February 2020 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix deadlock during fast fsync when logging prealloc" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From a5ae50dea9111db63d30d700766dd5509602f7ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:29:49 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix deadlock during fast fsync when logging prealloc extents beyond eof While logging the prealloc extents of an inode during a fast fsync we call btrfs_truncate_inode_items(), through btrfs_log_prealloc_extents(), while holding a read lock on a leaf of the inode's root (not the log root, the fs/subvol root), and then that function locks the file range in the inode's iotree. This can lead to a deadlock when: * the fsync is ranged * the file has prealloc extents beyond eof * writeback for a range different from the fsync range starts during the fsync * the size of the file is not sector size aligned Because when finishing an ordered extent we lock first a file range and then try to COW the fs/subvol tree to insert an extent item. The following diagram shows how the deadlock can happen. CPU 1 CPU 2 btrfs_sync_file() --> for range [0, 1MiB) --> inode has a size of 1MiB and has 1 prealloc extent beyond the i_size, starting at offset 4MiB flushes all delalloc for the range [0MiB, 1MiB) and waits for the respective ordered extents to complete --> before task at CPU 1 locks the inode, a write into file range [1MiB, 2MiB + 1KiB) is made --> i_size is updated to 2MiB + 1KiB --> writeback is started for that range, [1MiB, 2MiB + 4KiB) --> end offset rounded up to be sector size aligned btrfs_log_dentry_safe() btrfs_log_inode_parent() btrfs_log_inode() btrfs_log_changed_extents() btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() --> does a search on the inode's root --> holds a read lock on leaf X btrfs_finish_ordered_io() --> locks range [1MiB, 2MiB + 4KiB) --> end offset rounded up to be sector size aligned --> tries to cow leaf X, through insert_reserved_file_extent() --> already locked by the task at CPU 1 btrfs_truncate_inode_items() --> gets an i_size of 2MiB + 1KiB, which is not sector size aligned --> tries to lock file range [2MiB, (u64)-1) --> the start range is rounded down from 2MiB + 1K to 2MiB to be sector size aligned --> but the subrange [2MiB, 2MiB + 4KiB) is already locked by task at CPU 2 which is waiting to get a write lock on leaf X for which we are holding a read lock *** deadlock *** This results in a stack trace like the following, triggered by test case generic/561 from fstests: [ 2779.973608] INFO: task kworker/u8:6:247 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 2779.979536] Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-53 #1 [ 2779.984503] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 2779.990136] kworker/u8:6 D 0 247 2 0x80004000 [ 2779.990457] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [ 2779.990466] Call Trace: [ 2779.990491] ? __schedule+0x384/0xa30 [ 2779.990521] schedule+0x33/0xe0 [ 2779.990616] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x19e/0x2e0 [btrfs] [ 2779.990632] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60 [ 2779.990730] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x2f/0x40 [btrfs] [ 2779.990782] btrfs_search_slot+0x510/0x1000 [btrfs] [ 2779.990869] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x4a/0x70 [btrfs] [ 2779.990944] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x161/0x1060 [btrfs] [ 2779.990987] ? mark_held_locks+0x6d/0xc0 [ 2779.990994] ? __slab_alloc.isra.49+0x99/0x100 [ 2779.991060] ? insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.19+0x64/0x300 [btrfs] [ 2779.991145] insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.19+0x97/0x300 [btrfs] [ 2779.991222] ? start_transaction+0xdd/0x5c0 [btrfs] [ 2779.991291] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x4f4/0x840 [btrfs] [ 2779.991405] btrfs_work_helper+0xaa/0x720 [btrfs] [ 2779.991432] process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0 [ 2779.991460] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0 [ 2779.991481] ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0 [ 2779.991489] kthread+0x103/0x140 [ 2779.991499] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [ 2779.991515] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 (...) [ 2780.026211] INFO: task fsstress:17375 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 2780.027480] Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-53 #1 [ 2780.028482] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 2780.030035] fsstress D 0 17375 17373 0x00004000 [ 2780.030038] Call Trace: [ 2780.030044] ? __schedule+0x384/0xa30 [ 2780.030052] schedule+0x33/0xe0 [ 2780.030075] lock_extent_bits+0x20c/0x320 [btrfs] [ 2780.030094] ? btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0xf4/0x1150 [btrfs] [ 2780.030098] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x59/0xa0 [ 2780.030102] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60 [ 2780.030122] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x133/0x1150 [btrfs] [ 2780.030151] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0xb2/0x160 [btrfs] [ 2780.030165] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x379/0x1000 [btrfs] [ 2780.030195] btrfs_log_changed_extents.isra.8+0x841/0x93e [btrfs] [ 2780.030202] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 2780.030215] ? btrfs_get_num_csums+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] [ 2780.030239] btrfs_log_inode+0xf83/0x1124 [btrfs] [ 2780.030251] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x45/0x2a0 [ 2780.030275] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x2a0/0xe40 [btrfs] [ 2780.030282] ? dget_parent+0xa1/0x370 [ 2780.030309] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x4a/0x70 [btrfs] [ 2780.030329] btrfs_sync_file+0x3f3/0x490 [btrfs] [ 2780.030339] do_fsync+0x38/0x60 [ 2780.030343] __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x13/0x20 [ 2780.030345] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x280 [ 2780.030348] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 2780.030356] RIP: 0033:0x7f2d80f6d5f0 [ 2780.030361] Code: Bad RIP value. [ 2780.030362] RSP: 002b:00007ffdba3c8548 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004b [ 2780.030364] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f2d80f6d5f0 [ 2780.030365] RDX: 00007ffdba3c84b0 RSI: 00007ffdba3c84b0 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 2780.030367] RBP: 000000000000004a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007ffdba3c855c [ 2780.030368] R10: 0000000000000078 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000001f4 [ 2780.030369] R13: 0000000051eb851f R14: 00007ffdba3c85f0 R15: 0000557a49220d90 So fix this by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items() not lock the range in the inode's iotree when the target root is a log root, since it's not needed to lock the range for log roots as the protection from the inode's lock and log_mutex are all that's needed. Fixes: 28553fa992cb28 ("Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 4f47ba652b31..1ccb3f8d528d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4103,8 +4103,9 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, return -ENOMEM; path->reada = READA_BACK; - lock_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, - &cached_state); + if (root->root_key.objectid != BTRFS_TREE_LOG_OBJECTID) + lock_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, + &cached_state); /* * We want to drop from the next block forward in case this new size is @@ -4368,11 +4369,10 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (!ret && last_size > new_size) last_size = new_size; btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, last_size, NULL); + unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, + (u64)-1, &cached_state); } - unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, - &cached_state); - btrfs_free_path(path); return ret; }

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix deadlock during fast fsync when logging prealloc" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From a5ae50dea9111db63d30d700766dd5509602f7ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:29:49 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix deadlock during fast fsync when logging prealloc extents beyond eof While logging the prealloc extents of an inode during a fast fsync we call btrfs_truncate_inode_items(), through btrfs_log_prealloc_extents(), while holding a read lock on a leaf of the inode's root (not the log root, the fs/subvol root), and then that function locks the file range in the inode's iotree. This can lead to a deadlock when: * the fsync is ranged * the file has prealloc extents beyond eof * writeback for a range different from the fsync range starts during the fsync * the size of the file is not sector size aligned Because when finishing an ordered extent we lock first a file range and then try to COW the fs/subvol tree to insert an extent item. The following diagram shows how the deadlock can happen. CPU 1 CPU 2 btrfs_sync_file() --> for range [0, 1MiB) --> inode has a size of 1MiB and has 1 prealloc extent beyond the i_size, starting at offset 4MiB flushes all delalloc for the range [0MiB, 1MiB) and waits for the respective ordered extents to complete --> before task at CPU 1 locks the inode, a write into file range [1MiB, 2MiB + 1KiB) is made --> i_size is updated to 2MiB + 1KiB --> writeback is started for that range, [1MiB, 2MiB + 4KiB) --> end offset rounded up to be sector size aligned btrfs_log_dentry_safe() btrfs_log_inode_parent() btrfs_log_inode() btrfs_log_changed_extents() btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() --> does a search on the inode's root --> holds a read lock on leaf X btrfs_finish_ordered_io() --> locks range [1MiB, 2MiB + 4KiB) --> end offset rounded up to be sector size aligned --> tries to cow leaf X, through insert_reserved_file_extent() --> already locked by the task at CPU 1 btrfs_truncate_inode_items() --> gets an i_size of 2MiB + 1KiB, which is not sector size aligned --> tries to lock file range [2MiB, (u64)-1) --> the start range is rounded down from 2MiB + 1K to 2MiB to be sector size aligned --> but the subrange [2MiB, 2MiB + 4KiB) is already locked by task at CPU 2 which is waiting to get a write lock on leaf X for which we are holding a read lock *** deadlock *** This results in a stack trace like the following, triggered by test case generic/561 from fstests: [ 2779.973608] INFO: task kworker/u8:6:247 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 2779.979536] Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-53 #1 [ 2779.984503] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 2779.990136] kworker/u8:6 D 0 247 2 0x80004000 [ 2779.990457] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [ 2779.990466] Call Trace: [ 2779.990491] ? __schedule+0x384/0xa30 [ 2779.990521] schedule+0x33/0xe0 [ 2779.990616] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x19e/0x2e0 [btrfs] [ 2779.990632] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60 [ 2779.990730] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x2f/0x40 [btrfs] [ 2779.990782] btrfs_search_slot+0x510/0x1000 [btrfs] [ 2779.990869] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x4a/0x70 [btrfs] [ 2779.990944] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x161/0x1060 [btrfs] [ 2779.990987] ? mark_held_locks+0x6d/0xc0 [ 2779.990994] ? __slab_alloc.isra.49+0x99/0x100 [ 2779.991060] ? insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.19+0x64/0x300 [btrfs] [ 2779.991145] insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.19+0x97/0x300 [btrfs] [ 2779.991222] ? start_transaction+0xdd/0x5c0 [btrfs] [ 2779.991291] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x4f4/0x840 [btrfs] [ 2779.991405] btrfs_work_helper+0xaa/0x720 [btrfs] [ 2779.991432] process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0 [ 2779.991460] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0 [ 2779.991481] ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0 [ 2779.991489] kthread+0x103/0x140 [ 2779.991499] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [ 2779.991515] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 (...) [ 2780.026211] INFO: task fsstress:17375 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 2780.027480] Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-53 #1 [ 2780.028482] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 2780.030035] fsstress D 0 17375 17373 0x00004000 [ 2780.030038] Call Trace: [ 2780.030044] ? __schedule+0x384/0xa30 [ 2780.030052] schedule+0x33/0xe0 [ 2780.030075] lock_extent_bits+0x20c/0x320 [btrfs] [ 2780.030094] ? btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0xf4/0x1150 [btrfs] [ 2780.030098] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x59/0xa0 [ 2780.030102] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60 [ 2780.030122] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x133/0x1150 [btrfs] [ 2780.030151] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0xb2/0x160 [btrfs] [ 2780.030165] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x379/0x1000 [btrfs] [ 2780.030195] btrfs_log_changed_extents.isra.8+0x841/0x93e [btrfs] [ 2780.030202] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 2780.030215] ? btrfs_get_num_csums+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] [ 2780.030239] btrfs_log_inode+0xf83/0x1124 [btrfs] [ 2780.030251] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x45/0x2a0 [ 2780.030275] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x2a0/0xe40 [btrfs] [ 2780.030282] ? dget_parent+0xa1/0x370 [ 2780.030309] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x4a/0x70 [btrfs] [ 2780.030329] btrfs_sync_file+0x3f3/0x490 [btrfs] [ 2780.030339] do_fsync+0x38/0x60 [ 2780.030343] __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x13/0x20 [ 2780.030345] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x280 [ 2780.030348] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 2780.030356] RIP: 0033:0x7f2d80f6d5f0 [ 2780.030361] Code: Bad RIP value. [ 2780.030362] RSP: 002b:00007ffdba3c8548 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004b [ 2780.030364] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f2d80f6d5f0 [ 2780.030365] RDX: 00007ffdba3c84b0 RSI: 00007ffdba3c84b0 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 2780.030367] RBP: 000000000000004a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007ffdba3c855c [ 2780.030368] R10: 0000000000000078 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000001f4 [ 2780.030369] R13: 0000000051eb851f R14: 00007ffdba3c85f0 R15: 0000557a49220d90 So fix this by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items() not lock the range in the inode's iotree when the target root is a log root, since it's not needed to lock the range for log roots as the protection from the inode's lock and log_mutex are all that's needed. Fixes: 28553fa992cb28 ("Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 4f47ba652b31..1ccb3f8d528d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4103,8 +4103,9 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, return -ENOMEM; path->reada = READA_BACK; - lock_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, - &cached_state); + if (root->root_key.objectid != BTRFS_TREE_LOG_OBJECTID) + lock_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, + &cached_state); /* * We want to drop from the next block forward in case this new size is @@ -4368,11 +4369,10 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (!ret && last_size > new_size) last_size = new_size; btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, last_size, NULL); + unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, + (u64)-1, &cached_state); } - unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, - &cached_state); - btrfs_free_path(path); return ret; }

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix deadlock during fast fsync when logging prealloc" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From a5ae50dea9111db63d30d700766dd5509602f7ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:29:49 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix deadlock during fast fsync when logging prealloc extents beyond eof While logging the prealloc extents of an inode during a fast fsync we call btrfs_truncate_inode_items(), through btrfs_log_prealloc_extents(), while holding a read lock on a leaf of the inode's root (not the log root, the fs/subvol root), and then that function locks the file range in the inode's iotree. This can lead to a deadlock when: * the fsync is ranged * the file has prealloc extents beyond eof * writeback for a range different from the fsync range starts during the fsync * the size of the file is not sector size aligned Because when finishing an ordered extent we lock first a file range and then try to COW the fs/subvol tree to insert an extent item. The following diagram shows how the deadlock can happen. CPU 1 CPU 2 btrfs_sync_file() --> for range [0, 1MiB) --> inode has a size of 1MiB and has 1 prealloc extent beyond the i_size, starting at offset 4MiB flushes all delalloc for the range [0MiB, 1MiB) and waits for the respective ordered extents to complete --> before task at CPU 1 locks the inode, a write into file range [1MiB, 2MiB + 1KiB) is made --> i_size is updated to 2MiB + 1KiB --> writeback is started for that range, [1MiB, 2MiB + 4KiB) --> end offset rounded up to be sector size aligned btrfs_log_dentry_safe() btrfs_log_inode_parent() btrfs_log_inode() btrfs_log_changed_extents() btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() --> does a search on the inode's root --> holds a read lock on leaf X btrfs_finish_ordered_io() --> locks range [1MiB, 2MiB + 4KiB) --> end offset rounded up to be sector size aligned --> tries to cow leaf X, through insert_reserved_file_extent() --> already locked by the task at CPU 1 btrfs_truncate_inode_items() --> gets an i_size of 2MiB + 1KiB, which is not sector size aligned --> tries to lock file range [2MiB, (u64)-1) --> the start range is rounded down from 2MiB + 1K to 2MiB to be sector size aligned --> but the subrange [2MiB, 2MiB + 4KiB) is already locked by task at CPU 2 which is waiting to get a write lock on leaf X for which we are holding a read lock *** deadlock *** This results in a stack trace like the following, triggered by test case generic/561 from fstests: [ 2779.973608] INFO: task kworker/u8:6:247 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 2779.979536] Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-53 #1 [ 2779.984503] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 2779.990136] kworker/u8:6 D 0 247 2 0x80004000 [ 2779.990457] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [ 2779.990466] Call Trace: [ 2779.990491] ? __schedule+0x384/0xa30 [ 2779.990521] schedule+0x33/0xe0 [ 2779.990616] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x19e/0x2e0 [btrfs] [ 2779.990632] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60 [ 2779.990730] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x2f/0x40 [btrfs] [ 2779.990782] btrfs_search_slot+0x510/0x1000 [btrfs] [ 2779.990869] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x4a/0x70 [btrfs] [ 2779.990944] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x161/0x1060 [btrfs] [ 2779.990987] ? mark_held_locks+0x6d/0xc0 [ 2779.990994] ? __slab_alloc.isra.49+0x99/0x100 [ 2779.991060] ? insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.19+0x64/0x300 [btrfs] [ 2779.991145] insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.19+0x97/0x300 [btrfs] [ 2779.991222] ? start_transaction+0xdd/0x5c0 [btrfs] [ 2779.991291] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x4f4/0x840 [btrfs] [ 2779.991405] btrfs_work_helper+0xaa/0x720 [btrfs] [ 2779.991432] process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0 [ 2779.991460] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0 [ 2779.991481] ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0 [ 2779.991489] kthread+0x103/0x140 [ 2779.991499] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [ 2779.991515] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 (...) [ 2780.026211] INFO: task fsstress:17375 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 2780.027480] Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-53 #1 [ 2780.028482] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 2780.030035] fsstress D 0 17375 17373 0x00004000 [ 2780.030038] Call Trace: [ 2780.030044] ? __schedule+0x384/0xa30 [ 2780.030052] schedule+0x33/0xe0 [ 2780.030075] lock_extent_bits+0x20c/0x320 [btrfs] [ 2780.030094] ? btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0xf4/0x1150 [btrfs] [ 2780.030098] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x59/0xa0 [ 2780.030102] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60 [ 2780.030122] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x133/0x1150 [btrfs] [ 2780.030151] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0xb2/0x160 [btrfs] [ 2780.030165] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x379/0x1000 [btrfs] [ 2780.030195] btrfs_log_changed_extents.isra.8+0x841/0x93e [btrfs] [ 2780.030202] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 2780.030215] ? btrfs_get_num_csums+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] [ 2780.030239] btrfs_log_inode+0xf83/0x1124 [btrfs] [ 2780.030251] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x45/0x2a0 [ 2780.030275] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x2a0/0xe40 [btrfs] [ 2780.030282] ? dget_parent+0xa1/0x370 [ 2780.030309] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x4a/0x70 [btrfs] [ 2780.030329] btrfs_sync_file+0x3f3/0x490 [btrfs] [ 2780.030339] do_fsync+0x38/0x60 [ 2780.030343] __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x13/0x20 [ 2780.030345] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x280 [ 2780.030348] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 2780.030356] RIP: 0033:0x7f2d80f6d5f0 [ 2780.030361] Code: Bad RIP value. [ 2780.030362] RSP: 002b:00007ffdba3c8548 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004b [ 2780.030364] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f2d80f6d5f0 [ 2780.030365] RDX: 00007ffdba3c84b0 RSI: 00007ffdba3c84b0 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 2780.030367] RBP: 000000000000004a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007ffdba3c855c [ 2780.030368] R10: 0000000000000078 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000001f4 [ 2780.030369] R13: 0000000051eb851f R14: 00007ffdba3c85f0 R15: 0000557a49220d90 So fix this by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items() not lock the range in the inode's iotree when the target root is a log root, since it's not needed to lock the range for log roots as the protection from the inode's lock and log_mutex are all that's needed. Fixes: 28553fa992cb28 ("Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 4f47ba652b31..1ccb3f8d528d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4103,8 +4103,9 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, return -ENOMEM; path->reada = READA_BACK; - lock_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, - &cached_state); + if (root->root_key.objectid != BTRFS_TREE_LOG_OBJECTID) + lock_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, + &cached_state); /* * We want to drop from the next block forward in case this new size is @@ -4368,11 +4369,10 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (!ret && last_size > new_size) last_size = new_size; btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, last_size, NULL); + unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, + (u64)-1, &cached_state); } - unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, - &cached_state); - btrfs_free_path(path); return ret; }

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: don't set path->leave_spinning for truncate" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 52e29e331070cd7d52a64cbf1b0958212a340e28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 09:02:20 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: don't set path->leave_spinning for truncate The only time we actually leave the path spinning is if we're truncating a small amount and don't actually free an extent, which is not a common occurrence. We have to set the path blocking in order to add the delayed ref anyway, so the first extent we find we set the path to blocking and stay blocking for the duration of the operation. With the upcoming file extent map stuff there will be another case that we have to have the path blocking, so just swap to blocking always. Note: this patch also fixes a warning after 28553fa992cb ("Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap") got merged that inserts extent locks around truncation so the path must not leave spinning locks after btrfs_search_slot. [70.794783] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:565 [70.794834] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1141, name: rsync [70.794863] 5 locks held by rsync/1141: [70.794876] #0: ffff888417b9c408 (sb_writers#17){.+.+}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [70.795030] #1: ffff888428de28e8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#13/1){+.+.}, at: lock_rename+0xf1/0x100 [70.795051] #2: ffff888417b9c608 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x394/0x560 [70.795124] #3: ffff888403081768 (btrfs-fs-01){++++}, at: btrfs_try_tree_write_lock+0x2f/0x160 [70.795203] #4: ffff888403086568 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}, at: btrfs_try_tree_write_lock+0x2f/0x160 [70.795222] CPU: 5 PID: 1141 Comm: rsync Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-backup+ #2 [70.795362] Call Trace: [70.795374] dump_stack+0x71/0xa0 [70.795445] ___might_sleep.part.96.cold.106+0xa6/0xb6 [70.795459] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d3/0x290 [70.795471] alloc_extent_state+0x22/0x1c0 [70.795544] __clear_extent_bit+0x3ba/0x580 [70.795557] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 [70.795569] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x339/0xe50 [70.795647] btrfs_evict_inode+0x269/0x540 [70.795659] ? dput.part.38+0x29/0x460 [70.795671] evict+0xcd/0x190 [70.795682] __dentry_kill+0xd6/0x180 [70.795754] dput.part.38+0x2ad/0x460 [70.795765] do_renameat2+0x3cb/0x540 [70.795777] __x64_sys_rename+0x1c/0x20 Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej(a)codemonkey.org.uk> Fixes: 28553fa992cb ("Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> [ add note ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 7d26b4bfb2c6..36deef69f847 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4142,7 +4142,6 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, goto out; } - path->leave_spinning = 1; ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, -1, 1); if (ret < 0) goto out; @@ -4294,7 +4293,6 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, root == fs_info->tree_root)) { struct btrfs_ref ref = { 0 }; - btrfs_set_path_blocking(path); bytes_deleted += extent_num_bytes; btrfs_init_generic_ref(&ref, BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF,

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: don't set path->leave_spinning for truncate" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 52e29e331070cd7d52a64cbf1b0958212a340e28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 09:02:20 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: don't set path->leave_spinning for truncate The only time we actually leave the path spinning is if we're truncating a small amount and don't actually free an extent, which is not a common occurrence. We have to set the path blocking in order to add the delayed ref anyway, so the first extent we find we set the path to blocking and stay blocking for the duration of the operation. With the upcoming file extent map stuff there will be another case that we have to have the path blocking, so just swap to blocking always. Note: this patch also fixes a warning after 28553fa992cb ("Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap") got merged that inserts extent locks around truncation so the path must not leave spinning locks after btrfs_search_slot. [70.794783] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:565 [70.794834] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1141, name: rsync [70.794863] 5 locks held by rsync/1141: [70.794876] #0: ffff888417b9c408 (sb_writers#17){.+.+}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [70.795030] #1: ffff888428de28e8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#13/1){+.+.}, at: lock_rename+0xf1/0x100 [70.795051] #2: ffff888417b9c608 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x394/0x560 [70.795124] #3: ffff888403081768 (btrfs-fs-01){++++}, at: btrfs_try_tree_write_lock+0x2f/0x160 [70.795203] #4: ffff888403086568 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}, at: btrfs_try_tree_write_lock+0x2f/0x160 [70.795222] CPU: 5 PID: 1141 Comm: rsync Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-backup+ #2 [70.795362] Call Trace: [70.795374] dump_stack+0x71/0xa0 [70.795445] ___might_sleep.part.96.cold.106+0xa6/0xb6 [70.795459] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d3/0x290 [70.795471] alloc_extent_state+0x22/0x1c0 [70.795544] __clear_extent_bit+0x3ba/0x580 [70.795557] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 [70.795569] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x339/0xe50 [70.795647] btrfs_evict_inode+0x269/0x540 [70.795659] ? dput.part.38+0x29/0x460 [70.795671] evict+0xcd/0x190 [70.795682] __dentry_kill+0xd6/0x180 [70.795754] dput.part.38+0x2ad/0x460 [70.795765] do_renameat2+0x3cb/0x540 [70.795777] __x64_sys_rename+0x1c/0x20 Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej(a)codemonkey.org.uk> Fixes: 28553fa992cb ("Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> [ add note ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 7d26b4bfb2c6..36deef69f847 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4142,7 +4142,6 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, goto out; } - path->leave_spinning = 1; ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, -1, 1); if (ret < 0) goto out; @@ -4294,7 +4293,6 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, root == fs_info->tree_root)) { struct btrfs_ref ref = { 0 }; - btrfs_set_path_blocking(path); bytes_deleted += extent_num_bytes; btrfs_init_generic_ref(&ref, BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF,

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: don't set path->leave_spinning for truncate" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 52e29e331070cd7d52a64cbf1b0958212a340e28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 09:02:20 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: don't set path->leave_spinning for truncate The only time we actually leave the path spinning is if we're truncating a small amount and don't actually free an extent, which is not a common occurrence. We have to set the path blocking in order to add the delayed ref anyway, so the first extent we find we set the path to blocking and stay blocking for the duration of the operation. With the upcoming file extent map stuff there will be another case that we have to have the path blocking, so just swap to blocking always. Note: this patch also fixes a warning after 28553fa992cb ("Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap") got merged that inserts extent locks around truncation so the path must not leave spinning locks after btrfs_search_slot. [70.794783] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:565 [70.794834] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1141, name: rsync [70.794863] 5 locks held by rsync/1141: [70.794876] #0: ffff888417b9c408 (sb_writers#17){.+.+}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [70.795030] #1: ffff888428de28e8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#13/1){+.+.}, at: lock_rename+0xf1/0x100 [70.795051] #2: ffff888417b9c608 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x394/0x560 [70.795124] #3: ffff888403081768 (btrfs-fs-01){++++}, at: btrfs_try_tree_write_lock+0x2f/0x160 [70.795203] #4: ffff888403086568 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}, at: btrfs_try_tree_write_lock+0x2f/0x160 [70.795222] CPU: 5 PID: 1141 Comm: rsync Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-backup+ #2 [70.795362] Call Trace: [70.795374] dump_stack+0x71/0xa0 [70.795445] ___might_sleep.part.96.cold.106+0xa6/0xb6 [70.795459] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d3/0x290 [70.795471] alloc_extent_state+0x22/0x1c0 [70.795544] __clear_extent_bit+0x3ba/0x580 [70.795557] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 [70.795569] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x339/0xe50 [70.795647] btrfs_evict_inode+0x269/0x540 [70.795659] ? dput.part.38+0x29/0x460 [70.795671] evict+0xcd/0x190 [70.795682] __dentry_kill+0xd6/0x180 [70.795754] dput.part.38+0x2ad/0x460 [70.795765] do_renameat2+0x3cb/0x540 [70.795777] __x64_sys_rename+0x1c/0x20 Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej(a)codemonkey.org.uk> Fixes: 28553fa992cb ("Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> [ add note ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 7d26b4bfb2c6..36deef69f847 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4142,7 +4142,6 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, goto out; } - path->leave_spinning = 1; ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, -1, 1); if (ret < 0) goto out; @@ -4294,7 +4293,6 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, root == fs_info->tree_root)) { struct btrfs_ref ref = { 0 }; - btrfs_set_path_blocking(path); bytes_deleted += extent_num_bytes; btrfs_init_generic_ref(&ref, BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF,

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: don't set path->leave_spinning for truncate" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 52e29e331070cd7d52a64cbf1b0958212a340e28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 09:02:20 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: don't set path->leave_spinning for truncate The only time we actually leave the path spinning is if we're truncating a small amount and don't actually free an extent, which is not a common occurrence. We have to set the path blocking in order to add the delayed ref anyway, so the first extent we find we set the path to blocking and stay blocking for the duration of the operation. With the upcoming file extent map stuff there will be another case that we have to have the path blocking, so just swap to blocking always. Note: this patch also fixes a warning after 28553fa992cb ("Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap") got merged that inserts extent locks around truncation so the path must not leave spinning locks after btrfs_search_slot. [70.794783] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:565 [70.794834] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1141, name: rsync [70.794863] 5 locks held by rsync/1141: [70.794876] #0: ffff888417b9c408 (sb_writers#17){.+.+}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [70.795030] #1: ffff888428de28e8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#13/1){+.+.}, at: lock_rename+0xf1/0x100 [70.795051] #2: ffff888417b9c608 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x394/0x560 [70.795124] #3: ffff888403081768 (btrfs-fs-01){++++}, at: btrfs_try_tree_write_lock+0x2f/0x160 [70.795203] #4: ffff888403086568 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}, at: btrfs_try_tree_write_lock+0x2f/0x160 [70.795222] CPU: 5 PID: 1141 Comm: rsync Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-backup+ #2 [70.795362] Call Trace: [70.795374] dump_stack+0x71/0xa0 [70.795445] ___might_sleep.part.96.cold.106+0xa6/0xb6 [70.795459] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d3/0x290 [70.795471] alloc_extent_state+0x22/0x1c0 [70.795544] __clear_extent_bit+0x3ba/0x580 [70.795557] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 [70.795569] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x339/0xe50 [70.795647] btrfs_evict_inode+0x269/0x540 [70.795659] ? dput.part.38+0x29/0x460 [70.795671] evict+0xcd/0x190 [70.795682] __dentry_kill+0xd6/0x180 [70.795754] dput.part.38+0x2ad/0x460 [70.795765] do_renameat2+0x3cb/0x540 [70.795777] __x64_sys_rename+0x1c/0x20 Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej(a)codemonkey.org.uk> Fixes: 28553fa992cb ("Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> [ add note ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 7d26b4bfb2c6..36deef69f847 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4142,7 +4142,6 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, goto out; } - path->leave_spinning = 1; ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, -1, 1); if (ret < 0) goto out; @@ -4294,7 +4293,6 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, root == fs_info->tree_root)) { struct btrfs_ref ref = { 0 }; - btrfs_set_path_blocking(path); bytes_deleted += extent_num_bytes; btrfs_init_generic_ref(&ref, BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF,

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 28553fa992cb28be6a65566681aac6cafabb4f2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 12:23:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap When there is a fiemap executing in parallel with a shrinking truncate we can end up in a situation where we have extent maps for which we no longer have corresponding file extent items. This is generally harmless and at the moment the only consequences are missing file extent items representing holes after we expand the file size again after the truncate operation removed the prealloc extent items, and stale information for future fiemap calls (reporting extents that no longer exist or may have been reallocated to other files for example). Consider the following example: 1) Our inode has a size of 128KiB, one 128KiB extent at file offset 0 and a 1MiB prealloc extent at file offset 128KiB; 2) Task A starts doing a shrinking truncate of our inode to reduce it to a size of 64KiB. Before it searches the subvolume tree for file extent items to delete, it drops all the extent maps in the range from 64KiB to (u64)-1 by calling btrfs_drop_extent_cache(); 3) Task B starts doing a fiemap against our inode. When looking up for the inode's extent maps in the range from 128KiB to (u64)-1, it doesn't find any in the inode's extent map tree, since they were removed by task A. Because it didn't find any in the extent map tree, it scans the inode's subvolume tree for file extent items, and it finds the 1MiB prealloc extent at file offset 128KiB, then it creates an extent map based on that file extent item and adds it to inode's extent map tree (this ends up being done by btrfs_get_extent() <- btrfs_get_extent_fiemap() <- get_extent_skip_holes()); 4) Task A then drops the prealloc extent at file offset 128KiB and shrinks the 128KiB extent file offset 0 to a length of 64KiB. The truncation operation finishes and we end up with an extent map representing a 1MiB prealloc extent at file offset 128KiB, despite we don't have any more that extent; After this the two types of problems we have are: 1) Future calls to fiemap always report that a 1MiB prealloc extent exists at file offset 128KiB. This is stale information, no longer correct; 2) If the size of the file is increased, by a truncate operation that increases the file size or by a write into a file offset > 64KiB for example, we end up not inserting file extent items to represent holes for any range between 128KiB and 128KiB + 1MiB, since the hole expansion function, btrfs_cont_expand() will skip hole insertion for any range for which an extent map exists that represents a prealloc extent. This causes fsck to complain about missing file extent items when not using the NO_HOLES feature. The second issue could be often triggered by test case generic/561 from fstests, which runs fsstress and duperemove in parallel, and duperemove does frequent fiemap calls. Essentially the problems happens because fiemap does not acquire the inode's lock while truncate does, and fiemap locks the file range in the inode's iotree while truncate does not. So fix the issue by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items() lock the file range from the new file size to (u64)-1, so that it serializes with fiemap. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 5b3ec93ff911..7d26b4bfb2c6 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4085,6 +4085,8 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 bytes_deleted = 0; bool be_nice = false; bool should_throttle = false; + const u64 lock_start = ALIGN_DOWN(new_size, fs_info->sectorsize); + struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL; BUG_ON(new_size > 0 && min_type != BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY); @@ -4101,6 +4103,9 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, return -ENOMEM; path->reada = READA_BACK; + lock_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, + &cached_state); + /* * We want to drop from the next block forward in case this new size is * not block aligned since we will be keeping the last block of the @@ -4367,6 +4372,9 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, last_size, NULL); } + unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, + &cached_state); + btrfs_free_path(path); return ret; }

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 28553fa992cb28be6a65566681aac6cafabb4f2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 12:23:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap When there is a fiemap executing in parallel with a shrinking truncate we can end up in a situation where we have extent maps for which we no longer have corresponding file extent items. This is generally harmless and at the moment the only consequences are missing file extent items representing holes after we expand the file size again after the truncate operation removed the prealloc extent items, and stale information for future fiemap calls (reporting extents that no longer exist or may have been reallocated to other files for example). Consider the following example: 1) Our inode has a size of 128KiB, one 128KiB extent at file offset 0 and a 1MiB prealloc extent at file offset 128KiB; 2) Task A starts doing a shrinking truncate of our inode to reduce it to a size of 64KiB. Before it searches the subvolume tree for file extent items to delete, it drops all the extent maps in the range from 64KiB to (u64)-1 by calling btrfs_drop_extent_cache(); 3) Task B starts doing a fiemap against our inode. When looking up for the inode's extent maps in the range from 128KiB to (u64)-1, it doesn't find any in the inode's extent map tree, since they were removed by task A. Because it didn't find any in the extent map tree, it scans the inode's subvolume tree for file extent items, and it finds the 1MiB prealloc extent at file offset 128KiB, then it creates an extent map based on that file extent item and adds it to inode's extent map tree (this ends up being done by btrfs_get_extent() <- btrfs_get_extent_fiemap() <- get_extent_skip_holes()); 4) Task A then drops the prealloc extent at file offset 128KiB and shrinks the 128KiB extent file offset 0 to a length of 64KiB. The truncation operation finishes and we end up with an extent map representing a 1MiB prealloc extent at file offset 128KiB, despite we don't have any more that extent; After this the two types of problems we have are: 1) Future calls to fiemap always report that a 1MiB prealloc extent exists at file offset 128KiB. This is stale information, no longer correct; 2) If the size of the file is increased, by a truncate operation that increases the file size or by a write into a file offset > 64KiB for example, we end up not inserting file extent items to represent holes for any range between 128KiB and 128KiB + 1MiB, since the hole expansion function, btrfs_cont_expand() will skip hole insertion for any range for which an extent map exists that represents a prealloc extent. This causes fsck to complain about missing file extent items when not using the NO_HOLES feature. The second issue could be often triggered by test case generic/561 from fstests, which runs fsstress and duperemove in parallel, and duperemove does frequent fiemap calls. Essentially the problems happens because fiemap does not acquire the inode's lock while truncate does, and fiemap locks the file range in the inode's iotree while truncate does not. So fix the issue by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items() lock the file range from the new file size to (u64)-1, so that it serializes with fiemap. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 5b3ec93ff911..7d26b4bfb2c6 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4085,6 +4085,8 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 bytes_deleted = 0; bool be_nice = false; bool should_throttle = false; + const u64 lock_start = ALIGN_DOWN(new_size, fs_info->sectorsize); + struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL; BUG_ON(new_size > 0 && min_type != BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY); @@ -4101,6 +4103,9 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, return -ENOMEM; path->reada = READA_BACK; + lock_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, + &cached_state); + /* * We want to drop from the next block forward in case this new size is * not block aligned since we will be keeping the last block of the @@ -4367,6 +4372,9 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, last_size, NULL); } + unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, + &cached_state); + btrfs_free_path(path); return ret; }

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 28553fa992cb28be6a65566681aac6cafabb4f2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 12:23:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap When there is a fiemap executing in parallel with a shrinking truncate we can end up in a situation where we have extent maps for which we no longer have corresponding file extent items. This is generally harmless and at the moment the only consequences are missing file extent items representing holes after we expand the file size again after the truncate operation removed the prealloc extent items, and stale information for future fiemap calls (reporting extents that no longer exist or may have been reallocated to other files for example). Consider the following example: 1) Our inode has a size of 128KiB, one 128KiB extent at file offset 0 and a 1MiB prealloc extent at file offset 128KiB; 2) Task A starts doing a shrinking truncate of our inode to reduce it to a size of 64KiB. Before it searches the subvolume tree for file extent items to delete, it drops all the extent maps in the range from 64KiB to (u64)-1 by calling btrfs_drop_extent_cache(); 3) Task B starts doing a fiemap against our inode. When looking up for the inode's extent maps in the range from 128KiB to (u64)-1, it doesn't find any in the inode's extent map tree, since they were removed by task A. Because it didn't find any in the extent map tree, it scans the inode's subvolume tree for file extent items, and it finds the 1MiB prealloc extent at file offset 128KiB, then it creates an extent map based on that file extent item and adds it to inode's extent map tree (this ends up being done by btrfs_get_extent() <- btrfs_get_extent_fiemap() <- get_extent_skip_holes()); 4) Task A then drops the prealloc extent at file offset 128KiB and shrinks the 128KiB extent file offset 0 to a length of 64KiB. The truncation operation finishes and we end up with an extent map representing a 1MiB prealloc extent at file offset 128KiB, despite we don't have any more that extent; After this the two types of problems we have are: 1) Future calls to fiemap always report that a 1MiB prealloc extent exists at file offset 128KiB. This is stale information, no longer correct; 2) If the size of the file is increased, by a truncate operation that increases the file size or by a write into a file offset > 64KiB for example, we end up not inserting file extent items to represent holes for any range between 128KiB and 128KiB + 1MiB, since the hole expansion function, btrfs_cont_expand() will skip hole insertion for any range for which an extent map exists that represents a prealloc extent. This causes fsck to complain about missing file extent items when not using the NO_HOLES feature. The second issue could be often triggered by test case generic/561 from fstests, which runs fsstress and duperemove in parallel, and duperemove does frequent fiemap calls. Essentially the problems happens because fiemap does not acquire the inode's lock while truncate does, and fiemap locks the file range in the inode's iotree while truncate does not. So fix the issue by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items() lock the file range from the new file size to (u64)-1, so that it serializes with fiemap. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 5b3ec93ff911..7d26b4bfb2c6 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4085,6 +4085,8 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 bytes_deleted = 0; bool be_nice = false; bool should_throttle = false; + const u64 lock_start = ALIGN_DOWN(new_size, fs_info->sectorsize); + struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL; BUG_ON(new_size > 0 && min_type != BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY); @@ -4101,6 +4103,9 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, return -ENOMEM; path->reada = READA_BACK; + lock_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, + &cached_state); + /* * We want to drop from the next block forward in case this new size is * not block aligned since we will be keeping the last block of the @@ -4367,6 +4372,9 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, last_size, NULL); } + unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1, + &cached_state); + btrfs_free_path(path); return ret; }

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror February 2020