On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 17:55:14 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
I confirm this, I can reproduce the warning with Clang 21.
It is indeed a false positive, because the code does that:
if (addr.ss_family == AF_INET) raw_addr = &(((struct sockaddr_in *)&addr)->sin_addr); else if (addr.ss_family == AF_INET6) raw_addr = &(((struct sockaddr_in6 *)&addr)->sin6_addr); else xerror("bad family");
"xerror()" calls "exit(1)", so "raw_addr" is never used uninitialized.
I'm not sure why Clang 21 reports that now, and not before, but well, the modification you did in the selftests doesn't hurt:
I think annotating xerror with __noreturn is a better fix. Including kselftest.h will be needed.