April 2020 - Linux-stable-mirror

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 01/17] iio:ad7797: Use correct attribute_group

by Sasha Levin

From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing(a)huawei.com> [ Upstream commit 28535877ac5b2b84f0d394fd67a5ec71c0c48b10 ] It should use ad7797_attribute_group in ad7797_info, according to commit ("iio:ad7793: Add support for the ad7796 and ad7797"). Scale is fixed for the ad7796 and not programmable, hence should not have the scale_available attribute. Fixes: fd1a8b912841 ("iio:ad7793: Add support for the ad7796 and ad7797") Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars(a)metafoo.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c index 47c3d7f329004..437762a1e4877 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static const struct iio_info ad7797_info = { .read_raw = &ad7793_read_raw, .write_raw = &ad7793_write_raw, .write_raw_get_fmt = &ad7793_write_raw_get_fmt, - .attrs = &ad7793_attribute_group, + .attrs = &ad7797_attribute_group, .validate_trigger = ad_sd_validate_trigger, .driver_module = THIS_MODULE, }; -- 2.20.1

5 years, 1 month

1
16
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 01/27] iio:ad7797: Use correct attribute_group

by Sasha Levin

From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing(a)huawei.com> [ Upstream commit 28535877ac5b2b84f0d394fd67a5ec71c0c48b10 ] It should use ad7797_attribute_group in ad7797_info, according to commit ("iio:ad7793: Add support for the ad7796 and ad7797"). Scale is fixed for the ad7796 and not programmable, hence should not have the scale_available attribute. Fixes: fd1a8b912841 ("iio:ad7793: Add support for the ad7796 and ad7797") Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars(a)metafoo.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c index 07246a6037e31..f64781d03d5d3 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static const struct iio_info ad7797_info = { .read_raw = &ad7793_read_raw, .write_raw = &ad7793_write_raw, .write_raw_get_fmt = &ad7793_write_raw_get_fmt, - .attrs = &ad7793_attribute_group, + .attrs = &ad7797_attribute_group, .validate_trigger = ad_sd_validate_trigger, .driver_module = THIS_MODULE, }; -- 2.20.1

5 years, 1 month

1
26
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 01/30] iio:ad7797: Use correct attribute_group

by Sasha Levin

From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing(a)huawei.com> [ Upstream commit 28535877ac5b2b84f0d394fd67a5ec71c0c48b10 ] It should use ad7797_attribute_group in ad7797_info, according to commit ("iio:ad7793: Add support for the ad7796 and ad7797"). Scale is fixed for the ad7796 and not programmable, hence should not have the scale_available attribute. Fixes: fd1a8b912841 ("iio:ad7793: Add support for the ad7796 and ad7797") Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars(a)metafoo.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c index d4bbe5b533189..23a6e7baa396b 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static const struct iio_info ad7797_info = { .read_raw = &ad7793_read_raw, .write_raw = &ad7793_write_raw, .write_raw_get_fmt = &ad7793_write_raw_get_fmt, - .attrs = &ad7793_attribute_group, + .attrs = &ad7797_attribute_group, .validate_trigger = ad_sd_validate_trigger, }; -- 2.20.1

5 years, 1 month

1
29
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 01/57] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Split bind() into probe() and real bind()

by Sasha Levin

From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski(a)samsung.com> [ Upstream commit 83a196773b8bc6702f49df1eddc848180e350340 ] Analogix_dp driver acquires all its resources in the ->bind() callback, what is a bit against the component driver based approach, where the driver initialization is split into a probe(), where all resources are gathered, and a bind(), where all objects are created and a compound driver is initialized. Extract all the resource related operations to analogix_dp_probe() and analogix_dp_remove(), then call them before/after registration of the device components from the main Exynos DP and Rockchip DP drivers. Also move the plat_data initialization to the probe() to make it available for the analogix_dp_probe() function. This fixes the multiple calls to the bind() of the DRM compound driver when the DP PHY driver is not yet loaded/probed: [drm] Exynos DRM: using 14400000.fimd device for DMA mapping operations exynos-drm exynos-drm: bound 14400000.fimd (ops fimd_component_ops [exynosdrm]) exynos-drm exynos-drm: bound 14450000.mixer (ops mixer_component_ops [exynosdrm]) exynos-dp 145b0000.dp-controller: no DP phy configured exynos-drm exynos-drm: failed to bind 145b0000.dp-controller (ops exynos_dp_ops [exynosdrm]): -517 exynos-drm exynos-drm: master bind failed: -517 ... [drm] Exynos DRM: using 14400000.fimd device for DMA mapping operations exynos-drm exynos-drm: bound 14400000.fimd (ops hdmi_enable [exynosdrm]) exynos-drm exynos-drm: bound 14450000.mixer (ops hdmi_enable [exynosdrm]) exynos-drm exynos-drm: bound 145b0000.dp-controller (ops hdmi_enable [exynosdrm]) exynos-drm exynos-drm: bound 14530000.hdmi (ops hdmi_enable [exynosdrm]) [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013). Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 170x48 exynos-drm exynos-drm: fb0: exynosdrmfb frame buffer device [drm] Initialized exynos 1.1.0 20180330 for exynos-drm on minor 1 ... Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski(a)samsung.com> Acked-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan(a)rock-chips.com> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda(a)samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda(a)samsung.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200310103427.26048-1-m.szyp… Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 33 +++++++++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c | 29 ++++++++------- .../gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c | 36 ++++++++++--------- include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h | 5 +-- 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c index 22885dceaa177..1f26890a8da6e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c @@ -1635,8 +1635,7 @@ static ssize_t analogix_dpaux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, } struct analogix_dp_device * -analogix_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct drm_device *drm_dev, - struct analogix_dp_plat_data *plat_data) +analogix_dp_probe(struct device *dev, struct analogix_dp_plat_data *plat_data) { struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); struct analogix_dp_device *dp; @@ -1739,22 +1738,30 @@ analogix_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct drm_device *drm_dev, irq_flags, "analogix-dp", dp); if (ret) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request irq\n"); - goto err_disable_pm_runtime; + return ERR_PTR(ret); } disable_irq(dp->irq); + return dp; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_probe); + +int analogix_dp_bind(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, struct drm_device *drm_dev) +{ + int ret; + dp->drm_dev = drm_dev; dp->encoder = dp->plat_data->encoder; dp->aux.name = "DP-AUX"; dp->aux.transfer = analogix_dpaux_transfer; - dp->aux.dev = &pdev->dev; + dp->aux.dev = dp->dev; ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&dp->aux); if (ret) - return ERR_PTR(ret); + return ret; - pm_runtime_enable(dev); + pm_runtime_enable(dp->dev); ret = analogix_dp_create_bridge(drm_dev, dp); if (ret) { @@ -1762,13 +1769,12 @@ analogix_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct drm_device *drm_dev, goto err_disable_pm_runtime; } - return dp; + return 0; err_disable_pm_runtime: + pm_runtime_disable(dp->dev); - pm_runtime_disable(dev); - - return ERR_PTR(ret); + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_bind); @@ -1785,10 +1791,15 @@ void analogix_dp_unbind(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) drm_dp_aux_unregister(&dp->aux); pm_runtime_disable(dp->dev); - clk_disable_unprepare(dp->clock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_unbind); +void analogix_dp_remove(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) +{ + clk_disable_unprepare(dp->clock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_remove); + #ifdef CONFIG_PM int analogix_dp_suspend(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c index 3a0f0ba8c63a0..e0cfae744afc9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c @@ -158,15 +158,8 @@ static int exynos_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data) struct drm_device *drm_dev = data; int ret; - dp->dev = dev; dp->drm_dev = drm_dev; - dp->plat_data.dev_type = EXYNOS_DP; - dp->plat_data.power_on_start = exynos_dp_poweron; - dp->plat_data.power_off = exynos_dp_poweroff; - dp->plat_data.attach = exynos_dp_bridge_attach; - dp->plat_data.get_modes = exynos_dp_get_modes; - if (!dp->plat_data.panel && !dp->ptn_bridge) { ret = exynos_dp_dt_parse_panel(dp); if (ret) @@ -184,13 +177,11 @@ static int exynos_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data) dp->plat_data.encoder = encoder; - dp->adp = analogix_dp_bind(dev, dp->drm_dev, &dp->plat_data); - if (IS_ERR(dp->adp)) { + ret = analogix_dp_bind(dp->adp, dp->drm_dev); + if (ret) dp->encoder.funcs->destroy(&dp->encoder); - return PTR_ERR(dp->adp); - } - return 0; + return ret; } static void exynos_dp_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, @@ -221,6 +212,7 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!dp) return -ENOMEM; + dp->dev = dev; /* * We just use the drvdata until driver run into component * add function, and then we would set drvdata to null, so @@ -246,16 +238,29 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* The remote port can be either a panel or a bridge */ dp->plat_data.panel = panel; + dp->plat_data.dev_type = EXYNOS_DP; + dp->plat_data.power_on_start = exynos_dp_poweron; + dp->plat_data.power_off = exynos_dp_poweroff; + dp->plat_data.attach = exynos_dp_bridge_attach; + dp->plat_data.get_modes = exynos_dp_get_modes; dp->plat_data.skip_connector = !!bridge; + dp->ptn_bridge = bridge; out: + dp->adp = analogix_dp_probe(dev, &dp->plat_data); + if (IS_ERR(dp->adp)) + return PTR_ERR(dp->adp); + return component_add(&pdev->dev, &exynos_dp_ops); } static int exynos_dp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { + struct exynos_dp_device *dp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + component_del(&pdev->dev, &exynos_dp_ops); + analogix_dp_remove(dp->adp); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c index f38f5e113c6b3..ce98c08aa8b44 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c @@ -325,15 +325,9 @@ static int rockchip_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data) { struct rockchip_dp_device *dp = dev_get_drvdata(dev); - const struct rockchip_dp_chip_data *dp_data; struct drm_device *drm_dev = data; int ret; - dp_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); - if (!dp_data) - return -ENODEV; - - dp->data = dp_data; dp->drm_dev = drm_dev; ret = rockchip_dp_drm_create_encoder(dp); @@ -344,16 +338,9 @@ static int rockchip_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, dp->plat_data.encoder = &dp->encoder; - dp->plat_data.dev_type = dp->data->chip_type; - dp->plat_data.power_on_start = rockchip_dp_poweron_start; - dp->plat_data.power_off = rockchip_dp_powerdown; - dp->plat_data.get_modes = rockchip_dp_get_modes; - - dp->adp = analogix_dp_bind(dev, dp->drm_dev, &dp->plat_data); - if (IS_ERR(dp->adp)) { - ret = PTR_ERR(dp->adp); + ret = analogix_dp_bind(dp->adp, drm_dev); + if (ret) goto err_cleanup_encoder; - } return 0; err_cleanup_encoder: @@ -368,8 +355,6 @@ static void rockchip_dp_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, analogix_dp_unbind(dp->adp); dp->encoder.funcs->destroy(&dp->encoder); - - dp->adp = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); } static const struct component_ops rockchip_dp_component_ops = { @@ -380,10 +365,15 @@ static const struct component_ops rockchip_dp_component_ops = { static int rockchip_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + const struct rockchip_dp_chip_data *dp_data; struct drm_panel *panel = NULL; struct rockchip_dp_device *dp; int ret; + dp_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); + if (!dp_data) + return -ENODEV; + ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 1, 0, &panel, NULL); if (ret < 0) return ret; @@ -394,7 +384,12 @@ static int rockchip_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) dp->dev = dev; dp->adp = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); + dp->data = dp_data; dp->plat_data.panel = panel; + dp->plat_data.dev_type = dp->data->chip_type; + dp->plat_data.power_on_start = rockchip_dp_poweron_start; + dp->plat_data.power_off = rockchip_dp_powerdown; + dp->plat_data.get_modes = rockchip_dp_get_modes; ret = rockchip_dp_of_probe(dp); if (ret < 0) @@ -402,12 +397,19 @@ static int rockchip_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dp); + dp->adp = analogix_dp_probe(dev, &dp->plat_data); + if (IS_ERR(dp->adp)) + return PTR_ERR(dp->adp); + return component_add(dev, &rockchip_dp_component_ops); } static int rockchip_dp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { + struct rockchip_dp_device *dp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + component_del(&pdev->dev, &rockchip_dp_component_ops); + analogix_dp_remove(dp->adp); return 0; } diff --git a/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h b/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h index 7aa2f93da49ca..b0dcc07334a1e 100644 --- a/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h +++ b/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h @@ -42,9 +42,10 @@ int analogix_dp_resume(struct analogix_dp_device *dp); int analogix_dp_suspend(struct analogix_dp_device *dp); struct analogix_dp_device * -analogix_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct drm_device *drm_dev, - struct analogix_dp_plat_data *plat_data); +analogix_dp_probe(struct device *dev, struct analogix_dp_plat_data *plat_data); +int analogix_dp_bind(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, struct drm_device *drm_dev); void analogix_dp_unbind(struct analogix_dp_device *dp); +void analogix_dp_remove(struct analogix_dp_device *dp); int analogix_dp_start_crc(struct drm_connector *connector); int analogix_dp_stop_crc(struct drm_connector *connector); -- 2.20.1

5 years, 1 month

1
56
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged users" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 6e7e63cbb023976d828cdb22422606bf77baa8a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 02:00:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged users When check_xadd() verifies an XADD operation on a pointer to a stack slot containing a spilled pointer, check_stack_read() verifies that the read, which is part of XADD, is valid. However, since the placeholder value -1 is passed as `value_regno`, check_stack_read() can only return a binary decision and can't return the type of the value that was read. The intent here is to verify whether the value read from the stack slot may be used as a SCALAR_VALUE; but since check_stack_read() doesn't check the type, and the type information is lost when check_stack_read() returns, this is not enforced, and a malicious user can abuse XADD to leak spilled kernel pointers. Fix it by letting check_stack_read() verify that the value is usable as a SCALAR_VALUE if no type information is passed to the caller. To be able to use __is_pointer_value() in check_stack_read(), move it up. Fix up the expected unprivileged error message for a BPF selftest that, until now, assumed that unprivileged users can use XADD on stack-spilled pointers. This also gives us a test for the behavior introduced in this patch for free. In theory, this could also be fixed by forbidding XADD on stack spills entirely, since XADD is a locked operation (for operations on memory with concurrency) and there can't be any concurrency on the BPF stack; but Alexei has said that he wants to keep XADD on stack slots working to avoid changes to the test suite [1]. The following BPF program demonstrates how to leak a BPF map pointer as an unprivileged user using this bug: // r7 = map_pointer BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_7, small_map), // r8 = launder(map_pointer) BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_7, -8), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), ((struct bpf_insn) { .code = BPF_STX | BPF_DW | BPF_XADD, .dst_reg = BPF_REG_FP, .src_reg = BPF_REG_1, .off = -8 }), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_FP, -8), // store r8 into map BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG1, BPF_REG_7), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_FP), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG2, -4), BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_ARG2, 0, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN() [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200416211116.qxqcza5vo2ddnkdq@ast-mbp.dhcp.th… Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200417000007.10734-1-jannh@google.com diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 38cfcf701eeb..9e92d3d5ffd1 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2118,6 +2118,15 @@ static bool register_is_const(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) return reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && tnum_is_const(reg->var_off); } +static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + if (allow_ptr_leaks) + return false; + + return reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE; +} + static void save_register_state(struct bpf_func_state *state, int spi, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { @@ -2308,6 +2317,16 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, * which resets stack/reg liveness for state transitions */ state->regs[value_regno].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; + } else if (__is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, reg)) { + /* If value_regno==-1, the caller is asking us whether + * it is acceptable to use this value as a SCALAR_VALUE + * (e.g. for XADD). + * We must not allow unprivileged callers to do that + * with spilled pointers. + */ + verbose(env, "leaking pointer from stack off %d\n", + off); + return -EACCES; } mark_reg_read(env, reg, reg->parent, REG_LIVE_READ64); } else { @@ -2673,15 +2692,6 @@ static int check_sock_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, return -EACCES; } -static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, - const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) -{ - if (allow_ptr_leaks) - return false; - - return reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE; -} - static struct bpf_reg_state *reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) { return cur_regs(env) + regno; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c index 7f6c232cd842..ed1c2cea1dea 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "leaking pointer from stack off -8", .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged users" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 6e7e63cbb023976d828cdb22422606bf77baa8a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 02:00:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged users When check_xadd() verifies an XADD operation on a pointer to a stack slot containing a spilled pointer, check_stack_read() verifies that the read, which is part of XADD, is valid. However, since the placeholder value -1 is passed as `value_regno`, check_stack_read() can only return a binary decision and can't return the type of the value that was read. The intent here is to verify whether the value read from the stack slot may be used as a SCALAR_VALUE; but since check_stack_read() doesn't check the type, and the type information is lost when check_stack_read() returns, this is not enforced, and a malicious user can abuse XADD to leak spilled kernel pointers. Fix it by letting check_stack_read() verify that the value is usable as a SCALAR_VALUE if no type information is passed to the caller. To be able to use __is_pointer_value() in check_stack_read(), move it up. Fix up the expected unprivileged error message for a BPF selftest that, until now, assumed that unprivileged users can use XADD on stack-spilled pointers. This also gives us a test for the behavior introduced in this patch for free. In theory, this could also be fixed by forbidding XADD on stack spills entirely, since XADD is a locked operation (for operations on memory with concurrency) and there can't be any concurrency on the BPF stack; but Alexei has said that he wants to keep XADD on stack slots working to avoid changes to the test suite [1]. The following BPF program demonstrates how to leak a BPF map pointer as an unprivileged user using this bug: // r7 = map_pointer BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_7, small_map), // r8 = launder(map_pointer) BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_7, -8), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), ((struct bpf_insn) { .code = BPF_STX | BPF_DW | BPF_XADD, .dst_reg = BPF_REG_FP, .src_reg = BPF_REG_1, .off = -8 }), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_FP, -8), // store r8 into map BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG1, BPF_REG_7), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_FP), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG2, -4), BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_ARG2, 0, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN() [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200416211116.qxqcza5vo2ddnkdq@ast-mbp.dhcp.th… Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200417000007.10734-1-jannh@google.com diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 38cfcf701eeb..9e92d3d5ffd1 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2118,6 +2118,15 @@ static bool register_is_const(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) return reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && tnum_is_const(reg->var_off); } +static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + if (allow_ptr_leaks) + return false; + + return reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE; +} + static void save_register_state(struct bpf_func_state *state, int spi, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { @@ -2308,6 +2317,16 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, * which resets stack/reg liveness for state transitions */ state->regs[value_regno].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; + } else if (__is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, reg)) { + /* If value_regno==-1, the caller is asking us whether + * it is acceptable to use this value as a SCALAR_VALUE + * (e.g. for XADD). + * We must not allow unprivileged callers to do that + * with spilled pointers. + */ + verbose(env, "leaking pointer from stack off %d\n", + off); + return -EACCES; } mark_reg_read(env, reg, reg->parent, REG_LIVE_READ64); } else { @@ -2673,15 +2692,6 @@ static int check_sock_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, return -EACCES; } -static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, - const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) -{ - if (allow_ptr_leaks) - return false; - - return reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE; -} - static struct bpf_reg_state *reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) { return cur_regs(env) + regno; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c index 7f6c232cd842..ed1c2cea1dea 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "leaking pointer from stack off -8", .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged users" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 6e7e63cbb023976d828cdb22422606bf77baa8a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 02:00:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged users When check_xadd() verifies an XADD operation on a pointer to a stack slot containing a spilled pointer, check_stack_read() verifies that the read, which is part of XADD, is valid. However, since the placeholder value -1 is passed as `value_regno`, check_stack_read() can only return a binary decision and can't return the type of the value that was read. The intent here is to verify whether the value read from the stack slot may be used as a SCALAR_VALUE; but since check_stack_read() doesn't check the type, and the type information is lost when check_stack_read() returns, this is not enforced, and a malicious user can abuse XADD to leak spilled kernel pointers. Fix it by letting check_stack_read() verify that the value is usable as a SCALAR_VALUE if no type information is passed to the caller. To be able to use __is_pointer_value() in check_stack_read(), move it up. Fix up the expected unprivileged error message for a BPF selftest that, until now, assumed that unprivileged users can use XADD on stack-spilled pointers. This also gives us a test for the behavior introduced in this patch for free. In theory, this could also be fixed by forbidding XADD on stack spills entirely, since XADD is a locked operation (for operations on memory with concurrency) and there can't be any concurrency on the BPF stack; but Alexei has said that he wants to keep XADD on stack slots working to avoid changes to the test suite [1]. The following BPF program demonstrates how to leak a BPF map pointer as an unprivileged user using this bug: // r7 = map_pointer BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_7, small_map), // r8 = launder(map_pointer) BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_7, -8), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), ((struct bpf_insn) { .code = BPF_STX | BPF_DW | BPF_XADD, .dst_reg = BPF_REG_FP, .src_reg = BPF_REG_1, .off = -8 }), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_FP, -8), // store r8 into map BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG1, BPF_REG_7), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_FP), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG2, -4), BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_ARG2, 0, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN() [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200416211116.qxqcza5vo2ddnkdq@ast-mbp.dhcp.th… Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200417000007.10734-1-jannh@google.com diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 38cfcf701eeb..9e92d3d5ffd1 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2118,6 +2118,15 @@ static bool register_is_const(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) return reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && tnum_is_const(reg->var_off); } +static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + if (allow_ptr_leaks) + return false; + + return reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE; +} + static void save_register_state(struct bpf_func_state *state, int spi, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { @@ -2308,6 +2317,16 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, * which resets stack/reg liveness for state transitions */ state->regs[value_regno].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; + } else if (__is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, reg)) { + /* If value_regno==-1, the caller is asking us whether + * it is acceptable to use this value as a SCALAR_VALUE + * (e.g. for XADD). + * We must not allow unprivileged callers to do that + * with spilled pointers. + */ + verbose(env, "leaking pointer from stack off %d\n", + off); + return -EACCES; } mark_reg_read(env, reg, reg->parent, REG_LIVE_READ64); } else { @@ -2673,15 +2692,6 @@ static int check_sock_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, return -EACCES; } -static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, - const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) -{ - if (allow_ptr_leaks) - return false; - - return reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE; -} - static struct bpf_reg_state *reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) { return cur_regs(env) + regno; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c index 7f6c232cd842..ed1c2cea1dea 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "leaking pointer from stack off -8", .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged users" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 6e7e63cbb023976d828cdb22422606bf77baa8a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 02:00:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged users When check_xadd() verifies an XADD operation on a pointer to a stack slot containing a spilled pointer, check_stack_read() verifies that the read, which is part of XADD, is valid. However, since the placeholder value -1 is passed as `value_regno`, check_stack_read() can only return a binary decision and can't return the type of the value that was read. The intent here is to verify whether the value read from the stack slot may be used as a SCALAR_VALUE; but since check_stack_read() doesn't check the type, and the type information is lost when check_stack_read() returns, this is not enforced, and a malicious user can abuse XADD to leak spilled kernel pointers. Fix it by letting check_stack_read() verify that the value is usable as a SCALAR_VALUE if no type information is passed to the caller. To be able to use __is_pointer_value() in check_stack_read(), move it up. Fix up the expected unprivileged error message for a BPF selftest that, until now, assumed that unprivileged users can use XADD on stack-spilled pointers. This also gives us a test for the behavior introduced in this patch for free. In theory, this could also be fixed by forbidding XADD on stack spills entirely, since XADD is a locked operation (for operations on memory with concurrency) and there can't be any concurrency on the BPF stack; but Alexei has said that he wants to keep XADD on stack slots working to avoid changes to the test suite [1]. The following BPF program demonstrates how to leak a BPF map pointer as an unprivileged user using this bug: // r7 = map_pointer BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_7, small_map), // r8 = launder(map_pointer) BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_7, -8), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), ((struct bpf_insn) { .code = BPF_STX | BPF_DW | BPF_XADD, .dst_reg = BPF_REG_FP, .src_reg = BPF_REG_1, .off = -8 }), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_FP, -8), // store r8 into map BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG1, BPF_REG_7), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_FP), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG2, -4), BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_ARG2, 0, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN() [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200416211116.qxqcza5vo2ddnkdq@ast-mbp.dhcp.th… Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200417000007.10734-1-jannh@google.com diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 38cfcf701eeb..9e92d3d5ffd1 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2118,6 +2118,15 @@ static bool register_is_const(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) return reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && tnum_is_const(reg->var_off); } +static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + if (allow_ptr_leaks) + return false; + + return reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE; +} + static void save_register_state(struct bpf_func_state *state, int spi, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { @@ -2308,6 +2317,16 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, * which resets stack/reg liveness for state transitions */ state->regs[value_regno].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; + } else if (__is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, reg)) { + /* If value_regno==-1, the caller is asking us whether + * it is acceptable to use this value as a SCALAR_VALUE + * (e.g. for XADD). + * We must not allow unprivileged callers to do that + * with spilled pointers. + */ + verbose(env, "leaking pointer from stack off %d\n", + off); + return -EACCES; } mark_reg_read(env, reg, reg->parent, REG_LIVE_READ64); } else { @@ -2673,15 +2692,6 @@ static int check_sock_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, return -EACCES; } -static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, - const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) -{ - if (allow_ptr_leaks) - return false; - - return reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE; -} - static struct bpf_reg_state *reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) { return cur_regs(env) + regno; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c index 7f6c232cd842..ed1c2cea1dea 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "leaking pointer from stack off -8", .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

List of patches to apply to stable releases (4/29)

by Guenter Roeck

Hi, Please consider applying the following patches to the listed stable releases. The following patches were found to be missing in stable releases by the Chrome OS missing patch robot. The patches meet the following criteria. - The patch includes a Fixes: tag - The patch referenced in the Fixes: tag has been applied to the listed stable release - The patch has not been applied to that stable release All patches have been applied to the listed stable releases and to at least one Chrome OS branch. Resulting images have been build- and runtime-tested (where applicable) on real hardware and with virtual hardware on kerneltests.org. Thanks, Guenter --- Upstream commit a8dd397903a6 ("sctp: use right member as the param of list_for_each_entry") upstream: v4.15-rc2 Fixes: d04adf1b3551 ("sctp: reset owner sk for data chunks on out queues when migrating a sock") in linux-4.4.y: 4b5bb7723da1 in linux-4.9.y: b89fc6a5caff upstream: v4.14-rc7 Affected branches: linux-4.4.y linux-4.9.y (already applied) linux-4.14.y (already applied) i Upstream commit 2d84a2d19b61 ("fuse: fix possibly missed wake-up after abort") upstream: v4.20-rc3 Fixes: b8f95e5d13f5 ("fuse: umount should wait for all requests") in linux-4.4.y: 4d6ef17a060c in linux-4.9.y: 6465d7688c2d in linux-4.14.y: 973206923812 upstream: v4.19-rc1 Affected branches: linux-4.4.y linux-4.9.y linux-4.14.y (already applied) linux-4.19.y (already applied) Upstream commit d9b8a67b3b95 ("mtd: cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer") upstream: v5.1-rc4 Fixes: dfeae1073583 ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to check correct value") in linux-4.4.y: 5069cd50117a in linux-4.9.y: e9dc5dce0925 in linux-4.14.y: 746c1362c434 upstream: v4.18-rc1 Affected branches: linux-4.4.y linux-4.9.y linux-4.14.y linux-4.19.y Upstream commit 467d12f5c784 ("include/uapi/linux/swab.h: fix userspace breakage, use __BITS_PER_LONG for swap") upstream: v5.6-rc3 Fixes: d5767057c9a7 ("uapi: rename ext2_swab() to swab() and share globally in swab.h") in linux-4.14.y: 4eb9d5bc7065 in linux-4.19.y: 9af535dc019e in linux-5.4.y: 8b0f08036659 in linux-5.5.y: b83fb35b0300 upstream: v5.6-rc1 Affected branches: linux-4.14.y linux-4.19.y linux-5.4.y (already applied) Upstream commit 60d488571083 ("binder: take read mode of mmap_sem in binder_alloc_free_page()") upstream: v5.2-rc1 Fixes: 5cec2d2e5839 ("binder: fix race between munmap() and direct reclaim") in linux-4.14.y: c2a035d7822a in linux-4.19.y: 9d57cfd4e9d8 upstream: v5.1-rc3 Affected branches: linux-4.14.y linux-4.19.y Upstream commit e2bcb65782f9 ("ASoC: stm32: sai: fix sai probe") upstream: v5.7-rc3 Fixes: 0d6defc7e0e4 ("ASoC: stm32: sai: manage rebind issue") in linux-5.4.y: af7dd05d7c8f in linux-5.5.y: 1ab75b0342d2 upstream: v5.6-rc5 Affected branches: linux-5.4.y linux-5.6.y

5 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

[PATCH 1/4] mmc: sdio: Fix potential NULL pointer error in mmc_sdio_init_card()

by Ulf Hansson

During some scenarios mmc_sdio_init_card() runs a retry path for the UHS-I specific initialization, which leads to removal of the previously allocated card. A new card is then re-allocated while retrying. However, in one of the corresponding error paths we may end up to remove an already removed card, which likely leads to a NULL pointer exception. So, let's fix this. Fixes: 5fc3d80ef496 ("mmc: sdio: don't use rocr to check if the card could support UHS mode") Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson(a)linaro.org> --- drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c index ebb387aa5158..d35679e6e6aa 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c @@ -718,9 +718,8 @@ static int mmc_sdio_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr, /* Retry init sequence, but without R4_18V_PRESENT. */ retries = 0; goto try_again; - } else { - goto remove; } + return err; } /* -- 2.20.1

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror April 2020