On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 5:30 PM Paul Walmsley paul.walmsley@sifive.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
There is one failing kernel selftest: global.user_notification_signal
Is this the only failing test? Or are the rest of the selftests skipped when this test fails, and no further tests are run, as seems to be shown here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CADnnUqcmDMRe1f+3jG8SPR6jRrnBsY8VVD70VbK...
Yes, it's a single test failing. After removing global.user_notification_signal test everything else pass and you get the results printed.
OK.
Well the code states ".. and hope that it doesn't break when there is actually a signal :)". Maybe we are just unlucky. I don't have results from other architectures to compare.
I found that Linaro is running selftests, but SECCOMP is disabled and thus it's failing. Is there another CI which tracks selftests?
0day runs the kselftests, and at least on some architectures/Kconfigs, it's succeeding:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190726083740.GG22106@shao2-debian/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190712064850.GC20848@shao2-debian/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190311074115.GC10839@shao2-debian/
etc.
- Paul