On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:08 AM Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:25:05PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
The PMU test commandline option takes an argument to disable a certain test. The initial assumption behind this was a common use case is just to run all the test most of the time. However, running a single test seems more useful instead. Especially, the overflow test has been helpful to validate PMU virtualizaiton interrupt changes.
Switching the command line option to run a single test instead of disabling a single test also allows to provide additional test specific arguments to the test. The default without any options remains unchanged which continues to run all the tests.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra atishp@rivosinc.com
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c | 40 +++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c index 284bc80193bd..533b76d0de82 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c @@ -39,7 +39,11 @@ static bool illegal_handler_invoked; #define SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT BIT(2) #define SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW BIT(3)
-static int disabled_tests; +struct test_args {
int disabled_tests;
+};
+static struct test_args targs;
unsigned long pmu_csr_read_num(int csr_num) { @@ -604,7 +608,11 @@ static void test_vm_events_overflow(void *guest_code) vcpu_init_vector_tables(vcpu); /* Initialize guest timer frequency. */ timer_freq = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, RISCV_TIMER_REG(frequency));
/* Export the shared variables to the guest */ sync_global_to_guest(vm, timer_freq);
sync_global_to_guest(vm, vcpu_shared_irq_count);
sync_global_to_guest(vm, targs); run_vcpu(vcpu);
@@ -613,28 +621,30 @@ static void test_vm_events_overflow(void *guest_code)
static void test_print_help(char *name) {
pr_info("Usage: %s [-h] [-d <test name>]\n", name);
pr_info("\t-d: Test to disable. Available tests are 'basic', 'events', 'snapshot', 'overflow'\n");
pr_info("Usage: %s [-h] [-t <test name>]\n", name);
pr_info("\t-t: Test to run (default all). Available tests are 'basic', 'events', 'snapshot', 'overflow'\n");
It's probably fine to drop '-d', since we don't make any claims about support, but doing so does risk breaking some CI somewhere. If that potential breakage is a concern, then we could keep '-d', since nothing stops us from having both.
I don't think we have so much legacy usage with this test that we need to maintain both options. Since this was merged only a few cycles ago, I assume that it's not available in many CI to cause breakage. If somebody running CI actually shouts that it breaks their setup, sure. Otherwise, I feel it will be just confusing to the users.
pr_info("\t-h: print this help screen\n");
}
static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[]) { int opt;
while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hd:")) != -1) {
int temp_disabled_tests = SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC | SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS | SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT |
SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW;
while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "h:t:n:")) != -1) {
'-h' doesn't need an argument and '-n' should be introduced with the next patch.
Yes. Thanks for catching it. I will fix it in v2.
switch (opt) {
case 'd':
case 't': if (!strncmp("basic", optarg, 5))
disabled_tests |= SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC;
temp_disabled_tests &= ~SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC; else if (!strncmp("events", optarg, 6))
disabled_tests |= SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS;
temp_disabled_tests &= ~SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS; else if (!strncmp("snapshot", optarg, 8))
disabled_tests |= SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT;
temp_disabled_tests &= ~SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT; else if (!strncmp("overflow", optarg, 8))
disabled_tests |= SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW;
temp_disabled_tests &= ~SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW; else goto done;
targs.disabled_tests = temp_disabled_tests; break; case 'h': default:
@@ -650,25 +660,27 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[])
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
targs.disabled_tests = 0;
if (!parse_args(argc, argv)) exit(KSFT_SKIP);
if (!(disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC)) {
if (!(targs.disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC)) { test_vm_basic_test(test_pmu_basic_sanity); pr_info("SBI PMU basic test : PASS\n"); }
if (!(disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS)) {
if (!(targs.disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS)) { test_vm_events_test(test_pmu_events); pr_info("SBI PMU event verification test : PASS\n"); }
if (!(disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT)) {
if (!(targs.disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT)) { test_vm_events_snapshot_test(test_pmu_events_snaphost); pr_info("SBI PMU event verification with snapshot test : PASS\n"); }
if (!(disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW)) {
if (!(targs.disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW)) { test_vm_events_overflow(test_pmu_events_overflow); pr_info("SBI PMU event verification with overflow test : PASS\n"); }
-- 2.43.0
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com