On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:12 AM Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:05 PM Patricia Alfonso trishalfonso@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:25 AM Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:42 PM 'Patricia Alfonso' via kasan-dev kasan-dev@googlegroups.com wrote:
Transfer all previous tests for KASAN to KUnit so they can be run more easily. Using kunit_tool, developers can run these tests with their other KUnit tests and see "pass" or "fail" with the appropriate KASAN report instead of needing to parse each KASAN report to test KASAN functionalities. All KASAN reports are still printed to dmesg.
Stack tests do not work in UML so those tests are protected inside an "#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_STACK)" so this only runs if stack instrumentation is enabled.
copy_user_test cannot be run in KUnit so there is a separate test file for those tests, which can be run as before as a module.
Hi Patricia,
FWIW I've got some conflicts applying this patch on latest linux-next next-20200324. There are some changes to the tests in mm tree I think.
Which tree will this go through? I would be nice to resolve these conflicts somehow, but I am not sure how. Maybe the kasan tests changes are merged upstream next windows, and then rebase this?
Also, how can I apply this for testing? I assume this is based on some kunit branch? which one?
Hmm... okay, that sounds like a problem. I will have to look into the conflicts. I'm not sure which tree this will go through upstream; I expect someone will tell me which is best when the time comes. This is based on the kunit branch in the kunit documentation here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/lo...
I've checked out:
commit 0476e69f39377192d638c459d11400c6e9a6ffb0 (HEAD, kselftest/kunit) Date: Mon Mar 23 12:04:59 2020 -0700
But the build still fails for me:
mm/kasan/report.c: In function ‘kasan_update_kunit_status’: mm/kasan/report.c:466:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kunit_find_named_resource’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declar] 466 | if (kunit_find_named_resource(cur_test, "kasan_data")) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/kasan/report.c:467:12: warning: assignment to ‘struct kunit_resource *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cas] 467 | resource = kunit_find_named_resource(cur_test, "kasan_data"); | ^ mm/kasan/report.c:468:24: error: ‘struct kunit_resource’ has no member named ‘data’ 468 | kasan_data = resource->data; | ^~
What am I doing wrong?
This patchset relies on another RFC patchset from Alan: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/1583251361-12748-1-git-send-email-al...
I thought I linked it in the commit message but it may only be in the commit message for part 2/3. It should work with Alan's patchset, but let me know if you have any trouble.
-- Best, Patricia