From: "Steven J. Magnani" <magnani(a)ieee.org>
[ Upstream commit 63c9e47a1642fc817654a1bc18a6ec4bbcc0f056 ]
When extending a file, udf_do_extend_file() may enter following empty
indirect extent. At the end of udf_do_extend_file() we revert prev_epos
to point to the last written extent. However if we end up not adding any
further extent in udf_do_extend_file(), the reverting points prev_epos
into the header area of the AED and following updates of the extents
(in udf_update_extents()) will corrupt the header.
Make sure that we do not follow indirect extent if we are not going to
add any more extents so that returning back to the last written extent
works correctly.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210107234116.6190-2-magnani@ieee.org
Signed-off-by: Steven J. Magnani <magnani(a)ieee.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
fs/udf/inode.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c
index dd57bd446340..e0e2bc19c929 100644
--- a/fs/udf/inode.c
+++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
@@ -540,11 +540,14 @@ static int udf_do_extend_file(struct inode *inode,
udf_write_aext(inode, last_pos, &last_ext->extLocation,
last_ext->extLength, 1);
+
/*
- * We've rewritten the last extent but there may be empty
- * indirect extent after it - enter it.
+ * We've rewritten the last extent. If we are going to add
+ * more extents, we may need to enter possible following
+ * empty indirect extent.
*/
- udf_next_aext(inode, last_pos, &tmploc, &tmplen, 0);
+ if (new_block_bytes || prealloc_len)
+ udf_next_aext(inode, last_pos, &tmploc, &tmplen, 0);
}
/* Managed to do everything necessary? */
--
2.30.1
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas(a)sang-engineering.com>
[ Upstream commit c7b514ec979e23a08c411f3d8ed39c7922751422 ]
To avoid the HW race condition on R-Car Gen2 and earlier, we need to
write to ICMCR as soon as possible in the interrupt handler. We can
improve this by writing a static value instead of masking out bits.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas(a)sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas(a)ragnatech.se>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
index 217def2d7cb4..824586d7ee56 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
@@ -91,7 +91,6 @@
#define RCAR_BUS_PHASE_START (MDBS | MIE | ESG)
#define RCAR_BUS_PHASE_DATA (MDBS | MIE)
-#define RCAR_BUS_MASK_DATA (~(ESG | FSB) & 0xFF)
#define RCAR_BUS_PHASE_STOP (MDBS | MIE | FSB)
#define RCAR_IRQ_SEND (MNR | MAL | MST | MAT | MDE)
@@ -621,7 +620,7 @@ static bool rcar_i2c_slave_irq(struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv)
/*
* This driver has a lock-free design because there are IP cores (at least
* R-Car Gen2) which have an inherent race condition in their hardware design.
- * There, we need to clear RCAR_BUS_MASK_DATA bits as soon as possible after
+ * There, we need to switch to RCAR_BUS_PHASE_DATA as soon as possible after
* the interrupt was generated, otherwise an unwanted repeated message gets
* generated. It turned out that taking a spinlock at the beginning of the ISR
* was already causing repeated messages. Thus, this driver was converted to
@@ -630,13 +629,11 @@ static bool rcar_i2c_slave_irq(struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv)
static irqreturn_t rcar_i2c_irq(int irq, void *ptr)
{
struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv = ptr;
- u32 msr, val;
+ u32 msr;
/* Clear START or STOP immediately, except for REPSTART after read */
- if (likely(!(priv->flags & ID_P_REP_AFTER_RD))) {
- val = rcar_i2c_read(priv, ICMCR);
- rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICMCR, val & RCAR_BUS_MASK_DATA);
- }
+ if (likely(!(priv->flags & ID_P_REP_AFTER_RD)))
+ rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICMCR, RCAR_BUS_PHASE_DATA);
msr = rcar_i2c_read(priv, ICMSR);
--
2.30.1
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas(a)sang-engineering.com>
[ Upstream commit c7b514ec979e23a08c411f3d8ed39c7922751422 ]
To avoid the HW race condition on R-Car Gen2 and earlier, we need to
write to ICMCR as soon as possible in the interrupt handler. We can
improve this by writing a static value instead of masking out bits.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas(a)sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas(a)ragnatech.se>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
index 217def2d7cb4..824586d7ee56 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
@@ -91,7 +91,6 @@
#define RCAR_BUS_PHASE_START (MDBS | MIE | ESG)
#define RCAR_BUS_PHASE_DATA (MDBS | MIE)
-#define RCAR_BUS_MASK_DATA (~(ESG | FSB) & 0xFF)
#define RCAR_BUS_PHASE_STOP (MDBS | MIE | FSB)
#define RCAR_IRQ_SEND (MNR | MAL | MST | MAT | MDE)
@@ -621,7 +620,7 @@ static bool rcar_i2c_slave_irq(struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv)
/*
* This driver has a lock-free design because there are IP cores (at least
* R-Car Gen2) which have an inherent race condition in their hardware design.
- * There, we need to clear RCAR_BUS_MASK_DATA bits as soon as possible after
+ * There, we need to switch to RCAR_BUS_PHASE_DATA as soon as possible after
* the interrupt was generated, otherwise an unwanted repeated message gets
* generated. It turned out that taking a spinlock at the beginning of the ISR
* was already causing repeated messages. Thus, this driver was converted to
@@ -630,13 +629,11 @@ static bool rcar_i2c_slave_irq(struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv)
static irqreturn_t rcar_i2c_irq(int irq, void *ptr)
{
struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv = ptr;
- u32 msr, val;
+ u32 msr;
/* Clear START or STOP immediately, except for REPSTART after read */
- if (likely(!(priv->flags & ID_P_REP_AFTER_RD))) {
- val = rcar_i2c_read(priv, ICMCR);
- rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICMCR, val & RCAR_BUS_MASK_DATA);
- }
+ if (likely(!(priv->flags & ID_P_REP_AFTER_RD)))
+ rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICMCR, RCAR_BUS_PHASE_DATA);
msr = rcar_i2c_read(priv, ICMSR);
--
2.30.1