January 2021 - Linux-stable-mirror

[PATCH] btrfs: avoid double put of block group when emptying cluster

by Josef Bacik

In __btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space we will bail doing the cleanup of the cluster if the block group we passed in doesn't match the block group on the cluster. However we drop a reference to block_group, as the cluster holds a reference to the block group while it's attached to the cluster. If cluster->block_group != block_group however then this is an extra put, which means we'll go negative and free this block group down the line, leading to a UAF. Fix this by simply bailing if the … [View More]

4 years, 2 months

3
5
0 0

[PATCH 0/5] rcu/sched: Fix ignored rescheduling after rcu_eqs_enter() v4

by Frederic Weisbecker

So, here is a hopefully improved version with the following changes: * No more late wake up debugging, objtool should debug that later with noinstr code calling into the scheduler (Peter suggestion) * Dropped the double rdp fetch patch, just keep the fix part for now * Properly protect irq work call from rcu_user_enter() inside instrumention_begin() * Handle CONFIG_KVM_XFER_TO_GUEST_WORK (as per Peter suggestion) git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git… [View More]

4 years, 2 months

3
17
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From fca3f138105727c3a22edda32d02f91ce1bf11c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin(a)baikalelectronics.ru> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:07 +… [View More]0300 Subject: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with Protocol-based one Originally the procedure of the ULPI transaction finish detection has been developed as a simple busy-loop with just decrementing counter and no delays. It's wrong since on different systems the loop will take a different time to complete. So if the system bus and CPU are fast enough to overtake the ULPI bus and the companion PHY reaction, then we'll get to take a false timeout error. Fix this by converting the busy-loop procedure to take the standard bus speed, address value and the registers access mode into account for the busy-loop delay calculation. Here is the way the fix works. It's known that the ULPI bus is clocked with 60MHz signal. In accordance with [1] the ULPI bus protocol is created so to spend 5 and 6 clock periods for immediate register write and read operations respectively, and 6 and 7 clock periods - for the extended register writes and reads. Based on that we can easily pre-calculate the time which will be needed for the controller to perform a requested IO operation. Note we'll still preserve the attempts counter in case if the DWC USB3 controller has got some internals delays. [1] UTMI+ Low Pin Interface (ULPI) Specification, Revision 1.1, October 20, 2004, pp. 30 - 36. Fixes: 88bc9d194ff6 ("usb: dwc3: add ULPI interface support") Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin(a)baikalelectronics.ru> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210085008.13264-3-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectro… Cc: stable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c index 3cc4f4970c05..54c877f7b51d 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ * Author: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus(a)linux.intel.com> */ +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/time64.h> #include <linux/ulpi/regs.h> #include "core.h" @@ -17,12 +19,22 @@ DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(ULPI_ACCESS_EXTENDED) | \ DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_EXTEND_ADDR(a) : DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(a)) -static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc) +#define DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, 60000000L) + +static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc, u8 addr, bool read) { + unsigned long ns = 5L * DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY; unsigned int count = 1000; u32 reg; + if (addr >= ULPI_EXT_VENDOR_SPECIFIC) + ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY; + + if (read) + ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY; + while (count--) { + ndelay(ns); reg = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0)); if (reg & DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_DONE) return 0; @@ -47,7 +59,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_read(struct device *dev, u8 addr) reg = DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_NEWREGREQ | DWC3_ULPI_ADDR(addr); dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg); - ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc); + ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, true); if (ret) return ret; @@ -71,7 +83,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_write(struct device *dev, u8 addr, u8 val) reg |= DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_WRITE | val; dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg); - return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc); + return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, false); } static const struct ulpi_ops dwc3_ulpi_ops = { [View Less]

4 years, 2 months

3
2
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From fca3f138105727c3a22edda32d02f91ce1bf11c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin(a)baikalelectronics.ru> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:07 +… [View More]0300 Subject: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with Protocol-based one Originally the procedure of the ULPI transaction finish detection has been developed as a simple busy-loop with just decrementing counter and no delays. It's wrong since on different systems the loop will take a different time to complete. So if the system bus and CPU are fast enough to overtake the ULPI bus and the companion PHY reaction, then we'll get to take a false timeout error. Fix this by converting the busy-loop procedure to take the standard bus speed, address value and the registers access mode into account for the busy-loop delay calculation. Here is the way the fix works. It's known that the ULPI bus is clocked with 60MHz signal. In accordance with [1] the ULPI bus protocol is created so to spend 5 and 6 clock periods for immediate register write and read operations respectively, and 6 and 7 clock periods - for the extended register writes and reads. Based on that we can easily pre-calculate the time which will be needed for the controller to perform a requested IO operation. Note we'll still preserve the attempts counter in case if the DWC USB3 controller has got some internals delays. [1] UTMI+ Low Pin Interface (ULPI) Specification, Revision 1.1, October 20, 2004, pp. 30 - 36. Fixes: 88bc9d194ff6 ("usb: dwc3: add ULPI interface support") Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin(a)baikalelectronics.ru> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210085008.13264-3-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectro… Cc: stable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c index 3cc4f4970c05..54c877f7b51d 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ * Author: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus(a)linux.intel.com> */ +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/time64.h> #include <linux/ulpi/regs.h> #include "core.h" @@ -17,12 +19,22 @@ DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(ULPI_ACCESS_EXTENDED) | \ DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_EXTEND_ADDR(a) : DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(a)) -static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc) +#define DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, 60000000L) + +static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc, u8 addr, bool read) { + unsigned long ns = 5L * DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY; unsigned int count = 1000; u32 reg; + if (addr >= ULPI_EXT_VENDOR_SPECIFIC) + ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY; + + if (read) + ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY; + while (count--) { + ndelay(ns); reg = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0)); if (reg & DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_DONE) return 0; @@ -47,7 +59,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_read(struct device *dev, u8 addr) reg = DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_NEWREGREQ | DWC3_ULPI_ADDR(addr); dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg); - ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc); + ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, true); if (ret) return ret; @@ -71,7 +83,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_write(struct device *dev, u8 addr, u8 val) reg |= DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_WRITE | val; dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg); - return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc); + return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, false); } static const struct ulpi_ops dwc3_ulpi_ops = { [View Less]

4 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From fca3f138105727c3a22edda32d02f91ce1bf11c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin(a)baikalelectronics.ru> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:07 +… [View More]0300 Subject: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with Protocol-based one Originally the procedure of the ULPI transaction finish detection has been developed as a simple busy-loop with just decrementing counter and no delays. It's wrong since on different systems the loop will take a different time to complete. So if the system bus and CPU are fast enough to overtake the ULPI bus and the companion PHY reaction, then we'll get to take a false timeout error. Fix this by converting the busy-loop procedure to take the standard bus speed, address value and the registers access mode into account for the busy-loop delay calculation. Here is the way the fix works. It's known that the ULPI bus is clocked with 60MHz signal. In accordance with [1] the ULPI bus protocol is created so to spend 5 and 6 clock periods for immediate register write and read operations respectively, and 6 and 7 clock periods - for the extended register writes and reads. Based on that we can easily pre-calculate the time which will be needed for the controller to perform a requested IO operation. Note we'll still preserve the attempts counter in case if the DWC USB3 controller has got some internals delays. [1] UTMI+ Low Pin Interface (ULPI) Specification, Revision 1.1, October 20, 2004, pp. 30 - 36. Fixes: 88bc9d194ff6 ("usb: dwc3: add ULPI interface support") Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin(a)baikalelectronics.ru> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210085008.13264-3-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectro… Cc: stable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c index 3cc4f4970c05..54c877f7b51d 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ * Author: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus(a)linux.intel.com> */ +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/time64.h> #include <linux/ulpi/regs.h> #include "core.h" @@ -17,12 +19,22 @@ DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(ULPI_ACCESS_EXTENDED) | \ DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_EXTEND_ADDR(a) : DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(a)) -static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc) +#define DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, 60000000L) + +static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc, u8 addr, bool read) { + unsigned long ns = 5L * DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY; unsigned int count = 1000; u32 reg; + if (addr >= ULPI_EXT_VENDOR_SPECIFIC) + ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY; + + if (read) + ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY; + while (count--) { + ndelay(ns); reg = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0)); if (reg & DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_DONE) return 0; @@ -47,7 +59,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_read(struct device *dev, u8 addr) reg = DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_NEWREGREQ | DWC3_ULPI_ADDR(addr); dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg); - ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc); + ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, true); if (ret) return ret; @@ -71,7 +83,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_write(struct device *dev, u8 addr, u8 val) reg |= DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_WRITE | val; dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg); - return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc); + return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, false); } static const struct ulpi_ops dwc3_ulpi_ops = { [View Less]

4 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From fca3f138105727c3a22edda32d02f91ce1bf11c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin(a)baikalelectronics.ru> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:07 +… [View More]0300 Subject: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with Protocol-based one Originally the procedure of the ULPI transaction finish detection has been developed as a simple busy-loop with just decrementing counter and no delays. It's wrong since on different systems the loop will take a different time to complete. So if the system bus and CPU are fast enough to overtake the ULPI bus and the companion PHY reaction, then we'll get to take a false timeout error. Fix this by converting the busy-loop procedure to take the standard bus speed, address value and the registers access mode into account for the busy-loop delay calculation. Here is the way the fix works. It's known that the ULPI bus is clocked with 60MHz signal. In accordance with [1] the ULPI bus protocol is created so to spend 5 and 6 clock periods for immediate register write and read operations respectively, and 6 and 7 clock periods - for the extended register writes and reads. Based on that we can easily pre-calculate the time which will be needed for the controller to perform a requested IO operation. Note we'll still preserve the attempts counter in case if the DWC USB3 controller has got some internals delays. [1] UTMI+ Low Pin Interface (ULPI) Specification, Revision 1.1, October 20, 2004, pp. 30 - 36. Fixes: 88bc9d194ff6 ("usb: dwc3: add ULPI interface support") Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin(a)baikalelectronics.ru> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210085008.13264-3-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectro… Cc: stable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c index 3cc4f4970c05..54c877f7b51d 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ * Author: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus(a)linux.intel.com> */ +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/time64.h> #include <linux/ulpi/regs.h> #include "core.h" @@ -17,12 +19,22 @@ DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(ULPI_ACCESS_EXTENDED) | \ DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_EXTEND_ADDR(a) : DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(a)) -static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc) +#define DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, 60000000L) + +static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc, u8 addr, bool read) { + unsigned long ns = 5L * DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY; unsigned int count = 1000; u32 reg; + if (addr >= ULPI_EXT_VENDOR_SPECIFIC) + ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY; + + if (read) + ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY; + while (count--) { + ndelay(ns); reg = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0)); if (reg & DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_DONE) return 0; @@ -47,7 +59,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_read(struct device *dev, u8 addr) reg = DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_NEWREGREQ | DWC3_ULPI_ADDR(addr); dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg); - ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc); + ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, true); if (ret) return ret; @@ -71,7 +83,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_write(struct device *dev, u8 addr, u8 val) reg |= DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_WRITE | val; dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg); - return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc); + return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, false); } static const struct ulpi_ops dwc3_ulpi_ops = { [View Less]

4 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Validate MBA firmware size before" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From e013f455d95add874f310dc47c608e8c70692ae5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sibi Sankar <sibis(a)codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:40:45 +0530 Subject: … [View More]

4 years, 2 months

3
2
0 0

[RFC][PATCH 01/13] mm/vmscan: restore zone_reclaim_mode ABI

by Dave Hansen

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> I went to go add a new RECLAIM_* mode for the zone_reclaim_mode sysctl. Like a good kernel developer, I also went to go update the documentation. I noticed that the bits in the documentation didn't match the bits in the #defines. The VM never explicitly checks the RECLAIM_ZONE bit. The bit is, however implicitly checked when checking 'node_reclaim_mode==0'. The RECLAIM_ZONE #define was removed in a cleanup. That, by itself is fine. … [View More]But, when the bit was removed (bit 0) the _other_ bit locations also got changed. That's not OK because the bit values are documented to mean one specific thing and users surely rely on them meaning that one thing and not changing from kernel to kernel. The end result is that if someone had a script that did: sysctl vm.zone_reclaim_mode=1 This script would have gone from enalbing node reclaim for clean unmapped pages to writing out pages during node reclaim after the commit in question. That's not great. Put the bits back the way they were and add a comment so something like this is a bit harder to do again. Update the documentation to make it clear that the first bit is ignored. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> Fixes: 648b5cf368e0 ("mm/vmscan: remove unused RECLAIM_OFF/RECLAIM_ZONE") Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky(a)intel.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes(a)google.com> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl(a)linux.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi(a)linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner(a)suse.de> Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin(a)kernel.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl(a)linux.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang(a)intel.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai(a)lca.pw> Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner(a)suse.de> Cc: osalvador <osalvador(a)suse.de> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org -- Changes from v2: * Update description to indicate that bit0 was used for clean unmapped page node reclaim. --- b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst | 10 +++++----- b/mm/vmscan.c | 9 +++++++-- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff -puN Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst~mm-vmscan-restore-old-zone_reclaim_mode-abi Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst~mm-vmscan-restore-old-zone_reclaim_mode-abi 2021-01-25 16:23:06.048866718 -0800 +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst 2021-01-25 16:23:06.056866718 -0800 @@ -978,11 +978,11 @@ that benefit from having their data cach left disabled as the caching effect is likely to be more important than data locality. -zone_reclaim may be enabled if it's known that the workload is partitioned -such that each partition fits within a NUMA node and that accessing remote -memory would cause a measurable performance reduction. The page allocator -will then reclaim easily reusable pages (those page cache pages that are -currently not used) before allocating off node pages. +Consider enabling one or more zone_reclaim mode bits if it's known that the +workload is partitioned such that each partition fits within a NUMA node +and that accessing remote memory would cause a measurable performance +reduction. The page allocator will take additional actions before +allocating off node pages. Allowing zone reclaim to write out pages stops processes that are writing large amounts of data from dirtying pages on other nodes. Zone diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-restore-old-zone_reclaim_mode-abi mm/vmscan.c --- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-restore-old-zone_reclaim_mode-abi 2021-01-25 16:23:06.052866718 -0800 +++ b/mm/vmscan.c 2021-01-25 16:23:06.057866718 -0800 @@ -4086,8 +4086,13 @@ module_init(kswapd_init) */ int node_reclaim_mode __read_mostly; -#define RECLAIM_WRITE (1<<0) /* Writeout pages during reclaim */ -#define RECLAIM_UNMAP (1<<1) /* Unmap pages during reclaim */ +/* + * These bit locations are exposed in the vm.zone_reclaim_mode sysctl + * ABI. New bits are OK, but existing bits can never change. + */ +#define RECLAIM_ZONE (1<<0) /* Run shrink_inactive_list on the zone */ +#define RECLAIM_WRITE (1<<1) /* Writeout pages during reclaim */ +#define RECLAIM_UNMAP (1<<2) /* Unmap pages during reclaim */ /* * Priority for NODE_RECLAIM. This determines the fraction of pages _ [View Less]

4 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Validate modem blob firmware size" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 135b9e8d1cd8ba5ac9ad9bcf24b464b7b052e5b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sibi Sankar <sibis(a)codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:40:46 +0530 Subject: … [View More]

4 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCHv2] firmware: stratix10-svc: reset COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL to 0

by richard.gong＠linux.intel.com

From: Richard Gong <richard.gong(a)intel.com> Clean up COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL flag by resetting it to 0, which aligns with the firmware settings. Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # 5.9+ Fixes: 36847f9e3e56 ("firmware: correct reconfig flag and timeout values") Signed-off-by: Richard Gong <richard.gong(a)intel.com> --- v2: add tag Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # 5.9+ add 'Fixes: ... ' line in the comment --- include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h … [View More]

4 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror January 2021