November 2018 - Linux-stable-mirror

request for 4.14-stable: 4ee3fad34a9c ("Btrfs: fix fsync after hole punching when using no-holes feature")

by Sudip Mukherjee

Hi Greg, This was not marked for stable but seems it should be in stable. Please apply to your queue of 4.14-stable. -- Regards Sudip

6 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix use-after-free when dumping free space" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 9084cb6a24bf5838a665af92ded1af8363f9e563 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:43:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix use-after-free when dumping free space We were iterating a block group's free space cache rbtree without locking first the lock that protects it (the free_space_ctl->free_space_offset rbtree is protected by the free_space_ctl->tree_lock spinlock). KASAN reported an use-after-free problem when iterating such a rbtree due to a concurrent rbtree delete: [ 9520.359168] ================================================================== [ 9520.359656] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rb_next+0x13/0x90 [ 9520.359949] Read of size 8 at addr ffff8800b7ada500 by task btrfs-transacti/1721 [ 9520.360357] [ 9520.360530] CPU: 4 PID: 1721 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G L 4.19.0-rc8-nbor #555 [ 9520.360990] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 [ 9520.362682] Call Trace: [ 9520.362887] dump_stack+0xa4/0xf5 [ 9520.363146] print_address_description+0x78/0x280 [ 9520.363412] kasan_report+0x263/0x390 [ 9520.363650] ? rb_next+0x13/0x90 [ 9520.363873] __asan_load8+0x54/0x90 [ 9520.364102] rb_next+0x13/0x90 [ 9520.364380] btrfs_dump_free_space+0x146/0x160 [btrfs] [ 9520.364697] dump_space_info+0x2cd/0x310 [btrfs] [ 9520.364997] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1ee/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 9520.365310] __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x1cc/0x620 [btrfs] [ 9520.365646] ? btrfs_update_time+0x180/0x180 [btrfs] [ 9520.365923] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40 [ 9520.366204] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x2c0/0x5c0 [btrfs] [ 9520.366549] btrfs_prealloc_file_range_trans+0x23/0x30 [btrfs] [ 9520.366880] cache_save_setup+0x42e/0x580 [btrfs] [ 9520.367220] ? btrfs_check_data_free_space+0xd0/0xd0 [btrfs] [ 9520.367518] ? lock_downgrade+0x2f0/0x2f0 [ 9520.367799] ? btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x11f/0x6e0 [btrfs] [ 9520.368104] ? kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 9520.368349] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140 [ 9520.368638] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x2af/0x6e0 [btrfs] [ 9520.368978] ? btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x870/0x870 [btrfs] [ 9520.369282] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140 [ 9520.369534] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40 [ 9520.369811] ? btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1b8/0x230 [btrfs] [ 9520.370137] commit_cowonly_roots+0x4b9/0x610 [btrfs] [ 9520.370560] ? commit_fs_roots+0x350/0x350 [btrfs] [ 9520.370926] ? btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1b8/0x230 [btrfs] [ 9520.371285] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x5e5/0x10e0 [btrfs] [ 9520.371612] ? btrfs_apply_pending_changes+0x90/0x90 [btrfs] [ 9520.371943] ? start_transaction+0x168/0x6c0 [btrfs] [ 9520.372257] transaction_kthread+0x21c/0x240 [btrfs] [ 9520.372537] kthread+0x1d2/0x1f0 [ 9520.372793] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0xb50/0xb50 [btrfs] [ 9520.373090] ? kthread_park+0xb0/0xb0 [ 9520.373329] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 9520.373567] [ 9520.373738] Allocated by task 1804: [ 9520.373974] kasan_kmalloc+0xff/0x180 [ 9520.374208] kasan_slab_alloc+0x11/0x20 [ 9520.374447] kmem_cache_alloc+0xfc/0x2d0 [ 9520.374731] __btrfs_add_free_space+0x40/0x580 [btrfs] [ 9520.375044] unpin_extent_range+0x4f7/0x7a0 [btrfs] [ 9520.375383] btrfs_finish_extent_commit+0x15f/0x4d0 [btrfs] [ 9520.375707] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xb06/0x10e0 [btrfs] [ 9520.376027] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x237/0x5c0 [btrfs] [ 9520.376365] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x81/0xd0 [btrfs] [ 9520.376689] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x25/0x80 [btrfs] [ 9520.377018] btrfs_direct_IO+0x42e/0x6d0 [btrfs] [ 9520.377284] generic_file_direct_write+0x11e/0x220 [ 9520.377587] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x472/0xac0 [btrfs] [ 9520.377875] aio_write+0x25c/0x360 [ 9520.378106] io_submit_one+0xaa0/0xdc0 [ 9520.378343] __se_sys_io_submit+0xfa/0x2f0 [ 9520.378589] __x64_sys_io_submit+0x43/0x50 [ 9520.378840] do_syscall_64+0x7d/0x240 [ 9520.379081] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 9520.379387] [ 9520.379557] Freed by task 1802: [ 9520.379782] __kasan_slab_free+0x173/0x260 [ 9520.380028] kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10 [ 9520.380262] kmem_cache_free+0xc1/0x2c0 [ 9520.380544] btrfs_find_space_for_alloc+0x4cd/0x4e0 [btrfs] [ 9520.380866] find_free_extent+0xa99/0x17e0 [btrfs] [ 9520.381166] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd5/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 9520.381474] btrfs_get_blocks_direct+0x60b/0xbd0 [btrfs] [ 9520.381761] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x10ee/0x58a1 [ 9520.382059] btrfs_direct_IO+0x25a/0x6d0 [btrfs] [ 9520.382321] generic_file_direct_write+0x11e/0x220 [ 9520.382623] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x472/0xac0 [btrfs] [ 9520.382904] aio_write+0x25c/0x360 [ 9520.383172] io_submit_one+0xaa0/0xdc0 [ 9520.383416] __se_sys_io_submit+0xfa/0x2f0 [ 9520.383678] __x64_sys_io_submit+0x43/0x50 [ 9520.383927] do_syscall_64+0x7d/0x240 [ 9520.384165] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 9520.384439] [ 9520.384610] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8800b7ada500 which belongs to the cache btrfs_free_space of size 72 [ 9520.385175] The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of 72-byte region [ffff8800b7ada500, ffff8800b7ada548) [ 9520.385691] The buggy address belongs to the page: [ 9520.385957] page:ffffea0002deb680 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff880108a1d700 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 [ 9520.388030] flags: 0x8100(slab|head) [ 9520.388281] raw: 0000000000008100 ffffea0002deb608 ffffea0002728808 ffff880108a1d700 [ 9520.388722] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000130013 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 9520.389169] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 9520.389473] [ 9520.389658] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 9520.389943] ffff8800b7ada400: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 9520.390368] ffff8800b7ada480: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 9520.390796] >ffff8800b7ada500: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 9520.391223] ^ [ 9520.391461] ffff8800b7ada580: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 9520.391885] ffff8800b7ada600: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 9520.392313] ================================================================== [ 9520.392772] BTRFS critical (device vdc): entry offset 2258497536, bytes 131072, bitmap no [ 9520.393247] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000011 [ 9520.393705] PGD 800000010dbab067 P4D 800000010dbab067 PUD 107551067 PMD 0 [ 9520.394059] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC KASAN PTI [ 9520.394378] CPU: 4 PID: 1721 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G B L 4.19.0-rc8-nbor #555 [ 9520.394858] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 [ 9520.395350] RIP: 0010:rb_next+0x3c/0x90 [ 9520.396461] RSP: 0018:ffff8801074ff780 EFLAGS: 00010292 [ 9520.396762] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffffffff81b5ac4c [ 9520.397115] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: 0000000000000011 [ 9520.397468] RBP: ffff8801074ff7a0 R08: ffffed0021d64ccc R09: ffffed0021d64ccc [ 9520.397821] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed0021d64ccb R12: ffff8800b91e0000 [ 9520.398188] R13: ffff8800a3ceba48 R14: ffff8800b627bf80 R15: 0000000000020000 [ 9520.398555] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88010eb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 9520.399007] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 9520.399335] CR2: 0000000000000011 CR3: 0000000106b52000 CR4: 00000000000006a0 [ 9520.399679] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 9520.400023] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 9520.400400] Call Trace: [ 9520.400648] btrfs_dump_free_space+0x146/0x160 [btrfs] [ 9520.400974] dump_space_info+0x2cd/0x310 [btrfs] [ 9520.401287] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1ee/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 9520.401609] __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x1cc/0x620 [btrfs] [ 9520.401952] ? btrfs_update_time+0x180/0x180 [btrfs] [ 9520.402232] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40 [ 9520.402522] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x2c0/0x5c0 [btrfs] [ 9520.402882] btrfs_prealloc_file_range_trans+0x23/0x30 [btrfs] [ 9520.403261] cache_save_setup+0x42e/0x580 [btrfs] [ 9520.403570] ? btrfs_check_data_free_space+0xd0/0xd0 [btrfs] [ 9520.403871] ? lock_downgrade+0x2f0/0x2f0 [ 9520.404161] ? btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x11f/0x6e0 [btrfs] [ 9520.404481] ? kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 9520.404732] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140 [ 9520.405026] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x2af/0x6e0 [btrfs] [ 9520.405375] ? btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x870/0x870 [btrfs] [ 9520.405694] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140 [ 9520.405958] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40 [ 9520.406243] ? btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1b8/0x230 [btrfs] [ 9520.406574] commit_cowonly_roots+0x4b9/0x610 [btrfs] [ 9520.406899] ? commit_fs_roots+0x350/0x350 [btrfs] [ 9520.407253] ? btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1b8/0x230 [btrfs] [ 9520.407589] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x5e5/0x10e0 [btrfs] [ 9520.407925] ? btrfs_apply_pending_changes+0x90/0x90 [btrfs] [ 9520.408262] ? start_transaction+0x168/0x6c0 [btrfs] [ 9520.408582] transaction_kthread+0x21c/0x240 [btrfs] [ 9520.408870] kthread+0x1d2/0x1f0 [ 9520.409138] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0xb50/0xb50 [btrfs] [ 9520.409440] ? kthread_park+0xb0/0xb0 [ 9520.409682] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 9520.410508] Dumping ftrace buffer: [ 9520.410764] (ftrace buffer empty) [ 9520.411007] CR2: 0000000000000011 [ 9520.411297] ---[ end trace 01a0863445cf360a ]--- [ 9520.411568] RIP: 0010:rb_next+0x3c/0x90 [ 9520.412644] RSP: 0018:ffff8801074ff780 EFLAGS: 00010292 [ 9520.412932] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffffffff81b5ac4c [ 9520.413274] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: 0000000000000011 [ 9520.413616] RBP: ffff8801074ff7a0 R08: ffffed0021d64ccc R09: ffffed0021d64ccc [ 9520.414007] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed0021d64ccb R12: ffff8800b91e0000 [ 9520.414349] R13: ffff8800a3ceba48 R14: ffff8800b627bf80 R15: 0000000000020000 [ 9520.416074] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88010eb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 9520.416536] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 9520.416848] CR2: 0000000000000011 CR3: 0000000106b52000 CR4: 00000000000006a0 [ 9520.418477] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 9520.418846] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 9520.419204] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception [ 9520.419666] Dumping ftrace buffer: [ 9520.419930] (ftrace buffer empty) [ 9520.420168] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 9520.420406] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]--- Fix this by acquiring the respective lock before iterating the rbtree. Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c index 7f90c2bf9d5f..4ba0aedc878b 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c @@ -2458,6 +2458,7 @@ void btrfs_dump_free_space(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group, struct rb_node *n; int count = 0; + spin_lock(&ctl->tree_lock); for (n = rb_first(&ctl->free_space_offset); n; n = rb_next(n)) { info = rb_entry(n, struct btrfs_free_space, offset_index); if (info->bytes >= bytes && !block_group->ro) @@ -2466,6 +2467,7 @@ void btrfs_dump_free_space(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group, info->offset, info->bytes, (info->bitmap) ? "yes" : "no"); } + spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock); btrfs_info(fs_info, "block group has cluster?: %s", list_empty(&block_group->cluster_list) ? "no" : "yes"); btrfs_info(fs_info,

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix use-after-free during inode eviction" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 421f0922a2cfb0c75acd9746454aaa576c711a65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:02:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix use-after-free during inode eviction At inode.c:evict_inode_truncate_pages(), when we iterate over the inode's extent states, we access an extent state record's "state" field after we unlocked the inode's io tree lock. This can lead to a use-after-free issue because after we unlock the io tree that extent state record might have been freed due to being merged into another adjacent extent state record (a previous inflight bio for a read operation finished in the meanwhile which unlocked a range in the io tree and cause a merge of extent state records, as explained in the comment before the while loop added in commit 6ca0709756710 ("Btrfs: fix hang during inode eviction due to concurrent readahead")). Fix this by keeping a copy of the extent state's flags in a local variable and using it after unlocking the io tree. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201189 Fixes: b9d0b38928e2 ("btrfs: Add handler for invalidate page") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 28625f344952..f4d31fd62eed 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -5268,11 +5268,13 @@ static void evict_inode_truncate_pages(struct inode *inode) struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL; u64 start; u64 end; + unsigned state_flags; node = rb_first(&io_tree->state); state = rb_entry(node, struct extent_state, rb_node); start = state->start; end = state->end; + state_flags = state->state; spin_unlock(&io_tree->lock); lock_extent_bits(io_tree, start, end, &cached_state); @@ -5285,7 +5287,7 @@ static void evict_inode_truncate_pages(struct inode *inode) * * Note, end is the bytenr of last byte, so we need + 1 here. */ - if (state->state & EXTENT_DELALLOC) + if (state_flags & EXTENT_DELALLOC) btrfs_qgroup_free_data(inode, NULL, start, end - start + 1); clear_extent_bit(io_tree, start, end,

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix use-after-free during inode eviction" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 421f0922a2cfb0c75acd9746454aaa576c711a65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:02:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix use-after-free during inode eviction At inode.c:evict_inode_truncate_pages(), when we iterate over the inode's extent states, we access an extent state record's "state" field after we unlocked the inode's io tree lock. This can lead to a use-after-free issue because after we unlock the io tree that extent state record might have been freed due to being merged into another adjacent extent state record (a previous inflight bio for a read operation finished in the meanwhile which unlocked a range in the io tree and cause a merge of extent state records, as explained in the comment before the while loop added in commit 6ca0709756710 ("Btrfs: fix hang during inode eviction due to concurrent readahead")). Fix this by keeping a copy of the extent state's flags in a local variable and using it after unlocking the io tree. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201189 Fixes: b9d0b38928e2 ("btrfs: Add handler for invalidate page") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 28625f344952..f4d31fd62eed 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -5268,11 +5268,13 @@ static void evict_inode_truncate_pages(struct inode *inode) struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL; u64 start; u64 end; + unsigned state_flags; node = rb_first(&io_tree->state); state = rb_entry(node, struct extent_state, rb_node); start = state->start; end = state->end; + state_flags = state->state; spin_unlock(&io_tree->lock); lock_extent_bits(io_tree, start, end, &cached_state); @@ -5285,7 +5287,7 @@ static void evict_inode_truncate_pages(struct inode *inode) * * Note, end is the bytenr of last byte, so we need + 1 here. */ - if (state->state & EXTENT_DELALLOC) + if (state_flags & EXTENT_DELALLOC) btrfs_qgroup_free_data(inode, NULL, start, end - start + 1); clear_extent_bit(io_tree, start, end,

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix use-after-free during inode eviction" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 421f0922a2cfb0c75acd9746454aaa576c711a65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:02:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix use-after-free during inode eviction At inode.c:evict_inode_truncate_pages(), when we iterate over the inode's extent states, we access an extent state record's "state" field after we unlocked the inode's io tree lock. This can lead to a use-after-free issue because after we unlock the io tree that extent state record might have been freed due to being merged into another adjacent extent state record (a previous inflight bio for a read operation finished in the meanwhile which unlocked a range in the io tree and cause a merge of extent state records, as explained in the comment before the while loop added in commit 6ca0709756710 ("Btrfs: fix hang during inode eviction due to concurrent readahead")). Fix this by keeping a copy of the extent state's flags in a local variable and using it after unlocking the io tree. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201189 Fixes: b9d0b38928e2 ("btrfs: Add handler for invalidate page") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 28625f344952..f4d31fd62eed 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -5268,11 +5268,13 @@ static void evict_inode_truncate_pages(struct inode *inode) struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL; u64 start; u64 end; + unsigned state_flags; node = rb_first(&io_tree->state); state = rb_entry(node, struct extent_state, rb_node); start = state->start; end = state->end; + state_flags = state->state; spin_unlock(&io_tree->lock); lock_extent_bits(io_tree, start, end, &cached_state); @@ -5285,7 +5287,7 @@ static void evict_inode_truncate_pages(struct inode *inode) * * Note, end is the bytenr of last byte, so we need + 1 here. */ - if (state->state & EXTENT_DELALLOC) + if (state_flags & EXTENT_DELALLOC) btrfs_qgroup_free_data(inode, NULL, start, end - start + 1); clear_extent_bit(io_tree, start, end,

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: don't run delayed_iputs in commit" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 30928e9baac238a7330085a1c5747f0b5df444b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:54:31 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: don't run delayed_iputs in commit This could result in a really bad case where we do something like evict evict_refill_and_join btrfs_commit_transaction btrfs_run_delayed_iputs evict evict_refill_and_join btrfs_commit_transaction ... forever We have plenty of other places where we run delayed iputs that are much safer, let those do the work. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c index 5686290a50e1..d1eeef9ec5da 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c @@ -2283,15 +2283,6 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) kmem_cache_free(btrfs_trans_handle_cachep, trans); - /* - * If fs has been frozen, we can not handle delayed iputs, otherwise - * it'll result in deadlock about SB_FREEZE_FS. - */ - if (current != fs_info->transaction_kthread && - current != fs_info->cleaner_kthread && - !test_bit(BTRFS_FS_FROZEN, &fs_info->flags)) - btrfs_run_delayed_iputs(fs_info); - return ret; scrub_continue:

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: don't run delayed_iputs in commit" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 30928e9baac238a7330085a1c5747f0b5df444b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:54:31 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: don't run delayed_iputs in commit This could result in a really bad case where we do something like evict evict_refill_and_join btrfs_commit_transaction btrfs_run_delayed_iputs evict evict_refill_and_join btrfs_commit_transaction ... forever We have plenty of other places where we run delayed iputs that are much safer, let those do the work. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c index 5686290a50e1..d1eeef9ec5da 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c @@ -2283,15 +2283,6 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) kmem_cache_free(btrfs_trans_handle_cachep, trans); - /* - * If fs has been frozen, we can not handle delayed iputs, otherwise - * it'll result in deadlock about SB_FREEZE_FS. - */ - if (current != fs_info->transaction_kthread && - current != fs_info->cleaner_kthread && - !test_bit(BTRFS_FS_FROZEN, &fs_info->flags)) - btrfs_run_delayed_iputs(fs_info); - return ret; scrub_continue:

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: reset max_extent_size properly" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 21a94f7acf0f748599ea552af5d9ee7d7e41c72f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:54:03 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: reset max_extent_size properly If we use up our block group before allocating a new one we'll easily get a max_extent_size that's set really really low, which will result in a lot of fragmentation. We need to make sure we're resetting the max_extent_size when we add a new chunk or add new space. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index b6d930356dd3..87d6666cd8e3 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -4565,6 +4565,7 @@ static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 flags, goto out; } else { ret = 1; + space_info->max_extent_size = 0; } space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE; @@ -6459,6 +6460,7 @@ static void btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, space_info->bytes_readonly += num_bytes; cache->reserved -= num_bytes; space_info->bytes_reserved -= num_bytes; + space_info->max_extent_size = 0; if (delalloc) cache->delalloc_bytes -= num_bytes;

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: reset max_extent_size properly" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 21a94f7acf0f748599ea552af5d9ee7d7e41c72f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:54:03 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: reset max_extent_size properly If we use up our block group before allocating a new one we'll easily get a max_extent_size that's set really really low, which will result in a lot of fragmentation. We need to make sure we're resetting the max_extent_size when we add a new chunk or add new space. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index b6d930356dd3..87d6666cd8e3 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -4565,6 +4565,7 @@ static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 flags, goto out; } else { ret = 1; + space_info->max_extent_size = 0; } space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE; @@ -6459,6 +6460,7 @@ static void btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, space_info->bytes_readonly += num_bytes; cache->reserved -= num_bytes; space_info->bytes_reserved -= num_bytes; + space_info->max_extent_size = 0; if (delalloc) cache->delalloc_bytes -= num_bytes;

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: reset max_extent_size properly" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 21a94f7acf0f748599ea552af5d9ee7d7e41c72f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:54:03 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: reset max_extent_size properly If we use up our block group before allocating a new one we'll easily get a max_extent_size that's set really really low, which will result in a lot of fragmentation. We need to make sure we're resetting the max_extent_size when we add a new chunk or add new space. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index b6d930356dd3..87d6666cd8e3 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -4565,6 +4565,7 @@ static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 flags, goto out; } else { ret = 1; + space_info->max_extent_size = 0; } space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE; @@ -6459,6 +6460,7 @@ static void btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, space_info->bytes_readonly += num_bytes; cache->reserved -= num_bytes; space_info->bytes_reserved -= num_bytes; + space_info->max_extent_size = 0; if (delalloc) cache->delalloc_bytes -= num_bytes;

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror November 2018