From: Jinrong Liang cloudliang@tencent.com
None of the callers consume remove_event(), and it incorrectly implies that the incoming filter isn't modified. Drop the return.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang cloudliang@tencent.com --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c index 40507ed9fe8a..5ac05e64bec9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c @@ -265,8 +265,7 @@ static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *event_filter(uint32_t action) * Remove the first occurrence of 'event' (if any) from the filter's * event list. */ -static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *remove_event(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f, - uint64_t event) +static void remove_event(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f, uint64_t event) { bool found = false; int i; @@ -279,7 +278,6 @@ static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *remove_event(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f, } if (found) f->nevents--; - return f; }
#define ASSERT_PMC_COUNTING_INSTRUCTIONS() \