the size used with dma_sync_* API is less than the size used with dma_[un]map_*, under certain circumstances we may still end up with swiotlb not being transparent. In that sense, this is no perfect fix either. To get this bullet proof, we would have to bounce the entire mapping/bounce buffer. For that we would have to figure out the starting address, and the size of the mapping in swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(). While this does seem possible, there seems to be no firm consensus on how things are supposed to work. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Fixes: ddbd89deb7d3 ("swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst index 17706dc91ec9..1887d92e8e92 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst @@ -130,11 +130,3 @@ accesses to DMA buffers in both privileged "supervisor" and unprivileged subsystem that the buffer is fully accessible at the elevated privilege level (and ideally inaccessible or at least read-only at the lesser-privileged levels). - -DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE ------------------- - -This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected to -overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any of the -previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows bounce-buffering -implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h index 6150d11a607e..dca2b1355bb1 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h @@ -61,14 +61,6 @@ */ #define DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED (1UL << 9) -/* - * This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected - * to overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any - * of the previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows - * bounce-buffering implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. - */ -#define DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE (1UL << 10) - /* * A dma_addr_t can hold any valid DMA or bus address for the platform. It can * be given to a device to use as a DMA source or target. It is specific to a diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index bfc56cb21705..6db1c475ec82 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -627,10 +627,14 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr, for (i = 0; i < nr_slots(alloc_size + offset); i++) mem->slots[index + i].orig_addr = slot_addr(orig_addr, i); tlb_addr = slot_addr(mem->start, index) + offset; - if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) && - (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE) || dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || - dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + /* + * When dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE we could omit the copy from the orig + * to the tlb buffer, if we knew for sure the device will + * overwirte the entire current content. But we don't. Thus + * unconditional bounce may prevent leaking swiotlb content (i.e. + * kernel memory) to user-space. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); return tlb_addr; } @@ -697,10 +701,13 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, void swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir) { - if (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); - else - BUG_ON(dir != DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + /* + * Unconditional bounce is necessary to avoid corruption on + * sync_*_for_cpu or dma_ummap_* when the device didn't overwrite + * the whole lengt of the bounce buffer. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir)); } void swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From ddbd89deb7d32b1fbb879f48d68fda1a8ac58e8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 02:12:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE The problem I'm addressing was discovered by the LTP test covering cve-2018-1000204. A short description of what happens follows: 1) The test case issues a command code 00 (TEST UNIT READY) via the SG_IO interface with: dxfer_len == 524288, dxdfer_dir == SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV and a corresponding dxferp. The peculiar thing about this is that TUR is not reading from the device. 2) In sg_start_req() the invocation of blk_rq_map_user() effectively bounces the user-space buffer. As if the device was to transfer into it. Since commit a45b599ad808 ("scsi: sg: allocate with __GFP_ZERO in sg_build_indirect()") we make sure this first bounce buffer is allocated with GFP_ZERO. 3) For the rest of the story we keep ignoring that we have a TUR, so the device won't touch the buffer we prepare as if the we had a DMA_FROM_DEVICE type of situation. My setup uses a virtio-scsi device and the buffer allocated by SG is mapped by the function virtqueue_add_split() which uses DMA_FROM_DEVICE for the "in" sgs (here scatter-gather and not scsi generics). This mapping involves bouncing via the swiotlb (we need swiotlb to do virtio in protected guest like s390 Secure Execution, or AMD SEV). 4) When the SCSI TUR is done, we first copy back the content of the second (that is swiotlb) bounce buffer (which most likely contains some previous IO data), to the first bounce buffer, which contains all zeros. Then we copy back the content of the first bounce buffer to the user-space buffer. 5) The test case detects that the buffer, which it zero-initialized, ain't all zeros and fails. One can argue that this is an swiotlb problem, because without swiotlb we leak all zeros, and the swiotlb should be transparent in a sense that it does not affect the outcome (if all other participants are well behaved). Copying the content of the original buffer into the swiotlb buffer is the only way I can think of to make swiotlb transparent in such scenarios. So let's do just that if in doubt, but allow the driver to tell us that the whole mapped buffer is going to be overwritten, in which case we can preserve the old behavior and avoid the performance impact of the extra bounce. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst index 1887d92e8e92..17706dc91ec9 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst @@ -130,3 +130,11 @@ accesses to DMA buffers in both privileged "supervisor" and unprivileged subsystem that the buffer is fully accessible at the elevated privilege level (and ideally inaccessible or at least read-only at the lesser-privileged levels). + +DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE +------------------ + +This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected to +overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any of the +previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows bounce-buffering +implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h index dca2b1355bb1..6150d11a607e 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h @@ -61,6 +61,14 @@ */ #define DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED (1UL << 9) +/* + * This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected + * to overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any + * of the previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows + * bounce-buffering implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. + */ +#define DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE (1UL << 10) + /* * A dma_addr_t can hold any valid DMA or bus address for the platform. It can * be given to a device to use as a DMA source or target. It is specific to a diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index f1e7ea160b43..bfc56cb21705 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -628,7 +628,8 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr, mem->slots[index + i].orig_addr = slot_addr(orig_addr, i); tlb_addr = slot_addr(mem->start, index) + offset; if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) && - (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) + (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE) || dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || + dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); return tlb_addr; }

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From ddbd89deb7d32b1fbb879f48d68fda1a8ac58e8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 02:12:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE The problem I'm addressing was discovered by the LTP test covering cve-2018-1000204. A short description of what happens follows: 1) The test case issues a command code 00 (TEST UNIT READY) via the SG_IO interface with: dxfer_len == 524288, dxdfer_dir == SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV and a corresponding dxferp. The peculiar thing about this is that TUR is not reading from the device. 2) In sg_start_req() the invocation of blk_rq_map_user() effectively bounces the user-space buffer. As if the device was to transfer into it. Since commit a45b599ad808 ("scsi: sg: allocate with __GFP_ZERO in sg_build_indirect()") we make sure this first bounce buffer is allocated with GFP_ZERO. 3) For the rest of the story we keep ignoring that we have a TUR, so the device won't touch the buffer we prepare as if the we had a DMA_FROM_DEVICE type of situation. My setup uses a virtio-scsi device and the buffer allocated by SG is mapped by the function virtqueue_add_split() which uses DMA_FROM_DEVICE for the "in" sgs (here scatter-gather and not scsi generics). This mapping involves bouncing via the swiotlb (we need swiotlb to do virtio in protected guest like s390 Secure Execution, or AMD SEV). 4) When the SCSI TUR is done, we first copy back the content of the second (that is swiotlb) bounce buffer (which most likely contains some previous IO data), to the first bounce buffer, which contains all zeros. Then we copy back the content of the first bounce buffer to the user-space buffer. 5) The test case detects that the buffer, which it zero-initialized, ain't all zeros and fails. One can argue that this is an swiotlb problem, because without swiotlb we leak all zeros, and the swiotlb should be transparent in a sense that it does not affect the outcome (if all other participants are well behaved). Copying the content of the original buffer into the swiotlb buffer is the only way I can think of to make swiotlb transparent in such scenarios. So let's do just that if in doubt, but allow the driver to tell us that the whole mapped buffer is going to be overwritten, in which case we can preserve the old behavior and avoid the performance impact of the extra bounce. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic(a)linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst index 1887d92e8e92..17706dc91ec9 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst @@ -130,3 +130,11 @@ accesses to DMA buffers in both privileged "supervisor" and unprivileged subsystem that the buffer is fully accessible at the elevated privilege level (and ideally inaccessible or at least read-only at the lesser-privileged levels). + +DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE +------------------ + +This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected to +overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any of the +previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows bounce-buffering +implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h index dca2b1355bb1..6150d11a607e 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h @@ -61,6 +61,14 @@ */ #define DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED (1UL << 9) +/* + * This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected + * to overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any + * of the previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows + * bounce-buffering implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. + */ +#define DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE (1UL << 10) + /* * A dma_addr_t can hold any valid DMA or bus address for the platform. It can * be given to a device to use as a DMA source or target. It is specific to a diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index f1e7ea160b43..bfc56cb21705 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -628,7 +628,8 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr, mem->slots[index + i].orig_addr = slot_addr(orig_addr, i); tlb_addr = slot_addr(mem->start, index) + offset; if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) && - (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) + (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE) || dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || + dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); return tlb_addr; }

2 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror March 2022